Congress misses deadline to reauthorize CHIP; childrens' health care program! GOP no love kids

[Baz Ares]

Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program.
Congress missed a deadline to reauthorize the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) over the weekend, leaving federal funding to expire at the end of the month, according to ABC News.

Neither the House nor the Senate took up a vote to reauthorize the program, which helps states provide inexpensive health insurance to children in lower-income families.

Congress was on track to miss the deadline earlier this week, and though the Senate released a bipartisan, five-year bill to reauthorize the program, a vote wasn’t scheduled.
Another
study by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 10 states would run out money by the end of the year.

The deadline to reauthorize the program passed after Senate Republicans spent much of the last few weeks pushing to pass an ObamaCare repeal bill co-sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).That bill wasn’t introduced for a vote on the Senate floor after three Republicans announced their opposition, killing its chance of passing.
Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program

YEP! The GOP/DOPer party is taking it out on the kids, as they can't govern as a party.
This could be a clean bill to save kiddies. What use is the GOP/DOPer party?
Yes, these kids are out of the womb and must die, seems to be the GOP/DOPer way, I guess?

 

[Conservative65]

Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program.
Congress missed a deadline to reauthorize the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) over the weekend, leaving federal funding to expire at the end of the month, according to ABC News.

Neither the House nor the Senate took up a vote to reauthorize the program, which helps states provide inexpensive health insurance to children in lower-income families.

Congress was on track to miss the deadline earlier this week, and though the Senate released a bipartisan, five-year bill to reauthorize the program, a vote wasn’t scheduled.
Another
study by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 10 states would run out money by the end of the year.

The deadline to reauthorize the program passed after Senate Republicans spent much of the last few weeks pushing to pass an ObamaCare repeal bill co-sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).That bill wasn’t introduced for a vote on the Senate floor after three Republicans announced their opposition, killing its chance of passing.
Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program

YEP! The GOP/DOPer party is taking it out on the kids, as they can't govern as a party.
This could be a clean bill to save kiddies. What use is the GOP/DOPer party?
Yes, these kids are out of the womb and must die, seems to be the GOP/DOPer way, I guess?

Let's see, someone makes a choice to have a child they can't afford then blames someone else because the parents don't meet their responsibility to provide for that child.

It's the parent's responsibility to provide for their kids. If anyone it taking it out on the kids it's the parents not doing their job. If someone makes the choice to have a kid, why should the responsibility for supporting it be on those that didn't produce the child?

Look at is as an opportunity for YOU to prove you care as much as you pretend to care.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program.
Congress missed a deadline to reauthorize the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) over the weekend, leaving federal funding to expire at the end of the month, according to ABC News.

Neither the House nor the Senate took up a vote to reauthorize the program, which helps states provide inexpensive health insurance to children in lower-income families.

Congress was on track to miss the deadline earlier this week, and though the Senate released a bipartisan, five-year bill to reauthorize the program, a vote wasn’t scheduled.
Another
study by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 10 states would run out money by the end of the year.

The deadline to reauthorize the program passed after Senate Republicans spent much of the last few weeks pushing to pass an ObamaCare repeal bill co-sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).That bill wasn’t introduced for a vote on the Senate floor after three Republicans announced their opposition, killing its chance of passing.
Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program

YEP! The GOP/DOPer party is taking it out on the kids, as they can't govern as a party.
This could be a clean bill to save kiddies. What use is the GOP/DOPer party?
Yes, these kids are out of the womb and must die, seems to be the GOP/DOPer way, I guess?

Kids schmids

 

[Old Rocks]

And fuck all of you 'Conservatives'. Your 'caring' about abortion is nothing but politics. You care for nothing but yourselves. You are the trash that needs to be carried out of this nation.

 

[Baz Ares]

Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program.
Congress missed a deadline to reauthorize the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) over the weekend, leaving federal funding to expire at the end of the month, according to ABC News.

Neither the House nor the Senate took up a vote to reauthorize the program, which helps states provide inexpensive health insurance to children in lower-income families.

Congress was on track to miss the deadline earlier this week, and though the Senate released a bipartisan, five-year bill to reauthorize the program, a vote wasn’t scheduled.
Another
study by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 10 states would run out money by the end of the year.

The deadline to reauthorize the program passed after Senate Republicans spent much of the last few weeks pushing to pass an ObamaCare repeal bill co-sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).That bill wasn’t introduced for a vote on the Senate floor after three Republicans announced their opposition, killing its chance of passing.
Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program

YEP! The GOP/DOPer party is taking it out on the kids, as they can't govern as a party.
This could be a clean bill to save kiddies. What use is the GOP/DOPer party?
Yes, these kids are out of the womb and must die, seems to be the GOP/DOPer way, I guess?

Let's see, someone makes a choice to have a child they can't afford then blames someone else because the parents don't meet their responsibility to provide for that child.

It's the parent's responsibility to provide for their kids. If anyone it taking it out on the kids it's the parents not doing their job. If someone makes the choice to have a kid, why should the responsibility for supporting it be on those that didn't produce the child?

Look at is as an opportunity for YOU to prove you care as much as you pretend to care.

Free abortions will save us taxpayers YUGE--YUGE amounts of money. One kid can cost us 350K to age 18, and some, cost millions till dead. WTF!? FFS!
Abortions cost 1,000 in most cases and really less like $750. So we spend 1 Million dollars in free abortions, will save us how much you ask?
Let's see here. So that would be 1,000 x 350K = 350M- 1M in upfront free services
=340M in savings! WHEE! If we paid for1M Abortions the savings would be 35,000,000,000
(35 billion a year).

 

[Conservative65]

Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program.
Congress missed a deadline to reauthorize the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) over the weekend, leaving federal funding to expire at the end of the month, according to ABC News.

Neither the House nor the Senate took up a vote to reauthorize the program, which helps states provide inexpensive health insurance to children in lower-income families.

Congress was on track to miss the deadline earlier this week, and though the Senate released a bipartisan, five-year bill to reauthorize the program, a vote wasn’t scheduled.
Another
study by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 10 states would run out money by the end of the year.

The deadline to reauthorize the program passed after Senate Republicans spent much of the last few weeks pushing to pass an ObamaCare repeal bill co-sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).That bill wasn’t introduced for a vote on the Senate floor after three Republicans announced their opposition, killing its chance of passing.
Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program

YEP! The GOP/DOPer party is taking it out on the kids, as they can't govern as a party.
This could be a clean bill to save kiddies. What use is the GOP/DOPer party?
Yes, these kids are out of the womb and must die, seems to be the GOP/DOPer way, I guess?

Let's see, someone makes a choice to have a child they can't afford then blames someone else because the parents don't meet their responsibility to provide for that child.

It's the parent's responsibility to provide for their kids. If anyone it taking it out on the kids it's the parents not doing their job. If someone makes the choice to have a kid, why should the responsibility for supporting it be on those that didn't produce the child?

Look at is as an opportunity for YOU to prove you care as much as you pretend to care.

Free abortions will save us taxpayers YUGE--YUGE amounts of money. One kid can cost us 350K to age 18, and some, cost millions till dead. WTF!? FFS!
Abortions cost 1,000 in most cases and really less like $750. So we spend 1 Million dollars in free abortions, will save us how much you ask?
Let's see here. So that would be 1,000 x 350K = 350M- 1M in upfront free services
=340M in savings! WHEE! If we paid for1M Abortions the savings would be 35,000,000,000
(35 billion a year).

If they cost they're not free.

If that kid costs 350K to age 18, that costs is on the ones that produced the kid not those of us that didn't. That means $0 to the taxpayer and if the parents can't provide, tough shit.

That's the problem with you idiots on the left. You want to give people everything for free then expect them to act better than they do.

 

[Baz Ares]

Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program.
Congress missed a deadline to reauthorize the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) over the weekend, leaving federal funding to expire at the end of the month, according to ABC News.

Neither the House nor the Senate took up a vote to reauthorize the program, which helps states provide inexpensive health insurance to children in lower-income families.

Congress was on track to miss the deadline earlier this week, and though the Senate released a bipartisan, five-year bill to reauthorize the program, a vote wasn’t scheduled.
Another
study by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 10 states would run out money by the end of the year.

The deadline to reauthorize the program passed after Senate Republicans spent much of the last few weeks pushing to pass an ObamaCare repeal bill co-sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).That bill wasn’t introduced for a vote on the Senate floor after three Republicans announced their opposition, killing its chance of passing.
Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program

YEP! The GOP/DOPer party is taking it out on the kids, as they can't govern as a party.
This could be a clean bill to save kiddies. What use is the GOP/DOPer party?
Yes, these kids are out of the womb and must die, seems to be the GOP/DOPer way, I guess?

Let's see, someone makes a choice to have a child they can't afford then blames someone else because the parents don't meet their responsibility to provide for that child.

It's the parent's responsibility to provide for their kids. If anyone it taking it out on the kids it's the parents not doing their job. If someone makes the choice to have a kid, why should the responsibility for supporting it be on those that didn't produce the child?

Look at is as an opportunity for YOU to prove you care as much as you pretend to care.

Free abortions will save us taxpayers YUGE--YUGE amounts of money. One kid can cost us 350K to age 18, and some, cost millions till dead. WTF!? FFS!
Abortions cost 1,000 in most cases and really less like $750. So we spend 1 Million dollars in free abortions, will save us how much you ask?
Let's see here. So that would be 1,000 x 350K = 350M- 1M in upfront free services
=340M in savings! WHEE! If we paid for1M Abortions the savings would be 35,000,000,000
(35 billion a year).

If they cost they're not free.

If that kid costs 350K to age 18, that costs is on the ones that produced the kid not those of us that didn't. That means $0 to the taxpayer and if the parents can't provide, tough shit.

That's the problem with you idiots on the left. You want to give people everything for free then expect them to act better than they do.

Nope, you don't get it. Spending 750 bucks per abortion, to cut down on long-term takers is a very conservative spending plan, for other peoples tax money.
I rather pay 2 bucks as my part to give out free abortions, than pay to cover that 350k- millions per each. Where this will take some1000 bucks
of my paid in tax money to cover. That be more spending on them. Seeing clearly now!

 

[The Derp]

Yes, these kids are out of the womb and must die, seems to be the GOP/DOPer way, I guess?

Are we really shocked that Conservatives in Congress would fail at governing?

 

[The Derp]

If they cost they're not free. If that kid costs 350K to age 18, that costs is on the ones that produced the kid not those of us that didn't. That means $0 to the taxpayer and if the parents can't provide, tough shit.

Wow. How very Christian. Let the sick die. What Bible passage is that from?

So you're punishing children because their parents aren't wealthy enough to afford health care, or their employers don't provide it? How is that fair to the child, who has no say in the matter?

"Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?" - is that your next response?

That's the problem with you idiots on the left. You want to give people everything for free then expect them to act better than they do.

Who says it's for free? SCHIP is paid out of taxpayer dollars, so we all contribute to it. It's hard to see the moral argument for letting children die because their parents are poor. It's hard to see any argument for that, come to think of it.

 

[Conservative65]

Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program.
Congress missed a deadline to reauthorize the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) over the weekend, leaving federal funding to expire at the end of the month, according to ABC News.

Neither the House nor the Senate took up a vote to reauthorize the program, which helps states provide inexpensive health insurance to children in lower-income families.

Congress was on track to miss the deadline earlier this week, and though the Senate released a bipartisan, five-year bill to reauthorize the program, a vote wasn’t scheduled.
Another
study by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 10 states would run out money by the end of the year.

The deadline to reauthorize the program passed after Senate Republicans spent much of the last few weeks pushing to pass an ObamaCare repeal bill co-sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).That bill wasn’t introduced for a vote on the Senate floor after three Republicans announced their opposition, killing its chance of passing.
Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program

YEP! The GOP/DOPer party is taking it out on the kids, as they can't govern as a party.
This could be a clean bill to save kiddies. What use is the GOP/DOPer party?
Yes, these kids are out of the womb and must die, seems to be the GOP/DOPer way, I guess?

Let's see, someone makes a choice to have a child they can't afford then blames someone else because the parents don't meet their responsibility to provide for that child.

It's the parent's responsibility to provide for their kids. If anyone it taking it out on the kids it's the parents not doing their job. If someone makes the choice to have a kid, why should the responsibility for supporting it be on those that didn't produce the child?

Look at is as an opportunity for YOU to prove you care as much as you pretend to care.

Free abortions will save us taxpayers YUGE--YUGE amounts of money. One kid can cost us 350K to age 18, and some, cost millions till dead. WTF!? FFS!
Abortions cost 1,000 in most cases and really less like $750. So we spend 1 Million dollars in free abortions, will save us how much you ask?
Let's see here. So that would be 1,000 x 350K = 350M- 1M in upfront free services
=340M in savings! WHEE! If we paid for1M Abortions the savings would be 35,000,000,000
(35 billion a year).

If they cost they're not free.

If that kid costs 350K to age 18, that costs is on the ones that produced the kid not those of us that didn't. That means $0 to the taxpayer and if the parents can't provide, tough shit.

That's the problem with you idiots on the left. You want to give people everything for free then expect them to act better than they do.

Nope, you don't get it. Spending 750 bucks per abortion, to cut down on long-term takers is a very conservative spending plan, for other peoples tax money.
I rather pay 2 bucks as my part to give out free abortions, than pay to cover that 350k- millions per each. Where this will take some1000 bucks
of my paid in tax money to cover. That be more spending on them. Seeing clearly now!

Providing funding to someone whose choice to do it is what people like you say is their choice alone is a very Liberal spending plan. The conservative plan would be if you make the choice, you pay the costs.

You leave out one option. Those not making the choice either way paying nothing for a choice they were told was none of their business. If you don't spend people where the spending either way is unacceptable, your result is paying nothing.

If the woman spreading her legs gets an abortion, she pays. If the woman spreading her legs decides to keep the child, she pays. Either way, if it's HER choice, it's HER responsibility to pay.

Why do you oppose personal responsibility for those making choices?

 

[Conservative65]

If they cost they're not free. If that kid costs 350K to age 18, that costs is on the ones that produced the kid not those of us that didn't. That means $0 to the taxpayer and if the parents can't provide, tough shit.

Wow. How very Christian. Let the sick die. What Bible passage is that from?

So you're punishing children because their parents aren't wealthy enough to afford health care, or their employers don't provide it? How is that fair to the child, who has no say in the matter?

"Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?" - is that your next response?

That's the problem with you idiots on the left. You want to give people everything for free then expect them to act better than they do.

Who says it's for free? SCHIP is paid out of taxpayer dollars, so we all contribute to it. It's hard to see the moral argument for letting children die because their parents are poor. It's hard to see any argument for that, come to think of it.

Since those kids aren't my responsibility, I'm not the one letting them die. Those that are responsible are.

I'm expecting that parents that produced and chose to have those children provide it. They made the choice, let them pay.

How is it fair to those of us that didn't make the choice to pay the price while those making the choice do nothing? In other words, if I didn't get the pussy the kid came out of, it isn't my responsibility to provide for it. If you mindset is that the one having no say shouldn't pay the price, you shouldn't have a problem with how I look at things.

Baz Ares says it's free. If it's PAID for with tax dollars it's not free. We ALL do not contribute to it. The ones benefiting from it don't contribute to the pot that pays it and vice versa. Since I have no responsibility to someone for which I had no say in whether or not they're here, there is no accountability on me when it comes to providing for them. If you want to take on someone else's kids, fine. I choose not to and I thought you lefties were about choice. Guess not.

By the way, I don't let kids for which I'm responsible go without. There are two of them.

 

[Baz Ares]

Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program.
Congress missed a deadline to reauthorize the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) over the weekend, leaving federal funding to expire at the end of the month, according to ABC News.

Neither the House nor the Senate took up a vote to reauthorize the program, which helps states provide inexpensive health insurance to children in lower-income families.

Congress was on track to miss the deadline earlier this week, and though the Senate released a bipartisan, five-year bill to reauthorize the program, a vote wasn’t scheduled.
Another
study by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 10 states would run out money by the end of the year.

The deadline to reauthorize the program passed after Senate Republicans spent much of the last few weeks pushing to pass an ObamaCare repeal bill co-sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).That bill wasn’t introduced for a vote on the Senate floor after three Republicans announced their opposition, killing its chance of passing.
Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program

YEP! The GOP/DOPer party is taking it out on the kids, as they can't govern as a party.
This could be a clean bill to save kiddies. What use is the GOP/DOPer party?
Yes, these kids are out of the womb and must die, seems to be the GOP/DOPer way, I guess?

Let's see, someone makes a choice to have a child they can't afford then blames someone else because the parents don't meet their responsibility to provide for that child.

It's the parent's responsibility to provide for their kids. If anyone it taking it out on the kids it's the parents not doing their job. If someone makes the choice to have a kid, why should the responsibility for supporting it be on those that didn't produce the child?

Look at is as an opportunity for YOU to prove you care as much as you pretend to care.

Free abortions will save us taxpayers YUGE--YUGE amounts of money. One kid can cost us 350K to age 18, and some, cost millions till dead. WTF!? FFS!
Abortions cost 1,000 in most cases and really less like $750. So we spend 1 Million dollars in free abortions, will save us how much you ask?
Let's see here. So that would be 1,000 x 350K = 350M- 1M in upfront free services
=340M in savings! WHEE! If we paid for1M Abortions the savings would be 35,000,000,000
(35 billion a year).

If they cost they're not free.

If that kid costs 350K to age 18, that costs is on the ones that produced the kid not those of us that didn't. That means $0 to the taxpayer and if the parents can't provide, tough shit.

That's the problem with you idiots on the left. You want to give people everything for free then expect them to act better than they do.

Nope, you don't get it. Spending 750 bucks per abortion, to cut down on long-term takers is a very conservative spending plan, for other peoples tax money.
I rather pay 2 bucks as my part to give out free abortions, than pay to cover that 350k- millions per each. Where this will take some1000 bucks
of my paid in tax money to cover. That be more spending on them. Seeing clearly now!

Providing funding to someone whose choice to do it is what people like you say is their choice alone is a very Liberal spending plan. The conservative plan would be if you make the choice, you pay the costs.

You leave out one option. Those not making the choice either way paying nothing for a choice they were told was none of their business. If you don't spend people where the spending either way is unacceptable, your result is paying nothing.

If the woman spreading her legs gets an abortion, she pays. If the woman spreading her legs decides to keep the child, she pays. Either way, if it's HER choice, it's HER responsibility to pay.

Why do you oppose personal responsibility for those making choices?

You're really lost here. Look at the real big picture. That will not change.
We will always have to deal with our poor people choices. We give all born kids a free education option through high school.
One abortion cost us 750 bucks. 8-12 years of schooling cost 145K. Many were not planning kids, as the guy leaked.
If they could cover the cost themselves, they do it. But we cover time after time the poor births and child care. FFS! Get real here.

 

[Conservative65]

Let's see, someone makes a choice to have a child they can't afford then blames someone else because the parents don't meet their responsibility to provide for that child.

It's the parent's responsibility to provide for their kids. If anyone it taking it out on the kids it's the parents not doing their job. If someone makes the choice to have a kid, why should the responsibility for supporting it be on those that didn't produce the child?

Look at is as an opportunity for YOU to prove you care as much as you pretend to care.

Free abortions will save us taxpayers YUGE--YUGE amounts of money. One kid can cost us 350K to age 18, and some, cost millions till dead. WTF!? FFS!
Abortions cost 1,000 in most cases and really less like $750. So we spend 1 Million dollars in free abortions, will save us how much you ask?
Let's see here. So that would be 1,000 x 350K = 350M- 1M in upfront free services
=340M in savings! WHEE! If we paid for1M Abortions the savings would be 35,000,000,000
(35 billion a year).

If they cost they're not free.

If that kid costs 350K to age 18, that costs is on the ones that produced the kid not those of us that didn't. That means $0 to the taxpayer and if the parents can't provide, tough shit.

That's the problem with you idiots on the left. You want to give people everything for free then expect them to act better than they do.

Nope, you don't get it. Spending 750 bucks per abortion, to cut down on long-term takers is a very conservative spending plan, for other peoples tax money.
I rather pay 2 bucks as my part to give out free abortions, than pay to cover that 350k- millions per each. Where this will take some1000 bucks
of my paid in tax money to cover. That be more spending on them. Seeing clearly now!

Providing funding to someone whose choice to do it is what people like you say is their choice alone is a very Liberal spending plan. The conservative plan would be if you make the choice, you pay the costs.

You leave out one option. Those not making the choice either way paying nothing for a choice they were told was none of their business. If you don't spend people where the spending either way is unacceptable, your result is paying nothing.

If the woman spreading her legs gets an abortion, she pays. If the woman spreading her legs decides to keep the child, she pays. Either way, if it's HER choice, it's HER responsibility to pay.

Why do you oppose personal responsibility for those making choices?

You're really lost here. Look at the real big picture. That will not change.
We will always have to deal with our poor people choices. We give all born kids a free education option through high school.
One abortion cost us 750 bucks. 8-12 years of schooling cost 145K. Many were not planning kids, as the guy leaked.
If they could cover the cost themselves, they do it. But we cover time after time the poor births and child care. FFS! Get real here.

I am looking at the big picture. I expect people to support themselves and you make excuses for them when they don't.

It's not free, dumbass. I suppose all those taxes I paid to the local school district really weren't paid if, as you claim, it's free.

Don't care if the guy leaked. He did what it took to product the child. Because it wasn't his intention doesn't mean someone else gets the bill.

I am getting real. As long as you offset the costs of those unwilling to do for themselves, they have no reason to do better. If they can't cover it themselves for the decisions they made or the action they took, they can get it from you. If you won't do it for them, they can do without. It's that simple despite how hard you want to make it or how many excuses you're willing to make.

 

[busybee01]

Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program.
Congress missed a deadline to reauthorize the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) over the weekend, leaving federal funding to expire at the end of the month, according to ABC News.

Neither the House nor the Senate took up a vote to reauthorize the program, which helps states provide inexpensive health insurance to children in lower-income families.

Congress was on track to miss the deadline earlier this week, and though the Senate released a bipartisan, five-year bill to reauthorize the program, a vote wasn’t scheduled.
Another
study by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 10 states would run out money by the end of the year.

The deadline to reauthorize the program passed after Senate Republicans spent much of the last few weeks pushing to pass an ObamaCare repeal bill co-sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).That bill wasn’t introduced for a vote on the Senate floor after three Republicans announced their opposition, killing its chance of passing.
Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program

YEP! The GOP/DOPer party is taking it out on the kids, as they can't govern as a party.
This could be a clean bill to save kiddies. What use is the GOP/DOPer party?
Yes, these kids are out of the womb and must die, seems to be the GOP/DOPer way, I guess?

Let's see, someone makes a choice to have a child they can't afford then blames someone else because the parents don't meet their responsibility to provide for that child.

It's the parent's responsibility to provide for their kids. If anyone it taking it out on the kids it's the parents not doing their job. If someone makes the choice to have a kid, why should the responsibility for supporting it be on those that didn't produce the child?

Look at is as an opportunity for YOU to prove you care as much as you pretend to care.

Because we have a moral society that cares about all Americans including low income people. We want to help people who need help. Telling people to drop dead is not the American way of doing things.

 

[Conservative65]

Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program.
Congress missed a deadline to reauthorize the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) over the weekend, leaving federal funding to expire at the end of the month, according to ABC News.

Neither the House nor the Senate took up a vote to reauthorize the program, which helps states provide inexpensive health insurance to children in lower-income families.

Congress was on track to miss the deadline earlier this week, and though the Senate released a bipartisan, five-year bill to reauthorize the program, a vote wasn’t scheduled.
Another
study by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 10 states would run out money by the end of the year.

The deadline to reauthorize the program passed after Senate Republicans spent much of the last few weeks pushing to pass an ObamaCare repeal bill co-sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).That bill wasn’t introduced for a vote on the Senate floor after three Republicans announced their opposition, killing its chance of passing.
Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program

YEP! The GOP/DOPer party is taking it out on the kids, as they can't govern as a party.
This could be a clean bill to save kiddies. What use is the GOP/DOPer party?
Yes, these kids are out of the womb and must die, seems to be the GOP/DOPer way, I guess?

Let's see, someone makes a choice to have a child they can't afford then blames someone else because the parents don't meet their responsibility to provide for that child.

It's the parent's responsibility to provide for their kids. If anyone it taking it out on the kids it's the parents not doing their job. If someone makes the choice to have a kid, why should the responsibility for supporting it be on those that didn't produce the child?

Look at is as an opportunity for YOU to prove you care as much as you pretend to care.

Because we have a moral society that cares about all Americans including low income people. We want to help people who need help. Telling people to drop dead is not the American way of doing things.

Apparently many want to offset the bad choices of people then expect that they will make better decisions the next time.

I'm not telling them to drop dead. I'm telling them to do for themselves what they should be doing for themselves or find people like you that are foolish enough to think it's a good idea to pay for someone else's bad choices.

How is it immoral to expect people that make the choice to pay for it? How is it moral to make a choice then expect others to be forced to pay the price?

 

[Peach]

This IS surprising, CHIP is relied upon by many is this conservative, poor county. Not going to help the GOP. A Dump looks bad for not urging renewal in a professional manner, and needs to address this failure promptly.

 

[Harry Dresden]

And fuck all of you 'Conservatives'. Your 'caring' about abortion is nothing but politics. You care for nothing but yourselves. You are the trash that needs to be carried out of this nation.

the far right yes,but the far left asswipes are the same way and should be on the same train outta here......

 

[busybee01]

Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program.
Congress missed a deadline to reauthorize the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) over the weekend, leaving federal funding to expire at the end of the month, according to ABC News.

Neither the House nor the Senate took up a vote to reauthorize the program, which helps states provide inexpensive health insurance to children in lower-income families.

Congress was on track to miss the deadline earlier this week, and though the Senate released a bipartisan, five-year bill to reauthorize the program, a vote wasn’t scheduled.
Another
study by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 10 states would run out money by the end of the year.

The deadline to reauthorize the program passed after Senate Republicans spent much of the last few weeks pushing to pass an ObamaCare repeal bill co-sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).That bill wasn’t introduced for a vote on the Senate floor after three Republicans announced their opposition, killing its chance of passing.
Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program

YEP! The GOP/DOPer party is taking it out on the kids, as they can't govern as a party.
This could be a clean bill to save kiddies. What use is the GOP/DOPer party?
Yes, these kids are out of the womb and must die, seems to be the GOP/DOPer way, I guess?

Let's see, someone makes a choice to have a child they can't afford then blames someone else because the parents don't meet their responsibility to provide for that child.

It's the parent's responsibility to provide for their kids. If anyone it taking it out on the kids it's the parents not doing their job. If someone makes the choice to have a kid, why should the responsibility for supporting it be on those that didn't produce the child?

Look at is as an opportunity for YOU to prove you care as much as you pretend to care.

Because we have a moral society that cares about all Americans including low income people. We want to help people who need help. Telling people to drop dead is not the American way of doing things.

Apparently many want to offset the bad choices of people then expect that they will make better decisions the next time.

I'm not telling them to drop dead. I'm telling them to do for themselves what they should be doing for themselves or find people like you that are foolish enough to think it's a good idea to pay for someone else's bad choices.

How is it immoral to expect people that make the choice to pay for it? How is it moral to make a choice then expect others to be forced to pay the price?

You are essentially telling them to drop dead. Those children are there and they are not going away because you want them to do so. How moral is it to punish the kids. Not very moral.

 

[Old Rocks]

Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program.
Congress missed a deadline to reauthorize the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) over the weekend, leaving federal funding to expire at the end of the month, according to ABC News.

Neither the House nor the Senate took up a vote to reauthorize the program, which helps states provide inexpensive health insurance to children in lower-income families.

Congress was on track to miss the deadline earlier this week, and though the Senate released a bipartisan, five-year bill to reauthorize the program, a vote wasn’t scheduled.
Another
study by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 10 states would run out money by the end of the year.

The deadline to reauthorize the program passed after Senate Republicans spent much of the last few weeks pushing to pass an ObamaCare repeal bill co-sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).That bill wasn’t introduced for a vote on the Senate floor after three Republicans announced their opposition, killing its chance of passing.
Congress misses deadline to reauthorize childrens' health care program

YEP! The GOP/DOPer party is taking it out on the kids, as they can't govern as a party.
This could be a clean bill to save kiddies. What use is the GOP/DOPer party?
Yes, these kids are out of the womb and must die, seems to be the GOP/DOPer way, I guess?

Let's see, someone makes a choice to have a child they can't afford then blames someone else because the parents don't meet their responsibility to provide for that child.

It's the parent's responsibility to provide for their kids. If anyone it taking it out on the kids it's the parents not doing their job. If someone makes the choice to have a kid, why should the responsibility for supporting it be on those that didn't produce the child?

Look at is as an opportunity for YOU to prove you care as much as you pretend to care.

Because we have a moral society that cares about all Americans including low income people. We want to help people who need help. Telling people to drop dead is not the American way of doing things.

Apparently many want to offset the bad choices of people then expect that they will make better decisions the next time.

I'm not telling them to drop dead. I'm telling them to do for themselves what they should be doing for themselves or find people like you that are foolish enough to think it's a good idea to pay for someone else's bad choices.

How is it immoral to expect people that make the choice to pay for it? How is it moral to make a choice then expect others to be forced to pay the price?

So, you want a five year old to go out and take care of himself. How kind of you. And if that child grows up uneducated, hungry, and with no hope, what do you think his life choices will be? You seek to punish the child for the parents poor choices, and, in doing so, punish our whole nation. Not only are you a heartless son of a bitch with a shriveled soul, you are stupid.

 

[gallantwarrior]

If they cost they're not free. If that kid costs 350K to age 18, that costs is on the ones that produced the kid not those of us that didn't. That means $0 to the taxpayer and if the parents can't provide, tough shit.

Wow. How very Christian. Let the sick die. What Bible passage is that from?

So you're punishing children because their parents aren't wealthy enough to afford health care, or their employers don't provide it? How is that fair to the child, who has no say in the matter?

"Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?" - is that your next response?

That's the problem with you idiots on the left. You want to give people everything for free then expect them to act better than they do.

Who says it's for free? SCHIP is paid out of taxpayer dollars, so we all contribute to it. It's hard to see the moral argument for letting children die because their parents are poor. It's hard to see any argument for that, come to think of it.

As long as those children are murdered in utereo, I guess they don't count. What's the price of a human life. I guess libs would rather take the cheap option and pay $750-$1000. Well, at least you won't be wasting as many tax dollars.