Dem Constitutional Expert: Pelosi Played Into McConnell's Hands, Destroyed Her Own Case

[Nostra]

Hmm, I can make the same argument that Trump was forced to ask Ukraine to investigate Biden and his son’s phony job to fulfill his oath to protect the country from foreign influence and interference. Why else would a foreign oil company give the coke head son of our VEEP a high paying job when his only qualification was his last name?

Hunter Biden is not a coke head. He is someone who has a disease. Just like Rush Limbaugh. There is no evidence that there was anything illegal. The DOJ could investigate the Bidens if there was any evidence to open even a preliminary inquiry. The DOJ has not done so.

Hunter Biden is not a coke head.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Joe Biden's Son Hunter Kicked Out of Navy for Cocaine

He is a person who has a sickness. For you to take advantage of it shows how much garbage you and Trump supporters are.

He is a corrupt crack head scumbag.

No wonder you worship him.

Having sympathy for someone who has a addiction is a Christian value that I picked up.

Good for you.

Biden is still a corrupt crack head scumbag.

 

[easyt65]

He was held in contempt of court. He was not found guilty of any statutory crimes. He was impeached by Republicans and the American people opposed it. That is not true in this case.

Damn - you could gibe Barry a run for his money on who is the bigger liar.

So now you are defending the lying, sexual harassing / abusing POS by attempting to claim the Judge in charge of his Sexual Harassment case did NOT find Clinton guilty of 'Contempt of Court' due to a complete lack of ethics, attempting to defraud / deceive the court and Jury , for VIOLATING HIS OATH OF OFFICE.....

Clinton broke the law - he was found guilty by a judge and punished for it....as opposed to Democrats who have zero crimes, zero evidence, and zero witnesses

 

[JusticeHammer]

Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.

Not to shine a spotlight on your ignorance, but Turley is a highly-praised DEMOCRAT Constitutional Expert who was brilliantly called by the Republicans, knowing the Democrats would not / could not complain about them calling the Democrat's most acknowledged Constitutional expert.

Turley made it clear right up front that he is a DEMOCRSAT, that he does not like the President, that he did NOT VOTE for the President, but that he is an objective Constitutional Scholar, confirming he has been called repeatedly by the Democrats to advise on Constitutional matters.

Again, this is the difference between Democrats playing checkers and Republicans playing chess.

The Republicans chose Turley as their witness, and Turley torpedoed the Democrats by testifying the President did NOT commit a crime, did NOT violate the Constitution, and did NOT abuse his power, but, again, he declared the DEMOCRATS have and continue to do so.

DEMOCRATS have not said a word abut Turley's testimony because he gave them no room to do so by what he pointed out right up front. Once again, however, we see snowflakes declaring what DEMOCRATS ADMIT / CONFESS / TESTIFY TO is suddenly NOT true / is false, even when Democrats refuse to make the same claim.

Bwuhahahahaha.....

Thanks for admitting you lied about him being a Dem witness.

Your surrender is accepted.

You're too dense to understand the truth. He is absolutely correct and you are wrong just like a good little commie lib.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.



Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.

Who is 100% a Democrat, who voted for Hillary
He simply does not think that The Constitution is worth ignoring.
Your argument is childish.

To you people the truth is always childish.

You people hate the truth, why you lie all the time.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.

Not to shine a spotlight on your ignorance, but Turley is a highly-praised DEMOCRAT Constitutional Expert who was brilliantly called by the Republicans, knowing the Democrats would not / could not complain about them calling the Democrat's most acknowledged Constitutional expert.

Turley made it clear right up front that he is a DEMOCRSAT, that he does not like the President, that he did NOT VOTE for the President, but that he is an objective Constitutional Scholar, confirming he has been called repeatedly by the Democrats to advise on Constitutional matters.

Again, this is the difference between Democrats playing checkers and Republicans playing chess.

The Republicans chose Turley as their witness, and Turley torpedoed the Democrats by testifying the President did NOT commit a crime, did NOT violate the Constitution, and did NOT abuse his power, but, again, he declared the DEMOCRATS have and continue to do so.

DEMOCRATS have not said a word abut Turley's testimony because he gave them no room to do so by what he pointed out right up front. Once again, however, we see snowflakes declaring what DEMOCRATS ADMIT / CONFESS / TESTIFY TO is suddenly NOT true / is false, even when Democrats refuse to make the same claim.

Bwuhahahahaha.....

The trouble is that Turley is wrong. Numerous legal experts disagree with him and 2 other experts who testified with him disagree. Trump is too stupid to play checkers. The Republicans chose Turley because they knew what he would say. It doesn't matter what someone's political leanings are. Turley is plain wrong. What Trump has done makes Watergate look like a tea party.

You are an idiot.

 

[busybee01]

He did not base his testimony on the US Constitution and American law.

Holy Shit - you just won't stop lying!

1st you claim to be smarter than a Constitutional, to know more than he does.
You then claim he gave his personal testimony, despite the fact that he CITED the Constitution to back-up everything he said.
You never even attempt to back up the lies you tell, like this continuous stream of horse shit.

You are obviously confusing Turley with Schiff's non-existent whistle blower and every 'witness' the Democrats had testify during the House Intel Committee's Impeachment hearings, who all admitted they personally witnessed nothing and had no 1st-hand account information. Or perhaps you are confusing Turley with the Liberal Extremist College professors who spewed their opinions during Nadler's coup hearings.

Turley was the ONLY true witness in both House hearings who had anything factual, non-opinionated to say.

FAIL....try again, snowflake. Show us how impartial and how much of a proven Constitutional expert you are.

Bwuhahahahahaha......

He did not cite the Constitution. The Constitution says nothing about when a record in incomplete. The other Constitutional experts who testified with him, disagreed with him on many points. You are the one giving us horseshit. There are plenty of experts who disagree with Turley including Turley himself.

Yes there is a whistleblower. A whistleblower whose complaint was found to be credible. Yes there were witnesses who had first hand knowledge of the call. We also have first hand knowledge of Giuliani's attempts to pressure Ukraine through the Parnas investigation.

 

[busybee01]

You are the one who is laughable. Apparently no dissent is allowed with the people you agree with.

You can 'dissent' all you want, but to declare the Democrats' Constitutional Expert is wrong based on snowflake opinion is hilarious. You are the same idiots who watch the same videotaped confession by Joe Biden and say, 'That isn't what he means'...'He didn't really say that'...bwuhahahahaha.

To be a Constitutional expert, you need some common sense...

That leaves you out, snowflake

That leaves you out snowflake.

 

[easyt65]

He did not cite the Constitution. The Constitution says nothing about when a record in incomplete. The other Constitutional experts who testified with him, disagreed with him on many points.

Do you ever stop lying? Thank you for attempting to tell me - and Mr. Turley - in your vast Constitutional expertise what the Constitution does and does not say. Pardon me if I believe the proven, established Constitutional Expert and not a butt-hurt, Trump-hating snowflake. The only true Constitutional Expert who testified was Jonathon Turley, and he most certainly did cite and base his testimony on the Constitution.

 

[busybee01]

She was forced to impeach by the oath she took to protect this country and our elections from foreign interference. She had no choice.

Hmm, I can make the same argument that Trump was forced to ask Ukraine to investigate Biden and his son’s phony job to fulfill his oath to protect the country from foreign influence and interference. Why else would a foreign oil company give the coke head son of our VEEP a high paying job when his only qualification was his last name?

Hunter Biden is not a coke head. He is someone who has a disease. Just like Rush Limbaugh. There is no evidence that there was anything illegal. The DOJ could investigate the Bidens if there was any evidence to open even a preliminary inquiry. The DOJ has not done so.

Hunter Biden is not a coke head.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Joe Biden's Son Hunter Kicked Out of Navy for Cocaine

He is a person who has a sickness. For you to take advantage of it shows how much garbage you and Trump supporters are.

Whhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Try reading the Bible some time.

 

[easyt65]

You are the one who is laughable. Apparently no dissent is allowed with the people you agree with.

You can 'dissent' all you want, but to declare the Democrats' Constitutional Expert is wrong based on snowflake opinion is hilarious. You are the same idiots who watch the same videotaped confession by Joe Biden and say, 'That isn't what he means'...'He didn't really say that'...bwuhahahahaha.

To be a Constitutional expert, you need some common sense...

That leaves you out, snowflake

That leaves you out snowflake.

Poor lil' snowflake...can't come up with anything original...all she can do is parrot others.

 

[easyt65]

But back to the topic....Pelosi completely destroyed the Democrats' argument that Trump was such a threat that he had to be removed from office immediately....by, again, refusing to send the Articles over. By refusing to do so, like everything else they did, she proved their case for Impeachment is bullshit...or, as THEY admitted, is purely POLITICAL.

 

[hadit]

" I would like you to do us a favor". Without an announcement of an investigation, not an actual investigation, Trump was going to withhold aid. This isn`t about Obama or anyone named Biden. Do you have anything else?

Bill Clinton based his entire defense of his sexual harassment of Paula jones on SEMANTICS - on the 'Definition of the word 'IS' '.
-- For his effort, he was found guilty of Contempt of Court, for attempting to deceive the court and jury, for attempting to deprive an American citizen of her right to a fair trial, he was stripped of his license to practice law, and he was Impeached.

Now you snowflakes want to base the Impeachment of he most successful President in the last 50 years, in some cases EVER...you seek to claim that the Democrats' Impeachment - that the Founding Fathers mandated requires evidence of 'Crimes' / 'High Crimes and Misdemeanors' - is based on SEMANTICS, on the DEMOCRATS' / SNOWFLAKES' biased, hate-driven, TDS-suffering definition of the word 'US'?!

Bwuhahahahahahahaha!

Lying to congress about a consensual blowjob or shaking down foreign leaders to interfere with our electoral process. Which is the greater threat to this country? This is a hard question for a cultist bootlicker so take your time and try to get it right. I know you`re not Ken Jennings but do your best with this one. Let Lindsey Graham be your conscience.

Now it's clear you weren't paying attention. Bubba lied in court, to a judge, not Congress. Judges hate that.

 

[Billiejeens]

He did not cite the Constitution. The Constitution says nothing about when a record in incomplete. The other Constitutional experts who testified with him, disagreed with him on many points.

Do you ever stop lying? Thank you for attempting to tell me - and Mr. Turley - in your vast Constitutional expertise what the Constitution does and does not say. Pardon me if I believe the proven, established Constitutional Expert and not a butt-hurt, Trump-hating snowflake. The only true Constitutional Expert who testified was Jonathon Turley, and he most certainly did cite and base his testimony on the Constitution.

Turley is an avowed leftist
He is just not crazy.
Back when Barack Hussein was doing everything through executive order, he said that he personally agreed with everything Obama was doing, he didnt agree with doing through executive orders.

 

[busybee01]

Obama was correctly ensuring that American aid was not lost to corruption.

Bwuhahahaha.......

Obama was keeping his promise to Putin that he made through Medvedev in 2012. 2 years later Barry gave him uranium, Crimea, and 2 years of un-challenged interference, hacking, and social-media-based Counter-Intel Ops in the US.

You snowflakes are so F*ed up in the head:

Barak Obama promising to be more 'flexible' after re-election in 2012 then giving Putin uranium, Crimea, and a 'free pass' from 2014 - 2016 isn't 'illegal collusion' to snowflakes.

Hillary Clinton paying a Trump-hating, known untrustworthy foreign spy for Russian-authored Counter-Intelligence propaganda is not illegal collusion to snowflakes.

Barak Obama overriding his own Homeland Security to void a ban into the US for a Russian lawyer in order to facilitate a meeting between the Russian and Trump's son - a meeting that was under surveillance by Obama's FBI and one in which Obama's own personal Russian translator was in the room - is not illegal collusion to snowflakes

BUT Trump Jr walking out of that meeting with no information changing hands IS illegal collusion?!

?!

Barak Obama withholding lethal military aid from Ukraine and preventing any one else from giving them that aid they needed to protect themselves from Putin's invasion and the annexation of Crimea - ACTUALLY WITHHOLDING AID FROM UKRAINE - is perfectly fine with snowflakes....

But President Trump acting to ensuring CONTINUED corruption and corrupt Ukrainian official's interference in US elections (on behalf of Hillary / Democrats) was not still going on - and aid was NOT withheld - Ukraine got the aid - is am Impeachable offense?

Barry f*ing GAVE Crimea to Putin by ACTUALLY withholding aid from Crimea!


And snowflakes still seek to claim Trump extorted / blackmailed the Ukraine PM when even the Democrats have dropped that lie / claim and settled for 'Abuse of Power' yet they seek to continue to deny reality by insisting that Biden's videotaped confession of extorting the previous Ukraine PM does not exist / 'is not what you think you see'....

?!


Snowflakes like you have gone farther down the tracks on the 'Insanity Train' than even Democrats have been willing to go.

That was a policy decision. Obama never withheld military aid from the Ukrainians. Obama like Trump thought he could work with Putin and Putin used that just as Putin is taking advantage of Trump.

Ukraine got the aid after the hold-up become public knowledge. Trump was not acting against corruption in Ukraine. Ukraine did not interfere in our elections. That is garbage and rational people know this. Trump wanted Ukraine to open up a phony investigation against a political rival.

The Obama Administration had a duty to ensure that American economic aid was not lost to corruption. They sought to force out a prosecutor who American officials, the world community and Ukrainians knew was corrupt. Abuse of power is the correct call although apparently the GAO says Trump broke the law.

 

[busybee01]

Hunter Biden is not a coke head. He is someone who has a disease. Just like Rush Limbaugh. There is no evidence that there was anything illegal. The DOJ could investigate the Bidens if there was any evidence to open even a preliminary inquiry. The DOJ has not done so.

Hunter Biden is not a coke head.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Joe Biden's Son Hunter Kicked Out of Navy for Cocaine

He is a person who has a sickness. For you to take advantage of it shows how much garbage you and Trump supporters are.

He is a corrupt crack head scumbag.

No wonder you worship him.

Having sympathy for someone who has a addiction is a Christian value that I picked up.

Good for you.

Biden is still a corrupt crack head scumbag.

You are the corrupt scumbag.

 

[Billiejeens]

Obama was correctly ensuring that American aid was not lost to corruption.

Bwuhahahaha.......

Obama was keeping his promise to Putin that he made through Medvedev in 2012. 2 years later Barry gave him uranium, Crimea, and 2 years of un-challenged interference, hacking, and social-media-based Counter-Intel Ops in the US.

You snowflakes are so F*ed up in the head:

Barak Obama promising to be more 'flexible' after re-election in 2012 then giving Putin uranium, Crimea, and a 'free pass' from 2014 - 2016 isn't 'illegal collusion' to snowflakes.

Hillary Clinton paying a Trump-hating, known untrustworthy foreign spy for Russian-authored Counter-Intelligence propaganda is not illegal collusion to snowflakes.

Barak Obama overriding his own Homeland Security to void a ban into the US for a Russian lawyer in order to facilitate a meeting between the Russian and Trump's son - a meeting that was under surveillance by Obama's FBI and one in which Obama's own personal Russian translator was in the room - is not illegal collusion to snowflakes

BUT Trump Jr walking out of that meeting with no information changing hands IS illegal collusion?!

?!

Barak Obama withholding lethal military aid from Ukraine and preventing any one else from giving them that aid they needed to protect themselves from Putin's invasion and the annexation of Crimea - ACTUALLY WITHHOLDING AID FROM UKRAINE - is perfectly fine with snowflakes....

But President Trump acting to ensuring CONTINUED corruption and corrupt Ukrainian official's interference in US elections (on behalf of Hillary / Democrats) was not still going on - and aid was NOT withheld - Ukraine got the aid - is am Impeachable offense?

Barry f*ing GAVE Crimea to Putin by ACTUALLY withholding aid from Crimea!


And snowflakes still seek to claim Trump extorted / blackmailed the Ukraine PM when even the Democrats have dropped that lie / claim and settled for 'Abuse of Power' yet they seek to continue to deny reality by insisting that Biden's videotaped confession of extorting the previous Ukraine PM does not exist / 'is not what you think you see'....

?!


Snowflakes like you have gone farther down the tracks on the 'Insanity Train' than even Democrats have been willing to go.

That was a policy decision. Obama never withheld military aid from the Ukrainians. Obama like Trump thought he could work with Putin and Putin used that just as Putin is taking advantage of Trump.

Ukraine got the aid after the hold-up become public knowledge. Trump was not acting against corruption in Ukraine. Ukraine did not interfere in our elections. That is garbage and rational people know this. Trump wanted Ukraine to open up a phony investigation against a political rival.

The Obama Administration had a duty to ensure that American economic aid was not lost to corruption. They sought to force out a prosecutor who American officials, the world community and Ukrainians knew was corrupt. Abuse of power is the correct call although apparently the GAO says Trump broke the law.

Retards like you are a Democrats dream.
So stupid
So deluded.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley declared Speaker Pelosi abused her power, overplayed her hand by delaying sending Articles of Impeachment to the Senate to pressure McConnell for concessions and preserve her self-image as a 'master strategist' - 'IT BACKFIRED!'

McConnell had no reason to give Pelosi anything as she had no leverage, authority, power...and everyone knew it...except Nancy.



Turley stated 'Pelosi pushed impeachment out of "vanity" ' and would pay a "high price" for doing so.'

Claiming the need to immediately remove the President then delaying was an epic blunder that derailed / debunked her own case, exposing the House's Impeachment as dangerously politically partisan:

“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,”

...SAID THE DEMOCRATS' OWN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT, WHO TESTIFIED DURING THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT THAT TRUMP NEVER VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION, NEVER BROKE THE LAW, AND NEVER ABUSED HIS POWERS....BUT SAID THE DEMOCRATS HAD AND CONTINUE TO DO SO...


Jonathan Turley: Pelosi 'played into' McConnell's hands, 'destroyed' her own case for impeachment

.

Not to burst your little bubble of ignorance you live in, but Turley was the Repubs expert not the Dems.

Who is 100% a Democrat, who voted for Hillary
He simply does not think that The Constitution is worth ignoring.
Your argument is childish.

To you people the truth is always childish.

You people hate the truth, why you lie all the time.

Yet I am the only one here presenting the facts and you Trump worshipers are the only ones being triggered...weird.

 

[Siete]

Hunter Biden is not a coke head.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Joe Biden's Son Hunter Kicked Out of Navy for Cocaine

He is a person who has a sickness. For you to take advantage of it shows how much garbage you and Trump supporters are.

He is a corrupt crack head scumbag.

No wonder you worship him.

Having sympathy for someone who has a addiction is a Christian value that I picked up.

Good for you.

Biden is still a corrupt crack head scumbag.

You are the corrupt scumbag.

well, there is that -

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Do you ever stop lying? Thank you for attempting to tell me - and Mr. Turley - in your vast Constitutional expertise what the Constitution does and does not say. Pardon me if I believe the proven, established Constitutional Expert and not a butt-hurt, Trump-hating snowflake. The only true Constitutional Expert who testified was Jonathon Turley, and he most certainly did cite and base his testimony on the Constitution.

Yet you choose to ignore two proven, established Constitutional Experts and waht they say on the matter, so it seems that it is not the messenger but just the message you care about.

 

[Siete]

Do you ever stop lying? Thank you for attempting to tell me - and Mr. Turley - in your vast Constitutional expertise what the Constitution does and does not say. Pardon me if I believe the proven, established Constitutional Expert and not a butt-hurt, Trump-hating snowflake. The only true Constitutional Expert who testified was Jonathon Turley, and he most certainly did cite and base his testimony on the Constitution.

Yet you choose to ignore two proven, established Constitutional Experts and waht they say on the matter, so it seems that it is not the messenger but just the message you care about.

defend trump at all costs - kiss his fat ass and keep kissing, never stop.

rule #1 GOP handbook -