Chillicothe
Platinum Member
- Feb 14, 2021
- 10,266
- 6,580
- 938
How did Don Trump's defense attorneys handle that aspect?so she clearly was being the sexual aggressor.
If they did....well, how did the jury respond?
-----------------------------------------------------------
Well, I ain't a lawyer, but I believe that Don Trump had capable and skilled legal representation. How did they address your "burden-of-proof" theory with the judge, and then the jury?It was Jean Carroll who was making the allegations, so she had the burden of proof, and she proved absolutely nothing.
And, I am surprised that "she proved absolutely nothing" was not addressed by Trump' defense attorneys. Or for that matter, I'm surprised the judge and the jury didn't ...seemingly ....object to the lack of proof.
----------------------------------------
I didn't know that.Waiting 30 years clearly is criminal.
Have no desire to appear skeptical; however, can poster Rigby please cite the ruling statute on that issue.
Thanx.
-----------------------------------------
And that assertion also surprised me. I had assumed that the expensive legal talent that this very rich man can hire....well, I presumed their skill in performing voir dire would have uncovered these biases. And those folks would have been rejected by Trump's experienced and competent representation.The jury likely was totally biased this case.