Procrustes Stretched
"intuition and imagination and intelligence"
For the record: DevNell would never ever ever quote anyone out of context.
got that one right.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For the record: DevNell would never ever ever quote anyone out of context.
The difference is really very "simple".
ID says that complex biological systems could not have "evolved" because they are "complex" so they must have been "designed and made".
The science of evolution proves how those same complex biological systems evolved.
Conservatives haven't "evolved" far enough to understand the data, so they stick with, "It must have been "shimmered into being" because anything else is too hard to understand".
History is littered with dis-proven scientific theories & lies,
Yet they still manage to find groups with short memories to line up & believe in the next big whopper.
So please continue believing a group of highly educated morons who call all the bible thumpers knuckle dragging flat earthers.
Who created that chart? One or two hoaxes do not invalidate the theory. Although if you want evidence of cellar evolution try starting at this.
E. coli long-term evolution experiment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Who created that chart? One or two hoaxes do not invalidate the theory. Although if you want evidence of cellar evolution try starting at this.
E. coli long-term evolution experiment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your article does not state DNA information in cells increased. It only states change. Evolution has been dis-proven. De-evolution & extinction have been proven. This proves intelligent design or creation. None of your links show the contrary. Nothing but wordy noise. If scientist could prove it they would be singing their praises all over TV. They can't prove it or show evidence of it.
Some dupe just told me they're wicked different.
Anyone want to take a stab at explaining exactly where the two disagree?
Some dupe just told me they're wicked different.
Anyone want to take a stab at explaining exactly where the two disagree?
manifold a paraphrase said:Some dupe just told me something.
Anyone want to take a stab at explaining something?
Knowing how dumb most of you are, and having a healthy amount of contempt for you all, I get to look smaht by asking questions without first taking a stand on anything.
I bait the hook, and the rest of you get to feel smaht by answering.
The joke is lost on you, but not on the real trolls
you may have well have posted:
manifold a paraphrase said:Some dupe just told me something.
Anyone want to take a stab at explaining something?
Knowing how dumb most of you are, and having a healthy amount of contempt for you all, I get to look smaht by asking questions without first taking a stand on anything.
I bait the hook, and the rest of you get to feel smaht by answering.
The joke is lost on you, but not on the real trolls
Who created that chart? One or two hoaxes do not invalidate the theory. Although if you want evidence of cellar evolution try starting at this.
E. coli long-term evolution experiment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your article does not state DNA information in cells increased. It only states change. Evolution has been dis-proven. De-evolution, loss of genetic DNA information code & extinction have been proven. This proves intelligent design or creation. None of your links show the contrary. Nothing but wordy noise. If scientist could prove it they would be singing their praises all over TV. They can't prove it or show evidence of it.
smaht is a relative term and here at USMB it is highly suspect.you may have well have posted:
manifold a paraphrase said:Some dupe just told me something.
Anyone want to take a stab at explaining something?
Knowing how dumb most of you are, and having a healthy amount of contempt for you all, I get to look smaht by asking questions without first taking a stand on anything.
I bait the hook, and the rest of you get to feel smaht by answering.
The joke is lost on you, but not on the real trolls
Nice. Although I disagree that I get to look smaht.
Who created that chart? One or two hoaxes do not invalidate the theory. Although if you want evidence of cellar evolution try starting at this.
E. coli long-term evolution experiment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your article does not state DNA information in cells increased. It only states change. Evolution has been dis-proven. De-evolution, loss of genetic DNA information code & extinction have been proven. This proves intelligent design or creation. None of your links show the contrary. Nothing but wordy noise. If scientist could prove it they would be singing their praises all over TV. They can't prove it or show evidence of it.
Show me where evolution has been disproven show me where creationism has been proven all you have is noise
debates are like merry-go-rounds?I'd still like some damn proof that you can't add genetic information but in the mean time
[ Because the bible has always told us that the earth was round. Here are a few passages off the top of my head: Genesis 1:9-13, Proverbs 8:27, Isaiah 40:22, Job 22:14 & 26:10, Second Chronicles 18:18
Some dupe just told me they're wicked different.
Anyone want to take a stab at explaining exactly where the two disagree?