Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Who can prove why Comey was fired? <no one>
Well, there are 3 courts.
Law
Public Opinion
The Senate (if it goes that far).
Law. He said; she said. Won't matter. Unless we have another firing or tweet or something else.
Public Opinion. For most people, firing the top cop who is investigating you is a sign that you did something wrong.
The Senate. They can make their own judgment about intent.
All three have a different threshold to clear for a guilty verdict. Most people think Casey Anthony and OJ are guilty despite trials that had different outcomes.
Law: not indictable
Public opinion: GOP v Dems <tie, not indictable>
The Senate: Never get there....not indictable
Yep, the Senate that will do a thorough bi-partisan investigation, and conclude that Trump did not collude, that the FBI can investigate w/o Comey, and that Clinton Lost because of Clinton. Trump did not obstruct justice, Comey did when he let Hillary skate on the illegal server <i.e. the no intent bullshit>Who can prove why Comey was fired? <no one>
Well, there are 3 courts.
Law
Public Opinion
The Senate (if it goes that far).
Law. He said; she said. Won't matter. Unless we have another firing or tweet or something else.
Public Opinion. For most people, firing the top cop who is investigating you is a sign that you did something wrong.
The Senate. They can make their own judgment about intent.
All three have a different threshold to clear for a guilty verdict. Most people think Casey Anthony and OJ are guilty despite trials that had different outcomes.
Law: not indictable
Public opinion: GOP v Dems <tie, not indictable>
The Senate: Never get there....not indictable
Clinton lost 3 states by 100,000 votes in total. Having a president who is widely known to have obstructed justice in fact if not in name....going to shake some of them loose.
The same Senate that could have shut down this entire hearing today to where it never would have happened???? Is THAT the senate you're talking about?
Yep, the Senate that will do a thorough bi-partisan investigation, and conclude that Trump did not collude, that the FBI can investigate w/o Comey, and that Clinton Lost because of Clinton. Trump did not obstruct justice, Comey did when he let Hillary skate on the illegal server <i.e. the no intent bullshit>Who can prove why Comey was fired? <no one>
Well, there are 3 courts.
Law
Public Opinion
The Senate (if it goes that far).
Law. He said; she said. Won't matter. Unless we have another firing or tweet or something else.
Public Opinion. For most people, firing the top cop who is investigating you is a sign that you did something wrong.
The Senate. They can make their own judgment about intent.
All three have a different threshold to clear for a guilty verdict. Most people think Casey Anthony and OJ are guilty despite trials that had different outcomes.
Law: not indictable
Public opinion: GOP v Dems <tie, not indictable>
The Senate: Never get there....not indictable
Clinton lost 3 states by 100,000 votes in total. Having a president who is widely known to have obstructed justice in fact if not in name....going to shake some of them loose.
The same Senate that could have shut down this entire hearing today to where it never would have happened???? Is THAT the senate you're talking about?
Yep, the Senate that will do a thorough bi-partisan investigation, and conclude that Trump did not collude, that the FBI can investigate w/o Comey, and that Clinton Lost because of Clinton. Trump did not obstruct justice, Comey did when he let Hillary skate on the illegal server <i.e. the no intent bullshit>Who can prove why Comey was fired? <no one>
Well, there are 3 courts.
Law
Public Opinion
The Senate (if it goes that far).
Law. He said; she said. Won't matter. Unless we have another firing or tweet or something else.
Public Opinion. For most people, firing the top cop who is investigating you is a sign that you did something wrong.
The Senate. They can make their own judgment about intent.
All three have a different threshold to clear for a guilty verdict. Most people think Casey Anthony and OJ are guilty despite trials that had different outcomes.
Law: not indictable
Public opinion: GOP v Dems <tie, not indictable>
The Senate: Never get there....not indictable
Clinton lost 3 states by 100,000 votes in total. Having a president who is widely known to have obstructed justice in fact if not in name....going to shake some of them loose.
The same Senate that could have shut down this entire hearing today to where it never would have happened???? Is THAT the senate you're talking about?
Its funny how you folks keep trying to convince yourselves that the reason Trump finds himself embroiled in now two major scandals is because the Democrats are hung up on Hillary losing. Yet you guys are the only ones who keep bringing up Ms. Clinton. Now why is that?
He told the nations' top cop to "drop it" (a potentially politically damaging investigation)
He didn't.
The President fired him shortly there after.
Pretty much the definition of obstruction of justice.
Yep, the Senate that will do a thorough bi-partisan investigation, and conclude that Trump did not collude, that the FBI can investigate w/o Comey, and that Clinton Lost because of Clinton. Trump did not obstruct justice, Comey did when he let Hillary skate on the illegal server <i.e. the no intent bullshit>Well, there are 3 courts.
Law
Public Opinion
The Senate (if it goes that far).
Law. He said; she said. Won't matter. Unless we have another firing or tweet or something else.
Public Opinion. For most people, firing the top cop who is investigating you is a sign that you did something wrong.
The Senate. They can make their own judgment about intent.
All three have a different threshold to clear for a guilty verdict. Most people think Casey Anthony and OJ are guilty despite trials that had different outcomes.
Law: not indictable
Public opinion: GOP v Dems <tie, not indictable>
The Senate: Never get there....not indictable
Clinton lost 3 states by 100,000 votes in total. Having a president who is widely known to have obstructed justice in fact if not in name....going to shake some of them loose.
The same Senate that could have shut down this entire hearing today to where it never would have happened???? Is THAT the senate you're talking about?
Its funny how you folks keep trying to convince yourselves that the reason Trump finds himself embroiled in now two major scandals is because the Democrats are hung up on Hillary losing. Yet you guys are the only ones who keep bringing up Ms. Clinton. Now why is that?
He told the nations' top cop to "drop it" (a potentially politically damaging investigation)
He didn't.
The President fired him shortly there after.
Pretty much the definition of obstruction of justice.
1. The Flynn investigation did not skip a beat, the FBI is still investigating Flynn
2. Comey was fired because of the recommendation from Justice, period.
Justice was not obstructed.
Want me to address the OP?Let us know what your fictional novel is on Amazon so we can be sure to miss it.If the mayor of Anytown USA had a friend who broke the law and fired the Chief of Police for not dropping the investigation
Oh that was clever but doesn't address the OP at all. Do you know why?
Because if you answered you'd be exposed as a phony. Tap dance all you like buddy
The left have come out of the closet and have gone full USSR.Where's the beef? Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?If the mayor of Anytown USA had a friend who broke the law and fired the Chief of Police for not dropping the investigation
And you think stuff like this doesn't happen all the time.If the mayor of Anytown USA had a friend who broke the law and fired the Chief of Police for not dropping the investigation
And you think stuff like this doesn't happen all the time.If the mayor of Anytown USA had a friend who broke the law and fired the Chief of Police for not dropping the investigation
It's obvious you're not involved with local politics.
And you think stuff like this doesn't happen all the time.If the mayor of Anytown USA had a friend who broke the law and fired the Chief of Police for not dropping the investigation
It's obvious you're not involved with local politics.
I'm sure it does but I'll let you enlighten and entertain the audience...feel free to cite an instance. I've got to get to work.
You have to fabricate another Trump lie?And you think stuff like this doesn't happen all the time.If the mayor of Anytown USA had a friend who broke the law and fired the Chief of Police for not dropping the investigation
It's obvious you're not involved with local politics.
I've got to get to work.
Filing for Social Benefits is work.And you think stuff like this doesn't happen all the time.If the mayor of Anytown USA had a friend who broke the law and fired the Chief of Police for not dropping the investigation
It's obvious you're not involved with local politics.
I'm sure it does but I'll let you enlighten and entertain the audience...feel free to cite an instance. I've got to get to work.
Socialists don't work...
Who can prove why Comey was fired? <no one>
Well, there are 3 courts.
Law
Public Opinion
The Senate (if it goes that far).
Law. He said; she said. Won't matter. Unless we have another firing or tweet or something else.
Public Opinion. For most people, firing the top cop who is investigating you is a sign that you did something wrong.
The Senate. They can make their own judgment about intent.
All three have a different threshold to clear for a guilty verdict. Most people think Casey Anthony and OJ are guilty despite trials that had different outcomes.
Yep, the Senate that will do a thorough bi-partisan investigation, and conclude that Trump did not collude, that the FBI can investigate w/o Comey, and that Clinton Lost because of Clinton. Trump did not obstruct justice, Comey did when he let Hillary skate on the illegal server <i.e. the no intent bullshit>Who can prove why Comey was fired? <no one>
Well, there are 3 courts.
Law
Public Opinion
The Senate (if it goes that far).
Law. He said; she said. Won't matter. Unless we have another firing or tweet or something else.
Public Opinion. For most people, firing the top cop who is investigating you is a sign that you did something wrong.
The Senate. They can make their own judgment about intent.
All three have a different threshold to clear for a guilty verdict. Most people think Casey Anthony and OJ are guilty despite trials that had different outcomes.
Law: not indictable
Public opinion: GOP v Dems <tie, not indictable>
The Senate: Never get there....not indictable
Clinton lost 3 states by 100,000 votes in total. Having a president who is widely known to have obstructed justice in fact if not in name....going to shake some of them loose.
The same Senate that could have shut down this entire hearing today to where it never would have happened???? Is THAT the senate you're talking about?
Its funny how you folks keep trying to convince yourselves that the reason Trump finds himself embroiled in now two major scandals is because the Democrats are hung up on Hillary losing. Yet you guys are the only ones who keep bringing up Ms. Clinton. Now why is that?
He told the nations' top cop to "drop it" (a potentially politically damaging investigation)
He didn't.
The President fired him shortly there after.
Pretty much the definition of obstruction of justice.
Leftards are in a full grassy knoll frenzy. Will be for the next 8 years.Who can prove why Comey was fired? <no one>
Well, there are 3 courts.
Law
Public Opinion
The Senate (if it goes that far).
Law. He said; she said. Won't matter. Unless we have another firing or tweet or something else.
Public Opinion. For most people, firing the top cop who is investigating you is a sign that you did something wrong.
The Senate. They can make their own judgment about intent.
All three have a different threshold to clear for a guilty verdict. Most people think Casey Anthony and OJ are guilty despite trials that had different outcomes.
How many times do you have to be told that Trump was NOT being investigated?
Yep, the Senate that will do a thorough bi-partisan investigation, and conclude that Trump did not collude, that the FBI can investigate w/o Comey, and that Clinton Lost because of Clinton. Trump did not obstruct justice, Comey did when he let Hillary skate on the illegal server <i.e. the no intent bullshit>Law: not indictable
Public opinion: GOP v Dems <tie, not indictable>
The Senate: Never get there....not indictable
Clinton lost 3 states by 100,000 votes in total. Having a president who is widely known to have obstructed justice in fact if not in name....going to shake some of them loose.
The same Senate that could have shut down this entire hearing today to where it never would have happened???? Is THAT the senate you're talking about?
Its funny how you folks keep trying to convince yourselves that the reason Trump finds himself embroiled in now two major scandals is because the Democrats are hung up on Hillary losing. Yet you guys are the only ones who keep bringing up Ms. Clinton. Now why is that?
He told the nations' top cop to "drop it" (a potentially politically damaging investigation)
He didn't.
The President fired him shortly there after.
Pretty much the definition of obstruction of justice.
1. The Flynn investigation did not skip a beat, the FBI is still investigating Flynn
2. Comey was fired because of the recommendation from Justice, period.
Justice was not obstructed.
I think they are now investigating Mr. Trump...since, you know...he fired the nation's top cop for not dropping an investigation. They're still going after Flynn too.
It was announced today that Flynn may not have to testify before the SIC. I guess that was to be expected when you have your own personal special prosecutor.
Oh, come on! Something's got to be brewing!Leftards are in a full grassy knoll frenzy. Will be for the next 8 years.Who can prove why Comey was fired? <no one>
Well, there are 3 courts.
Law
Public Opinion
The Senate (if it goes that far).
Law. He said; she said. Won't matter. Unless we have another firing or tweet or something else.
Public Opinion. For most people, firing the top cop who is investigating you is a sign that you did something wrong.
The Senate. They can make their own judgment about intent.
All three have a different threshold to clear for a guilty verdict. Most people think Casey Anthony and OJ are guilty despite trials that had different outcomes.
How many times do you have to be told that Trump was NOT being investigated?
Aren't some lies worth repeating?Yep, the Senate that will do a thorough bi-partisan investigation, and conclude that Trump did not collude, that the FBI can investigate w/o Comey, and that Clinton Lost because of Clinton. Trump did not obstruct justice, Comey did when he let Hillary skate on the illegal server <i.e. the no intent bullshit>Clinton lost 3 states by 100,000 votes in total. Having a president who is widely known to have obstructed justice in fact if not in name....going to shake some of them loose.
The same Senate that could have shut down this entire hearing today to where it never would have happened???? Is THAT the senate you're talking about?
Its funny how you folks keep trying to convince yourselves that the reason Trump finds himself embroiled in now two major scandals is because the Democrats are hung up on Hillary losing. Yet you guys are the only ones who keep bringing up Ms. Clinton. Now why is that?
He told the nations' top cop to "drop it" (a potentially politically damaging investigation)
He didn't.
The President fired him shortly there after.
Pretty much the definition of obstruction of justice.
1. The Flynn investigation did not skip a beat, the FBI is still investigating Flynn
2. Comey was fired because of the recommendation from Justice, period.
Justice was not obstructed.
I think they are now investigating Mr. Trump...since, you know...he fired the nation's top cop for not dropping an investigation. They're still going after Flynn too.
It was announced today that Flynn may not have to testify before the SIC. I guess that was to be expected when you have your own personal special prosecutor.
Why do you keep repeating the lie?
