DENIED: Rand Paul Blocks Pro-Whistleblower Resolution Pushed by DemonRATS, Citing ‘Fake Outrage’

[The Purge]

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has emerged as President Donald Trump’s most outspoken advocate against the newest phase of the Democrats’ witch hunt to remove him from office...

...Democrats attempted to pass a pro-whistleblower resolution unanimously in the Senate today in order to build the case for this deep state operative...

...Schumer, who has supported the persecution of real whistleblowers like WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and NSA leaker Edward Snowden, had the audacity to claim that he wanted to “send a message today that the Senate reaffirms our long standing tradition about defending whistleblowers.”

Paul was not having any of Schumer’s nauseating hypocrisy. He objected to passing the resolution unanimously, and instead proposed the passage of his legitimate bill that would protect authentic whistleblowers.

“I support whistleblowers and I do think they have a role to play in keeping government accountable … but what we have seen over the last few years is that we have a system that we should continue to refine,” Paul said.

Paul made note that his legislation would give the President the right to face his accuser. It would also apply to contractors and be retroactive, so that Snowden would be protected as well for exposing the NSA’s unconstitutional spying program in 2013.

“The bill I will introduce today will expand the whistleblower act [and] would be made retroactive so Edward Snowden can come home to live in his own country. All he did was expose that his government was not obeying the Constitution,” Paul said.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...

-----------

It’s hard to say, some of the others might have objected if Rand didn’t but the Demoncrats thought they were going along again with their insanity....where was Sen. Cruz and others? A libertarian the only one with balls....SAD!

 

[SAYIT]

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has emerged as President Donald Trump’s most outspoken advocate against the newest phase of the Democrats’ witch hunt to remove him from office...

...Democrats attempted to pass a pro-whistleblower resolution unanimously in the Senate today in order to build the case for this deep state operative...

...Schumer, who has supported the persecution of real whistleblowers like WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and NSA leaker Edward Snowden, had the audacity to claim that he wanted to “send a message today that the Senate reaffirms our long standing tradition about defending whistleblowers.”

Paul was not having any of Schumer’s nauseating hypocrisy. He objected to passing the resolution unanimously, and instead proposed the passage of his legitimate bill that would protect authentic whistleblowers.

“I support whistleblowers and I do think they have a role to play in keeping government accountable … but what we have seen over the last few years is that we have a system that we should continue to refine,” Paul said.

Paul made note that his legislation would give the President the right to face his accuser. It would also apply to contractors and be retroactive, so that Snowden would be protected as well for exposing the NSA’s unconstitutional spying program in 2013.

“The bill I will introduce today will expand the whistleblower act [and] would be made retroactive so Edward Snowden can come home to live in his own country. All he did was expose that his government was not obeying the Constitution,” Paul said.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...

-----------

It’s hard to say, some of the others might have objected if Rand didn’t but the Demoncrats thought they were going along again with their insanity....where was Sen. Cruz and others? A libertarian the only one with balls....SAD!

The Senate's reticence to call a sham a sham was evident at last year's Prof Blasey-Fraud's circus when all gave deference to her claims despite the gaping holes in them. No honest American is fooled by the Dem's routine anymore ... it's all about their need to negate the 2016 election results because they can't beat Trump in 2020. They have not only failed to address any of America's pressing issues, they have fought anything the POTUS would do to improve our lives.

Traitors ... every stinkin' one of 'em.

 

[busybee01]

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has emerged as President Donald Trump’s most outspoken advocate against the newest phase of the Democrats’ witch hunt to remove him from office...

...Democrats attempted to pass a pro-whistleblower resolution unanimously in the Senate today in order to build the case for this deep state operative...

...Schumer, who has supported the persecution of real whistleblowers like WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and NSA leaker Edward Snowden, had the audacity to claim that he wanted to “send a message today that the Senate reaffirms our long standing tradition about defending whistleblowers.”

Paul was not having any of Schumer’s nauseating hypocrisy. He objected to passing the resolution unanimously, and instead proposed the passage of his legitimate bill that would protect authentic whistleblowers.

“I support whistleblowers and I do think they have a role to play in keeping government accountable … but what we have seen over the last few years is that we have a system that we should continue to refine,” Paul said.

Paul made note that his legislation would give the President the right to face his accuser. It would also apply to contractors and be retroactive, so that Snowden would be protected as well for exposing the NSA’s unconstitutional spying program in 2013.

“The bill I will introduce today will expand the whistleblower act [and] would be made retroactive so Edward Snowden can come home to live in his own country. All he did was expose that his government was not obeying the Constitution,” Paul said.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...

-----------

It’s hard to say, some of the others might have objected if Rand didn’t but the Demoncrats thought they were going along again with their insanity....where was Sen. Cruz and others? A libertarian the only one with balls....SAD!

Rand Paul is a punk and he had better look at what happened to Bevins. Suburban voters threw Bevins out. A President should not have the right to confront whistleblowers. It would discourage whistleblowers from coming forward because of fear of retaliation. Trump has suggested the whistleblower should be charged with treason. Rand Paul is a prime example of politicians who sell their values down the river for political expediency. Paul is a disgusting animal who deserves a good spanking like most brats should get.

 

[busybee01]

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has emerged as President Donald Trump’s most outspoken advocate against the newest phase of the Democrats’ witch hunt to remove him from office...

...Democrats attempted to pass a pro-whistleblower resolution unanimously in the Senate today in order to build the case for this deep state operative...

...Schumer, who has supported the persecution of real whistleblowers like WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and NSA leaker Edward Snowden, had the audacity to claim that he wanted to “send a message today that the Senate reaffirms our long standing tradition about defending whistleblowers.”

Paul was not having any of Schumer’s nauseating hypocrisy. He objected to passing the resolution unanimously, and instead proposed the passage of his legitimate bill that would protect authentic whistleblowers.

“I support whistleblowers and I do think they have a role to play in keeping government accountable … but what we have seen over the last few years is that we have a system that we should continue to refine,” Paul said.

Paul made note that his legislation would give the President the right to face his accuser. It would also apply to contractors and be retroactive, so that Snowden would be protected as well for exposing the NSA’s unconstitutional spying program in 2013.

“The bill I will introduce today will expand the whistleblower act [and] would be made retroactive so Edward Snowden can come home to live in his own country. All he did was expose that his government was not obeying the Constitution,” Paul said.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...

-----------

It’s hard to say, some of the others might have objected if Rand didn’t but the Demoncrats thought they were going along again with their insanity....where was Sen. Cruz and others? A libertarian the only one with balls....SAD!

The Senate's reticence to call a sham a sham was evident at last year's Prof Blasey-Fraud's circus when all gave deference to her claims despite the gaping holes in them. No honest American is fooled by the Dem's routine anymore ... it's all about their need to negate the 2016 election results because they can't beat Trump in 2020. They have not only failed to address any of America's pressing issues, they have fought anything the POTUS would do to improve our lives.

Traitors ... every stinkin' one of 'em.

You are not a honest American since you are a Trump supporter. If Ford's story had gaping holes then why not conduct a thorough FBI investigation. Clearly you are afraid a thorough investigation would have shown Kavanaugh lied to Congress. If Trump is going to win in 2020 then why are Trump and Republicans trying to smear Joe Biden? The fact is that Trump has not done anything to improve our lives unless you are rich and powerful. Trump has done a lot for them and screwed everyone else.

 

[The Purge]

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has emerged as President Donald Trump’s most outspoken advocate against the newest phase of the Democrats’ witch hunt to remove him from office...

...Democrats attempted to pass a pro-whistleblower resolution unanimously in the Senate today in order to build the case for this deep state operative...

...Schumer, who has supported the persecution of real whistleblowers like WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and NSA leaker Edward Snowden, had the audacity to claim that he wanted to “send a message today that the Senate reaffirms our long standing tradition about defending whistleblowers.”

Paul was not having any of Schumer’s nauseating hypocrisy. He objected to passing the resolution unanimously, and instead proposed the passage of his legitimate bill that would protect authentic whistleblowers.

“I support whistleblowers and I do think they have a role to play in keeping government accountable … but what we have seen over the last few years is that we have a system that we should continue to refine,” Paul said.

Paul made note that his legislation would give the President the right to face his accuser. It would also apply to contractors and be retroactive, so that Snowden would be protected as well for exposing the NSA’s unconstitutional spying program in 2013.

“The bill I will introduce today will expand the whistleblower act [and] would be made retroactive so Edward Snowden can come home to live in his own country. All he did was expose that his government was not obeying the Constitution,” Paul said.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...

-----------

It’s hard to say, some of the others might have objected if Rand didn’t but the Demoncrats thought they were going along again with their insanity....where was Sen. Cruz and others? A libertarian the only one with balls....SAD!

Rand Paul is a punk and he had better look at what happened to Bevins. Suburban voters threw Bevins out. A President should not have the right to confront whistleblowers. It would discourage whistleblowers from coming forward because of fear of retaliation. Trump has suggested the whistleblower should be charged with treason. Rand Paul is a prime example of politicians who sell their values down the river for political expediency. Paul is a disgusting animal who deserves a good spanking like most brats should get.

And EVERY OTHER REPUBLICAN was elected completely shutting out the Communists in Ky.....you are such a fool....but entertaining in your delusional ways!...ROTFLMFAO!....TOO bad Paul didn't have a gun on him when attacked by that deranged DemonRAT...one less piece of shit in Ky.!

 

[The Purge]

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has emerged as President Donald Trump’s most outspoken advocate against the newest phase of the Democrats’ witch hunt to remove him from office...

...Democrats attempted to pass a pro-whistleblower resolution unanimously in the Senate today in order to build the case for this deep state operative...

...Schumer, who has supported the persecution of real whistleblowers like WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and NSA leaker Edward Snowden, had the audacity to claim that he wanted to “send a message today that the Senate reaffirms our long standing tradition about defending whistleblowers.”

Paul was not having any of Schumer’s nauseating hypocrisy. He objected to passing the resolution unanimously, and instead proposed the passage of his legitimate bill that would protect authentic whistleblowers.

“I support whistleblowers and I do think they have a role to play in keeping government accountable … but what we have seen over the last few years is that we have a system that we should continue to refine,” Paul said.

Paul made note that his legislation would give the President the right to face his accuser. It would also apply to contractors and be retroactive, so that Snowden would be protected as well for exposing the NSA’s unconstitutional spying program in 2013.

“The bill I will introduce today will expand the whistleblower act [and] would be made retroactive so Edward Snowden can come home to live in his own country. All he did was expose that his government was not obeying the Constitution,” Paul said.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...

-----------

It’s hard to say, some of the others might have objected if Rand didn’t but the Demoncrats thought they were going along again with their insanity....where was Sen. Cruz and others? A libertarian the only one with balls....SAD!

The Senate's reticence to call a sham a sham was evident at last year's Prof Blasey-Fraud's circus when all gave deference to her claims despite the gaping holes in them. No honest American is fooled by the Dem's routine anymore ... it's all about their need to negate the 2016 election results because they can't beat Trump in 2020. They have not only failed to address any of America's pressing issues, they have fought anything the POTUS would do to improve our lives.

Traitors ... every stinkin' one of 'em.

You are not a honest American since you are a Trump supporter. If Ford's story had gaping holes then why not conduct a thorough FBI investigation. Clearly you are afraid a thorough investigation would have shown Kavanaugh lied to Congress. If Trump is going to win in 2020 then why are Trump and Republicans trying to smear Joe Biden? The fact is that Trump has not done anything to improve our lives unless you are rich and powerful. Trump has done a lot for them and screwed everyone else.

Blasey Ford investigation.... you think it might be flying under the radar?
Sen. Thom Tillis: Investigation into Blasey Ford's attorney possible after Kavanaugh remarks ...
Sep 5, 2019 · Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said comments by Christine Blasey Ford's attorney may be worthy of an investigation after she admitted

 

[Hossfly]

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has emerged as President Donald Trump’s most outspoken advocate against the newest phase of the Democrats’ witch hunt to remove him from office...

...Democrats attempted to pass a pro-whistleblower resolution unanimously in the Senate today in order to build the case for this deep state operative...

...Schumer, who has supported the persecution of real whistleblowers like WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and NSA leaker Edward Snowden, had the audacity to claim that he wanted to “send a message today that the Senate reaffirms our long standing tradition about defending whistleblowers.”

Paul was not having any of Schumer’s nauseating hypocrisy. He objected to passing the resolution unanimously, and instead proposed the passage of his legitimate bill that would protect authentic whistleblowers.

“I support whistleblowers and I do think they have a role to play in keeping government accountable … but what we have seen over the last few years is that we have a system that we should continue to refine,” Paul said.

Paul made note that his legislation would give the President the right to face his accuser. It would also apply to contractors and be retroactive, so that Snowden would be protected as well for exposing the NSA’s unconstitutional spying program in 2013.

“The bill I will introduce today will expand the whistleblower act [and] would be made retroactive so Edward Snowden can come home to live in his own country. All he did was expose that his government was not obeying the Constitution,” Paul said.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...

-----------

It’s hard to say, some of the others might have objected if Rand didn’t but the Demoncrats thought they were going along again with their insanity....where was Sen. Cruz and others? A libertarian the only one with balls....SAD!

Rand Paul is a punk and he had better look at what happened to Bevins. Suburban voters threw Bevins out. A President should not have the right to confront whistleblowers. It would discourage whistleblowers from coming forward because of fear of retaliation. Trump has suggested the whistleblower should be charged with treason. Rand Paul is a prime example of politicians who sell their values down the river for political expediency. Paul is a disgusting animal who deserves a good spanking like most brats should get.

Read the Constitution. If this farce comes to impeachment, at that time the President has a right to face his accuser. The whistle blower is the accuser. True story.

 

[The Purge]

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has emerged as President Donald Trump’s most outspoken advocate against the newest phase of the Democrats’ witch hunt to remove him from office...

...Democrats attempted to pass a pro-whistleblower resolution unanimously in the Senate today in order to build the case for this deep state operative...

...Schumer, who has supported the persecution of real whistleblowers like WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and NSA leaker Edward Snowden, had the audacity to claim that he wanted to “send a message today that the Senate reaffirms our long standing tradition about defending whistleblowers.”

Paul was not having any of Schumer’s nauseating hypocrisy. He objected to passing the resolution unanimously, and instead proposed the passage of his legitimate bill that would protect authentic whistleblowers.

“I support whistleblowers and I do think they have a role to play in keeping government accountable … but what we have seen over the last few years is that we have a system that we should continue to refine,” Paul said.

Paul made note that his legislation would give the President the right to face his accuser. It would also apply to contractors and be retroactive, so that Snowden would be protected as well for exposing the NSA’s unconstitutional spying program in 2013.

“The bill I will introduce today will expand the whistleblower act [and] would be made retroactive so Edward Snowden can come home to live in his own country. All he did was expose that his government was not obeying the Constitution,” Paul said.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...

-----------

It’s hard to say, some of the others might have objected if Rand didn’t but the Demoncrats thought they were going along again with their insanity....where was Sen. Cruz and others? A libertarian the only one with balls....SAD!

Rand Paul is a punk and he had better look at what happened to Bevins. Suburban voters threw Bevins out. A President should not have the right to confront whistleblowers. It would discourage whistleblowers from coming forward because of fear of retaliation. Trump has suggested the whistleblower should be charged with treason. Rand Paul is a prime example of politicians who sell their values down the river for political expediency. Paul is a disgusting animal who deserves a good spanking like most brats should get.

Read the Constitution. If this farce comes to impeachment, at that time the President has a right to face his accuser. The whistle blower is the accuser. True story.

View attachment 288459

Biden, by now has shit himself TWICE....He is on Barr's list of things to do....depending if the ABNORMALS actually pick Jojo as their nominee!

 

[Kilroy2]

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has emerged as President Donald Trump’s most outspoken advocate against the newest phase of the Democrats’ witch hunt to remove him from office...



...Democrats attempted to pass a pro-whistleblower resolution unanimously in the Senate today in order to build the case for this deep state operative...

...Schumer, who has supported the persecution of real whistleblowers like WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and NSA leaker Edward Snowden, had the audacity to claim that he wanted to “send a message today that the Senate reaffirms our long standing tradition about defending whistleblowers.”

Paul was not having any of Schumer’s nauseating hypocrisy. He objected to passing the resolution unanimously, and instead proposed the passage of his legitimate bill that would protect authentic whistleblowers.

“I support whistleblowers and I do think they have a role to play in keeping government accountable … but what we have seen over the last few years is that we have a system that we should continue to refine,” Paul said.

Paul made note that his legislation would give the President the right to face his accuser. It would also apply to contractors and be retroactive, so that Snowden would be protected as well for exposing the NSA’s unconstitutional spying program in 2013.

“The bill I will introduce today will expand the whistleblower act [and] would be made retroactive so Edward Snowden can come home to live in his own country. All he did was expose that his government was not obeying the Constitution,” Paul said.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...

-----------

It’s hard to say, some of the others might have objected if Rand didn’t but the Demoncrats thought they were going along again with their insanity....where was Sen. Cruz and others? A libertarian the only one with balls....SAD!

Rand Paul is a punk and he had better look at what happened to Bevins. Suburban voters threw Bevins out. A President should not have the right to confront whistleblowers. It would discourage whistleblowers from coming forward because of fear of retaliation. Trump has suggested the whistleblower should be charged with treason. Rand Paul is a prime example of politicians who sell their values down the river for political expediency. Paul is a disgusting animal who deserves a good spanking like most brats should get.

Read the Constitution. If this farce comes to impeachment, at that time the President has a right to face his accuser. The whistle blower is the accuser. True story.

View attachment 288459

impeachment is based on some type of criminal activity but it differs from a criminal trial as there is no jail time.

So there is no requirement that he has to face his accuser. There is no appeal

It is just a way to remove an elected official using the senate and HOR as the prosecution and jury.

The only thing that would happen is he would be removed from office

There is no jail time because of an impeachment. He would still be a free man

if the crime was serious enough then I suppose they could have a trial in which case it would go thru the normal channels of the judicial system. He would be tried as a citizen and not as a president. being removed from office

 

[WEATHER53]

Keep a “whistleblower” hidden from all to be used against thr President is treason. He and his office is by far the higher authority.

 

[busybee01]

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has emerged as President Donald Trump’s most outspoken advocate against the newest phase of the Democrats’ witch hunt to remove him from office...

...Democrats attempted to pass a pro-whistleblower resolution unanimously in the Senate today in order to build the case for this deep state operative...

...Schumer, who has supported the persecution of real whistleblowers like WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and NSA leaker Edward Snowden, had the audacity to claim that he wanted to “send a message today that the Senate reaffirms our long standing tradition about defending whistleblowers.”

Paul was not having any of Schumer’s nauseating hypocrisy. He objected to passing the resolution unanimously, and instead proposed the passage of his legitimate bill that would protect authentic whistleblowers.

“I support whistleblowers and I do think they have a role to play in keeping government accountable … but what we have seen over the last few years is that we have a system that we should continue to refine,” Paul said.

Paul made note that his legislation would give the President the right to face his accuser. It would also apply to contractors and be retroactive, so that Snowden would be protected as well for exposing the NSA’s unconstitutional spying program in 2013.

“The bill I will introduce today will expand the whistleblower act [and] would be made retroactive so Edward Snowden can come home to live in his own country. All he did was expose that his government was not obeying the Constitution,” Paul said.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...

-----------

It’s hard to say, some of the others might have objected if Rand didn’t but the Demoncrats thought they were going along again with their insanity....where was Sen. Cruz and others? A libertarian the only one with balls....SAD!

Rand Paul is a punk and he had better look at what happened to Bevins. Suburban voters threw Bevins out. A President should not have the right to confront whistleblowers. It would discourage whistleblowers from coming forward because of fear of retaliation. Trump has suggested the whistleblower should be charged with treason. Rand Paul is a prime example of politicians who sell their values down the river for political expediency. Paul is a disgusting animal who deserves a good spanking like most brats should get.

And EVERY OTHER REPUBLICAN was elected completely shutting out the Communists in Ky.....you are such a fool....but entertaining in your delusional ways!...ROTFLMFAO!....TOO bad Paul didn't have a gun on him when attacked by that deranged DemonRAT...one less piece of shit in Ky.!

Someone said that Bevins was Trump before there was a Trump. That was rejected by suburban voters in red Kentucky. That spells real problems for Republicans in 2020. While Kentucky may stay in the Trump column in 2020, it could spell disaster for Republicans in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. Even states like Georgia, Arizona and Texas are in play because of suburban voters and especially suburban women. If Paul had one, he would be charged with murder. You are the piece of shit as Rand Paul is.

 

[busybee01]

Keep a “whistleblower” hidden from all to be used against thr President is treason. He and his office is by far the higher authority.

This is not Nazi Germany or a banana republic. There is no treason. The founding fathers set up a system of checks and balances on a President. He does not have unlimited power.

 

[Penelope]

Tramps wants Assange, he doesn't want him snooping in his business.
and
I guess Schumer agrees with Graham:

The Russian media report said Snowden intended to fly to Cuba on Monday and then on to Caracas, Venezuela.
Snip
U.S. lawmakers scoffed. "The freedom trail is not exactly China-Russia-Cuba-Venezuela, so I hope we'll chase him to the ends of the earth, bring him to justice and let the Russians know there'll be consequences if they harbor this guy," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.
WikiLeaks: NSA leaker Snowden going to Ecuador to seek asylum
---------------------------------

anyway Snowden nor Assange never went by the whistleblowers rule, well Assange was getting paid by Putin, and Snowden ran to another country to release his classified docs.

Rand Paul is a joke.

 

[Lesh]

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has emerged as President Donald Trump’s most outspoken advocate against the newest phase of the Democrats’ witch hunt to remove him from office...

...Democrats attempted to pass a pro-whistleblower resolution unanimously in the Senate today in order to build the case for this deep state operative...

...Schumer, who has supported the persecution of real whistleblowers like WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and NSA leaker Edward Snowden, had the audacity to claim that he wanted to “send a message today that the Senate reaffirms our long standing tradition about defending whistleblowers.”

Paul was not having any of Schumer’s nauseating hypocrisy. He objected to passing the resolution unanimously, and instead proposed the passage of his legitimate bill that would protect authentic whistleblowers.

“I support whistleblowers and I do think they have a role to play in keeping government accountable … but what we have seen over the last few years is that we have a system that we should continue to refine,” Paul said.

Paul made note that his legislation would give the President the right to face his accuser. It would also apply to contractors and be retroactive, so that Snowden would be protected as well for exposing the NSA’s unconstitutional spying program in 2013.

“The bill I will introduce today will expand the whistleblower act [and] would be made retroactive so Edward Snowden can come home to live in his own country. All he did was expose that his government was not obeying the Constitution,” Paul said.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...

-----------

It’s hard to say, some of the others might have objected if Rand didn’t but the Demoncrats thought they were going along again with their insanity....where was Sen. Cruz and others? A libertarian the only one with balls....SAD!

Rand Paul is a punk and he had better look at what happened to Bevins. Suburban voters threw Bevins out. A President should not have the right to confront whistleblowers. It would discourage whistleblowers from coming forward because of fear of retaliation. Trump has suggested the whistleblower should be charged with treason. Rand Paul is a prime example of politicians who sell their values down the river for political expediency. Paul is a disgusting animal who deserves a good spanking like most brats should get.

Whatever shred of integrity Paul might have had


GONE

 

[jameny5]

All you Democrats coming on these blogs or posts - Stand up for the country and defend the Constitution against those using it for political gain. Denounce these people who support these wrongdoers. This is not what America is about. We are better than that and can do better. Show your true "BLUE" colors in the upcoming 2020 election - DEMOCRATIC WAVE ALL THE WAY! We took the House. Let's do the same with the Senate and Presidency. We can do it all over again.

 

[NoVote]

'Coup has started,' whistleblower's attorney said in 2017 posts calling for impeachment

Mark Zaid, one of the attorneys representing the intelligence community whistleblower at the center of the Democrats' ongoing impeachment inquiry, tweeted conspicuously in January 2017 that a "coup has started" and that "impeachment will follow ultimately."

Then, in July 2017, Zaid remarked, "I predict @CNN will play a key role in @realDonaldTrump not finishing out his full term as president." Also that month, Zaid tweeted, "We will get rid of him, and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters."

Amid a slew of impeachment-related posts, Zaid assured his Twitter followers that "as one falls, two more will take their place," apparently referring to Trump administration employees who defy the White House. Zaid promised that the "coup" would occur in "many steps."

The tweets, which came shortly after President Trump fired then-acting Attorney General Sally Yates for failing to defend federal laws in court, are likely to fuel Republican concerns that the anonymous whistleblower's complaint is tainted with partisanship. Trump's call with Ukraine's leader, which is the subject of the complaint, occurred in July 2019.

'Coup has started,' whistleblower's attorney said in 2017 posts calling for impeachment

Hannity: Whistleblower lawyer is a Trump-hater

 

[Hossfly]

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has emerged as President Donald Trump’s most outspoken advocate against the newest phase of the Democrats’ witch hunt to remove him from office...



...Democrats attempted to pass a pro-whistleblower resolution unanimously in the Senate today in order to build the case for this deep state operative...

...Schumer, who has supported the persecution of real whistleblowers like WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and NSA leaker Edward Snowden, had the audacity to claim that he wanted to “send a message today that the Senate reaffirms our long standing tradition about defending whistleblowers.”

Paul was not having any of Schumer’s nauseating hypocrisy. He objected to passing the resolution unanimously, and instead proposed the passage of his legitimate bill that would protect authentic whistleblowers.

“I support whistleblowers and I do think they have a role to play in keeping government accountable … but what we have seen over the last few years is that we have a system that we should continue to refine,” Paul said.

Paul made note that his legislation would give the President the right to face his accuser. It would also apply to contractors and be retroactive, so that Snowden would be protected as well for exposing the NSA’s unconstitutional spying program in 2013.

“The bill I will introduce today will expand the whistleblower act [and] would be made retroactive so Edward Snowden can come home to live in his own country. All he did was expose that his government was not obeying the Constitution,” Paul said.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...

-----------

It’s hard to say, some of the others might have objected if Rand didn’t but the Demoncrats thought they were going along again with their insanity....where was Sen. Cruz and others? A libertarian the only one with balls....SAD!

Rand Paul is a punk and he had better look at what happened to Bevins. Suburban voters threw Bevins out. A President should not have the right to confront whistleblowers. It would discourage whistleblowers from coming forward because of fear of retaliation. Trump has suggested the whistleblower should be charged with treason. Rand Paul is a prime example of politicians who sell their values down the river for political expediency. Paul is a disgusting animal who deserves a good spanking like most brats should get.

Read the Constitution. If this farce comes to impeachment, at that time the President has a right to face his accuser. The whistle blower is the accuser. True story.

View attachment 288459

impeachment is based on some type of criminal activity but it differs from a criminal trial as there is no jail time.

So there is no requirement that he has to face his accuser. There is no appeal

It is just a way to remove an elected official using the senate and HOR as the prosecution and jury.

The only thing that would happen is he would be removed from office

There is no jail time because of an impeachment. He would still be a free man

if the crime was serious enough then I suppose they could have a trial in which case it would go thru the normal channels of the judicial system. He would be tried as a citizen and not as a president. being removed from office

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has emerged as President Donald Trump’s most outspoken advocate against the newest phase of the Democrats’ witch hunt to remove him from office...



...Democrats attempted to pass a pro-whistleblower resolution unanimously in the Senate today in order to build the case for this deep state operative...

...Schumer, who has supported the persecution of real whistleblowers like WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and NSA leaker Edward Snowden, had the audacity to claim that he wanted to “send a message today that the Senate reaffirms our long standing tradition about defending whistleblowers.”

Paul was not having any of Schumer’s nauseating hypocrisy. He objected to passing the resolution unanimously, and instead proposed the passage of his legitimate bill that would protect authentic whistleblowers.

“I support whistleblowers and I do think they have a role to play in keeping government accountable … but what we have seen over the last few years is that we have a system that we should continue to refine,” Paul said.

Paul made note that his legislation would give the President the right to face his accuser. It would also apply to contractors and be retroactive, so that Snowden would be protected as well for exposing the NSA’s unconstitutional spying program in 2013.

“The bill I will introduce today will expand the whistleblower act [and] would be made retroactive so Edward Snowden can come home to live in his own country. All he did was expose that his government was not obeying the Constitution,” Paul said.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...

-----------

It’s hard to say, some of the others might have objected if Rand didn’t but the Demoncrats thought they were going along again with their insanity....where was Sen. Cruz and others? A libertarian the only one with balls....SAD!

Rand Paul is a punk and he had better look at what happened to Bevins. Suburban voters threw Bevins out. A President should not have the right to confront whistleblowers. It would discourage whistleblowers from coming forward because of fear of retaliation. Trump has suggested the whistleblower should be charged with treason. Rand Paul is a prime example of politicians who sell their values down the river for political expediency. Paul is a disgusting animal who deserves a good spanking like most brats should get.

Read the Constitution. If this farce comes to impeachment, at that time the President has a right to face his accuser. The whistle blower is the accuser. True story.

View attachment 288459

impeachment is based on some type of criminal activity but it differs from a criminal trial as there is no jail time.

So there is no requirement that he has to face his accuser. There is no appeal

It is just a way to remove an elected official using the senate and HOR as the prosecution and jury.

The only thing that would happen is he would be removed from office

There is no jail time because of an impeachment. He would still be a free man

if the crime was serious enough then I suppose they could have a trial in which case it would go thru the normal channels of the judicial system. He would be tried as a citizen and not as a president. being removed from office

The 6th amendment says a defendant can face his accuser, period.

 

[jc456]

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has emerged as President Donald Trump’s most outspoken advocate against the newest phase of the Democrats’ witch hunt to remove him from office...



...Democrats attempted to pass a pro-whistleblower resolution unanimously in the Senate today in order to build the case for this deep state operative...

...Schumer, who has supported the persecution of real whistleblowers like WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and NSA leaker Edward Snowden, had the audacity to claim that he wanted to “send a message today that the Senate reaffirms our long standing tradition about defending whistleblowers.”

Paul was not having any of Schumer’s nauseating hypocrisy. He objected to passing the resolution unanimously, and instead proposed the passage of his legitimate bill that would protect authentic whistleblowers.

“I support whistleblowers and I do think they have a role to play in keeping government accountable … but what we have seen over the last few years is that we have a system that we should continue to refine,” Paul said.

Paul made note that his legislation would give the President the right to face his accuser. It would also apply to contractors and be retroactive, so that Snowden would be protected as well for exposing the NSA’s unconstitutional spying program in 2013.

“The bill I will introduce today will expand the whistleblower act [and] would be made retroactive so Edward Snowden can come home to live in his own country. All he did was expose that his government was not obeying the Constitution,” Paul said.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...

-----------

It’s hard to say, some of the others might have objected if Rand didn’t but the Demoncrats thought they were going along again with their insanity....where was Sen. Cruz and others? A libertarian the only one with balls....SAD!

Rand Paul is a punk and he had better look at what happened to Bevins. Suburban voters threw Bevins out. A President should not have the right to confront whistleblowers. It would discourage whistleblowers from coming forward because of fear of retaliation. Trump has suggested the whistleblower should be charged with treason. Rand Paul is a prime example of politicians who sell their values down the river for political expediency. Paul is a disgusting animal who deserves a good spanking like most brats should get.

Read the Constitution. If this farce comes to impeachment, at that time the President has a right to face his accuser. The whistle blower is the accuser. True story.

View attachment 288459

impeachment is based on some type of criminal activity but it differs from a criminal trial as there is no jail time.

So there is no requirement that he has to face his accuser. There is no appeal

It is just a way to remove an elected official using the senate and HOR as the prosecution and jury.

The only thing that would happen is he would be removed from office

There is no jail time because of an impeachment. He would still be a free man

if the crime was serious enough then I suppose they could have a trial in which case it would go thru the normal channels of the judicial system. He would be tried as a citizen and not as a president. being removed from office

he won't be removed from office either. what a waste of time.

 

[The Original Tree]

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has emerged as President Donald Trump’s most outspoken advocate against the newest phase of the Democrats’ witch hunt to remove him from office...

...Democrats attempted to pass a pro-whistleblower resolution unanimously in the Senate today in order to build the case for this deep state operative...

...Schumer, who has supported the persecution of real whistleblowers like WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and NSA leaker Edward Snowden, had the audacity to claim that he wanted to “send a message today that the Senate reaffirms our long standing tradition about defending whistleblowers.”

Paul was not having any of Schumer’s nauseating hypocrisy. He objected to passing the resolution unanimously, and instead proposed the passage of his legitimate bill that would protect authentic whistleblowers.

“I support whistleblowers and I do think they have a role to play in keeping government accountable … but what we have seen over the last few years is that we have a system that we should continue to refine,” Paul said.

Paul made note that his legislation would give the President the right to face his accuser. It would also apply to contractors and be retroactive, so that Snowden would be protected as well for exposing the NSA’s unconstitutional spying program in 2013.

“The bill I will introduce today will expand the whistleblower act [and] would be made retroactive so Edward Snowden can come home to live in his own country. All he did was expose that his government was not obeying the Constitution,” Paul said.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...

-----------

It’s hard to say, some of the others might have objected if Rand didn’t but the Demoncrats thought they were going along again with their insanity....where was Sen. Cruz and others? A libertarian the only one with balls....SAD!

Funny How Schummer wants to lock away Edward Snowden for revealing that Obama Spied on Everyone, but holds up Obama Administration Spies who are part of a COUP to overturn the Election as Heroes who spied on The Trump Administration.

 

[The Original Tree]

All you Democrats coming on these blogs or posts - Stand up for the country and defend the Constitution against those using it for political gain. Denounce these people who support these wrongdoers. This is not what America is about. We are better than that and can do better. Show your true "BLUE" colors in the upcoming 2020 election - DEMOCRATIC WAVE ALL THE WAY! We took the House. Let's do the same with the Senate and Presidency. We can do it all over again.

Trust me. Not a single one of them Love this Country nor will they defend Due Process, nor The Constitution, and they daily spit on our flag.

They are here to do nothing but Troll and Propagandize, Rinse, Lather and Repeat. Honestly all of their crap belongs in The Flame Zone, because that is all it is, Flaming.