CDZ Confidential documents reveal U.S. officials failed to tell truth about war in Afghanistan

EvilEyeFleegle

Dogpatch USA
Gold Supporting Member
Nov 2, 2017
15,759
8,866
1,280
Twin Falls Idaho
Most of us have suspected for some time that we have been lied to...but this report is damning..and shows how Afghanistan became another Vietnam...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/grap...apers/afghanistan-war-confidential-documents/

A confidential trove of government documents obtained by The Washington Post reveals that senior U.S. officials failed to tell the truth about the war in Afghanistan throughout the 18-year campaign, making rosy pronouncements they knew to be false and hiding unmistakable evidence the war had become unwinnable.
The documents were generated by a federal project examining the root failures of the longest armed conflict in U.S. history. They include more than 2,000 pages of previously unpublished notes of interviews with people who played a direct role in the war, from generals and diplomats to aid workers and Afghan officials.
The U.S. government tried to shield the identities of the vast majority of those interviewed for the project and conceal nearly all of their remarks. The Post won release of the documents under the Freedom of Information Act after a three-year legal battle.



The Afghanistan Papers
At war with the truth

Interviews and memos
Explore the documents

Key insiders speak bluntly about the failures of the longest conflict in U.S. history

Post Reports
‘We didn’t know what the task was’

Hear candid interviews with former ambassador Ryan Crocker and retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn

The fight for the documents
About the investigation

It took three years and two federal lawsuits for The Post to pry loose 2,000 pages of interview records

Part 1
At war with the truth

U.S. officials constantly said they were making progress. They were not, and they knew it.

Part 2
Stranded without a strategy

Bush and Obama had polar-opposite plans to win the war. Both were destined to fail.

Part 3
Built to fail

Despite vows the U.S. wouldn’t get mired in “nation-building,” it has wasted billions doing just that

Part 4
Consumed by corruption

The U.S. flooded the country with money — then turned a blind eye to the graft it fueled

Part 5
Unguarded nation

Afghan security forces, despite years of training, were dogged by incompetence and corruption

Part 6
Overwhelmed by opium

The U.S. war on drugs in Afghanistan has imploded at nearly every turn

More stories
Interviewees respond

In the interviews, more than 400 insiders offered unrestrained criticism of what went wrong in Afghanistan and how the United States became mired in nearly two decades of warfare.
With a bluntness rarely expressed in public, the interviews lay bare pent-up complaints, frustrations and confessions, along with second-guessing and backbiting.

Click any underlined text in the story to see the statement in the original document

“We were devoid of a fundamental understanding of Afghanistan — we didn’t know what we were doing,” Douglas Lute, a three-star Army general who served as the White House’s Afghan war czar during the Bush and Obama administrations, told government interviewers in 2015. He added: “What are we trying to do here? We didn’t have the foggiest notion of what we were undertaking.”
“If the American people knew the magnitude of this dysfunction . . . 2,400 lives lost,” Lute added, blaming the deaths of U.S. military personnel on bureaucratic breakdowns among Congress, the Pentagon and the State Department. “Who will say this was in vain?”
Since 2001, more than 775,000 U.S. troops have deployed to Afghanistan, many repeatedly. Of those, 2,300 died there and 20,589 were wounded in action, according to Defense Department figures.
 
Another war the US should not have been involved in and enter through false pretenses. just another war for the Generals and the military industrial complex. Tell me again how Afghanistan was involved in 9/11?
 
Most of us have suspected for some time that we have been lied to...but this report is damning..and shows how Afghanistan became another Vietnam...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/grap...apers/afghanistan-war-confidential-documents/

A confidential trove of government documents obtained by The Washington Post reveals that senior U.S. officials failed to tell the truth about the war in Afghanistan throughout the 18-year campaign, making rosy pronouncements they knew to be false and hiding unmistakable evidence the war had become unwinnable.
The documents were generated by a federal project examining the root failures of the longest armed conflict in U.S. history. They include more than 2,000 pages of previously unpublished notes of interviews with people who played a direct role in the war, from generals and diplomats to aid workers and Afghan officials.
The U.S. government tried to shield the identities of the vast majority of those interviewed for the project and conceal nearly all of their remarks. The Post won release of the documents under the Freedom of Information Act after a three-year legal battle.



The Afghanistan Papers
At war with the truth

Interviews and memos
Explore the documents

Key insiders speak bluntly about the failures of the longest conflict in U.S. history

Post Reports
‘We didn’t know what the task was’

Hear candid interviews with former ambassador Ryan Crocker and retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn

The fight for the documents
About the investigation

It took three years and two federal lawsuits for The Post to pry loose 2,000 pages of interview records

Part 1
At war with the truth

U.S. officials constantly said they were making progress. They were not, and they knew it.

Part 2
Stranded without a strategy

Bush and Obama had polar-opposite plans to win the war. Both were destined to fail.

Part 3
Built to fail

Despite vows the U.S. wouldn’t get mired in “nation-building,” it has wasted billions doing just that

Part 4
Consumed by corruption

The U.S. flooded the country with money — then turned a blind eye to the graft it fueled

Part 5
Unguarded nation

Afghan security forces, despite years of training, were dogged by incompetence and corruption

Part 6
Overwhelmed by opium

The U.S. war on drugs in Afghanistan has imploded at nearly every turn

More stories
Interviewees respond

In the interviews, more than 400 insiders offered unrestrained criticism of what went wrong in Afghanistan and how the United States became mired in nearly two decades of warfare.
With a bluntness rarely expressed in public, the interviews lay bare pent-up complaints, frustrations and confessions, along with second-guessing and backbiting.

Click any underlined text in the story to see the statement in the original document

“We were devoid of a fundamental understanding of Afghanistan — we didn’t know what we were doing,” Douglas Lute, a three-star Army general who served as the White House’s Afghan war czar during the Bush and Obama administrations, told government interviewers in 2015. He added: “What are we trying to do here? We didn’t have the foggiest notion of what we were undertaking.”
“If the American people knew the magnitude of this dysfunction . . . 2,400 lives lost,” Lute added, blaming the deaths of U.S. military personnel on bureaucratic breakdowns among Congress, the Pentagon and the State Department. “Who will say this was in vain?”
Since 2001, more than 775,000 U.S. troops have deployed to Afghanistan, many repeatedly. Of those, 2,300 died there and 20,589 were wounded in action, according to Defense Department figures.

Nonsense, all right wing lies!!

More attempts to suggest government should not take over health care.
 
Another war the US should not have been involved in and enter through false pretenses. just another war for the Generals and the military industrial complex. Tell me again how Afghanistan was involved in 9/11?

Are you THAT ignorant? You don't know? I suggest you do a little reading.
there were supposedly terrorist training camps there, questionable now, but even if there were air strikes could have taken care of the problem, unlike a failing 18 year ground war that we have now.
 
Another war the US should not have been involved in and enter through false pretenses. just another war for the Generals and the military industrial complex. Tell me again how Afghanistan was involved in 9/11?
Afghanistan hosted AlQaeda's military training base.
 
Another war the US should not have been involved in and enter through false pretenses. just another war for the Generals and the military industrial complex. Tell me again how Afghanistan was involved in 9/11?

Are you THAT ignorant? You don't know? I suggest you do a little reading.
there were supposedly terrorist training camps there, questionable now, but even if there were air strikes could have taken care of the problem, unlike a failing 18 year ground war that we have now.
Not exactly. We had irrefutable evidence from satellite photos.

Edit: add photo
th

th
 
Last edited:
Impossible. All government officials always tell us the absolute, 100% truth!
 
Another war the US should not have been involved in and enter through false pretenses. just another war for the Generals and the military industrial complex. Tell me again how Afghanistan was involved in 9/11?
Afghanistan hosted AlQaeda's military training base.
So you favor a never ending 18 year ground war as opposed to air strikes on those bases?
 
These photos from the satellites were corroborated by on-the-ground visual images of terrorists training as well.

upload_2019-12-9_11-6-19.jpeg


th


See how that works. :cool:
 
Most of us have suspected for some time that we have been lied to...but this report is damning..and shows how Afghanistan became another Vietnam...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/grap...apers/afghanistan-war-confidential-documents/

[...]
“If the American people knew the magnitude of this dysfunction . . . 2,400 lives lost,” Lute added, blaming the deaths of U.S. military personnel on bureaucratic breakdowns among Congress, the Pentagon and the State Department. “Who will say this was in vain?”

Since 2001, more than 775,000 U.S. troops have deployed to Afghanistan, many repeatedly. Of those, 2,300 died there and 20,589 were wounded in action, according to Defense Department figures.​

As they say, the first victim of war inevitably is the truth. So, their painting rosy pictures should surprise exactly no one, and the reporting pretty much throughout demonstrated their statements to be at variance with the reality on the ground.

Another early victim of war, also inevitably, is the regard for the suffering, for the very humanity of those, on the other side of the conflict, to the effect that pretty much every Afghan - after nearly forty years of war, civil war, war again, and civil war again - knows victims of that war, personally, while we don't. Truth be told, we don't even know their number, not even a rough estimate. While careful accounting is available for "our" costs, the real question is not, Was this "in vain". It is, why is there no proper accounting for the combination of reckless disregard and cynicism, and what does that tell us about ourselves? Anyone investigating why "nation building", particularly over wide and deep cultural divides, is destined to fail under these circumstances, should take a long and hard look at that set of attitudes.
 
Most of us have suspected for some time that we have been lied to...but this report is damning..and shows how Afghanistan became another Vietnam...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/grap...apers/afghanistan-war-confidential-documents/

A confidential trove of government documents obtained by The Washington Post reveals that senior U.S. officials failed to tell the truth about the war in Afghanistan throughout the 18-year campaign, making rosy pronouncements they knew to be false and hiding unmistakable evidence the war had become unwinnable.
The documents were generated by a federal project examining the root failures of the longest armed conflict in U.S. history. They include more than 2,000 pages of previously unpublished notes of interviews with people who played a direct role in the war, from generals and diplomats to aid workers and Afghan officials.
The U.S. government tried to shield the identities of the vast majority of those interviewed for the project and conceal nearly all of their remarks. The Post won release of the documents under the Freedom of Information Act after a three-year legal battle.



The Afghanistan Papers
At war with the truth

Interviews and memos
Explore the documents

Key insiders speak bluntly about the failures of the longest conflict in U.S. history

Post Reports
‘We didn’t know what the task was’

Hear candid interviews with former ambassador Ryan Crocker and retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn

The fight for the documents
About the investigation

It took three years and two federal lawsuits for The Post to pry loose 2,000 pages of interview records

Part 1
At war with the truth

U.S. officials constantly said they were making progress. They were not, and they knew it.

Part 2
Stranded without a strategy

Bush and Obama had polar-opposite plans to win the war. Both were destined to fail.

Part 3
Built to fail

Despite vows the U.S. wouldn’t get mired in “nation-building,” it has wasted billions doing just that

Part 4
Consumed by corruption

The U.S. flooded the country with money — then turned a blind eye to the graft it fueled

Part 5
Unguarded nation

Afghan security forces, despite years of training, were dogged by incompetence and corruption

Part 6
Overwhelmed by opium

The U.S. war on drugs in Afghanistan has imploded at nearly every turn

More stories
Interviewees respond

In the interviews, more than 400 insiders offered unrestrained criticism of what went wrong in Afghanistan and how the United States became mired in nearly two decades of warfare.
With a bluntness rarely expressed in public, the interviews lay bare pent-up complaints, frustrations and confessions, along with second-guessing and backbiting.

Click any underlined text in the story to see the statement in the original document

“We were devoid of a fundamental understanding of Afghanistan — we didn’t know what we were doing,” Douglas Lute, a three-star Army general who served as the White House’s Afghan war czar during the Bush and Obama administrations, told government interviewers in 2015. He added: “What are we trying to do here? We didn’t have the foggiest notion of what we were undertaking.”
“If the American people knew the magnitude of this dysfunction . . . 2,400 lives lost,” Lute added, blaming the deaths of U.S. military personnel on bureaucratic breakdowns among Congress, the Pentagon and the State Department. “Who will say this was in vain?”
Since 2001, more than 775,000 U.S. troops have deployed to Afghanistan, many repeatedly. Of those, 2,300 died there and 20,589 were wounded in action, according to Defense Department figures.
BUT TRUMP SHOULD BE IMPEACHED FOR NOT LISTENING TO THE EXPERTS…: New Pentagon Papers? IG probe conclusions show Afghan war futility — and lies.

But the Inter-Agency Consensus Trump is supposed to bow and burn incense too!
 
America merely contained the problem? lol
And blew 2500 lives, who knows how many injuries and a $Trillion bucks.

New Pentagon Papers? IG probe conclusions show Afghan war futility -- and lies

Be sure to catch some especially sharp comments from Michael Flynn.) One Army colonel summed up the effort with a memorable metaphor:

Flynn you will remember, also bluntly told the truth about Syria and ISIS. He is a national treasure and he needs to be returned to public service.

“Every data point was altered to present the best picture possible,” Bob Crowley, an Army colonel who served as a senior counterinsurgency adviser to U.S. military commanders in 2013 and 2014, told government interviewers. “Surveys, for instance, were totally unreliable but reinforced that everything​

The US government didn’t literally give a trillion dollars to someone. However, they did give a number of people millions of dollars to spend without much guidance, as a means to identify and resolve local issues to improve the quality of life for ordinary Afghans.

One unidentified contractor told government interviewers he was expected to dole out $3 million daily for projects in a single Afghan district roughly the size of a U.S. county. He once asked a visiting congressman whether the lawmaker could responsibly spend that kind of money back home: “He said hell no. ‘Well, sir, that’s what you just obligated us to spend and I’m doing it for communities that live in mud huts with no windows.’ ”​

Trump's always been skeptical of the war in Afghanistan and has gone the farthest to try to get the US out. Three months ago, his plan to invite the Taliban to Camp David for negotiations around the anniversary of 9/11 set off political condemnations and led to the departure of John Bolton, but this blockbuster report shows that it was only a tactical error in the end. Trump has gone the farthest so far in being educated by “Lessons Learned,” even if it hasn’t yet resulted in an end to the effort, or apparently not an end to the deceptions over the self-licking ice cream cone either. The main thrust of this article validates Trump’s campaign criticism of the war as a colossal waste of US money and resources and the folly of aggressive interventionism in general.

The irony of that will be that if Trump succeeds in cutting a peace deal in Afghanistan, he’s the one that will pay the political price when the Taliban inevitably return to power. That desire to avoid political accountability for an impossible nation-building project was the driving force that created the self-licking ice cream cone in the first place.
 
Most of us have suspected for some time that we have been lied to...but this report is damning..and shows how Afghanistan became another Vietnam...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/grap...apers/afghanistan-war-confidential-documents/

A confidential trove of government documents obtained by The Washington Post reveals that senior U.S. officials failed to tell the truth about the war in Afghanistan throughout the 18-year campaign, making rosy pronouncements they knew to be false and hiding unmistakable evidence the war had become unwinnable.
The documents were generated by a federal project examining the root failures of the longest armed conflict in U.S. history. They include more than 2,000 pages of previously unpublished notes of interviews with people who played a direct role in the war, from generals and diplomats to aid workers and Afghan officials.
The U.S. government tried to shield the identities of the vast majority of those interviewed for the project and conceal nearly all of their remarks. The Post won release of the documents under the Freedom of Information Act after a three-year legal battle.



The Afghanistan Papers
At war with the truth

Interviews and memos
Explore the documents

Key insiders speak bluntly about the failures of the longest conflict in U.S. history

Post Reports
‘We didn’t know what the task was’

Hear candid interviews with former ambassador Ryan Crocker and retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn

The fight for the documents
About the investigation

It took three years and two federal lawsuits for The Post to pry loose 2,000 pages of interview records

Part 1
At war with the truth

U.S. officials constantly said they were making progress. They were not, and they knew it.

Part 2
Stranded without a strategy

Bush and Obama had polar-opposite plans to win the war. Both were destined to fail.

Part 3
Built to fail

Despite vows the U.S. wouldn’t get mired in “nation-building,” it has wasted billions doing just that

Part 4
Consumed by corruption

The U.S. flooded the country with money — then turned a blind eye to the graft it fueled

Part 5
Unguarded nation

Afghan security forces, despite years of training, were dogged by incompetence and corruption

Part 6
Overwhelmed by opium

The U.S. war on drugs in Afghanistan has imploded at nearly every turn

More stories
Interviewees respond

In the interviews, more than 400 insiders offered unrestrained criticism of what went wrong in Afghanistan and how the United States became mired in nearly two decades of warfare.
With a bluntness rarely expressed in public, the interviews lay bare pent-up complaints, frustrations and confessions, along with second-guessing and backbiting.

Click any underlined text in the story to see the statement in the original document

“We were devoid of a fundamental understanding of Afghanistan — we didn’t know what we were doing,” Douglas Lute, a three-star Army general who served as the White House’s Afghan war czar during the Bush and Obama administrations, told government interviewers in 2015. He added: “What are we trying to do here? We didn’t have the foggiest notion of what we were undertaking.”
“If the American people knew the magnitude of this dysfunction . . . 2,400 lives lost,” Lute added, blaming the deaths of U.S. military personnel on bureaucratic breakdowns among Congress, the Pentagon and the State Department. “Who will say this was in vain?”
Since 2001, more than 775,000 U.S. troops have deployed to Afghanistan, many repeatedly. Of those, 2,300 died there and 20,589 were wounded in action, according to Defense Department figures.
BUT TRUMP SHOULD BE IMPEACHED FOR NOT LISTENING TO THE EXPERTS…: New Pentagon Papers? IG probe conclusions show Afghan war futility — and lies.

But the Inter-Agency Consensus Trump is supposed to bow and burn incense too!
these "experts" have been fighting a war against a rag tag army for 18 years and have not won and you want Trump to listen to them?
 
Most of us have suspected for some time that we have been lied to...but this report is damning..and shows how Afghanistan became another Vietnam...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/grap...apers/afghanistan-war-confidential-documents/

A confidential trove of government documents obtained by The Washington Post reveals that senior U.S. officials failed to tell the truth about the war in Afghanistan throughout the 18-year campaign, making rosy pronouncements they knew to be false and hiding unmistakable evidence the war had become unwinnable.
The documents were generated by a federal project examining the root failures of the longest armed conflict in U.S. history. They include more than 2,000 pages of previously unpublished notes of interviews with people who played a direct role in the war, from generals and diplomats to aid workers and Afghan officials.
The U.S. government tried to shield the identities of the vast majority of those interviewed for the project and conceal nearly all of their remarks. The Post won release of the documents under the Freedom of Information Act after a three-year legal battle.



The Afghanistan Papers
At war with the truth

Interviews and memos
Explore the documents

Key insiders speak bluntly about the failures of the longest conflict in U.S. history

Post Reports
‘We didn’t know what the task was’

Hear candid interviews with former ambassador Ryan Crocker and retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn

The fight for the documents
About the investigation

It took three years and two federal lawsuits for The Post to pry loose 2,000 pages of interview records

Part 1
At war with the truth

U.S. officials constantly said they were making progress. They were not, and they knew it.

Part 2
Stranded without a strategy

Bush and Obama had polar-opposite plans to win the war. Both were destined to fail.

Part 3
Built to fail

Despite vows the U.S. wouldn’t get mired in “nation-building,” it has wasted billions doing just that

Part 4
Consumed by corruption

The U.S. flooded the country with money — then turned a blind eye to the graft it fueled

Part 5
Unguarded nation

Afghan security forces, despite years of training, were dogged by incompetence and corruption

Part 6
Overwhelmed by opium

The U.S. war on drugs in Afghanistan has imploded at nearly every turn

More stories
Interviewees respond

In the interviews, more than 400 insiders offered unrestrained criticism of what went wrong in Afghanistan and how the United States became mired in nearly two decades of warfare.
With a bluntness rarely expressed in public, the interviews lay bare pent-up complaints, frustrations and confessions, along with second-guessing and backbiting.

Click any underlined text in the story to see the statement in the original document

“We were devoid of a fundamental understanding of Afghanistan — we didn’t know what we were doing,” Douglas Lute, a three-star Army general who served as the White House’s Afghan war czar during the Bush and Obama administrations, told government interviewers in 2015. He added: “What are we trying to do here? We didn’t have the foggiest notion of what we were undertaking.”
“If the American people knew the magnitude of this dysfunction . . . 2,400 lives lost,” Lute added, blaming the deaths of U.S. military personnel on bureaucratic breakdowns among Congress, the Pentagon and the State Department. “Who will say this was in vain?”
Since 2001, more than 775,000 U.S. troops have deployed to Afghanistan, many repeatedly. Of those, 2,300 died there and 20,589 were wounded in action, according to Defense Department figures.
BUT TRUMP SHOULD BE IMPEACHED FOR NOT LISTENING TO THE EXPERTS…: New Pentagon Papers? IG probe conclusions show Afghan war futility — and lies.

But the Inter-Agency Consensus Trump is supposed to bow and burn incense too!
these "experts" have been fighting a war against a rag tag army for 18 years and have not won and you want Trump to listen to them?
Nope! I want Trump to do what he knows is right.
 
Most of us have suspected for some time that we have been lied to...but this report is damning..and shows how Afghanistan became another Vietnam...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/grap...apers/afghanistan-war-confidential-documents/

A confidential trove of government documents obtained by The Washington Post reveals that senior U.S. officials failed to tell the truth about the war in Afghanistan throughout the 18-year campaign, making rosy pronouncements they knew to be false and hiding unmistakable evidence the war had become unwinnable.
The documents were generated by a federal project examining the root failures of the longest armed conflict in U.S. history. They include more than 2,000 pages of previously unpublished notes of interviews with people who played a direct role in the war, from generals and diplomats to aid workers and Afghan officials.
The U.S. government tried to shield the identities of the vast majority of those interviewed for the project and conceal nearly all of their remarks. The Post won release of the documents under the Freedom of Information Act after a three-year legal battle.



The Afghanistan Papers
At war with the truth

Interviews and memos
Explore the documents

Key insiders speak bluntly about the failures of the longest conflict in U.S. history

Post Reports
‘We didn’t know what the task was’

Hear candid interviews with former ambassador Ryan Crocker and retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn

The fight for the documents
About the investigation

It took three years and two federal lawsuits for The Post to pry loose 2,000 pages of interview records

Part 1
At war with the truth

U.S. officials constantly said they were making progress. They were not, and they knew it.

Part 2
Stranded without a strategy

Bush and Obama had polar-opposite plans to win the war. Both were destined to fail.

Part 3
Built to fail

Despite vows the U.S. wouldn’t get mired in “nation-building,” it has wasted billions doing just that

Part 4
Consumed by corruption

The U.S. flooded the country with money — then turned a blind eye to the graft it fueled

Part 5
Unguarded nation

Afghan security forces, despite years of training, were dogged by incompetence and corruption

Part 6
Overwhelmed by opium

The U.S. war on drugs in Afghanistan has imploded at nearly every turn

More stories
Interviewees respond

In the interviews, more than 400 insiders offered unrestrained criticism of what went wrong in Afghanistan and how the United States became mired in nearly two decades of warfare.
With a bluntness rarely expressed in public, the interviews lay bare pent-up complaints, frustrations and confessions, along with second-guessing and backbiting.

Click any underlined text in the story to see the statement in the original document

“We were devoid of a fundamental understanding of Afghanistan — we didn’t know what we were doing,” Douglas Lute, a three-star Army general who served as the White House’s Afghan war czar during the Bush and Obama administrations, told government interviewers in 2015. He added: “What are we trying to do here? We didn’t have the foggiest notion of what we were undertaking.”
“If the American people knew the magnitude of this dysfunction . . . 2,400 lives lost,” Lute added, blaming the deaths of U.S. military personnel on bureaucratic breakdowns among Congress, the Pentagon and the State Department. “Who will say this was in vain?”
Since 2001, more than 775,000 U.S. troops have deployed to Afghanistan, many repeatedly. Of those, 2,300 died there and 20,589 were wounded in action, according to Defense Department figures.
BUT TRUMP SHOULD BE IMPEACHED FOR NOT LISTENING TO THE EXPERTS…: New Pentagon Papers? IG probe conclusions show Afghan war futility — and lies.

But the Inter-Agency Consensus Trump is supposed to bow and burn incense too!
these "experts" have been fighting a war against a rag tag army for 18 years and have not won and you want Trump to listen to them?
Nope! I want Trump to do what he knows is right.
I'm not a Trump fan---but.....I think he's doing exactly what he 'knows' is right. I think that in the Left's attempts to demonize the President they lose sight of the idea that Trump may well be trying his hardest...to bring his vision into focus. He's wrong, IMO, and not smart enough, and not principled enough..to get it done right.

But he's not Satan..or Hitler...just a guy who got by on his ability to smooze and a talent for selling himself. This job is too much for him.

The irony of who Trump is...and who his base are..never fails to stun me.
 

Forum List

Back
Top