- Aug 27, 2008
- 18,450
- 1,823
- 205
Many people compare Edward Snowden to me unfavorably for leaving the country and seeking asylum, rather than facing trial as I did. I dont agree. The country I stayed in was a different America, a long time ago.
After the New York Times had been enjoined from publishing the Pentagon Papers on June 15, 1971, the first prior restraint on a newspaper in U.S. history and I had given another copy to The Post (which would also be enjoined), I went underground with my wife, Patricia, for 13 days. My purpose (quite like Snowdens in flying to Hong Kong) was to elude surveillance while I was arranging with the crucial help of a number of others, still unknown to the FBI to distribute the Pentagon Papers sequentially to 17 other newspapers, in the face of two more injunctions. The last three days of that period was in defiance of an arrest order: I was, like Snowden now, a fugitive from justice.
This is important:
Nothing worthwhile would be served, in my opinion, by Snowden voluntarily surrendering to U.S. authorities given the current state of the law.
And this:
Snowden believes that he has done nothing wrong. I agree wholeheartedly. More than 40 years after my unauthorized disclosure of the Pentagon Papers, such leaks remain the lifeblood of a free press and our republic. One lesson of the Pentagon Papers and Snowdens leaks is simple: secrecy corrupts, just as power corrupts.
Daniel Ellsberg: NSA leaker Snowden made the right call - The Washington Post
So does anybody want to explain why Daniel Ellsberg, who supports Snowden, is a whistle-blower, and Snowden is a "traitor?" Or what they think Snowden being put in a hole like Bradley Manning would actually accomplish?