Dems Force Witness to Testify for Over Ten Hours

[Zorro!]

Lying Joe. Sells his office, foreign interests stuff his coke addled sons pockets with $Millions as Quid Pro Quo Joe openly brags about getting their prosecutors fired.

Did you hear that Joe himself got $900M from this same crooked Ukraine Oil and Gas Company?

And it is ABSOLUTELY IGNORED by the DEMOCRAT PROPAGANDA WING. Where there is OBVIOUS, BLATANT, IN YOUR FACE Quid Pro Quo ON VIDEO, they see nothing wrong, BECAUSE IT'S A DEMOCRAT. But when it comes to President Trump, if there isn't any, THEY'LL MAKE IT UP, and it's the BIGGEST STORY ON THE PLANET... WALL TO WALL.

Democrats are the party of trash.

There is this little matter of a Ukrainian investigation that shows that Biden did nothing. But you'll keep repeating alternative facts. In caps even.

Trump was warned to abandon this piece of steaming conspiracy batshit for a reason: its fucking stupid.

For example......Joe Biden as VP couldn't withhold any funding to anyone Its simply not a power that the VP had...

Biden says he had Obama's backing. Are you claiming your front runner is a liar?

Biden makes my point: Biden was delivering a US foreign policy decision...

Of the President.

...

It had nothing to do with Biden himself...

Well except that the company that the prosecutor was investigating was bribing the Vice President via his Coke addles son, Hunter.

...Biden lacked the authority to cut any funding for anyone...

He claimed he was speaking for Barack. Are you claiming your front runner is a liar?

...

Trump, as President, on the other hand had that authority...

He issued no ultimatum like Biden did.

...And used it for his own personal gain,...

Uncovering the bribery of the Vice President is in the interests of The United States.

... soliciting the Ukrainian president to conduct investigations on Trump's political rival...

He is the former Vice President of the United States, just because he is running for President makes him no more immune from investigation that Trump was will Hillary was buying Kremilin sourced dirt on Trump and Obama's Administration laundered the dirt into FISA warrants.

..., meeting with Trump's personal lawyers...

Guilani was working at the request of the State Department. And he is probably the best Organized Crime Prosecutor in the nation, exactly who we need to find out what's up with the Biden Crime Family.

... comply with Trump's demand...

Trump issued no demands. That's Fake News not back up by the transcript or either person in the conversation.

...This after Trump PERSONALLY halted the funding for Ukraine....

Funding that Obama NEVER delivered, though Trump has.

... the Pentagon was deeply concerned that it was illegal...

Says who?

...

Trump replied 'We have a favor to ask you though'....

So what? Trump is the first President to ask another leader for a favor?

.. before going into the specifics of his demands...

He made no demands. You made that up.

... Ukraine was definitely made to understand that cooperation with the United States was being held back until the corruption investigations were completed ...

The President of Ukraine didn't even know that it was held up while Trump confirmed that they had dealt with their corruption issue, which is why you folks claim Biden issued his
ultimatum. But when Biden issues a clear ultimatium you are fine with it, but when Trump asks for a favor, it's an impeachable act?

...This was the Ukraine's public summary of the call before the shit hit the fan...

"Donald Trump expressed his conviction that the new Ukrainian government will be able to quickly improve Ukraine's image and complete the investigation of corruption cases that have held back cooperation between Ukraine and the United States."

Of course Trump isn't going to give money to a foreign nation with a corruption problem. That's why Barack says that he never provided these funds that Trump, once satisfied, released.

...There's a reason why support for the impeachment of Donald Trump skyrocketed after the release of the transcript of that call.

Then impeach him already. We Dare You.

First you will be repudiated by the US Senate.
Then you will be repudiated by the US Electorate when they re-elect Trump.

 

[Zorro!]

And it took them ten hours to find out that she wasn't even there??

Talk about a pack of fools.

Why did she need to be there for the phone call that we have a summary transcript of?

She was questioned about what was going on with Giuliani, his 2 Soviet born thugs shadow gvt shenanigans, the State dept and administration doings PRIOR to the phone call that supported the contention that extortion was taking place.....

Actually the transcript exonerates Trump of Quid Pro Quo, though Joe Biden's quid pro quo was classic.

Oh, goodness no. The transcripts were a disaster for Trump. Support for impeachment flipped within days of their release.

The transcripts affirm that Trump solicited a foreign government to interfere with a foreign election. Which is more than a valid basis for impeachment. And the phrase 'we want you to do us a favor though' at mention of buying more weapons from the US flushes the 'QPD' denials.

The White House didn't quickly try to hide the call transcript in National Security servers because the call 'exonerated' Trump'. But because it was an absolute disaster for him.

Even Fox News puts support for impeachment at 55%.

The transcript exonerates Trump, and it revealed that the the claims about this meeting were bald faced lies and the "witnesses" worse than even the fools that tried to smear Kavanaugh.

Except of course, it doesn't. It establishes, unambiguously, that Trump solicited Zelensky to investigate his political rival...

Running from office doesn't make the Biden Crime Family immune from investigation.

Using the office of the presidency for Trump's own personal gain. Which, all by itself, is worth of impeachment....

$Millions going to your coke addled son while you are administrating aid is worthy of investigation. Trump was perfectly right to request this.

...But it gets worse. To emphasize how personal this was, Trump directing Zelenski to meet with his *personal lawyer*,...

Trump can use any Lawyer he likes. Guliani is one of the best Organized Crime prosecutors in the country. And he was acting at the request of the State Department.

... with Trump personally cutting funding to the Ukraine before the call,...

Obama is the one who initially withheld these funds. Once Trump confirmed that they were dealing with their corruption problems, he released them.

... the Pentagon was concerned was illegal...

Who made this claim?

spawned TWO whistleblower complaints...

Faked up and curated by Schiff, with a perjury committed by not disclosing his contact with Schiff and neither Whistle Blower has first hand information.

.....put the transcript on a sever reserved for top secret conversations of national security important...

So what? You guys all defended Hillary putting Classified Information on a server in a closet in her bathroom.

... keep the transcript secret....

We have the transcript.

...Public sentiment for impeachment has skyrocketed after the release of that transcript for a reason...

Then impeach him. We Dare You.

...Pelosi will do what she will on her own time schedule with the impeachment inquiry picking up speed.

Oh yeah, right. The Primaries start the first of Feb. How are you going to explain to the voters why you are tying to impeach a guy that will stand before the Electorate in months? Just explain that after 2016 that you just don't trust the Electorate anymore to make the "right" decision!

 

[Care4all]

She was one of the best knowledgeable witnesses they've ever interviewed, and did so willingly.

The repubs should be counting their blessings, it was not public, from what I hear.

And what could you have possibly heard?

This is all being conducted in secret...any leaks will get your prison time.

no specifics... just that she was incredibly knowledgeable, and in general, was able to support the contention that Giuliani and goons were running a shadow gvt, that differed with the State Dept's, that others like Bolton disagreed with the corrupt actions of withholding aid for political causes, warned others of the illegality of what Giuliani was doing, she knew info on the firing of our diplomat...

just a whole bunch of things that could help clarify for the Intel Committee what was going on and the timing of it....

 

[Zorro!]

She was one of the best knowledgeable witnesses they've ever interviewed, and did so willingly.

The repubs should be counting their blessings, it was not public, from what I hear.

And what could you have possibly heard?

This is all being conducted in secret...any leaks will get your prison time.

They are trying to craft the narrative through leaks, but the narrative looks crafted and just make them look worse.

 

[Zorro!]

She was one of the best knowledgeable witnesses they've ever interviewed, and did so willingly.

The repubs should be counting their blessings, it was not public, from what I hear.

And what could you have possibly heard?

This is all being conducted in secret...any leaks will get your prison time.

no specifics... just that she was incredibly knowledgeable, and in general, was able to support the contention that Giuliani and goons were running a shadow gvt, that differed with the State Dept's, that others like Bolton disagreed with the corrupt actions of withholding aid for political causes, warned others of the illegality of what Giuliani was doing, she knew info on the firing of our diplomat...

just a whole bunch of things that could help clarify for the Intel Committee what was going on and the timing of it....

In other words, the Clapping Seals applauded madly!

 

[Thunk]

no specifics... just that she was incredibly knowledgeable, and in general, was able to support the contention that Giuliani and goons were running a shadow gvt, that differed with the State Dept's, that others like Bolton disagreed with the corrupt actions of withholding aid for political causes, warned others of the illegality of what Giuliani was doing, she knew info on the firing of our diplomat...

Looks like enough "specifics" to get the leaker 20 years...if any of it is true.

 

[Synthaholic]

The only word to describe this is brutality.

<< Fiona Hill testifies for 10 hours in impeachment probe
>>

Former Trump Russia adviser Fiona Hill testifies for 10 hours in impeachment probe

Can you quote “forced” or similar in the article?

if not, you’ll have to admit the only word to describe your thread is stupid.

Exactly.

She was a willing witness and from what I have heard, devastating g to Trump

 

[IM2]

Actually the transcript exonerates Trump of Quid Pro Quo, though Joe Biden's quid pro quo was classic.

Oh, goodness no. The transcripts were a disaster for Trump. Support for impeachment flipped within days of their release.

The transcripts affirm that Trump solicited a foreign government to interfere with a foreign election. Which is more than a valid basis for impeachment. And the phrase 'we want you to do us a favor though' at mention of buying more weapons from the US flushes the 'QPD' denials.

The White House didn't quickly try to hide the call transcript in National Security servers because the call 'exonerated' Trump'. But because it was an absolute disaster for him.

Even Fox News puts support for impeachment at 55%.

The transcript exonerates Trump, and it revealed that the the claims about this meeting were bald faced lies and the "witnesses" worse than even the fools that tried to smear Kavanaugh.

The Fox Poll is designed to encourage you folks to impeach Trump, WE DARE YOU!

The phone call notes (not a transcript) backed up everything the whistleblower had been saying...

And the whistleblowers account of the transcript being moved to a national security sever. And, and, and.

So what? The Whistle Blower has NO first hand information on the conversation. Trump and the President of Ukraine do, and their account is fully supported by the transcript.

You lose in the Senate.
You lose again when Trump is re-elected at which point he will be impeachment proof - so blow your wad, hold your vote!

Bullshit. And if anybody loses if Trump does not get convicted is the American people. If Trump is not convicted it won't be due to lack of evidence, it will be due to a lack of republican morals. If Trump is re elected he is not impeachment proof and if he is re elected Americans lose.

 

[Bush92]

The only word to describe this is brutality.

<< Fiona Hill testifies for 10 hours in impeachment probe
>>

Former Trump Russia adviser Fiona Hill testifies for 10 hours in impeachment probe

They would have contributed more to the country if they sat and watched paint dry.

 

[Bush92]

Oh, goodness no. The transcripts were a disaster for Trump. Support for impeachment flipped within days of their release.

The transcripts affirm that Trump solicited a foreign government to interfere with a foreign election. Which is more than a valid basis for impeachment. And the phrase 'we want you to do us a favor though' at mention of buying more weapons from the US flushes the 'QPD' denials.

The White House didn't quickly try to hide the call transcript in National Security servers because the call 'exonerated' Trump'. But because it was an absolute disaster for him.

Even Fox News puts support for impeachment at 55%.

The transcript exonerates Trump, and it revealed that the the claims about this meeting were bald faced lies and the "witnesses" worse than even the fools that tried to smear Kavanaugh.

The Fox Poll is designed to encourage you folks to impeach Trump, WE DARE YOU!

The phone call notes (not a transcript) backed up everything the whistleblower had been saying...

And the whistleblowers account of the transcript being moved to a national security sever. And, and, and.

So what? The Whistle Blower has NO first hand information on the conversation. Trump and the President of Ukraine do, and their account is fully supported by the transcript.

You lose in the Senate.
You lose again when Trump is re-elected at which point he will be impeachment proof - so blow your wad, hold your vote!

Bullshit. And if anybody loses if Trump does not get convicted is the American people. If Trump is not convicted it won't be due to lack of evidence, it will be due to a lack of republican morals. If Trump is re elected he is not impeachment proof and if he is re elected Americans lose.

There is no evidence you easily manipulated simpleton.

 

[Care4all]

no specifics... just that she was incredibly knowledgeable, and in general, was able to support the contention that Giuliani and goons were running a shadow gvt, that differed with the State Dept's, that others like Bolton disagreed with the corrupt actions of withholding aid for political causes, warned others of the illegality of what Giuliani was doing, she knew info on the firing of our diplomat...

Looks like enough "specifics" to get the leaker 20 years...if any of it is true.

Nah, no one goes to jail for leaking non CLASSIFIED stuff.... if so representatives Jordan, meadows, Nunes and Sen. Grassley would all be serving 20.

Without leaks, we the people, would have no news on what the heck our gvt was trying to hide from us....

 

[Lesh]

You mean...other than the phone call, the texts, the testimony, and the obstruction.

Yea

 

[sparky]

Without leaks, we the people, would have no news on what the heck our gvt was trying to hide from us...

That speaks of our lack of clarity , but ends with one party grilling the other

So it becomes a who watches the watchers issue

~S~

 

[Bush92]

It was such bombshell testimony that Pelosi stopped the committee from a vote.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It was such bombshell testimony that Pelosi stopped the committee from a vote.

So many people are willimg to defy the corrupt , mentally ill president and testify, that there is no need to take a vote yet.

 

[Faun]

She was one of the best knowledgeable witnesses they've ever interviewed, and did so willingly.

The repubs should be counting their blessings, it was not public, from what I hear.

And what could you have possibly heard?

This is all being conducted in secret...any leaks will get your prison time.

They are trying to craft the narrative through leaks, but the narrative looks crafted and just make them look worse.

Trump gave us the narrative when he released the transcript of his "perfect" phone call with Zelensky. It perfectly demonstrated soliciting a foreign national to help with his campaign.

 

[hadit]

Here's hoping these leftist lunatics keep up their loathsome insanity right up to Nov 2, 2020.

You don't want that. Not at the rate these witnesses are implicating Trump.

I thought their testimony was secret. You know, like you wouldn't know what they said.

 

[Synthaholic]

The only word to describe this is brutality.

<< Fiona Hill testifies for 10 hours in impeachment probe
>>

Former Trump Russia adviser Fiona Hill testifies for 10 hours in impeachment probe

They would have contributed more to the country if they sat and watched paint dry.

More butthurt by the day.

 

[IM2]

The transcript exonerates Trump, and it revealed that the the claims about this meeting were bald faced lies and the "witnesses" worse than even the fools that tried to smear Kavanaugh.

The Fox Poll is designed to encourage you folks to impeach Trump, WE DARE YOU!

The phone call notes (not a transcript) backed up everything the whistleblower had been saying...

And the whistleblowers account of the transcript being moved to a national security sever. And, and, and.

So what? The Whistle Blower has NO first hand information on the conversation. Trump and the President of Ukraine do, and their account is fully supported by the transcript.

You lose in the Senate.
You lose again when Trump is re-elected at which point he will be impeachment proof - so blow your wad, hold your vote!

Bullshit. And if anybody loses if Trump does not get convicted is the American people. If Trump is not convicted it won't be due to lack of evidence, it will be due to a lack of republican morals. If Trump is re elected he is not impeachment proof and if he is re elected Americans lose.

There is no evidence you easily manipulated simpleton.

If you believe that, it is you who is the easily manipulated simpleton.

 

[IM2]

Here's hoping these leftist lunatics keep up their loathsome insanity right up to Nov 2, 2020.

You don't want that. Not at the rate these witnesses are implicating Trump.

I thought their testimony was secret. You know, like you wouldn't know what they said.

What you think misses what people who sat in those testimonies have said.