Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And tics like you think welfare is an "investment."
It is an investment.
I'll bet you think loaning money to your brother in law is an investment.
An investment is an expenditure you make because you expect it to earn a return. What is the return on welfare? What is the return on any government social program?
And tics like you think welfare is an "investment."
It is an investment.
How does making people dependent upon others an INVESTMENT?
It is an investment.
How does making people dependent upon others an INVESTMENT?
It's scary how often we think the same things.
No, Saddam was invading OTHER countries and supporting people who want to take over America. I realize that YOU live in the insular little bubble of your own mind-world, but most of the rest of us don't.
Hmm..a "half-truth" and on outright "un-truth".
Hardly a foundation to build a solid argument on..but carry on.
That never stops you people.
Right, honey. Saddam Hussein never invaded any other countries. Go tell Kuwait that. And Saddam Hussein never, ever supported terrorists in any way . . . He was a harmless, fluffy little bunny, practically the Gandhi of the Middle East.
Being accused of "half-truths" and "untruths" by someone who wouldn't know the truth if it crawled up his pants leg. Hmmm. Hardly a foundation for giving a shit . . . but carry on.
Reality never stops you people.
I'll bet you think loaning money to your brother in law is an investment.
An investment is an expenditure you make because you expect it to earn a return. What is the return on welfare? What is the return on any government social program?
Nothing. But If it were me?
I'd have welfare recipients out picking up trash on the roads and highways as a FAIR RETURN on investment...
But then that would be not fair to the jail system that uses that to punish law offenders...
Fuck it. They can wash and deatail my car...daily.
He was no threat to us. So why did we invade?
WMD? Nope.
Al Qaeda connection? Nope.
9/11 connection? Nope.
So, why did we invade?
We reduced the tax rate for the highest income earners (the oligarchs) from 35% to 15%. Their constitution forbid any foreign ownership. The new constitution that we wrote for them allows 100% foreign ownership and that 100% of profits can be taken out of the country untaxed. The oil sharing agreement, that was a benchmark, shared the oil. The Kurds got 10%, the Shia got 10%, the Sunni got 10%, and Bush's rich friends got 70%.
Armed robbery.
Heavens NO...that would derail the still-to-come AMNESTY push Obama has planned...I'll bet you think loaning money to your brother in law is an investment.
An investment is an expenditure you make because you expect it to earn a return. What is the return on welfare? What is the return on any government social program?
Nothing. But If it were me?
I'd have welfare recipients out picking up trash on the roads and highways as a FAIR RETURN on investment...
But then that would be not fair to the jail system that uses that to punish law offenders...
Fuck it. They can wash and deatail my car...daily.
Why don't we bus them out to local farms to pick fruit? They can do jobs that Americans don't want to do. That will take away one lame excuse for allowing illegal immigration.
Republicans think they can solve every problem with threats, intimidation and force. It's all they know. It makes them feel "safer".
the man of peace
Republicans think they can solve every problem with threats, intimidation and force. It's all they know. It makes them feel "safer".
Hmm..a "half-truth" and on outright "un-truth".
Hardly a foundation to build a solid argument on..but carry on.
That never stops you people.
Right, honey. Saddam Hussein never invaded any other countries. Go tell Kuwait that. And Saddam Hussein never, ever supported terrorists in any way . . . He was a harmless, fluffy little bunny, practically the Gandhi of the Middle East.
Being accused of "half-truths" and "untruths" by someone who wouldn't know the truth if it crawled up his pants leg. Hmmm. Hardly a foundation for giving a shit . . . but carry on.
Reality never stops you people.
He was no threat to us. So why did we invade?
WMD? Nope.
Al Qaeda connection? Nope.
9/11 connection? Nope.
So, why did we invade?
We reduced the tax rate for the highest income earners (the oligarchs) from 35% to 15%. Their constitution forbid any foreign ownership. The new constitution that we wrote for them allows 100% foreign ownership and that 100% of profits can be taken out of the country untaxed. The oil sharing agreement, that was a benchmark, shared the oil. The Kurds got 10%, the Shia got 10%, the Sunni got 10%, and Bush's rich friends got 70%.
Armed robbery.
Republicans think they can solve every problem with threats, intimidation and force. It's all they know. It makes them feel "safer".
Wrong. But you can definitely solve some problems with force. We solved the problems of imperialism, fascism and communism with force.
That's a record that only a fool would dare to argue against.
Republicans think they can solve every problem with threats, intimidation and force. It's all they know. It makes them feel "safer".
Wrong. But you can definitely solve some problems with force. We solved the problems of imperialism, fascism and communism with force.
That's a record that only a fool would dare to argue against.
maybe we should be using force against the liberals.
god knows they wouldn't put up much of a fight
Republicans think they can solve every problem with threats, intimidation and force. It's all they know. It makes them feel "safer".
Right, honey. Saddam Hussein never invaded any other countries. Go tell Kuwait that. And Saddam Hussein never, ever supported terrorists in any way . . . He was a harmless, fluffy little bunny, practically the Gandhi of the Middle East.
Being accused of "half-truths" and "untruths" by someone who wouldn't know the truth if it crawled up his pants leg. Hmmm. Hardly a foundation for giving a shit . . . but carry on.
Reality never stops you people.
He was no threat to us. So why did we invade?
WMD? Nope.
Al Qaeda connection? Nope.
9/11 connection? Nope.
So, why did we invade?
We reduced the tax rate for the highest income earners (the oligarchs) from 35% to 15%. Their constitution forbid any foreign ownership. The new constitution that we wrote for them allows 100% foreign ownership and that 100% of profits can be taken out of the country untaxed. The oil sharing agreement, that was a benchmark, shared the oil. The Kurds got 10%, the Shia got 10%, the Sunni got 10%, and Bush's rich friends got 70%.
Armed robbery.
Spare me your attempt to shoehorn your personal political hobbyhorse into the conversation. We are talking about war and national defense, not how much you hate George W. Bush.
Even if you managed to convince me that Saddam Hussein personally shot rainbow-painted unicorns out his ass (which you won't), it's not going to mean a damned thing to the overall subject of defense spending and its purpose and necessity in life. He was one guy, in one rogue nation.
You are not going to say anything that is going to change the fact that zeroing out defense spending so that we can use the money to plant daisies is a stupid fuckiing idea, so just move the fuck on. My patience for tangent-dancing has ended. Stop wasting my time.
Republicans think they can solve every problem with threats, intimidation and force. It's all they know. It makes them feel "safer".
He was no threat to us. So why did we invade?
WMD? Nope.
Al Qaeda connection? Nope.
9/11 connection? Nope.
So, why did we invade?
We reduced the tax rate for the highest income earners (the oligarchs) from 35% to 15%. Their constitution forbid any foreign ownership. The new constitution that we wrote for them allows 100% foreign ownership and that 100% of profits can be taken out of the country untaxed. The oil sharing agreement, that was a benchmark, shared the oil. The Kurds got 10%, the Shia got 10%, the Sunni got 10%, and Bush's rich friends got 70%.
Armed robbery.
Spare me your attempt to shoehorn your personal political hobbyhorse into the conversation. We are talking about war and national defense, not how much you hate George W. Bush.
Even if you managed to convince me that Saddam Hussein personally shot rainbow-painted unicorns out his ass (which you won't), it's not going to mean a damned thing to the overall subject of defense spending and its purpose and necessity in life. He was one guy, in one rogue nation.
You are not going to say anything that is going to change the fact that zeroing out defense spending so that we can use the money to plant daisies is a stupid fuckiing idea, so just move the fuck on. My patience for tangent-dancing has ended. Stop wasting my time.
I notice that you did not refute anything I said.
Republicans think they can solve every problem with threats, intimidation and force. It's all they know. It makes them feel "safer".
Wrong. But you can definitely solve some problems with force. We solved the problems of imperialism, fascism and communism with force.
That's a record that only a fool would dare to argue against.
maybe we should be using force against the liberals.
god knows they wouldn't put up much of a fight
Republicans think they can solve every problem with threats, intimidation and force. It's all they know. It makes them feel "safer".
