- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,463
- 32,437
- 2,300
Your ignorance of British civics is astounding. I have just been laughing about it with the Butler. Please explain to me what interest the"state" had in seeing this child die ?No they didnt. They were only offering palliative care. There was no cure,no treatment on offer. Why do you fuckwits persist with this fantasy ?The italian doctors disagreed with that statement.
As long as the person is still alive there is always slim hope.
It would have at least spared the parents this messy legal fight.
But government worshipping twats like you don't actually care about people when pretending to care about people. You care about power.
The government won, the people lost, and you have your dick in your hand, stroking furiously because of it.
The government had no hand in it. The courts made the decision in the childs interest and based on the best medical advice.
Why cant you fuckwits defend your own shit healthcare without dragging dying infants in to it ?
Healthcare in the UK is the government, despite claims otherwise.
The Courts are the government as well, and in the UK far less independent then in the US.
how about you get your own cum-guzzling nose out of other people's affairs?
Oh wait, your're a british statist twat who always knows better than other people.
power, pure and simple.
They can't have the NHS being shown up by being wrong.