- Thread starter
- #41
Okay, I'll bite...
I doubt there has been an ideal candidate, ever.
For the last 45 years for sure, and probably the last 100+ years, we've seen very few non-RINOs running for President. Perot was a reasonable Conservative from what I remember, but he didn't get the nod obviously. Reagan talked a great Conservative game, but spent like a Progressive.
I'm afraid to find a true Conservative (ironically, what we used to call a "Liberal"), I'd have to go back to Grover Cleveland. Ever since, it's been pretty much big government Rs. Team them up with the ALWAYS big government Ds, and you see why we're $16 trillion in debt with an ungodly number of laws and regulations and the idea of individual liberty and respect for personal property pretty much in the toilet.
So, there's my honest answer. We'll see if you're trolling here or not.
I dont even get what I could be trolling about - I already expressed my opinion right in the thread title..........................
I mean - I was looking to debate whether a Pres. or two named were actually conservative, but not trolling-to-do-so.
So debate
Nobody has named a Cons. they've been able to vote to said office.......................Grover Cleveland is a bit before most of our times..