Their is no hypocrisy in being opposed to abortion and in supporting the death penalty at the same time. That is unless you are seriously confused and you (wrongly) think that "pro-life" means to value all life and that even eating a salad is murder.
Don't know who brought up "abortion" or "pro-life" but it kinda does mean that. See also Ahimsa.
Always nice to see a poster quote the voices in his head because he can't be bothered to use the quote button. That's cute. Me, I brought up the term "pro-death". Guess you don't wanna touch that one though.
The rest of us (normal minded people) know that it's about the Constitution and the protections for innocent human beings (persons.)
The Constitution clearly says that no persons can be deprived of their life except through "due process."
Convicted criminals are afforded that process and aborted children are not. There is some hypocrisy for you.
Personally, I see the death penalty as society's right to "self defense." I don't care how "pro-life" anyone is, we all retain the right to defend ourselves and to defend the (especially human) lives around us and that includes the use of deadly force.
Again, as a defense of innocent lives.
Please to quote us the part of the Constitution that refers to "innocents". TIA.
Like the Original Tree said:
"When they allow trials for the unborn to determine if they have a right to life, then we can talk about The Justice of putting a Murderer to Death vs. The Justice of Killing The Unborn Innocent."
Nailed it!
Doesn't begin to answer my post in any way, now does it?
But congratulations are in order for finding the quote button. Baby steps.