Democrats' vanishing future

[Nyvin]

the RW's still can't find a candidate and the Dems are vanishing .... that's funny.

News Flash !!

Dems vanish form the next election, and are found in the WH ...

The republicans have many candidates to chose from.

Democrats have Hillary.

That shows the strangle hold the radicals have on the democrat party.

Or how shallow it is

You know, it's really awkward that something that is unprecedented such as having such a wide open primary season with not even clear 1st and 2nd place candidates is suddenly the "correct" way to be. As if this is how the GOP primary has always looked.

And something that the Republicans have done for literally decades...that is have a very clear and dominating frontrunner, like Reagan, HW Bush, Dole, W Bush, and McCain ALL were...is something that is suddenly bad and wrong.

You guys have quite an imagination.

 

[NYcarbineer]

If the GOP field is so great,

why is a Bush leading?

He isn't. Its way too early to know, but Jeb will not be the GOP nominee. Book it.

You guys need to face reality, obama has destroyed your once great party, the party of Kennedy. It will take 20 or 30 years to recover from the damage he has done. But you get what you vote for.

lol, Kennedy for his time was more liberal than Obama.

 

[Redfish]

If the GOP field is so great,

why is a Bush leading?

He isn't. Its way too early to know, but Jeb will not be the GOP nominee. Book it.

You guys need to face reality, obama has destroyed your once great party, the party of Kennedy. It will take 20 or 30 years to recover from the damage he has done. But you get what you vote for.

lol, Kennedy for his time was more liberal than Obama.

bullshit, by today's standards Kennedy was a far right conservative. He took on the unions, took on Russia, invaded Cuba (unsuccessfully), spent money on the space program, built up the military. If he was alive today he would be a republican.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

The fact that Hillary is running a silent campaign is the most telling.

 

[Redfish]

Detroit and Baltimore should be enough reason that a democrat can't run anything successfully.

The two richest cities in the US are run by Democrats.

they are also broke or going broke. Rich per capita does not mean well run.

Name the two richest cities in the US and prove they're going broke.

its your game and your turn. make your move and I will respond.

No, it was your statement as fact that the two richest cities in the US are going broke. If you don't know the names of those two cities,

then you can't possibly know their financial condition.

I'm pretty sure that qualifies as lying.

google says its San Fran and San Jose. Highest per capita incomes. Now prove that those two cities are fiscally sound and not going broke.

 

[Redfish]

The fact that Hillary is running a silent campaign is the most telling.

sooner or later she is going to have to answer the real questions, she can't hide behind those huge thighs forever.

 

[percysunshine]

Dems have 2 candidates: Hillary and whoever will actually get the nomination

Is Chelsea 35 yet?

Goodness....

Chelsea Victoria Clinton (born February 27, 1980)
Chelsea Clinton - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

.

 

[Redfish]

Dems have 2 candidates: Hillary and whoever will actually get the nomination

Is Chelsea 35 yet?

.

you mean Webb Hubbell's daughter? She sure looks like him.

 

[Pete7469]

What if that bandaid is holding your arm to your shoulder?

Then you must be a recipient of socialized healthcare.

 

[Pete7469]

Detroit and Baltimore should be enough reason that a democrat can't run anything successfully.

As if the USSR, Cuba, North Korea, Rhodesia, North Vietnam, nazi Germany and Cambodia aren't good enough examples.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

When all you have to offer up is Hillary it can only mean doom.

Democrats' Vanishing Future

May 21, 2015One of the most under appreciated stories in recent years is the deterioration of the Democratic bench under President Obama's tenure in office. The party has become much more ideologically homogeneous, losing most of its moderate wing as a result of the last two disastrous midterm elections. By one new catch-all measure, a party-strength index introduced by RealClearPolitics analysts Sean Trende and David Byler, Democrats are in their worst position since 1928. That dynamic has manifested itself in the Democratic presidential contest, where the bench is so barren that a flawed Hillary Clinton is barreling to an uncontested nomination.

Democrats Vanishing Future - NationalJournal.com

I'm Melting, I'm Melting. Disappearing.......Nah, still here.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

If the GOP field is so great,

why is a Bush leading?

He isn't. Its way too early to know, but Jeb will not be the GOP nominee. Book it.

You guys need to face reality, obama has destroyed your once great party, the party of Kennedy. It will take 20 or 30 years to recover from the damage he has done. But you get what you vote for.

lol, Kennedy for his time was more liberal than Obama.

Thats kind of the point.
Kennedy would be appalled at the shit obama is pulling....or jealous.

 

[Pete7469]

He isn't. Its way too early to know, but Jeb will not be the GOP nominee. Book it.

You guys need to face reality, obama has destroyed your once great party, the party of Kennedy. It will take 20 or 30 years to recover from the damage he has done. But you get what you vote for.

I hope and pray that you're right. Jeb's numbers come from deliberately skewed polling data for sure, but if the GOP does defy common sense and allows him to be the nominee, get ready for hitlary.

Or perhaps the write in presidency of Mickey Mouse.

 

[NYcarbineer]

If the GOP field is so great,

why is a Bush leading?

He isn't. Its way too early to know, but Jeb will not be the GOP nominee. Book it.

You guys need to face reality, obama has destroyed your once great party, the party of Kennedy. It will take 20 or 30 years to recover from the damage he has done. But you get what you vote for.

lol, Kennedy for his time was more liberal than Obama.

Thats kind of the point.
Kennedy would be appalled at the shit obama is pulling....or jealous.

That wasn't numbnut's point.

Conservatives try to claim Kennedy as some sort of conservatives.

Conservatives hated Kennedy in his time.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

If the GOP field is so great,

why is a Bush leading?

He isn't. Its way too early to know, but Jeb will not be the GOP nominee. Book it.

You guys need to face reality, obama has destroyed your once great party, the party of Kennedy. It will take 20 or 30 years to recover from the damage he has done. But you get what you vote for.

lol, Kennedy for his time was more liberal than Obama.

Thats kind of the point.
Kennedy would be appalled at the shit obama is pulling....or jealous.

That wasn't numbnut's point.

Conservatives try to claim Kennedy as some sort of conservatives.

Conservatives hated Kennedy in his time.

Shit,kennedy would be farther right than Jeb in todays world.

 

[percysunshine]

Dems have 2 candidates: Hillary and whoever will actually get the nomination

Is Chelsea 35 yet?

.

you mean Webb Hubbell's daughter? She sure looks like him.

It does not take long to do the calculus. The Clinton machine will take the hit so that Chelsea is the 2020 candidate.

You heard it here first folks...

.

 

[NYcarbineer]

If the GOP field is so great,

why is a Bush leading?

He isn't. Its way too early to know, but Jeb will not be the GOP nominee. Book it.

You guys need to face reality, obama has destroyed your once great party, the party of Kennedy. It will take 20 or 30 years to recover from the damage he has done. But you get what you vote for.

lol, Kennedy for his time was more liberal than Obama.

Thats kind of the point.
Kennedy would be appalled at the shit obama is pulling....or jealous.

That wasn't numbnut's point.

Conservatives try to claim Kennedy as some sort of conservatives.

Conservatives hated Kennedy in his time.

Shit,kennedy would be farther right than Jeb in todays world.

Google New Frontier and then come back and tell me that's a conservative agenda.

 

[mudwhistle]

When all they have to offer is a documented liar, I would say their party is in big trouble.

Anyone notice that as long as Hillary kept the contents of her emails secret, none of them were classified.
Many of the 200 or so she just released talked about Benghazi.....and were immediately declared classified by the WhiteHouse.
Hillary said over a month ago...none of her emails were of a classified nature. Apparently she lied.
So.....it appears that not only is Hillary lying about her emails but the White House is trying to keep her out of court or even jail by playing loose with National Security statues.

 

[percysunshine]

He isn't. Its way too early to know, but Jeb will not be the GOP nominee. Book it.

You guys need to face reality, obama has destroyed your once great party, the party of Kennedy. It will take 20 or 30 years to recover from the damage he has done. But you get what you vote for.

lol, Kennedy for his time was more liberal than Obama.

Thats kind of the point.
Kennedy would be appalled at the shit obama is pulling....or jealous.

That wasn't numbnut's point.

Conservatives try to claim Kennedy as some sort of conservatives.

Conservatives hated Kennedy in his time.

Shit,kennedy would be farther right than Jeb in todays world.

Google New Frontier and then come back and tell me that's a conservative agenda.

Well, I googled it...looks more like a socialist community organizing Jim Jones agenda....

.

.

 

[LoneLaugher]

I thought our nutters went bonkers after losing in 2012. Can you imagine the reaction to 2016? It will make putting up with all of the stupidity here worth it.