Congratulations President Obama

[Harry Dresden]

so, no more free handouts to CORPORATIONS?

I agree, but at least the corpation did give back they employed people.

Some did..

Many just kept the money in reserve
Many sent the jobs overseas

this is true.....was just looking at an artical on this.....

 

[Harry Dresden]

I agree, but at least the corpation did give back they employed people.

Some did..

Many just kept the money in reserve
Many sent the jobs overseas

It's their money, they can do with it as they choose. They kept their money because they did not know what the government was going to do about taxes.

Reb if the Federal Govt gives a Corporation a bunch of cash....WHOSE money is it they are giving to this Corporation?.....and some of those same Companies are investing it elsewhere.....not here....why is that?.....

 

[Harry Dresden]

Every American aged 65 or older is eligible for Medicare. Those who receive Social Security benefits are automatically enrolled in Medicare. There is no way to opt out. Either you enroll in Medicare Part A, or you forfeit your Social Security benefits.
You still have a choice

some choice.....lets see enroll i get to keep my SS.....if i dont, i lose it......geez i wonder which choice most people take.....

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Every American aged 65 or older is eligible for Medicare. Those who receive Social Security benefits are automatically enrolled in Medicare. There is no way to opt out. Either you enroll in Medicare Part A, or you forfeit your Social Security benefits.
You still have a choice

some choice.....lets see enroll i get to keep my SS.....if i dont, i lose it......geez i wonder which choice most people take.....

It's still a choice which is a lot better than whats coming in 2014

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Some did..

Many just kept the money in reserve
Many sent the jobs overseas

It's their money, they can do with it as they choose. They kept their money because they did not know what the government was going to do about taxes.

Reb if the Federal Govt gives a Corporation a bunch of cash....WHOSE money is it they are giving to this Corporation?.....and some of those same Companies are investing it elsewhere.....not here....why is that?.....

I was against the bailouts but I alos think the bailout had to be repaid.

 

[Jroc]

No conservative wanted to bailout anybody so don't try to pin that shit on us.

 

[Chris]

No conservative wanted to bailout anybody so don't try to pin that shit on us.

Don't worry.

I am sure if you had been in charge, we would have had a second Great Depression.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No conservative wanted to bailout anybody so don't try to pin that shit on us.

Don't worry.

I am sure if you had been in charge, we would have had a second Great Depression.

obama's still in office isn't he?

 

[Jroc]

No conservative wanted to bailout anybody so don't try to pin that shit on us.

Don't worry.

I am sure if you had been in charge, we would have had a second Great Depression.

Hardly...Big government liberal policies by both parties are what got us into this mess. It's people like you that want to double down on those failed policies that are the problem

 

[Harry Dresden]

It's their money, they can do with it as they choose. They kept their money because they did not know what the government was going to do about taxes.

Reb if the Federal Govt gives a Corporation a bunch of cash....WHOSE money is it they are giving to this Corporation?.....and some of those same Companies are investing it elsewhere.....not here....why is that?.....

I was against the bailouts but I alos think the bailout had to be repaid.

and every dime of it should have to be spent here.....which according to what i was reading in the paper the other day is not happening with some of the Bailoutees.....India was getting some investments over there from some of these places...

 

[(R)IGHTeous 1]

No conservative wanted to bailout anybody so don't try to pin that shit on us.

Don't worry.

I am sure if you had been in charge, we would have had a second Great Depression.

Because you know his politics soooo well:

 

[Harry Dresden]

No conservative wanted to bailout anybody so don't try to pin that shit on us.

Don't worry.

I am sure if you had been in charge, we would have had a second Great Depression.

and im sure if you were in charge we would long ago have been a broke third world country.....but hey.....we would have had single payer health care....just no one working to pay for it.....

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Reb if the Federal Govt gives a Corporation a bunch of cash....WHOSE money is it they are giving to this Corporation?.....and some of those same Companies are investing it elsewhere.....not here....why is that?.....

I was against the bailouts but I alos think the bailout had to be repaid.

and every dime of it should have to be spent here.....which according to what i was reading in the paper the other day is not happening with some of the Bailoutees.....India was getting some investments over there from some of these places...

Any time you have large sums of mmoney and the government is involved it will be wasted like that.

 

[earthling01]

Michael seems a little bit out of touch with reality here:

"America has grown increasingly poorer with each of his "successes."

Obama's "Success" is America's failure.

I HOPE HE FAILS"

Allow me to respond with two fundamentals:

One: Obama's policies do not make people poorer.
You can blame job losses squarely on the previous administration. I know you have heard that too many times by now, but the truth of it is inescapable. This point has been confirmed by the US Bureau of Employment Statistics.
Follow the money trail: two new Bush wars, more jobs moving overseas, a booming China/EU economy, a lack of federal stimulus to support the overextended US banking system, and a needless tax break for the wealthiest Americans all lead to our present economic demise. So please, stop watching FOX and buying into their constant flow of lies and conspiracies. They do not have anything productive to say about Obama in spite of the millions of new jobs created.

Two: Hoping Obama fails while hoping the economy recovers is contradictory.
It's like hoping both the Yankees beat the Giants and the Giants beat the Yankees in the same game.
In spite of what you learned on FOX, Obama is actually trying to save the US economy. Think of him as a sort of "Clean Up Crew" after eight years of drunken and irresponsible spending. With that in mind, hoping Obama fails is the same as encouraging the economy to fail.
It's far more effective [for you and for the current administration] to aim for the same thing. Ex: "Obama wants to boost employment, therefore I will not look for a job...".

I think it far more constructive to ask yourself "why" you would want Obama to fail, especially since he is fighting for you (assuming you're a middle-class citizen). And while you're at it, consider the fact that, as you and I are getting poorer, the wealthy are getting wealthier. Perhaps you should point your finger at those who have the power to change the economy, but refuse to lift a finger.

And which party has been fighting to make sure that doesn't change? [Hint: Their initials are GOP.]

 

[Harry Dresden]

And while you're at it, consider the fact that, as you and I are getting poorer, the wealthy are getting wealthier. Perhaps you should point your finger at those who have the power to change the economy, but refuse to lift a finger.

And while you're at it, consider the fact that, as you and I are getting poorer, the wealthy are getting wealthier.


so this tells me Obama is helping me how?

Perhaps you should point your finger at those who have the power to change the economy, but refuse to lift a finger.

which some people here are doing.....namely pointing at those in charge of the Govt....

 

[bigrebnc1775]

And while you're at it, consider the fact that, as you and I are getting poorer, the wealthy are getting wealthier. Perhaps you should point your finger at those who have the power to change the economy, but refuse to lift a finger.

And while you're at it, consider the fact that, as you and I are getting poorer, the wealthy are getting wealthier.


so this tells me Obama is helping me how?

Perhaps you should point your finger at those who have the power to change the economy, but refuse to lift a finger.

which some people here are doing.....namely pointing at those in charge of the Govt....

all the government has to is get out of the way

 

[Jroc]

Michael seems a little bit out of touch with reality here:

"America has grown increasingly poorer with each of his "successes."

Obama's "Success" is America's failure.

I HOPE HE FAILS"

Allow me to respond with two fundamentals:

One: Obama's policies do not make people poorer.
You can blame job losses squarely on the previous administration. I know you have heard that too many times by now, but the truth of it is inescapable. This point has been confirmed by the US Bureau of Employment Statistics.
Follow the money trail: two new Bush wars, more jobs moving overseas, a booming China/EU economy, a lack of federal stimulus to support the overextended US banking system, and a needless tax break for the wealthiest Americans all lead to our present economic demise. So please, stop watching FOX and buying into their constant flow of lies and conspiracies. They do not have anything productive to say about Obama in spite of the millions of new jobs created.

Two: Hoping Obama fails while hoping the economy recovers is contradictory.
It's like hoping both the Yankees beat the Giants and the Giants beat the Yankees in the same game.
In spite of what you learned on FOX, Obama is actually trying to save the US economy. Think of him as a sort of "Clean Up Crew" after eight years of drunken and irresponsible spending. With that in mind, hoping Obama fails is the same as encouraging the economy to fail.
It's far more effective [for you and for the current administration] to aim for the same thing. Ex: "Obama wants to boost employment, therefore I will not look for a job...".

I think it far more constructive to ask yourself "why" you would want Obama to fail, especially since he is fighting for you (assuming you're a middle-class citizen). And while you're at it, consider the fact that, as you and I are getting poorer, the wealthy are getting wealthier. Perhaps you should point your finger at those who have the power to change the economy, but refuse to lift a finger.

And which party has been fighting to make sure that doesn't change? [Hint: Their initials are GOP.]

Is there an echo in here? Why are all these new liberals coming to the board with the same talking points? Did Obama send out some kind of marching orders or something?

 

[(R)IGHTeous 1]

Michael seems a little bit out of touch with reality here:

"America has grown increasingly poorer with each of his "successes."

Obama's "Success" is America's failure.

I HOPE HE FAILS"

Allow me to respond with two fundamentals:

One: Obama's policies do not make people poorer.
You can blame job losses squarely on the previous administration. I know you have heard that too many times by now, but the truth of it is inescapable. This point has been confirmed by the US Bureau of Employment Statistics.
Follow the money trail: two new Bush wars, more jobs moving overseas, a booming China/EU economy, a lack of federal stimulus to support the overextended US banking system, and a needless tax break for the wealthiest Americans all lead to our present economic demise. So please, stop watching FOX and buying into their constant flow of lies and conspiracies. They do not have anything productive to say about Obama in spite of the millions of new jobs created.

Two: Hoping Obama fails while hoping the economy recovers is contradictory.
It's like hoping both the Yankees beat the Giants and the Giants beat the Yankees in the same game.
In spite of what you learned on FOX, Obama is actually trying to save the US economy. Think of him as a sort of "Clean Up Crew" after eight years of drunken and irresponsible spending. With that in mind, hoping Obama fails is the same as encouraging the economy to fail.
It's far more effective [for you and for the current administration] to aim for the same thing. Ex: "Obama wants to boost employment, therefore I will not look for a job...".

I think it far more constructive to ask yourself "why" you would want Obama to fail, especially since he is fighting for you (assuming you're a middle-class citizen). And while you're at it, consider the fact that, as you and I are getting poorer, the wealthy are getting wealthier. Perhaps you should point your finger at those who have the power to change the economy, but refuse to lift a finger.

And which party has been fighting to make sure that doesn't change? [Hint: Their initials are GOP.]

Is there an echo in here? Why are all these new liberals coming to the board with the same talking points? Did Obama send out some kind of marching orders or something?

LOL you don't gotta worry, I pwned this sheep noob when he was only 10 posts in.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Michael seems a little bit out of touch with reality here:

"America has grown increasingly poorer with each of his "successes."

Obama's "Success" is America's failure.

I HOPE HE FAILS" dusting off a 2 y/o qoute from Rush I see.

Allow me to respond with two fundamentals:

One: Obama's policies do not make people poorer. Taking money from those that have to "give" it to those that don't make people poorer. b/c the Fed takes it cut first and then may not even spread the wealth. fyi; welfare is a failed policy.
You can blame job losses squarely on the previous administration. Yep, Barney Franks and the dims killed us in the last 2 years. I know you have heard that too many times by now, but the truth of it is inescapable. Franks should be in jail. This point has been confirmed by the US Bureau of Employment Statistics.
Follow the money trail: two new Bush wars, good lord, must I explain what happened on 9/11 AGAIN? more jobs moving overseas, NAFTA was a clinton idea. a booming China b/c they adopted a form of capitalism /EU economy,uhm they are rioting right now. a lack of federal stimulus to support the overextended US banking system, You wanted Bush to dump more money? and a needless tax break for the wealthiest Americans What tax break did they get that we didn't? all lead to our present economic demise. shh, don't mention clintons bubbles, it will confuse him. So please, stop watching FOX and buying into their constant flow of lies and conspiracies. Since MSN's lies are so much better.They do not have anything productive to say about Obama in spite of the millions of new jobs created. You clearly have never watched. We dumped $1.4 Trillion for tops of 3 million jobs. Do the math, it aint pretty,

Two: Hoping Obama fails while hoping the economy recovers is contradictory. Not true, then man knows jack and squat about economy. So hoping his economy killing ideas don't pass is dead on the money <get the pun?>
It's like hoping both the Yankees beat the Giants and the Giants beat the Yankees in the same game. Are you smoking dope?
In spite of what you learned on FOX, Obama is actually trying to save the US economy. His actions and lack there of speak otherwiseThink of him as a sort of "Clean Up Crew" after eight years of drunken and irresponsible spending. That's the worst analogy you could have used since he has out spent Bush already. With that in mind, hoping Obama fails is the same as encouraging the economy to fail. wrong
It's far more effective [for you and for the current administration] to aim for the same thing. wrong Ex: "Obama wants to boost employment, no he doesn't therefore I will not look for a job...". I look for a second one daily. especially since my HCI went up by 40%

I think it far more constructive to ask yourself "why" you would want Obama to fail, I don't want to rely on the government for handouts. I am no ones slave. especially since he is fighting for you (assuming you're a middle-class citizen). yea, fuck the working poor. Thanks.And while you're at it, consider the fact that, as you and I are getting poorer, the wealthy are getting wealthier. oh really, how so? Perhaps you should point your finger at those who have the power to change the economy, but refuse to lift a finger. you mean the people that sign my pay check? The people in order to stay in business had to pass the cost of my benefits on to me?

And which party has been fighting to make sure that doesn't change? [Hint: Their initials are GOP.]

Damn, you are one died in the wool fanboy aren't you...

Not one free thought, nothing original, just talking points that we have been listening to non-stop for 2 years

2012 can't get here fast enough.

 

[Chris]

Michael seems a little bit out of touch with reality here:

"America has grown increasingly poorer with each of his "successes."

Obama's "Success" is America's failure.

I HOPE HE FAILS" dusting off a 2 y/o qoute from Rush I see.

Allow me to respond with two fundamentals:

One: Obama's policies do not make people poorer. Taking money from those that have to "give" it to those that don't make people poorer. b/c the Fed takes it cut first and then may not even spread the wealth. fyi; welfare is a failed policy.
You can blame job losses squarely on the previous administration. Yep, Barney Franks and the dims killed us in the last 2 years. I know you have heard that too many times by now, but the truth of it is inescapable. Franks should be in jail. This point has been confirmed by the US Bureau of Employment Statistics.
Follow the money trail: two new Bush wars, good lord, must I explain what happened on 9/11 AGAIN? more jobs moving overseas, NAFTA was a clinton idea. a booming China b/c they adopted a form of capitalism /EU economy,uhm they are rioting right now. a lack of federal stimulus to support the overextended US banking system, You wanted Bush to dump more money? and a needless tax break for the wealthiest Americans What tax break did they get that we didn't? all lead to our present economic demise. shh, don't mention clintons bubbles, it will confuse him. So please, stop watching FOX and buying into their constant flow of lies and conspiracies. Since MSN's lies are so much better.They do not have anything productive to say about Obama in spite of the millions of new jobs created. You clearly have never watched. We dumped $1.4 Trillion for tops of 3 million jobs. Do the math, it aint pretty,

Two: Hoping Obama fails while hoping the economy recovers is contradictory. Not true, then man knows jack and squat about economy. So hoping his economy killing ideas don't pass is dead on the money <get the pun?>
It's like hoping both the Yankees beat the Giants and the Giants beat the Yankees in the same game. Are you smoking dope?
In spite of what you learned on FOX, Obama is actually trying to save the US economy. His actions and lack there of speak otherwiseThink of him as a sort of "Clean Up Crew" after eight years of drunken and irresponsible spending. That's the worst analogy you could have used since he has out spent Bush already. With that in mind, hoping Obama fails is the same as encouraging the economy to fail. wrong
It's far more effective [for you and for the current administration] to aim for the same thing. wrong Ex: "Obama wants to boost employment, no he doesn't therefore I will not look for a job...". I look for a second one daily. especially since my HCI went up by 40%

I think it far more constructive to ask yourself "why" you would want Obama to fail, I don't want to rely on the government for handouts. I am no ones slave. especially since he is fighting for you (assuming you're a middle-class citizen). yea, fuck the working poor. Thanks.And while you're at it, consider the fact that, as you and I are getting poorer, the wealthy are getting wealthier. oh really, how so? Perhaps you should point your finger at those who have the power to change the economy, but refuse to lift a finger. you mean the people that sign my pay check? The people in order to stay in business had to pass the cost of my benefits on to me?

And which party has been fighting to make sure that doesn't change? [Hint: Their initials are GOP.]

Damn, you are one died in the wool fanboy aren't you...

Not one free thought, nothing original, just talking points that we have been listening to non-stop for 2 years

2012 can't get here fast enough.

Yes, 2012, when Obama wins a second term.