Defund NPR campain

Sure did. I looked under our house, behind the drapes and in the compost pile. Never did find another. I hear some of them are wireless, so maybe they're around and invisable?
Bush looked around the Oval Office for WMDs. Conservatives laughed. Families of dead soldiers did not.

Which conservatives laughed, what came first, the chicken or the egg, in this case, the chicken-liberal-democrats and the pacifist supporters such as yourself, its always the inaction of the cowards that lead to tyrants and dictators. How is it you find yourself on the side of the tyrant who murders. Of the most obvious person who makes a joke out of everything is yourself and the Liberals, making a joke about death and destruction, more telling of yourself.

What "inaction" led to Saddam Hussien? If anything he was pretty much installed by US spooks.

His major problem was he got "cute" and thought he could hedge between the Soviets and US.
 
Bush looked around the Oval Office for WMDs. Conservatives laughed. Families of dead soldiers did not.

Which conservatives laughed, what came first, the chicken or the egg, in this case, the chicken-liberal-democrats and the pacifist supporters such as yourself, its always the inaction of the cowards that lead to tyrants and dictators. How is it you find yourself on the side of the tyrant who murders. Of the most obvious person who makes a joke out of everything is yourself and the Liberals, making a joke about death and destruction, more telling of yourself.

What "inaction" led to Saddam Hussien? If anything he was pretty much installed by US spooks.

His major problem was he got "cute" and thought he could hedge between the Soviets and US.

i think he's referring to the neo-cons of the pnac begging to depose saddam even when bill clinton was president. they always thought that daddy bush didn't go far enough.

but no.. no inaction led to saddam. he was our boy from beginning to end. he just made the mistake of running his mouth too much.
 
Sure did. I looked under our house, behind the drapes and in the compost pile. Never did find another. I hear some of them are wireless, so maybe they're around and invisable?
Bush looked around the Oval Office for WMDs. Conservatives laughed. Families of dead soldiers did not.

Which conservatives laughed, what came first, the chicken or the egg, in this case, the chicken-liberal-democrats and the pacifist supporters such as yourself, its always the inaction of the cowards that lead to tyrants and dictators. How is it you find yourself on the side of the tyrant who murders. Of the most obvious person who makes a joke out of everything is yourself and the Liberals, making a joke about death and destruction, more telling of yourself.

Fuck you, asshole. What does any of your rant have to do with Bush making fun of not finding WMDs, while thousands of U.S. soldiers died looking for those non-existent WMDs?

Go fuck yourself.
 
Bush looked around the Oval Office for WMDs. Conservatives laughed. Families of dead soldiers did not.

Which conservatives laughed, what came first, the chicken or the egg, in this case, the chicken-liberal-democrats and the pacifist supporters such as yourself, its always the inaction of the cowards that lead to tyrants and dictators. How is it you find yourself on the side of the tyrant who murders. Of the most obvious person who makes a joke out of everything is yourself and the Liberals, making a joke about death and destruction, more telling of yourself.

What "inaction" led to Saddam Hussien? If anything he was pretty much installed by US spooks.

His major problem was he got "cute" and thought he could hedge between the Soviets and US.

Sorry, I did not realize you are to young to know the history of Iraq, never an allies of the USA. Oops, I got ahead of myself, I see you mention the Soviets, in reality you know a bit, as far as being installed by U.S. spooks, never heard that one, I do know that most of Saddam's weapons and support came from the USSR, after the collapse of Communism Saddam had a real need for hard cash, Kuwait seemed like a good target, too bad Bush had Colin Powell as an advisor as well as Bush wishing to empower the United Nations. Big mistake, we should get of the UN and kick ass as we see fit.

Anyhow, it seems we may be closer to being on the same page. I hated the Bush/Clinton/Bush regime, only good thing was destroying a dictator or two, half ass at that.
 
Bush looked around the Oval Office for WMDs. Conservatives laughed. Families of dead soldiers did not.

Which conservatives laughed, what came first, the chicken or the egg, in this case, the chicken-liberal-democrats and the pacifist supporters such as yourself, its always the inaction of the cowards that lead to tyrants and dictators. How is it you find yourself on the side of the tyrant who murders. Of the most obvious person who makes a joke out of everything is yourself and the Liberals, making a joke about death and destruction, more telling of yourself.

Fuck you, asshole. What does any of your rant have to do with Bush making fun of not finding WMDs, while thousands of U.S. soldiers died looking for those non-existent WMDs?

Go fuck yourself.

You stated "Conservatives", why get so angry when asked which, you respond with "Bush", Bush is a Liberal, not a conservative. Non-existent WMD's, Wiki leaks proves you wrong, further its assholes like yourself that are afraid of tyrants and dictators that create the problems of the world, I have nothing good to say about Bush except for one thing, he was man enough to stand up to Tyrant that murdered people, you shed crocodile tears to support your ideology.

Yes thousands died, with their hands tied behind their backs because of the rant you and the liberal-democrats strangled our soldiers with.

I say your directly responsible for those deaths, on both sides, siding with a murder causing Bush, the idiot, to hold back, to restrain our troops with lawyers.

The lack of total war is what kills our troops, appeasing the pussies like you results in the direct deaths of troops on the battlefield.
 
Which conservatives laughed, what came first, the chicken or the egg, in this case, the chicken-liberal-democrats and the pacifist supporters such as yourself, its always the inaction of the cowards that lead to tyrants and dictators. How is it you find yourself on the side of the tyrant who murders. Of the most obvious person who makes a joke out of everything is yourself and the Liberals, making a joke about death and destruction, more telling of yourself.

Fuck you, asshole. What does any of your rant have to do with Bush making fun of not finding WMDs, while thousands of U.S. soldiers died looking for those non-existent WMDs?

Go fuck yourself.

You stated "Conservatives", why get so angry when asked which, you respond with "Bush", Bush is a Liberal, not a conservative. Non-existent WMD's, Wiki leaks proves you wrong, further its assholes like yourself that are afraid of tyrants and dictators that create the problems of the world, I have nothing good to say about Bush except for one thing, he was man enough to stand up to Tyrant that murdered people, you shed crocodile tears to support your ideology.

Yes thousands died, with their hands tied behind their backs because of the rant you and the liberal-democrats strangled our soldiers with.

I say your directly responsible for those deaths, on both sides, siding with a murder causing Bush, the idiot, to hold back, to restrain our troops with lawyers.

The lack of total war is what kills our troops, appeasing the pussies like you results in the direct deaths of troops on the battlefield.
Bush had Republican majorities in both chambers of Congress: why would he have to appease anyone on the Left?

And you are totally ignorant about Saddam's relationship with the U.S. Who do you think gave him the poison gas and chemical weapons he used on the Kurds? Reagan, who armed Saddam to fight against Iran.

Learn something, for fuck's sake.
 
And you are totally ignorant about Saddam's relationship with the U.S. Who do you think gave him the poison gas and chemical weapons he used on the Kurds? Reagan, who armed Saddam to fight against Iran.

Learn something, for fuck's sake.
You still believing that old debunked leftist lie? What an idiot.

iraqiweaponsff5.jpg
 
Say, maybe you could get that fuckhead from Breitphart.com to help create some lying bullshit propaganda (you know some selectively cut video clips that makes it look like NPR worships the devil) that all the connies would buy into too?

Personally I think the FCC should revoke the Faux News license to broadcast.

On what grounds? That you don't like them?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Troll.
:eusa_hand:

Look, there is no direct funding for NPR from Congress. It's gonna take a lying bit of propaganda like the fuckwad from Brietphart is now famous for, to convince the "conned" that some how Congress has the ability to de-fund them. Okay maybe the "conned" have already been conned and the MSM need a way to hook on to the story to decieve the masses

Faux has betrayed the public trust by broadcasting from a single political perspective 24/7.

Betrayed what public trust? Fox offers a product. People are free to tune in or not 24/7.
And because of viewer choice Fox creams other cable news/commentary networks such as CNN and MSNBC in the ratings. You might say they trust Fox more.

And, dimwit, there is no license for the FCC to yank away from Fox, a CABLE NETWORK!
 
Bush looked around the Oval Office for WMDs. Conservatives laughed. Families of dead soldiers did not.

Which conservatives laughed, what came first, the chicken or the egg, in this case, the chicken-liberal-democrats and the pacifist supporters such as yourself, its always the inaction of the cowards that lead to tyrants and dictators. How is it you find yourself on the side of the tyrant who murders. Of the most obvious person who makes a joke out of everything is yourself and the Liberals, making a joke about death and destruction, more telling of yourself.

Fuck you, asshole. What does any of your rant have to do with Bush making fun of not finding WMDs, while thousands of U.S. soldiers died looking for those non-existent WMDs?

Go fuck yourself.

Well, as usual, a salient, intelligent response.

:cuckoo:
 
I cannot figure out a way to best respond to your replication. There is one internet, not two or more. Bush spoke of the "internets" and many laughed when he used the plural. So I suggested I too looked for another internet and didn't find one. Then I suggested Bush looked for WMD's and didn't find any. It was meant to be funny, but as is the case with many attempts at humor, it loses much when it needs further explanation.

Wait... you actually looked for a second Internet?

Sure did. I looked under our house, behind the drapes and in the compost pile. Never did find another. I hear some of them are wireless, so maybe they're around and invisable?

Compost pile? My Gawd... where do you live? :razz:
 
On what grounds? That you don't like them?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Troll.
:eusa_hand:

Look, there is no direct funding for NPR from Congress. It's gonna take a lying bit of propaganda like the fuckwad from Brietphart is now famous for, to convince the "conned" that some how Congress has the ability to de-fund them. Okay maybe the "conned" have already been conned and the MSM need a way to hook on to the story to decieve the masses

Faux has betrayed the public trust by broadcasting from a single political perspective 24/7.

Betrayed what public trust? Fox offers a product. People are free to tune in or not 24/7.
And because of viewer choice Fox creams other cable news/commentary networks such as CNN and MSNBC in the ratings. You might say they trust Fox more.

And, dimwit, there is no license for the FCC to yank away from Fox, a CABLE NETWORK!

True but every affiliate station that broadcastg their feed does don't they. Just like CBS was never fined for the "malfunction" at the Superbowl a few years ago, but their affiliate were. (Even though the FCC rules did not allow a tape delay)
 
:eusa_hand:

Look, there is no direct funding for NPR from Congress. It's gonna take a lying bit of propaganda like the fuckwad from Brietphart is now famous for, to convince the "conned" that some how Congress has the ability to de-fund them. Okay maybe the "conned" have already been conned and the MSM need a way to hook on to the story to decieve the masses

Faux has betrayed the public trust by broadcasting from a single political perspective 24/7.

Betrayed what public trust? Fox offers a product. People are free to tune in or not 24/7.
And because of viewer choice Fox creams other cable news/commentary networks such as CNN and MSNBC in the ratings. You might say they trust Fox more.

And, dimwit, there is no license for the FCC to yank away from Fox, a CABLE NETWORK!

True but every affiliate station that broadcastg their feed does don't they. Just like CBS was never fined for the "malfunction" at the Superbowl a few years ago, but their affiliate were. (Even though the FCC rules did not allow a tape delay)

CBS is broadcast; Fox news is cable. The Fox 'feed' to your tube is direct via the cable, not a local affiliate station. Fox news can tell the FCC to pound sand if they feel like it.
 
Fuck you, asshole. What does any of your rant have to do with Bush making fun of not finding WMDs, while thousands of U.S. soldiers died looking for those non-existent WMDs?

Go fuck yourself.

You stated "Conservatives", why get so angry when asked which, you respond with "Bush", Bush is a Liberal, not a conservative. Non-existent WMD's, Wiki leaks proves you wrong, further its assholes like yourself that are afraid of tyrants and dictators that create the problems of the world, I have nothing good to say about Bush except for one thing, he was man enough to stand up to Tyrant that murdered people, you shed crocodile tears to support your ideology.

Yes thousands died, with their hands tied behind their backs because of the rant you and the liberal-democrats strangled our soldiers with.

I say your directly responsible for those deaths, on both sides, siding with a murder causing Bush, the idiot, to hold back, to restrain our troops with lawyers.

The lack of total war is what kills our troops, appeasing the pussies like you results in the direct deaths of troops on the battlefield.
Bush had Republican majorities in both chambers of Congress: why would he have to appease anyone on the Left?

And you are totally ignorant about Saddam's relationship with the U.S. Who do you think gave him the poison gas and chemical weapons he used on the Kurds? Reagan, who armed Saddam to fight against Iran.

Learn something, for fuck's sake.

Reagan did not arm Saddam, nor did Bush sr.

Why would Bush have to appease the left, for media support, for support of Liberal Allies. Or maybe because Bush did not have super majorities, maybe because of the Democrat's use of the filibuster. Maybe Bush also had to appease bureaucrats, so many to appease the least of all being Saudi Arabia.
 
Wait... you actually looked for a second Internet?

Sure did. I looked under our house, behind the drapes and in the compost pile. Never did find another. I hear some of them are wireless, so maybe they're around and invisable?

Compost pile? My Gawd... where do you live? :razz:

Everyone should have a compost pile, turn food and green waste into mulch for a garden, sounds like a great way to live, fresh vegetables, a little relief from high prices in the supermarket.
 
From my observations, compost heaps are attractive nuisances for the raccoons, rats, skunks, opossums and any other vermin in the neighborhood.

No thank you.
 
This debate really isn't a debate. Independent studies have shown that NPR reporting on Democrats is overwhelmingly positive while their reporting on Republicans is overwhelmingly negative. They have had this Bias for many years. This isn't anything new. Debating this issue is useless because NPR's Bias has already been proven. The fact the Left/Democrats defend NPR & PBS so vigorously,also proves the point. So what is there to debate? If NPR & PBS spewed only Conservative/Republican propaganda,the Socialists/Progressives would have already had the Government shut them down. Socialists/Progressives do not support free & open speech. Most people understand this now. If NPR & PBS leaned Conservative/Republican,Defunding would have already happened. If they didn't lean Left,the Left wouldn't be defending them so aggressively either. So the case really is closed on this one. They should be forced to have balance or they should be Defunded.
 
Last edited:
Government funded news will always, by definition, be biased.

Hence, the only solution is for Government to quit funding it
 

Forum List

Back
Top