Defund NPR campain

Government funded news will always, by definition, be biased.

Hence, the only solution is for Government to quit funding it

Amen! I'm definitely with you on that. I was just pointing out that the Left/Democrats would not be defending NPR & PBS so vigorously if they didn't lean Left. It's just common sense in the end. If they leaned Conservative/Republican,the Socialists/Progressives would have had them Defunded a long time ago. But i do agree with you on your take.
 
And you are totally ignorant about Saddam's relationship with the U.S. Who do you think gave him the poison gas and chemical weapons he used on the Kurds? Reagan, who armed Saddam to fight against Iran.

Learn something, for fuck's sake.
You still believing that old debunked leftist lie? What an idiot.

iraqiweaponsff5.jpg

Did you make that with Photoshop? I know how good you are with that program.

It's partisan - where did you get it? Know how I know it's partisan? The term "liberating Iraq" - that's straight from Neo-Con talking points.

Oh - excuse me...I just noticed it also says "Nifty chart by: the dissident frogman".

Yeah - real official shit you found, davey!

c128.gif
c128.gif
c128.gif
 
Which conservatives laughed, what came first, the chicken or the egg, in this case, the chicken-liberal-democrats and the pacifist supporters such as yourself, its always the inaction of the cowards that lead to tyrants and dictators. How is it you find yourself on the side of the tyrant who murders. Of the most obvious person who makes a joke out of everything is yourself and the Liberals, making a joke about death and destruction, more telling of yourself.

Fuck you, asshole. What does any of your rant have to do with Bush making fun of not finding WMDs, while thousands of U.S. soldiers died looking for those non-existent WMDs?

Go fuck yourself.

Well, as usual, a salient, intelligent response.

:cuckoo:
Exactly right. And vulgar, too!

Wanna try answering the question?
 
Synthabrain continues to demonstrate its ignorance.

This data has been around for years - it's from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

DF just put it into a graphical representation.

One can do the search oneself, well, some of us can. I doubt synthabrain is capable of selecting the right criteria.

http://armstrade.sipri.org/armstrade/page/values.php
 
Last edited:
You stated "Conservatives", why get so angry when asked which, you respond with "Bush", Bush is a Liberal, not a conservative. Non-existent WMD's, Wiki leaks proves you wrong, further its assholes like yourself that are afraid of tyrants and dictators that create the problems of the world, I have nothing good to say about Bush except for one thing, he was man enough to stand up to Tyrant that murdered people, you shed crocodile tears to support your ideology.

Yes thousands died, with their hands tied behind their backs because of the rant you and the liberal-democrats strangled our soldiers with.

I say your directly responsible for those deaths, on both sides, siding with a murder causing Bush, the idiot, to hold back, to restrain our troops with lawyers.

The lack of total war is what kills our troops, appeasing the pussies like you results in the direct deaths of troops on the battlefield.
Bush had Republican majorities in both chambers of Congress: why would he have to appease anyone on the Left?

And you are totally ignorant about Saddam's relationship with the U.S. Who do you think gave him the poison gas and chemical weapons he used on the Kurds? Reagan, who armed Saddam to fight against Iran.

Learn something, for fuck's sake.

Reagan did not arm Saddam, nor did Bush sr.

Why would Bush have to appease the left, for media support, for support of Liberal Allies. Or maybe because Bush did not have super majorities, maybe because of the Democrat's use of the filibuster. Maybe Bush also had to appease bureaucrats, so many to appease the least of all being Saudi Arabia.


Maybe you're full of shit.
yes.gif


Maybe you should provide some links.
 
Sure did. I looked under our house, behind the drapes and in the compost pile. Never did find another. I hear some of them are wireless, so maybe they're around and invisable?

Compost pile? My Gawd... where do you live? :razz:

Everyone should have a compost pile, turn food and green waste into mulch for a garden, sounds like a great way to live, fresh vegetables, a little relief from high prices in the supermarket.
We finally agree.

If I ever start composting, I'm buying one of these.
 
And you are totally ignorant about Saddam's relationship with the U.S. Who do you think gave him the poison gas and chemical weapons he used on the Kurds? Reagan, who armed Saddam to fight against Iran.

Learn something, for fuck's sake.
You still believing that old debunked leftist lie? What an idiot.

iraqiweaponsff5.jpg

Did you make that with Photoshop? I know how good you are with that program.

It's partisan - where did you get it? Know how I know it's partisan? The term "liberating Iraq" - that's straight from Neo-Con talking points.

Oh - excuse me...I just noticed it also says "Nifty chart by: the dissident frogman".

Yeah - real official shit you found, davey!

c128.gif
c128.gif
c128.gif
Of course you dismiss it. It counters your Daily KOS talking points (which you have failed to corroborate, because you can't).

It makes a funny sound when leftist memes and reality collide. :lol:
 
This debate really isn't a debate. Independent studies have shown that NPR reporting on Democrats is overwhelmingly positive while their reporting on Republicans is overwhelmingly negative. They have had this Bias for many years. This isn't anything new. Debating this issue is useless because NPR's Bias has already been proven. The fact the Left/Democrats defend NPR & PBS so vigorously,also proves the point. So what is there to debate? If NPR & PBS spewed only Conservative/Republican propaganda,the Socialists/Progressives would have already had the Government shut them down. Socialists/Progressives do not support free & open speech. Most people understand this now. If NPR & PBS leaned Conservative/Republican,Defunding would have already happened. If they didn't lean Left,the Left wouldn't be defending them so aggressively either. So the case really is closed on this one. They should be forced to have balance or they should be Defunded.


If that was true, you would have provided a link. You didn't. It's a lie.
 
I'm always amazed at how willfully ignorant many will continue to be. Why do the Left/Democrats defend NPR & PBS so aggressively? That's a pretty simple question no? If they didn't lean Left,the Left wouldn't defend them so vigorously. It really is just common sense in the end. Just look at those who are aggressively defending them on this thread alone. They're all Leftists/Democrats. So they only helped proved the point in the end. Obviously NPR & PBS have a Left/Democrat Bias. Now it's time to address this Bias. Either they balance things out or they get Defunded. It should be that simple.
 
Last edited:
Synthabrain continues to demonstrate its ignorance.

This data has been around for years - it's from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

DF just put it into a graphical representation.

One can do the search oneself, well, some of us can. I doubt synthabrain is capable of selecting the right criteria.

Importer/Exporter TIV Tables
From SIPRI: We're sorry, but that page does not exist here.

:lol:
 
Government funded news will always, by definition, be biased.

Hence, the only solution is for Government to quit funding it
FOX proves that corporate news is even more biased.


You are one of the stupidest people on the interests.

Corporations cannot force you to fund news programs. You can choose not to watch and not to purchase the products of their advertisers.

Taxpayers are forced to subsidize NPR and PBS against many of their wills.

I harbor no illusion that you will be able to grok the difference between these two scenarios.
 
Synthabrain continues to demonstrate its ignorance.

This data has been around for years - it's from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

DF just put it into a graphical representation.

One can do the search oneself, well, some of us can. I doubt synthabrain is capable of selecting the right criteria.

Importer/Exporter TIV Tables
From SIPRI: We're sorry, but that page does not exist here.

:lol:



What a moron. Anybody with half a brain could find the sipri.org website and click through to the database searches.

SIPRI Arms Transfers Database — www.sipri.org
 
Last edited:
Synthabrain continues to demonstrate its ignorance.

This data has been around for years - it's from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

DF just put it into a graphical representation.

One can do the search oneself, well, some of us can. I doubt synthabrain is capable of selecting the right criteria.

Importer/Exporter TIV Tables
From SIPRI: We're sorry, but that page does not exist here.

:lol:



What an moron. Anybody with half a brain could find the sipri.org website and click through to the database searches.

SIPRI Arms Transfers Database — www.sipri.org
No, I was talking about the link in davey's chart.
 
From my observations, compost heaps are attractive nuisances for the raccoons, rats, skunks, opossums and any other vermin in the neighborhood.

No thank you.

I have had compost piles and not once seen a skunk or raccoon, although I did see a liberal democrat government leech rodent worker in the code enforcement truck at the curb, does that count.
 
and:
and:

The provision of chemical precursors from United States companies to Iraq was enabled by a Ronald Reagan administration policy that removed Iraq from the State Department's list of State Sponsors of Terrorism. Leaked portions of Iraq's "Full, Final and Complete" disclosure of the sources for its weapons programs shows that thiodiglycol, a substance needed to manufacture mustard gas, was among the chemical precursors provided to Iraq from US companies such as Alcolac International and Phillips. Both companies have since undergone reorganization and Phillips, once a subsidiary of Phillips Petroleum is now part of ConocoPhillips, an American oil and discount fossil fuel company, while Alcolac International has since dissolved and reformed as Alcolac Inc.[24] Alcolac was named as a defendant in the Aziz v. Iraq case presently pending in the United States District Court (Case No. 1:09-cv-00869-MJG).[citation needed]​
 
Synthabrain continues to demonstrate its ignorance.

This data has been around for years - it's from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

DF just put it into a graphical representation.

One can do the search oneself, well, some of us can. I doubt synthabrain is capable of selecting the right criteria.

Importer/Exporter TIV Tables
From SIPRI: We're sorry, but that page does not exist here.

:lol:



What an moron. Anybody with half a brain could find the sipri.org website and click through to the database searches.

SIPRI Arms Transfers Database — www.sipri.org

That's asking too much of Synthia... She is a moron...
 
Bush looked around the Oval Office for WMDs. Conservatives laughed. Families of dead soldiers did not.

You're a lying little piece of shit.
What part is a lie, CowardGirl?

'Conservatives laughed' - that's a lie. You are a despicable little piece of shit - and the coward is you.... Cowards use the families of dead soldiers to score political points... And, you should consider your words before you make such disgusting allegations. I am the family of a dead soldier, you fucking little bastard. You are scum for using me and mine for your pathetic politics.
 
and:
and:

The provision of chemical precursors from United States companies to Iraq was enabled by a Ronald Reagan administration policy that removed Iraq from the State Department's list of State Sponsors of Terrorism. Leaked portions of Iraq's "Full, Final and Complete" disclosure of the sources for its weapons programs shows that thiodiglycol, a substance needed to manufacture mustard gas, was among the chemical precursors provided to Iraq from US companies such as Alcolac International and Phillips. Both companies have since undergone reorganization and Phillips, once a subsidiary of Phillips Petroleum is now part of ConocoPhillips, an American oil and discount fossil fuel company, while Alcolac International has since dissolved and reformed as Alcolac Inc.[24] Alcolac was named as a defendant in the Aziz v. Iraq case presently pending in the United States District Court (Case No. 1:09-cv-00869-MJG).[citation needed]​

Bet your ass I am going to check you source.
 

Forum List

Back
Top