Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You don't know what the hell you are talking about. In fact, Republicans avoid funding wasteful programs instituted by left-wing, liberal DEMONRATS. The party of BIG government followed up by a lifelong tax and spend agenda. FJBTypical republican call for more government programs then refuse to fund them
You don't know what the hell you are talking about. In fact, Republicans avoid funding wasteful programs instituted by left-wing, liberal DEMONRATS. The party of BIG government followed up by a lifelong tax and spend agenda. FJB
Tell me what do you think will happen if people call CPS for on this issue?You don't know what the hell you are talking about. In fact, Republicans avoid funding wasteful programs instituted by left-wing, liberal DEMONRATS. The party of BIG government followed up by a lifelong tax and spend agenda. FJB
right I read hat wrong.
But not all addicts are addicts because of poor moral fiber either.
You never try to think of why people might get addicted to drugs do you?
The fact most addicts have a history of trauma and there is little or no help for these people, another large portion are mentally ill and self medicate because again there is no help available.
My mother was an addict and she OD'd when I was 14 I found out the she was abused by her stepfather and raped multiple times but no one would believe her so she fell into the trap and cycle of abuse and it really wasn't her moral fiber that was the root she gave up hope of ever being heard and getting help.
And truth be told I was better off with her than I was in the foster system
Yeah, what we need is another band-aid. Let's just pile it on top of the others.
Right-wing host slammed for suggesting it’s better to send kids to child services than give them free school lunches
After a far-right Republican state lawmaker claimed there are no hungry people in Minnesota because he hasn't met any, then voted against a free school lunch program, extremely conservative pundit Ben Shapiro, considered a right wing “thought leader,” weighed in, declaring Child Protective...www.rawstory.com
"After a far-right Republican state lawmaker claimed there are no hungry people in Minnesota because he hasn't met any, then voted against a free school lunch program, extremely conservative pundit Ben Shapiro, considered a right wing “thought leader,” weighed in, declaring Child Protective Services – not free school lunches – is the solution. school lunches are not going to solve the problem of child hunger at any serious level. Appearing to be reading a question from a supporter [about school lunch] - Shapiro said" Well, If there is a problem of children actually starving that is a child endangerment scenario to which CPS needs to be called - the truth is it does not take that much money to feed a child. I know I have three of them," he added.
Michael O’Brien, MD, a pediatrician, responded to the video of Shapiro and wrote: "The same pundits and activists targeting the LGBTQ community, drag queens, and books — in the name of ‘protecting kids’ — don’t give a damn about childhood hunger."
Now it makes sense....if a child Is having to rely on school lunch....maybe CPS needs to be called and the child removed..that is basically child abuse and if a parent has to rely on government to feed their kid, that child needs to be removed and placed in foster care. Truth of the matter is, no child in this country is hungry, therefore no child in this country needs to have a school provide them with free breakfast or lunch. I believe the Dems are trying to force these lunches on these kids; and using the GMO's in the food to turn these kids into gay CRT transgender Antifa woke mob soldiers.
declaring Child Protective Services – not free school lunches – is the solution.
He has a point... not feeding your children is an actual crime.
and arresting poor parents is going to be more cost effective than a school lunch program.
If jail were an actual consequence of child abuse, parent may spend less of their money on malt liquor and more on Lunchables.
I doubt that it would just require an expansion of the already broken foster system and republicans don't want to pay more for that either.
Is it that reprehensible to you people that a kid gets a free lunch at school?
Republicans won't pay for those either.Bring orphanages back, with oversight.
Foster families in home can and do wonderful work in some cases. In others, they are almost as neglectful and abusive as bio parents.
Orphanages mean that children with needs are in one spot so that social workers, doctors, dentists can be brought in. Case workers can be more present. Adults working in groups together bring more accountability.
Schools are already operating as day-orphanages at any rate.
A) Schools are meant to be places of education... not soup kitchens and
B) There is no such thing as a "free" lunch.
Republicans won't pay for those either.
Ah the wisdom of a person who has never been hungry.
Ah the wisdom of a person who has never been hungry.
I doubt that there's no payback in it for themI think the vast majority of Republicans would much rather pay for well-run, well-monitored orphanages rather than funding the war in Ukraine.
When I get hungry, I make something to eat.
When my children were hungry, I fed them. I didn't ask my neighbor to do it.
When I get hungry, I make something to eat.
When my children were hungry, I fed them. I didn't ask my neighbor to do it.
I doubt that there's no payback in it for them
