Deep State swamp rat blocks rand paul question


So if the suspected whistleblower is not the actual whistleblower, doesn't it put him at jeopardy if he's not? And wouldn't it make it safer instead of people who might act on suspicion, to know who is who to keep the innocent safe?

This safety issues is nothing more than a red herring so that he can't out Schiff Face. Nobody is threatening the whistleblower, and it's a made-up story to actually protect Schiff.
So if Republicans get the wrong guy, it is somehow the whistleblowers fault?

Who said anything about Republicans? If something did happen to Ciaramella, and Schiff did nothing but allow the rumor to continue without correction, then he would be responsible for not making the correction in the first place.
It is conservatives trying to lynch the poor guy

Don’t blame Schiff

Which conservatives? Because I haven't heard any anger expressed over him. But there are crazy's in the country like the baseball field shooter, Giffords, people who could be on any side of a political issue.
 
Yeah, Trump is not allowed to know his accuser. . . The Deep State is in charge of the nation now, the Constitution is just a damn piece of paper that is meaningless.


"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."

Impeachment isn't a criminal prosecution. There are laws that protect whistleblowers.
That law protects their jobs not their identities

Wrong.

Can I keep my identity confidential?
Yes. Most Inspectors General have hotlines that allow employees to make confidential disclosures. Inspectors General are prohibited from disclosing an employee’s identity unless the IG determines that disclosure is unavoidable or is compelled by a court order. If you file a disclosure with OSC, your identity will not be shared outside of OSC without your consent. However, OSC may disclose your identity only if OSC determines that it is necessary because of an imminent danger to public health or safety or an imminent violation of any criminal law.

U.S. Office of Special Counsel Know Your Rights When Reporting Wrongs
 
Why would you want to know who the whistleblower is?

Don’t you understand whistleblowers?
WTF is that supposed to mean?
It means whistleblower has protections
One of those protections is remaining anonymous and protection against retribution

Now, other than to harass, what reason do you have to know his name?
Why would you want to know who the whistleblower is?

Don’t you understand whistleblowers?
WTF is that supposed to mean?
It means whistleblower has protections
One of those protections is remaining anonymous and protection against retribution

Now, other than to harass, what reason do you have to know his name?
ya, it was hearsay. They had to make up a special law to protect hearsay of a whistleblower
The whole thing stinks.

Where does it say that a whistleblower can’t report information that he has heard?

The IG investigated what he reported he had heard and found it had merit
hearsay is not admissable evidence in any court of law.
But bingo if it means getting Trump we'll change the law.
 
So does Biden gets to confront his accuser and have him hauled in to testify under oath about the allegations he made against Good Old Joe?
Joes not on trial
Jesus

Well yeah, Joe was never accused of coercing a foreign nation into announcing investigations into his political rivals by denying them the funds Congress appropriated for their defense either. All the witnesses on the call willing to testify are known and have been confronted. The law is there to protect against vindictive people like President "Sonny"!

What they testified to is that the transcript was sound and accurate. In the transcript, Trump didn't say anything about the US military aid. The Democrats made that up.

The call was merely evidence of the larger plot to which other witnesses have testified. Vindictively confronting them is not enough for the man-child or what?

Oh, that Democrats crystal ball again, huh? Well if they knew it was part of a larger plot, why didn't they wait until Trump carried it out, or at the very least, wait until he completed his quid pro quo?

Face it, they proved their case and the Trumpublican Senate accepts and embraces the Trumpybear's corrupt intent to cheat in the upcoming election by any means necessary. That's a Ball an Chain ya'll can wear till November.

 
Joes not on trial
Jesus

Well yeah, Joe was never accused of coercing a foreign nation into announcing investigations into his political rivals by denying them the funds Congress appropriated for their defense either. All the witnesses on the call willing to testify are known and have been confronted. The law is there to protect against vindictive people like President "Sonny"!

What they testified to is that the transcript was sound and accurate. In the transcript, Trump didn't say anything about the US military aid. The Democrats made that up.

The call was merely evidence of the larger plot to which other witnesses have testified. Vindictively confronting them is not enough for the man-child or what?

Oh, that Democrats crystal ball again, huh? Well if they knew it was part of a larger plot, why didn't they wait until Trump carried it out, or at the very least, wait until he completed his quid pro quo?

Face it, they proved their case and the Trumpublican Senate accepts and embraces the Trumpybear's corrupt intent to cheat in the upcoming election by any means necessary. That's a Ball an Chain ya'll can wear till November.



Sorry, but other people with logic see it differently. They proved nothing. There is no possible way to charge somebody with cheating an election over a year before it even takes place. There is no possible way that the commies could tell anybody who the nominee would be a year before the primary either. That is of course, unless they rig the election again, but Trump would have no way of knowing that.

This "I think he was" impeachment will go down in history as the greatest farce of our country. The commies should be ashamed of themselves.
 
Well yeah, Joe was never accused of coercing a foreign nation into announcing investigations into his political rivals by denying them the funds Congress appropriated for their defense either. All the witnesses on the call willing to testify are known and have been confronted. The law is there to protect against vindictive people like President "Sonny"!

What they testified to is that the transcript was sound and accurate. In the transcript, Trump didn't say anything about the US military aid. The Democrats made that up.

The call was merely evidence of the larger plot to which other witnesses have testified. Vindictively confronting them is not enough for the man-child or what?

Oh, that Democrats crystal ball again, huh? Well if they knew it was part of a larger plot, why didn't they wait until Trump carried it out, or at the very least, wait until he completed his quid pro quo?

Face it, they proved their case and the Trumpublican Senate accepts and embraces the Trumpybear's corrupt intent to cheat in the upcoming election by any means necessary. That's a Ball an Chain ya'll can wear till November.



Sorry, but other people with logic see it differently. They proved nothing. There is no possible way to charge somebody with cheating an election over a year before it even takes place. There is no possible way that the commies could tell anybody who the nominee would be a year before the primary either. That is of course, unless they rig the election again, but Trump would have no way of knowing that.

This "I think he was" impeachment will go down in history as the greatest farce of our country. The commies should be ashamed of themselves.



READ: Lamar Alexander's statement on impeachment witness vote - CNNPolitics


"There is no need for more evidence to prove that the president asked Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden and his son, Hunter; he said this on television on October 3, 2019, and during his July 25, 2019, telephone call with the president of Ukraine. There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens; the House managers have proved this with what they call a 'mountain of overwhelming evidence.'......

"It was inappropriate for the president to ask a foreign leader to investigate his political opponent and to withhold United States aid to encourage that investigation. When elected officials inappropriately interfere with such investigations, it undermines the principle of equal justice under the law. ...."

"The question then is not whether the president did it, but whether the United States Senate or the American people should decide what to do about what he did. I believe that the Constitution provides that the people should make that decision in the presidential election that begins in Iowa on Monday.

Trumpublicans simple accept this type of election interference corruption. Good luck in November with that around all your necks.
 
What they testified to is that the transcript was sound and accurate. In the transcript, Trump didn't say anything about the US military aid. The Democrats made that up.

The call was merely evidence of the larger plot to which other witnesses have testified. Vindictively confronting them is not enough for the man-child or what?

Oh, that Democrats crystal ball again, huh? Well if they knew it was part of a larger plot, why didn't they wait until Trump carried it out, or at the very least, wait until he completed his quid pro quo?

Face it, they proved their case and the Trumpublican Senate accepts and embraces the Trumpybear's corrupt intent to cheat in the upcoming election by any means necessary. That's a Ball an Chain ya'll can wear till November.



Sorry, but other people with logic see it differently. They proved nothing. There is no possible way to charge somebody with cheating an election over a year before it even takes place. There is no possible way that the commies could tell anybody who the nominee would be a year before the primary either. That is of course, unless they rig the election again, but Trump would have no way of knowing that.

This "I think he was" impeachment will go down in history as the greatest farce of our country. The commies should be ashamed of themselves.



READ: Lamar Alexander's statement on impeachment witness vote - CNNPolitics


"There is no need for more evidence to prove that the president asked Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden and his son, Hunter; he said this on television on October 3, 2019, and during his July 25, 2019, telephone call with the president of Ukraine. There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens; the House managers have proved this with what they call a 'mountain of overwhelming evidence.'......

"It was inappropriate for the president to ask a foreign leader to investigate his political opponent and to withhold United States aid to encourage that investigation. When elected officials inappropriately interfere with such investigations, it undermines the principle of equal justice under the law. ...."

"The question then is not whether the president did it, but whether the United States Senate or the American people should decide what to do about what he did. I believe that the Constitution provides that the people should make that decision in the presidential election that begins in Iowa on Monday.

Trumpublicans simple accept this type of election interference corruption. Good luck in November with that around all your necks.


So where is this election interference in an election that has yet to be held? The ONlY corrupt interference in 2016 was foreign attempts to aid Hitlery. We don’t need luck in November. You assholes are going to take a beating as Trump rolls to re-election and Republicans get the house and senate. Enjoy it. Your misery will be fun to watch.
 
So where is this election interference in an election that has yet to be held?

I bet ol'Trumpybear was pissed too, when he realized all the work he had put into his little shakedown scheme was exposed.

The ONlY corrupt interference in 2016 was foreign attempts to aid Hitlery.

Yah, it was done from da Ukraine Comrade!

We don’t need luck in November.

But you will need a hand cart to tow Trumpybears Ball and Chain around, it's bound to get heavy.
 
So where is this election interference in an election that has yet to be held?

I bet ol'Trumpybear was pissed too, when he realized all the work he had put into his little shakedown scheme was exposed.

The ONlY corrupt interference in 2016 was foreign attempts to aid Hitlery.

Yah, it was done from da Ukraine Comrade!

We don’t need luck in November.

But you will need a hand cart to tow Trumpybears Ball and Chain around, it's bound to get heavy.

Keep dreaming. And stop posting while obviously intoxicated. Throwing out Russian insults. Weak. When taking a beating like this, it’s best to STFU, tuck your tail between your legs, and slink back under your rock.
 
So where is this election interference in an election that has yet to be held?

I bet ol'Trumpybear was pissed too, when he realized all the work he had put into his little shakedown scheme was exposed.

The ONlY corrupt interference in 2016 was foreign attempts to aid Hitlery.

Yah, it was done from da Ukraine Comrade!

We don’t need luck in November.

But you will need a hand cart to tow Trumpybears Ball and Chain around, it's bound to get heavy.

Keep dreaming. And stop posting while obviously intoxicated. Throwing out Russian insults. Weak. When taking a beating like this, it’s best to STFU, tuck your tail between your legs, and slink back under your rock.

Bask in the corruption. Ladle it all over your bad self.
 
What they testified to is that the transcript was sound and accurate. In the transcript, Trump didn't say anything about the US military aid. The Democrats made that up.

The call was merely evidence of the larger plot to which other witnesses have testified. Vindictively confronting them is not enough for the man-child or what?

Oh, that Democrats crystal ball again, huh? Well if they knew it was part of a larger plot, why didn't they wait until Trump carried it out, or at the very least, wait until he completed his quid pro quo?

Face it, they proved their case and the Trumpublican Senate accepts and embraces the Trumpybear's corrupt intent to cheat in the upcoming election by any means necessary. That's a Ball an Chain ya'll can wear till November.



Sorry, but other people with logic see it differently. They proved nothing. There is no possible way to charge somebody with cheating an election over a year before it even takes place. There is no possible way that the commies could tell anybody who the nominee would be a year before the primary either. That is of course, unless they rig the election again, but Trump would have no way of knowing that.

This "I think he was" impeachment will go down in history as the greatest farce of our country. The commies should be ashamed of themselves.



READ: Lamar Alexander's statement on impeachment witness vote - CNNPolitics


"There is no need for more evidence to prove that the president asked Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden and his son, Hunter; he said this on television on October 3, 2019, and during his July 25, 2019, telephone call with the president of Ukraine. There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens; the House managers have proved this with what they call a 'mountain of overwhelming evidence.'......

"It was inappropriate for the president to ask a foreign leader to investigate his political opponent and to withhold United States aid to encourage that investigation. When elected officials inappropriately interfere with such investigations, it undermines the principle of equal justice under the law. ...."

"The question then is not whether the president did it, but whether the United States Senate or the American people should decide what to do about what he did. I believe that the Constitution provides that the people should make that decision in the presidential election that begins in Iowa on Monday.

Trumpublicans simple accept this type of election interference corruption. Good luck in November with that around all your necks.


The problem is they have no evidence that Trump held back anything in regards to any investigation. In fact, the transcript never contained the word investigation. Trump asked for a favor, and never said that the US aid would be contingent on that favor being granted.

What the Democrats are saying is that they can read minds. Forget what Trump said about the aid, forget what Sondland said Trump said about the aid. The Democrats know how to read minds, so to the point they impeached on mind reading.

This would never hold in a court of law. It would have been thrown out in ten minutes.
 
So where is this election interference in an election that has yet to be held?

I bet ol'Trumpybear was pissed too, when he realized all the work he had put into his little shakedown scheme was exposed.

The ONlY corrupt interference in 2016 was foreign attempts to aid Hitlery.

Yah, it was done from da Ukraine Comrade!

We don’t need luck in November.

But you will need a hand cart to tow Trumpybears Ball and Chain around, it's bound to get heavy.

Keep dreaming. And stop posting while obviously intoxicated. Throwing out Russian insults. Weak. When taking a beating like this, it’s best to STFU, tuck your tail between your legs, and slink back under your rock.

Bask in the corruption. Ladle it all over your bad self.

Keep bathing in the stupidity blind boy. Enjoy 5 more years of Trump.
 

Forum List

Back
Top