Cops vs Hippies

"Spoken like someone who has no clue or remembers what happened at Kent State."

Kent State is a prime example of what habitual failure to hold spoiled brats accountable for their actions leads to.

Yep!! Shoot to kill. That'll sure teach them. :Boom2:

How dare they exersize their Constitutional rights!!??
----------------

Nobody had a problem with them exersizing their rights. It was their denial of the rights of others and the commission of serious crimes that were the problem at Kent State. Attacking armed men with rocks and bottles is about as idiotic as it gets.
 
"Spoken like someone who has no clue or remembers what happened at Kent State."

Kent State is a prime example of what habitual failure to hold spoiled brats accountable for their actions leads to.

Yep!! Shoot to kill. That'll sure teach them. :Boom2:

How dare they exersize their Constitutional rights!!??

They don't have a constitutional right to infringe on the rights of others or to threaten the safety of others.
 
"Spoken like someone who has no clue or remembers what happened at Kent State."

Kent State is a prime example of what habitual failure to hold spoiled brats accountable for their actions leads to.

Yep!! Shoot to kill. That'll sure teach them. :Boom2:

How dare they exersize their Constitutional rights!!??

They don't have a constitutional right to infringe on the rights of others or to threaten the safety of others.

Details details... :eusa_whistle:
 
Again, there is no evidence that the people who were pepper sprayed did anything unlawful. They were sitting in a line across a sidewalk. The cops could have simply walked on the grass around them.

btw, those $500 phones are usually free when you sign up for a plan. And yes, most people need a phone. Good thing most are also cameras or we'd not know about the abuse in this situation.

They were arm locked moving inwards, surrounding the police and that's not threatening...:cuckoo::cuckoo:
 
Yep!! Shoot to kill. That'll sure teach them. :Boom2:

How dare they exersize their Constitutional rights!!??

They don't have a constitutional right to infringe on the rights of others or to threaten the safety of others.

Details details... :eusa_whistle:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZ05rWx1pig]NYPD Police Pepper Spray Occupy Wall Street Protesters (Anthony Balogna) - YouTube[/ame]

Ya....it looks like the crowd was really threatening all right. :eusa_whistle:

What we have here are cops breaking the law, plain and simple.

Billy Jack: "When policemen break the law, then there isn't any law - just a fight for survival."
 
pepper-kids-ani.gif
 
The Kent State shootings resulted not from that one gathering of students, but from a spate of rioting and violence. This rioting and violence happened at a series of campuses - Berkeley, Harvard, Columbia, etc. In Cornell, guns were smuggled into the buildings overtaken by radicals. At the U of Wisconsin, a professor was MURDERED by a bomb planted by "anti-war" students.

Ever heard of Mark Rudd? Look him up. He called for students to FIGHT to shut down the ROTC program, its crime labs, its law enforcement training classes.

This continued for a year - repeat, ONE YEAR. The radical students took over a building on campus. The leader was Robert Franklin. Look that one up too. They occupied the building by breaking in.

On the day of the incident, the students actually burned a copy of the Constitution and draft cards. They set fire to a building. One student tried to photograph this, and was beaten. His camera was robbed. The firemen arrived, and were attacked. They could not put out the blaze and it burned all night.

The radical students went into town and burned buildings. They actually attacked and beat the police - WHO DID NOT WANT TO USE FORCE! Locals appealed to the governor - repeat, LOCALS CONTACTED THE GOVERNOR - to declare a state of emergency!

Nothing was done. The next day, another building was burned on campus. This spread to the president's building. Then, guess what these "students" did? They went back into the town and smashed up stores. This rioting increased to over 2,000 people. At a local airstrip, a truck was stolen, six planes attacked, and another fire was set.

The National Guard came. Finally. The ringleaders of the student formed a tight circle of students around themselves. The Guards tried to disperse the students. Up to 50 - repeat, FIFTY - students threw rocks at the Guards. One student actually threw a parking meter off a building roof at them!

The Guards got caught in a chain-link fence. The students were attacking.

But the following does not get reported: A student named Terry Norman pulled out a gun. He pistol-whipped another student. He pointed the gun at the Guardsmen and started running towards them.

The firing started.

The liberals claim that this "Norman" was really an FBI agent.

The four students were innocent bystanders. The Guardsmen were not prepared or well trained or experienced with such a thing.

But there is an element that wanted to use the deaths of these students to paint a picture of something totally different than what actually transpired.
 

Forum List

Back
Top