Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side...

We know the Democrat Party, the Party of Nazi Collaborator Soros, Murderer Ted Kennedy, Nazi syphilis Experimenter FDR, and LBJ SCOTUS "when I appoint a ******" nominator, will unleash their Personal Destruction machine over the "Scandals"
 

Not so fast....there are issues about Coons that can help O'Donnell....Chris Coons is a self-described Marxist....and Delaware is a corporate-friendly state...

A few issues that I expect to come up during the next few weeks:

1.As New Castle County Executive, Chris Coons raised taxes on the very voters that he will need to support him; Sussex is sure to go to O’Donnell on November 2, and Kent might do the same, but how much support can he expect from people who have criticized him in the past for unnecessarily raising taxes?

2.In May 2010, Politico reported that Coons described himself as a “bearded Marxist” in the 80s, and even when so far as to question the basic principles of “free enterprise,” in an article he wrote for a college newspaper. This story alone should be enough to turn any voter with an ounce of sanity against the Democrat. Delaware is a state full of businesses, and people who work for them, and the last person we need representing us in Washington is a self-described Marxist who has rejected capitalism and freedom itself.

3.Coons supports President Obama’s scheme for yet another economic “stimulus,” which would pay off special interests and hurt small businesses, as was the case with the first stimulus. This irresponsible economic strategy simply does not work. Do Delaware voters, even Democrats, really want to waste hundreds of billions of tax dollars on a plan that is obviously going to fail?

4.Simply being a card-carrying member of the Party of “O” will hurt Coons. A photo of him with a smiling President Obama is circulating the blogosphere, as Obams’s popularity continues to plummet, even among registered Democrats. Will Delawareans choose to send Obama another willing puppet to vote for socialistic legislation?

Don’t celebrate yet, Mr. Coons Slavens Says
 
Gotta hand it to those tea baggers, they sure know how to vet a candidate. The upside is they're sending her money that she's spending on herself, instead of her campaign.
 

liar+2.jpg

 
We know the Democrat Party, the Party of Nazi Collaborator Soros, Murderer Ted Kennedy, Nazi syphilis Experimenter FDR, and LBJ SCOTUS "when I appoint a ******" nominator, will unleash their Personal Destruction machine over the "Scandals"
liar+2.jpg
 
We know the Democrat Party, the Party of Nazi Collaborator Soros, Murderer Ted Kennedy, Nazi syphilis Experimenter FDR, and LBJ SCOTUS "when I appoint a ******" nominator, will unleash their Personal Destruction machine over the "Scandals"
liar+2.jpg

Soros collaborated with the Nazis, Teddy drowned his GF at Chappaquiddick, FDR liked to experiment on blacks with untreated syphilis (are we sure FDR had polio and not syphilis?), LBJ called Thurgood Marshall a ****** and Byrd was a Grand Kleagle.
 
Man, we have some upset liberals that they are going to get smoked this November....
 
Now that Christine O’Donnell has won the GOP Senate primary in Delaware, Democrats will definitely retain Joe Biden’s old Senate seat. It’s not because O’Donnell is too conservative — it’s because of her numerous and serious personal issues.

(For those seeking specifics, there are plenty.

•Her lawsuit against ISI for “mental anguish” is exhibit A. It even contains an apparent lie about her seeking a Master’s Degree at Princeton.
•Exhibit B is her lies about having a college degree all these years — and no, she didn’t simply finish paying loans, as she implies. People who take student loans use them to pay their schools, and they get their degrees. She did not until 20 years later.
•Exhibit C is the fact that she has no apparent income, then she admitted to John McCormack that she has concealed income by leaving it off her financial disclosures.
•Exhibit D is the fact that she appears to be paying her personal rent with her campaign money, which is completely illegal.
•Exhibit E is the question about whether O’Donnell’s home was foreclosed. These three points suggest we have a grifter who understands conservative rhetoric.
•Exhibit F is her false claims that she “tied” or “beat” Joe Biden in two counties in 2008.
•Exhibit G is her campaign’s assertion that Scott Rasmussen is a tool of Mike Castle’s campaign.
•Exhibit H is her campaign’s deliberate stoking of rumors that Mike Castle would switch parties or has cut a deal with the Biden family to hand the seat over to Beau Biden in four years.
•Exhibit I is her former campaign staff’s video accusing Mike Castle (baselessly) of a homosexual affair, followed by O’Donnell calling him “unmanly.”
•Exhibit J is her paranoia over who’s hiding in the bushes and vandalizing her house.
•Exhibit K…well, you get the picture.


Read more at the Washington Examiner: Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side | Washington Examiner
 

Apparently, the rightwingnuts are only interested in cleaning up washington if it's a dem or moderate repub who is alleged to have done something...

Now that Christine O’Donnell has won the GOP Senate primary in Delaware, Democrats will definitely retain Joe Biden’s old Senate seat. It’s not because O’Donnell is too conservative — it’s because of her numerous and serious personal issues.

(For those seeking specifics, there are plenty.

Her lawsuit against ISI for “mental anguish” is exhibit A. It even contains an apparent lie about her seeking a Master’s Degree at Princeton.
Exhibit B is her lies about having a college degree all these years — and no, she didn’t simply finish paying loans, as she implies. People who take student loans use them to pay their schools, and they get their degrees. She did not until 20 years later.
Exhibit C is the fact that she has no apparent income, then she admitted to John McCormack that she has concealed income by leaving it off her financial disclosures.
Exhibit D is the fact that she appears to be paying her personal rent with her campaign money, which is completely illegal.
Exhibit E is the question about whether O’Donnell’s home was foreclosed. These three points suggest we have a grifter who understands conservative rhetoric.
Exhibit F is her false claims that she “tied” or “beat” Joe Biden in two counties in 2008.
Exhibit G is her campaign’s assertion that Scott Rasmussen is a tool of Mike Castle’s campaign.
Exhibit H is her campaign’s deliberate stoking of rumors that Mike Castle would switch parties or has cut a deal with the Biden family to hand the seat over to Beau Biden in four years.
Exhibit I is her former campaign staff’s video accusing Mike Castle (baselessly) of a homosexual affair, followed by O’Donnell calling him “unmanly.”
Exhibit J is her paranoia over who’s hiding in the bushes and vandalizing her house.
Exhibit K…well, you get the picture

Read more at the Washington Examiner: Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side | Washington Examiner

and the loons wonder why the RSCC won't fund her?

lol..
 
You know what will happen in November? You may be right. I don't know. But I have stopped pretending I know what will happen in political campaigns.

The fact that Rangel won his nomination should be enough to tell us that anyone can be elected.
 
You know what will happen in November? You may be right. I don't know. But I have stopped pretending I know what will happen in political campaigns.

The fact that Rangel won his nomination should be enough to tell us that anyone can be elected.
....And....seeing-as-how they've only got two years to make a difference....why do the 'Baggers choose to throw a bunch o' rookies into the mix????
277.gif
 

Forum List

Back
Top