Conservatives

Incidentally, "PW@NDZAWRS" is absolute nonsense. Since "pwn" is a corruption of "own," the accurate term to use is "pwned." "Pwand" is merely a sign that someone knows very little about Netspeak.

You a newfag? lrn2b1337. ;)

And he apparently thinks 1337-speak is something only liberals do which is freaking laughable.
 
False... the only distinction is the fascist use of nationalism as a point of loyalty... where the Socialist is loyal only to Socialism itself...

Perhaps the most illustrative indication of their numerous divergences is your inability to offer a rebuttal to the points I made regarding their clear differences.

The point is that the research is wholly flawed and has no substance. I know plenty of die hard conservative men who are flat out Christian and you couldn't find a more impeccable character.

Are you telling me they are conservative because they are a bunch of angry anti-social brats in high school?

You're a fool to believe such crap.

In fact, though I've never gone myself nor would I ever want to, everyone I ask about New York City says the people there are terrible pieces of shit.

The people in New York City are rude, abrupt, and insulting.

Conversely if you go to any Southern town you'll probably be welcomed with a meal at some kindly stranger's house.

Why I remember when I was in Kentucky visiting a girl of mine, being invited over by a complete stranger from a hotel I was at, to have dinner with his family.

Let's see.

New York City, Liberal. Full of douchebags.

Kentucky, fairly Conservative, full of nice old hillbillies.

There I just refuted your bullshit argument.

You provided absolutely 0 evidence for your stupid inane blanket statement.

Here's something about the politeness of people in New York it's not great but it's a million times better than your anecdotal crap.

How Polite Are We?
 
ROFL... Oh I hear ya Ag... Except State capitalism is what Communist DO... thus it's communism; which is socialism.

The authoritarian practices of individuals claiming to be socialists hardly corrupts socialism itself, particularly when a significant number are actively condemning the unfolding of this state of affairs. Unless, of course, Jeremiah Wright is more of a Christian than you are.

Ya see sis, no matter how ya slice it, SOMEWHERE up the chain there's a market, and at the market, people exchanges good and services the to mutual benefit of both parties... and while the socialist may prohibit such, within their little slice of secular heaven, to the extent that they're able, the products produced by those slaves will be sold on that broader market...

Market exchange is not a sufficient condition for capitalism. Indeed, the socialist may utilize the allocative efficiency of the exchange market, since competitive enterprises are best established through economic democracy, as was previously mentioned. I understand your confusion, since the market=capitalism myth is as prevalent amongst your ilk as the government=socialism myth.

Which serves reason, given that Capitalism is, in the final analysis, the natural order of economics; which is to say, capitalism is 'nature's way...'

As previously mentioned, exchange is not a sufficient condition for capitalism, unless you want to claim that feudalism, for instance, was primarily a capitalist economic system.
 
Great ... word police now ...
Online Etymology Dictionary

heterogeneous Look up heterogeneous at Dictionary.com
1624, from Gk. heterogenes, from heteros "different" + genos "kind, gender, race stock" (see genus).

The alternative spelling is just that, an alternative spelling, actually more of a lazy spelling. Some "institutes" have professors who make mistakes, when they do they will then cover it up by saying something to the extent of "I was trying to differentiate between the two types" which then eventually the institute will adapt as being an alternate meaning and eventually many of them.
 
Great ... word police now ...
Online Etymology Dictionary

heterogeneous Look up heterogeneous at Dictionary.com
1624, from Gk. heterogenes, from heteros "different" + genos "kind, gender, race stock" (see genus).

The alternative spelling is just that, an alternative spelling, actually more of a lazy spelling. Some "institutes" have professors who make mistakes, when they do they will then cover it up by saying something to the extent of "I was trying to differentiate between the two types" which then eventually the institute will adapt as being an alternate meaning and eventually many of them.

It is a damn poor mind indeed which can't think of at least two ways to spell any word.
Andrew Jackson
;)
 
Perhaps the most illustrative indication of their numerous divergences is your inability to offer a rebuttal to the points I made regarding their clear differences.

The point is that the research is wholly flawed and has no substance. I know plenty of die hard conservative men who are flat out Christian and you couldn't find a more impeccable character.

Are you telling me they are conservative because they are a bunch of angry anti-social brats in high school?

You're a fool to believe such crap.

In fact, though I've never gone myself nor would I ever want to, everyone I ask about New York City says the people there are terrible pieces of shit.

The people in New York City are rude, abrupt, and insulting.

Conversely if you go to any Southern town you'll probably be welcomed with a meal at some kindly stranger's house.

Why I remember when I was in Kentucky visiting a girl of mine, being invited over by a complete stranger from a hotel I was at, to have dinner with his family.

Let's see.

New York City, Liberal. Full of douchebags.

Kentucky, fairly Conservative, full of nice old hillbillies.

There I just refuted your bullshit argument.

Please read the point of our discussion instead of engaging in this nonsensical rambling. Firstly, I don't care the least bit about your anecdotal "evidence." The widely varying spectrum of human actions and behaviors ensures that no "experience" can reply to such a thoroughly heterogenous population. Secondly, as far as I'm concerned, liberals are greater opponents of mine than conservatives are, as I'm a socialist. Liberals are actually able to fine-tune capitalism and appease worker militancy; the collapse of capitalism that would eventually be ensured by rightist economic policies is entirely in my favor. :cool:

Yes Agnapostate had quite a few sock puppets over on Political Forum too.
he/she/it has been permabanned over there.

Don't listen to this clown; he's accused several people of being sock puppets. From what's been told to me, he did the same thing to LiveUninhibited, who's explained to me that he was also registered on Political Forum.

Yeah and all they have to do is go over there and check with the mods. You lose again.

here's the thread. http://www.politicalforum.com/forum-help-feedback-etc/45816-official-why-_______-banned-thread.html
 
Last edited:
Great ... word police now ...
Online Etymology Dictionary

heterogeneous Look up heterogeneous at Dictionary.com
1624, from Gk. heterogenes, from heteros "different" + genos "kind, gender, race stock" (see genus).

The alternative spelling is just that, an alternative spelling, actually more of a lazy spelling. Some "institutes" have professors who make mistakes, when they do they will then cover it up by saying something to the extent of "I was trying to differentiate between the two types" which then eventually the institute will adapt as being an alternate meaning and eventually many of them.

It is a damn poor mind indeed which can't think of at least two ways to spell any word.
Andrew Jackson
;)

That's kinda cool ... LOL ...
 
Conservatives are devoid of new and advanced ideas. They cling to disproven economic theories such as "trickle-down economics", and "voodoo econmics" which no matter how you look at it is nothing more than the rantings of Ronnie Reagan - the failed god of the right-wing. Conservatives worship on the Christian alter of "forgiveness" yet they foam at the mouth at the mere thought of a condemed man being granted mercy. They rally against abortion yet refuse to help single-mothers financially. Guns are the tools of the right-wing fanatics "kill them, kill them" is the rallying cry.

Oh ye men of hypocricy I do pity you for you shall pay dearly when the Holy Father judges you.

Thank God you're not American - theunbubba
 
Perhaps the most illustrative indication of their numerous divergences is your inability to offer a rebuttal to the points I made regarding their clear differences.

The point is that the research is wholly flawed and has no substance. I know plenty of die hard conservative men who are flat out Christian and you couldn't find a more impeccable character.

Are you telling me they are conservative because they are a bunch of angry anti-social brats in high school?

You're a fool to believe such crap.

In fact, though I've never gone myself nor would I ever want to, everyone I ask about New York City says the people there are terrible pieces of shit.

The people in New York City are rude, abrupt, and insulting.

Conversely if you go to any Southern town you'll probably be welcomed with a meal at some kindly stranger's house.

Why I remember when I was in Kentucky visiting a girl of mine, being invited over by a complete stranger from a hotel I was at, to have dinner with his family.

Let's see.

New York City, Liberal. Full of douchebags.

Kentucky, fairly Conservative, full of nice old hillbillies.

There I just refuted your bullshit argument.

You provided absolutely 0 evidence for your stupid inane blanket statement.

Here's something about the politeness of people in New York it's not great but it's a million times better than your anecdotal crap.

How Polite Are We?

Reader's Digest? Really? Did you just randomly search yahoo for whatever matched "New York City Politeness"???

What a load of rubbish.

As I said, no one talks about "Bostonian Hospitality" or NYC for that matter.
 
The point is that the research is wholly flawed and has no substance. I know plenty of die hard conservative men who are flat out Christian and you couldn't find a more impeccable character.

Are you telling me they are conservative because they are a bunch of angry anti-social brats in high school?

You're a fool to believe such crap.

In fact, though I've never gone myself nor would I ever want to, everyone I ask about New York City says the people there are terrible pieces of shit.

The people in New York City are rude, abrupt, and insulting.

Conversely if you go to any Southern town you'll probably be welcomed with a meal at some kindly stranger's house.

Why I remember when I was in Kentucky visiting a girl of mine, being invited over by a complete stranger from a hotel I was at, to have dinner with his family.

Let's see.

New York City, Liberal. Full of douchebags.

Kentucky, fairly Conservative, full of nice old hillbillies.

There I just refuted your bullshit argument.

You provided absolutely 0 evidence for your stupid inane blanket statement.

Here's something about the politeness of people in New York it's not great but it's a million times better than your anecdotal crap.

How Polite Are We?

Reader's Digest? Really? Did you just randomly search yahoo for whatever matched "New York City Politeness"???

What a load of rubbish.

As I said, no one talks about "Bostonian Hospitality" or NYC for that matter.

I just said it's not the greatest source but they actually did a study unlike you. Oh and just because no one talks of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Although I find it funny that you've never been to New York and yet you know for a fact that all of them are rude.
 

Forum List

Back
Top