Bob Blaylock
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #261
they are free to do soGet Woke! Go Broke!
Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc. DKS -2.17% said weaker sales of Under Armour Inc. apparel and a decision to pull back from the hunting business dragged on the retailer’s latest quarterly results.
Comparable-store sales fell 4%, Dick’s said. Not adjusting for the 53rd week last year, the company’s same-store sales declined 1.9%.
The weaker-than-expected results bucked a trend in the retail sector, which largely has benefited from a surge in consumer spending fueled by a booming economy.
Consumer confidence for August, measured by the Conference Board’s consumer-confidence index, was the highest it has been in about 18 years.
That sentiment, along with other factors, has powered companies such as Walmart Inc. WMT -0.45% and Target Corp. TGT 1.07% to their best quarterly results in more than a decade.
Dick’s said part of the company’s sales problems were a result of Under Armour’s decision to sell in more stores including Kohl’s. Under Armour declined to comment.
Also hurting sales was Dick’s decision to tighten its policy on gun sales after 17 people were killed in a February shooting at a Parkland, Fla., high school. The retailer halted sales of any firearms to people under age 21 at all of its 845 Dick’s and Field & Stream stores and stopped selling assault-style weapons at Field & Stream.
Under Armour’s results accounted for three percentage points of declining sales at Dick’s, while weakness in the hunting and electronics categories contributed two percentage points of decline. When excluding Under Armour and the hunting and electronics business, comparable-store sales fell 1%....
Dick’s Says Under Armour, New Gun-Sales Policy Dragged on Results
Dick's leadership is betraying the stockholders, by putting acting according to their liberal ideology instead of their professional and ethical responsibilities.
If we had a healthy corporate culture in this country, they would all, at least be fired, if not sued.
and stock holders are free to leave
and customers are free to shop elsewhere
No, Dick's leadership is not free to act in interests counter to the interest of the sharedholders. They have fiduciary responsibility towards the shareholders for their stock ownership.
like i said if the stockholders are not happy they can invest elsewhere
Do you understand that the stockholders of a publicly-traded company are the owners of that company? The company belongs to the stockholders, and the CEO and the Board of Directors work for stockholders.
It is not the place of the CEO, Board of Directors, or other executives of such a company, to run the company according to their own will, without regard for the stockholders, and then to tell the stockholders that if they don't like it, they may sell their stock and invest elsewhere. It is very specifically the duty of such executives to represent the will and interests of the stockholders. To act against or with disregard for the will and interests of the stockholders is malfeasance.