Destroying the Rule of Law to Get Trump

[Stryder50]

No matter how many times you repeat it, history tells us they fixed what Republicans fk'd up! Clinton actually created a Surplus w/ the Nat'l Debt going down! Obama passed Nat'l Healthcare & brought the deficits down! Biden's record is still in progress, but unemployment is still under 4%, gas prices down, no recession or inflation spikes, & recovering from Trump's incompetent handling of Covid-19 P@ndemic! Either find a new song to sing or give it up! You're embarrassing yourself, but if a Trump supporter, you probably don't GAF! Lying is like a day at the beach for your type!

Your entire post is a pile of lies, distortions, and disinformation.
Clinton's surplus was at the expense of the military via his cuts in defense budget. Which left our military ill-prepared and scrambling for spare parts, ammo, and repairing equipment to deal with shortages when responding the Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait, enabled by Clinton's administration.

Obama's "Nat'l healthcare is an expensive boondagle which ruined more existing healthcare plans than it fixed. Deficit reduction at cost of other programs and delayed later debt increase to recover from the damage he did as POTUS.

Biden has added @$6.5 trillion to the National Debt with more deficit/debt on the way. Unemployment rate reflects largely people going back to work after his Admin continued economic shutdowns, and many new jobs are part-time and lower wages/benefits. Meanwhile inflation has soared like unseen in decades. As for COVID, I recall all you Libturds whining and crying when Trump's first response to restrict foreign travel in and out of USA.

You embarrass your self if you think you are an objective party here, but definetly goose step well in the Leftist, fascist march to destroy this nation.

 

[Hollie]

OK

Because Courts demand actual evidence and not wild conspiracy theories

Care to discuss the evidence against Trump or are you still in denial?

Actual evidence in court? That is pretty darn funny coming from Dems / Socialists.

When the DOJ and FBI are Dem / Socialist stooges, you just stall investigations until the statute of limitations expire.

Yeah. It's sleazy and unethical but that defines the Dem / Socialist party.

 

[Stryder50]

Robert G. Natelson, a former constitutional law professor who is senior fellow in constitutional jurisprudence at the Independence Institute in Denver, authored “The Original Constitution: What It Actually Said and Meant” (3rd ed., 2015). He is a contributor to The Heritage Foundation’s “Heritage Guide to the Constitution.”
...

The Colorado Supreme Court’s Decision Disqualifying President Trump​

There were two fundamental flaws in the Colorado Supreme Court’s 4–3 decision removing former President Donald Trump from the Colorado 2024 election ballot.
.....

What the Court Definitely Did Wrong​

President Trump has repeatedly been denied due process of law. This happened in the first and second impeachment trials, and at the House of Representatives’ “Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the U.S. Capitol.” (We’ll call it the “Jan. 6 committee.”)

And it just happened again in Colorado.

President Trump has never been convicted—or even charged—with insurrection. Under President Joe Biden, the Justice Department, which hasn’t been reluctant to prosecute political opponents (including President Trump), has never proceeded against the former president under the federal insurrection statute. The likely reason for this is that the prosecutors know there isn’t sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction. As
I have stated in a previous column, I think there should be a conviction for criminal insurrection before a person is disqualified.

The Colorado trial judge nevertheless allowed the suit to proceed. As a result, she had to determine whether the Jan. 6, 2021, riot really was an insurrection—and, if it was, whether President Trump knowingly promoted it. These are difficult issues, and they require preparation, tested evidence, and time to resolve.

As the dissenting justices pointed out, disqualification for public office is a drastic punishment that should be inflicted only after compliance with all due process standards: timely notification, disclosure of evidence among the parties, an impartial adjudicator, the right to call witnesses, the right to cross-examine, time to prepare, and—because of the seriousness of the punishment—proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
....

The Colorado Supreme Court’s Decision Disqualifying President Trump

There were two fundamental flaws in the Colorado Supreme Court’s 4–3 decision removing former President Donald Trump from the Colorado 2024 election ballot.

www.theepochtimes.com

 

[rightwinger]

Actual evidence in court? That is pretty darn funny coming from Dems / Socialists.

When the DOJ and FBI are Dem / Socialist stooges, you just stall investigations until the statute of limitations expire.

Yeah. It's sleazy and unethical but that defines the Dem / Socialist party.

There are thousands of pages of evidence against Trump along with testimony of his staff and Trumps own public statements

Screaming Socialism will not change that

 

[Stryder50]

What the Court Definitely Did Wrong​

Expedited proceedings might be fine for determining whether a person meets an age requirement, but they’re totally inadequate for trying the complex issue of whether the former president engaged in insurrection. For that reason, the trial judge should have dismissed the case. The correct path for the petitioners would have been to convince a prosecutor to seek a criminal conviction for insurrection or (assuming petitioners have standing) to commence a regular civil proceeding.

Possibly because the expedited hearing time was so limited, the trial judge compounded her mistake by heavy reliance on “evidence” from the Jan. 6 committee. The Colorado Supreme Court’s most serious mistake was approving this procedure.

Material from the Jan. 6 committee is hearsay, which means it can’t be cross-examined. True, the Supreme Court pointed out that an exception to the hearsay rule exists for “factual findings resulting from an investigation made pursuant to authority granted by law.” But the Jan. 6 committee’s spectacle wasn’t an “investigation” as that term is usually understood. It was a show trial: All the members of the committee had voted to impeach President Trump on the same charges. All Trump supporters were kept off the committee. The Trump team wasn’t permitted to introduce evidence, challenge evidence, or cross-examine witnesses. Evidence was admitted, highlighted, suppressed, or manipulated to achieve predetermined results.

The committee hearings were staged events designed to destroy a political opponent. Joe Stalin couldn’t have done it better.

In sum, material from the Jan. 6 committee has no place in a courtroom.
....

The Colorado Supreme Court’s Decision Disqualifying President Trump

There were two fundamental flaws in the Colorado Supreme Court’s 4–3 decision removing former President Donald Trump from the Colorado 2024 election ballot.

www.theepochtimes.com

 

[Hollie]

There are thousands of pages of evidence against Trump along with testimony of his staff and Trumps own public statements

Screaming Socialism will not change that.

Trump was acquitted on the phony Russia collusion hoax. So much for your ''thousands of pages'' of falsehoods and lies. It was about Dem / Socialist election interference.

Screeching Russia collusion won't change that.

 

[Stryder50]

What the Court Definitely Did Wrong​

...

The Future​

If the Colorado Supreme Court decision survives review by the U.S. Supreme Court—and I suspect it won’t—we can imagine the future. It will be like this:

• If the federal or state establishment opposes a popular political candidate, then Congress or the state legislature will conduct a show trial and issue a report “proving” the candidate is guilty of insurrection.
• The candidate’s opponents then will sue in a sympathetic court to remove that politician from the ballot, using the report as “evidence.”
• The court will remove the opposing politician from the ballot, and the voters will never be heard.

Is that the future we want?
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

The Colorado Supreme Court’s Decision Disqualifying President Trump

There were two fundamental flaws in the Colorado Supreme Court’s 4–3 decision removing former President Donald Trump from the Colorado 2024 election ballot.

www.theepochtimes.com

 

[Stryder50]

A thread here that is closely related to damage and corruption of Biden regime and Democrats in general;
Proof Biden ignores the Constitution.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Why not? Democrats have already destroyed the election process.

Oh, wah, we lost, so they must have cheated. And...

 

[maybelooking]

Nothing like continuing to harp on garbage, then forget the real crimes of an insurrection & fraud!

no insurrection too place. just like no Russia collusion took place. moron.

 

[maybelooking]

Nyah, not the Devil; just fighting dementia as Nancy was running things, esp. after he was shot!

sounds a lot more like Biden than Ron!!!!

 

[rightwinger]

Trump was acquitted on the phony Russia collusion hoax. So much for your ''thousands of pages'' of falsehoods and lies. It was about Dem / Socialist election interference.

Screeching Russia collusion won't change that.

Do you realize how stupid you look when you respond to mountains of evidence against Trump with…..Commie/Socialist rants?

 

[maybelooking]

fiero, one of the shittiest vehicles to ever come from an American auto maker!

 

[rightwinger]

Notice how Trump apologists can’t respond to the multitude of evidence against Trump and the fact that it is not Democrats testifying against Trump but fellow Republicans?

 

[Mac1958]

Donald J Trump is a victim of his own poor decisions

And we’re all paying for it.

Who knows what will remain when the dust settles. What a shame.

 

[Hollie]

Do you realize how stupid you look when you respond to mountains of evidence against Trump with…..Commie/Socialist rants?

Where are those mountains of evidence. You didn't know Trump was acquitted of the phony Russia collusion hoax?

Do you realize how stupid you look not knowing the facts while pressing silly conspiracy theories?

 

[22lcidw]

Oh, wah, we lost, so they must have cheated. And...

View attachment 881521

You are talking about an army and war while this man is talking about rioters destroying their own areas with the approval of the local governments. At some point our government may have no qualms using the military to drop WMD's on the population and that would be closer to what you typed.

 

[Stryder50]

And we’re all paying for it.

Who knows what will remain when the dust settles. What a shame.

We'll be paying several times more when Biden and his regime are done, if ever.

The shame is that so many Americans voted for and support this fascist puppet.

 

[leftwinger]

We'll be paying several times more when Biden and his regime are done, if ever.

The shame is that so many Americans voted for and support this fascist puppet.

BlackMaCGater and the trolling nonsense boys are working for the Deep State or exceptionally contrarian to common sense.//

 

[rightwinger]

Where are those mountains of evidence. You didn't know Trump was acquitted of the phony Russia collusion hoax?

Do you realize how stupid you look not knowing the facts while pressing silly conspiracy theories?

Trump was never acquitted
Read the Muller report