Deficit spending not sustainable. The Fed spends more on INTEREST ON DEBT than DEFENSE

A $7 Trillion Biden budget with $5 Trillion in new taxes.

We need to buy Biden a $5 Casio calculator and help him with the math.

Janet Yellen testified before Congress that Biden's spending plans will eventually push the deficit to $51 Trillion dollars. Thst is apparently the Dem / Socialist plan.

When it is obvious to anyone who is not a retard this is unsustainable…the only concluson pne can draw is that it is being done intentonally to bankrupt the US.

JUST LIKE THE US DID TO THE SOVIET UNION.

IS 1989 so long ago that retarded TDS CULT FUCKS do not recall what happened to SOVIET RUSSIA?
 
When it is obvious to anyone who is not a retard this is unsustainable…the only concluson pne can draw is that it is being done intentonally to bankrupt the US.

JUST LIKE THE US DID TO THE SOVIET UNION.

IS 1989 so long ago that retarded TDS CULT FUCKS do not recall what happened to SOVIET RUSSIA?
Exactly right. The implications are a 1929 style collapse of the financial markets and a depression not unlike the 1930's.
 
Why would they, every time we vote the same people back into office we are giving them our approval for their actions.

right. you macBlack have just the guy willing to fight the deep state & the filthy MSM. Because you’re smart. who is it again? Ronald macdonald? Chewin’ Ewan MacGater?

We had one in place 2017-2019 then you supported wiping him out launching your Flu game. You own it dunce.

Now you support the Police State attacking them all and jailing or bankrupting over made up BS. You’re an evil one going along giggling jn the background pretending you know better.

No one but Trump had the courage to put himself out there and fight back against all odds. No the Kennedy guy will not fight them most likely. He comes from them.
 
Last edited:
A big Tax on every stock share traded would get money. Not sure if Trading would halt if 10% of every share was taken and dumped into the FED Black hole? At current trade levels you could maybe find a few Trillion. But if they stopped buying selling shares? Then what?
 
Last edited:
You know how we all agree that government is way too big? And I'm sure each department would get along just fine if half their staff were cut? No one can disagree with this. But, what we need is an example.

Name a state where they have cut their government jobs in half? Name the Republican governor, Senator or House member who has half the staff his peers have. Like, he has 1 aid working for him.

Same goes for unregulated free market capitalism. Name the state that has it all figured out. Instead of talking shit about Florida, start bragging about your state and Republican governor. And small government. Show us that your state doesn't take more federal dollars than it pays.
WTF, you need an example? Here's your example.

 
Don't just roll back the Trump tax breaks, or the Bush tax breaks

Bring back all the loopholes as well, or no go.
 
The public sector employs 20.2 million people in the US, approximately 14.5 percent of the workforce. Public sector employment is generally divided into three categories: federal, state and local government.

There were nearly 118 million private sector jobs in May 2020, representing 85 percent of U.S. employment. State government had 4.6 million jobs (3.3 percent) and local government had 14.1 million jobs (10.1 percent).

:linky:
 
No, we want to start at the top, at the entity that sucks trillions out of the economy every year, that prints its own money to saddle untold future generations with debt

who was the last person you voted for that actually cut spending?
 
A big Tax on every stock share traded would get money. Not sure if Trading would halt if 10% of every share was taken and dumped into the FED Black hole? At current trade levels you could maybe find a few Trillion. But if they stopped buying selling shares? Then what?
That would also hurt the elderly dependent on stocks for their retirement, as well as every 401K. It's not just the wealthy in the stock market now.
 
Right now they need like $3T more every year just to break even on spending. So all your $100B trinkets proposals just make me yawn. Cuts and real Tax increases on where the money is is the answer w/o killing GDP. Income Tax is not it. Not sure there is an answer at $34T they have created?
 
who was the last person you voted for that actually cut spending?
Nobody has cut spending and no one will ever successfully campaign on cutting spending, because within milliseconds of them saying anything about it, the usual suspects would be screaming at the sky about the "children", and "grandma".
 
Nobody has cut spending and no one will ever successfully campaign on cutting spending, because within milliseconds of them saying anything about it, the usual suspects would be screaming at the sky about the "children", and "grandma".

Yep, because nobody really wants spending cut, our voting over the last 50 years proves this.
 
A big Tax on every stock share traded would get money. Not sure if Trading would halt if 10% of every share was taken and dumped into the FED Black hole? At current trade levels you could maybe find a few Trillion. But if they stopped buying selling shares? Then what?
10%?!

1712762105744.jpeg
 
A big Tax on every stock share traded would get money. Not sure if Trading would halt if 10% of every share was taken and dumped into the FED Black hole? At current trade levels you could maybe find a few Trillion. But if they stopped buying selling shares? Then what?
You know better than that, politicians would find a way to piss all new money away.
 

Forum List

Back
Top