Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Or quite possible: rooting out corruption in Ukraine. I think Joe needs to held to account for his son working at Burisma. I don't care if he's an opponent in an election. (however weak a candidate he may be and is IMO). The dems started with over 25 candidates and still have people jumping in because they don't have ANYONE that will beat Trump. That's my opinion. The Dems are fucking with the election more just by going the impeach on anything stance of the Dems.Only this wasn't a case of the U.S. getting something. It was a case of Trrump getting something. Namely, dirt on a political rival.LOLOLTechnically, you might be correct in that no witness said there was quid pro quo -- but that's only because Trump blocked his acting chief of staff from testifying...Ok - I'll give you that. But, there is still no direct factual evidence that a quid pro quo existed. Not one witness could say so. They were asked. Not even Sondland could testify Trump wanted a quid pro quo. When asked he said no - Trump never stated as such
"Did he also mention to me in passing the corruption related to the DNC server? Absolutely. No question about that. But that’s it. And that’s why we held up the money." ~ Mick Mulvaney
(emphasis added)
If that's true
It's perfectly fine
You surely understand that, somewhere inside that empty head of yours.
Oh? Quid pro quo is fine now?
It's fine everytime
Always has been.
The USA gives something and the USA gets something
That's the whole idea of aiding foreigners.
Ted knocks the hard core radical leftists that are now being exposed for the RATS THEY TRULY ARE!
Or quite possible: rooting out corruption in Ukraine. I think Joe needs to held to account for his son working at Burisma. I don't care if he's an opponent in an election. (however weak a candidate he may be and is IMO). The dems started with over 25 candidates and still have people jumping in because they don't have ANYONE that will beat Trump. That's my opinion. The Dems are fucking with the election more just by going the impeach on anything stance of the Dems.Only this wasn't a case of the U.S. getting something. It was a case of Trrump getting something. Namely, dirt on a political rival.LOLOLTechnically, you might be correct in that no witness said there was quid pro quo -- but that's only because Trump blocked his acting chief of staff from testifying...
"Did he also mention to me in passing the corruption related to the DNC server? Absolutely. No question about that. But that’s it. And that’s why we held up the money." ~ Mick Mulvaney
(emphasis added)
If that's true
It's perfectly fine
You surely understand that, somewhere inside that empty head of yours.
Oh? Quid pro quo is fine now?
It's fine everytime
Always has been.
The USA gives something and the USA gets something
That's the whole idea of aiding foreigners.
Ted knocks the hard core radical leftists that are now being exposed for the RATS THEY TRULY ARE!
Too little, too late, to save your Orange Baboon Demigod...
Where? Are you a moron?Physically? No. But you can stay on the line as long as you'd like. Unless you behave like a dick.It did not happen. It is NOT okay to make up shit like that and then abuse your power to investigate it.
You don't even believe what you've written. You need to use this lie because you've supported a loser for president and now you realize it.
It's a defense mechanism on your part.
So uninformed
So happy about it.
Weird.
You should call in to our next broadcast ( maybe Friday ) so we can talk in real time. I will give you a much needed education.
Can I sit in?
We're reasonable. But we don't have patience for dicks.
Let me sit in you pussy fuck
Neither does your Orange Creature... but you will... you will......I don't give a shit about blocking staff from testifying...
If Obumble or Uncle Joe or Shrillary or any of that crowd did wrong, then indict them... do it... go for it....How so?
If Obumble or Uncle Joe or Shrillary or any of that crowd did wrong, then indict them... do it... go for it....How so?
Unfortunately for you, and your Twit-in-Chief, all of that is immaterial to his own abuses of power.
They do not touch each other... your boy has screwed-up Bigly on his own dime, and now he is being called to account for it.
Actually, my point was there was someone who did say there was quid pro quo.Technically, you might be correct in that no witness said there was quid pro quo -- but that's only because Trump blocked his acting chief of staff from testifying...Presumably, you know what you're thinking so you should be able to answer -- would you publicly admit you knew favors were expected of you to collect that money if you were Zelensky?LOLOL
Zelensky is a politician. Politicians have been known to lie. I don't expect he would bite the hand that fed him $390 million. Would you admit you knew favors were expected of you to collect that money if you were Zelensky?
Sigh... More suppositions and opinion of what other people are thinking or knowledge they have contained with their cranium. It must be great to stroll through life presupposing everyones thoughts or maybe....just maybe.... You're a telepathist! Quickly - what I'm I thinking?
Ok - I'll give you that. But, there is still no direct factual evidence that a quid pro quo existed. Not one witness could say so. They were asked. Not even Sondland could testify Trump wanted a quid pro quo. When asked he said no - Trump never stated as such
"Did he also mention to me in passing the corruption related to the DNC server? Absolutely. No question about that. But that’s it. And that’s why we held up the money." ~ Mick Mulvaney
(emphasis added)
He and the republicans were never afforded defense or calling of witnesses they wanted. Limited questioning and many other BS unfair practices. So I don't give a shit about blocking staff from testifying. Capiche?
Not at all. I saw Trump had solicited campaign help from a foreign national. Why would I believe you over my own eyes?Only this wasn't a case of the U.S. getting something. It was a case of Trrump getting something. Namely, dirt on a political rival.LOLOLTechnically, you might be correct in that no witness said there was quid pro quo -- but that's only because Trump blocked his acting chief of staff from testifying...
"Did he also mention to me in passing the corruption related to the DNC server? Absolutely. No question about that. But that’s it. And that’s why we held up the money." ~ Mick Mulvaney
(emphasis added)
If that's true
It's perfectly fine
You surely understand that, somewhere inside that empty head of yours.
Oh? Quid pro quo is fine now?
It's fine everytime
Always has been.
The USA gives something and the USA gets something
That's the whole idea of aiding foreigners.
You are grotesquely uninformed on that.
What Biden did was almost 4 years ago. He's no longer VP. His son no longer works for Burisma. Shokin is no longer Prosecutor General. Poroshenko is no longer president and all charges against Zlochevsky have long been settled or dropped.Or quite possible: rooting out corruption in Ukraine. I think Joe needs to held to account for his son working at Burisma. I don't care if he's an opponent in an election. (however weak a candidate he may be and is IMO). The dems started with over 25 candidates and still have people jumping in because they don't have ANYONE that will beat Trump. That's my opinion. The Dems are fucking with the election more just by going the impeach on anything stance of the Dems.Only this wasn't a case of the U.S. getting something. It was a case of Trrump getting something. Namely, dirt on a political rival.LOLOLTechnically, you might be correct in that no witness said there was quid pro quo -- but that's only because Trump blocked his acting chief of staff from testifying...
"Did he also mention to me in passing the corruption related to the DNC server? Absolutely. No question about that. But that’s it. And that’s why we held up the money." ~ Mick Mulvaney
(emphasis added)
If that's true
It's perfectly fine
You surely understand that, somewhere inside that empty head of yours.
Oh? Quid pro quo is fine now?
It's fine everytime
Always has been.
The USA gives something and the USA gets something
That's the whole idea of aiding foreigners.
And yet the word, "corruption," apparently never escaped Trump's lips at any time during his phone call with Zelensky.Or quite possible: rooting out corruption in Ukraine. I think Joe needs to held to account for his son working at Burisma. I don't care if he's an opponent in an election. (however weak a candidate he may be and is IMO). The dems started with over 25 candidates and still have people jumping in because they don't have ANYONE that will beat Trump. That's my opinion. The Dems are fucking with the election more just by going the impeach on anything stance of the Dems.Only this wasn't a case of the U.S. getting something. It was a case of Trrump getting something. Namely, dirt on a political rival.LOLOLIf that's true
It's perfectly fine
You surely understand that, somewhere inside that empty head of yours.
Oh? Quid pro quo is fine now?
It's fine everytime
Always has been.
The USA gives something and the USA gets something
That's the whole idea of aiding foreigners.
Not only possible
Its was what was stated
And yet the word, "corruption," apparently never escaped Trump's lips at any time during his phone call with Zelensky.Or quite possible: rooting out corruption in Ukraine. I think Joe needs to held to account for his son working at Burisma. I don't care if he's an opponent in an election. (however weak a candidate he may be and is IMO). The dems started with over 25 candidates and still have people jumping in because they don't have ANYONE that will beat Trump. That's my opinion. The Dems are fucking with the election more just by going the impeach on anything stance of the Dems.Only this wasn't a case of the U.S. getting something. It was a case of Trrump getting something. Namely, dirt on a political rival.LOLOL
Oh? Quid pro quo is fine now?
It's fine everytime
Always has been.
The USA gives something and the USA gets something
That's the whole idea of aiding foreigners.
Not only possible
Its was what was stated
LOLAnd yet the word, "corruption," apparently never escaped Trump's lips at any time during his phone call with Zelensky.Or quite possible: rooting out corruption in Ukraine. I think Joe needs to held to account for his son working at Burisma. I don't care if he's an opponent in an election. (however weak a candidate he may be and is IMO). The dems started with over 25 candidates and still have people jumping in because they don't have ANYONE that will beat Trump. That's my opinion. The Dems are fucking with the election more just by going the impeach on anything stance of the Dems.Only this wasn't a case of the U.S. getting something. It was a case of Trrump getting something. Namely, dirt on a political rival.It's fine everytime
Always has been.
The USA gives something and the USA gets something
That's the whole idea of aiding foreigners.
Not only possible
Its was what was stated
False
And yet the word, "corruption," apparently never escaped Trump's lips at any time during his phone call with Zelensky.Or quite possible: rooting out corruption in Ukraine. I think Joe needs to held to account for his son working at Burisma. I don't care if he's an opponent in an election. (however weak a candidate he may be and is IMO). The dems started with over 25 candidates and still have people jumping in because they don't have ANYONE that will beat Trump. That's my opinion. The Dems are fucking with the election more just by going the impeach on anything stance of the Dems.Only this wasn't a case of the U.S. getting something. It was a case of Trrump getting something. Namely, dirt on a political rival.It's fine everytime
Always has been.
The USA gives something and the USA gets something
That's the whole idea of aiding foreigners.
Not only possible
Its was what was stated
False
Actually, my point was there was someone who did say there was quid pro quo.Technically, you might be correct in that no witness said there was quid pro quo -- but that's only because Trump blocked his acting chief of staff from testifying...Presumably, you know what you're thinking so you should be able to answer -- would you publicly admit you knew favors were expected of you to collect that money if you were Zelensky?Sigh... More suppositions and opinion of what other people are thinking or knowledge they have contained with their cranium
Ok - I'll give you that. But, there is still no direct factual evidence that a quid pro quo existed. Not one witness could say so. They were asked. Not even Sondland could testify Trump wanted a quid pro quo. When asked he said no - Trump never stated as such
"Did he also mention to me in passing the corruption related to the DNC server? Absolutely. No question about that. But that’s it. And that’s why we held up the money." ~ Mick Mulvaney
(emphasis added)
He and the republicans were never afforded defense or calling of witnesses they wanted. Limited questioning and many other BS unfair practices. So I don't give a shit about blocking staff from testifying. Capiche?
LOLAnd yet the word, "corruption," apparently never escaped Trump's lips at any time during his phone call with Zelensky.Or quite possible: rooting out corruption in Ukraine. I think Joe needs to held to account for his son working at Burisma. I don't care if he's an opponent in an election. (however weak a candidate he may be and is IMO). The dems started with over 25 candidates and still have people jumping in because they don't have ANYONE that will beat Trump. That's my opinion. The Dems are fucking with the election more just by going the impeach on anything stance of the Dems.Only this wasn't a case of the U.S. getting something. It was a case of Trrump getting something. Namely, dirt on a political rival.
Not only possible
Its was what was stated
False
Well there's your hollow denial ... and then there's the actual White House memorandum...
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf
And yet the word, "corruption," apparently never escaped Trump's lips at any time during his phone call with Zelensky.Or quite possible: rooting out corruption in Ukraine. I think Joe needs to held to account for his son working at Burisma. I don't care if he's an opponent in an election. (however weak a candidate he may be and is IMO). The dems started with over 25 candidates and still have people jumping in because they don't have ANYONE that will beat Trump. That's my opinion. The Dems are fucking with the election more just by going the impeach on anything stance of the Dems.Only this wasn't a case of the U.S. getting something. It was a case of Trrump getting something. Namely, dirt on a political rival.
Not only possible
Its was what was stated
False
True. Also adding to the evidence that it had nothing to do with corruption is the fact that Trump didn't care if there was an actual investigation, only the announcement of one.
Sondland: Trump only wanted Ukraine to announce investigation into Biden, not start real inquiry
What Biden did was almost 4 years ago. He's no longer VP. His son no longer works for Burisma. Shokin is no longer Prosecutor General. Poroshenko is no longer president and all charges against Zlochevsky have long been settled or dropped.Or quite possible: rooting out corruption in Ukraine. I think Joe needs to held to account for his son working at Burisma. I don't care if he's an opponent in an election. (however weak a candidate he may be and is IMO). The dems started with over 25 candidates and still have people jumping in because they don't have ANYONE that will beat Trump. That's my opinion. The Dems are fucking with the election more just by going the impeach on anything stance of the Dems.Only this wasn't a case of the U.S. getting something. It was a case of Trrump getting something. Namely, dirt on a political rival.LOLOLIf that's true
It's perfectly fine
You surely understand that, somewhere inside that empty head of yours.
Oh? Quid pro quo is fine now?
It's fine everytime
Always has been.
The USA gives something and the USA gets something
That's the whole idea of aiding foreigners.
So how would investigating that be "rooting out corruption?" Should we reopen the investigation into Watergate to "root out corruption" in Washington?
