Common sense gun regulations are not about taking guns away from everyone

[Vastator]

Common sense gun regulations are not about taking guns away from everyone
NRA and supporters say common sense gun regulations are the government attempting to take guns away from law abiding citizens.
Bull Shit - it is an evil attempt to confuse logical arguments for gun control. Those who confuse the discussion with lies all have blood on their hands.

I’m getting a Ruger 1911 45. Holds 8 plus 1. A smart regulation is to not make clips any bigger than this. It’s enough.

Good guys with guns can stop a bad guy with a gun as long as bad guy doesn’t have an assault rifle that can shoot or spray 40 bullets at a time.

And my Ruger bushmaster only holds 4.

What is a Ruger “bushmaster”? Pics please...[/QUOTE

What is a Ruger “bushmaster”? Pics please...

 

[Flash]

Common sense gun regulations are not about taking guns away from everyone
NRA and supporters say common sense gun regulations are the government attempting to take guns away from law abiding citizens.
Bull Shit - it is an evil attempt to confuse logical arguments for gun control. Those who confuse the discussion with lies all have blood on their hands.

If anybody is confused it is you Moon Bat. Either you are confused or you are downright lying.

Liberals hate the Second Amendment and the right to keep and bear arms. Several Liberals have even said that.

They will take guns away from everybody if they could. That is just the kind of assholes they are.

As an example of what lying Liberals will do, recently in New York a guy went to see a doctor about a mild case of insomnia The guy was a veteran that had never been in any trouble. Under the the filthy ass SAFE Act in New York(that was passed as "common sense gun control" the doctor reported his ailment to the authorities and they sent jack booted government thugs to confiscate his firearms.

I can give more examples if you want.

You can't trust filthy Liberals for "common sense gun control" because the sonsofbitches don't have any common sense.

Don't ever trust a Liberal on anything, especially our Constitutional rights. They are the lying scum of this country.

 

[Crixus]

Yes. Have you had any instruction in the proper operation of a hand gun? When the gun malfunctions, you TAP, as in hit the magazine smartly with the off hand. Then you RACK the slide with the offhand smartly with the off hand. Then it’s “front sight acquire fire. Tap rack bang drills were invented by 1911 operators because their highly customized 1911’s would jam allot. This is basic stuff. Maybe you should go with the .45 colt/.45ACP red hawk ? Less hassles and .45 colt is a fun round and easy to reload if you ever do that.

Sealy will kill himself if he actually gets a firearm. He is an idiot without the first clue as to how they operate. This may not be such a bad thing, but how many others will he injure or kill due to his ignorance and stupidity.

sealybobo IF you really are going to buy a gun, PLEASE take an NRA gun safety class first. These are NOT toys.

And a 1911 while awesome, is an easy weapon to have an Accident with. Glocks were sent by God to fix the mistakes made in the designs of all other hand guns.

More people have accidental discharges, even lethal ones, with Glocks ; than any other gun I can think of. Having to pull the trigger to disassemble has contributed to unknown numbers of accidental discharges and deaths... Glocks are ho-hum at best.

That’s Darwin theory in action, not bad design. Tex Gubner makes my case for me.

 

[Vastator]

Yes. Have you had any instruction in the proper operation of a hand gun? When the gun malfunctions, you TAP, as in hit the magazine smartly with the off hand. Then you RACK the slide with the offhand smartly with the off hand. Then it’s “front sight acquire fire. Tap rack bang drills were invented by 1911 operators because their highly customized 1911’s would jam allot. This is basic stuff. Maybe you should go with the .45 colt/.45ACP red hawk ? Less hassles and .45 colt is a fun round and easy to reload if you ever do that.

Sealy will kill himself if he actually gets a firearm. He is an idiot without the first clue as to how they operate. This may not be such a bad thing, but how many others will he injure or kill due to his ignorance and stupidity.

sealybobo IF you really are going to buy a gun, PLEASE take an NRA gun safety class first. These are NOT toys.

And a 1911 while awesome, is an easy weapon to have an Accident with. Glocks were sent by God to fix the mistakes made in the designs of all other hand guns.

More people have accidental discharges, even lethal ones, with Glocks ; than any other gun I can think of. Having to pull the trigger to disassemble has contributed to unknown numbers of accidental discharges and deaths... Glocks are ho-hum at best.

That’s Darwin theory in action, not bad design. Tex Gubner makes my case for me.

Anytime the trigger is pressed into double duty... That is; needed to do anything besides discharging a round... Its a bad design.

 

[sealybobo]

I’m just saying I don’t mind to learn my hunting rifle is only 3+1. I think that makes sense and would be ok if they never made them with more.

The nuts usually go buy their shit at the store. They aren’t going on the black market to find higher capacity rounds and ways to maximize damage. Some do but most just work with what’s available. Or what their parents have.

I wish klebolt and Harris parents only had five round revolvers.

The answer is simple...

Yet you don’t want anything stopping us from getting guns? Or any system that might catch and stop a nut?

Unfortunately casualties are a terrible byproduct of freedom and liberty.
Government regulation of freedom and liberty sucks...We have plenty now.
Why not prefer the imposition of a full police state in Democratic strongholds...Why not impose our will on the bad guys only?

We do. Blue states have different laws than red ones. People in red states don’t have to deal with the kinds of people we have to deal with if you know what I mean.

For example some red states allow conceal carry without a permit. Republicans in Michigan almost passed it but I’m sure they didn’t want blacks to be able to carry guns freely without having to first go through the class and jump through the hoops.

You know who hates guns? Cops.

First off, don't project blue state racism on red states. Second, cops do not hate guns.

The other standout takeaway, cited both by Ron Avery and Dan Marcou, is our overwhelming belief that the best defense against gun crime and mass shootings is an armed citizenry. A whopping 91 percent of those polled support concealed carry by honest/screened citizens.

When asked how important armed citizens are in reducing the overall crime rate — on a scale of one to five (with one being low and five being high) — 54 percent rate the effectiveness of citizens at a “5.” And more than 86 percent of the respondents feel a legally armed citizen at the Newtown or Aurora incidents could have reduced or eliminated casualties.
​

If you're this ignorant about guns, perhaps you shouldn't own any.

But you want anyone to own them. No training, no classes, no background checks. No permits to carry. Carry them in schools and in bars.

You want idiots like me to have no regulations.

Freedom isn’t free! Lol

 

[deanrd]

In Russia people aren’t even allowed to own guns. And yet Republicans are saying we should be like Russia. Because they send spies here to trick Republicans into thinking that guns protect you from government.

 

[sealybobo]

Anytime someone says common sense in front of it or the peoples republic of insert country here........its a red flag that really means they hate guns and the hate the country.

You can’t imagine people who love this country hate guns? How American of you

 

[22lcidw]

In Russia people aren’t even allowed to own guns. And yet Republicans are saying we should be like Russia. Because they send spies here to trick Republicans into thinking that guns protect you from government.

Its protection from you who vote for socialists/communists and realize it and still do.

 

[daveman]

The answer is simple...

Yet you don’t want anything stopping us from getting guns? Or any system that might catch and stop a nut?

Unfortunately casualties are a terrible byproduct of freedom and liberty.
Government regulation of freedom and liberty sucks...We have plenty now.
Why not prefer the imposition of a full police state in Democratic strongholds...Why not impose our will on the bad guys only?

We do. Blue states have different laws than red ones. People in red states don’t have to deal with the kinds of people we have to deal with if you know what I mean.

For example some red states allow conceal carry without a permit. Republicans in Michigan almost passed it but I’m sure they didn’t want blacks to be able to carry guns freely without having to first go through the class and jump through the hoops.

You know who hates guns? Cops.

First off, don't project blue state racism on red states. Second, cops do not hate guns.

The other standout takeaway, cited both by Ron Avery and Dan Marcou, is our overwhelming belief that the best defense against gun crime and mass shootings is an armed citizenry. A whopping 91 percent of those polled support concealed carry by honest/screened citizens.

When asked how important armed citizens are in reducing the overall crime rate — on a scale of one to five (with one being low and five being high) — 54 percent rate the effectiveness of citizens at a “5.” And more than 86 percent of the respondents feel a legally armed citizen at the Newtown or Aurora incidents could have reduced or eliminated casualties.
​

If you're this ignorant about guns, perhaps you shouldn't own any.

But you want anyone to own them. No training, no classes, no background checks. No permits to carry. Carry them in schools and in bars.

You want idiots like me to have no regulations.

Freedom isn’t free! Lol

Dood, why you gotta lie about me?

Where did I ever say I didn't want background checks?

Training and classes are a great idea. You sound like you sure as hell need classes.

The Second Amendment is a permit to carry. And I guess it's completely escaped your notice that most shootings happen in gun-free zones.

 

[daveman]

In Russia people aren’t even allowed to own guns. And yet Republicans are saying we should be like Russia. Because they send spies here to trick Republicans into thinking that guns protect you from government.

No Republicans say we should be like Russia.

Can you stop lying for two minutes in a row?

 

[sealybobo]

Yet you don’t want anything stopping us from getting guns? Or any system that might catch and stop a nut?

Unfortunately casualties are a terrible byproduct of freedom and liberty.
Government regulation of freedom and liberty sucks...We have plenty now.
Why not prefer the imposition of a full police state in Democratic strongholds...Why not impose our will on the bad guys only?

We do. Blue states have different laws than red ones. People in red states don’t have to deal with the kinds of people we have to deal with if you know what I mean.

For example some red states allow conceal carry without a permit. Republicans in Michigan almost passed it but I’m sure they didn’t want blacks to be able to carry guns freely without having to first go through the class and jump through the hoops.

You know who hates guns? Cops.

First off, don't project blue state racism on red states. Second, cops do not hate guns.

The other standout takeaway, cited both by Ron Avery and Dan Marcou, is our overwhelming belief that the best defense against gun crime and mass shootings is an armed citizenry. A whopping 91 percent of those polled support concealed carry by honest/screened citizens.

When asked how important armed citizens are in reducing the overall crime rate — on a scale of one to five (with one being low and five being high) — 54 percent rate the effectiveness of citizens at a “5.” And more than 86 percent of the respondents feel a legally armed citizen at the Newtown or Aurora incidents could have reduced or eliminated casualties.
​

If you're this ignorant about guns, perhaps you shouldn't own any.

But you want anyone to own them. No training, no classes, no background checks. No permits to carry. Carry them in schools and in bars.

You want idiots like me to have no regulations.

Freedom isn’t free! Lol

Dood, why you gotta lie about me?

Where did I ever say I didn't want background checks?

Training and classes are a great idea. You sound like you sure as hell need classes.

The Second Amendment is a permit to carry. And I guess it's completely escaped your notice that most shootings happen in gun-free zones.

You sound reasonable. Talk to your boys

 

[daveman]

Unfortunately casualties are a terrible byproduct of freedom and liberty.
Government regulation of freedom and liberty sucks...We have plenty now.
Why not prefer the imposition of a full police state in Democratic strongholds...Why not impose our will on the bad guys only?

We do. Blue states have different laws than red ones. People in red states don’t have to deal with the kinds of people we have to deal with if you know what I mean.

For example some red states allow conceal carry without a permit. Republicans in Michigan almost passed it but I’m sure they didn’t want blacks to be able to carry guns freely without having to first go through the class and jump through the hoops.

You know who hates guns? Cops.

First off, don't project blue state racism on red states. Second, cops do not hate guns.

The other standout takeaway, cited both by Ron Avery and Dan Marcou, is our overwhelming belief that the best defense against gun crime and mass shootings is an armed citizenry. A whopping 91 percent of those polled support concealed carry by honest/screened citizens.

When asked how important armed citizens are in reducing the overall crime rate — on a scale of one to five (with one being low and five being high) — 54 percent rate the effectiveness of citizens at a “5.” And more than 86 percent of the respondents feel a legally armed citizen at the Newtown or Aurora incidents could have reduced or eliminated casualties.
​

If you're this ignorant about guns, perhaps you shouldn't own any.

But you want anyone to own them. No training, no classes, no background checks. No permits to carry. Carry them in schools and in bars.

You want idiots like me to have no regulations.

Freedom isn’t free! Lol

Dood, why you gotta lie about me?

Where did I ever say I didn't want background checks?

Training and classes are a great idea. You sound like you sure as hell need classes.

The Second Amendment is a permit to carry. And I guess it's completely escaped your notice that most shootings happen in gun-free zones.

You sound reasonable. Talk to your boys

Conservatives don't require slavish echo-chamber adherence to Groupthink. That's the left.

 

[sealybobo]

We do. Blue states have different laws than red ones. People in red states don’t have to deal with the kinds of people we have to deal with if you know what I mean.

For example some red states allow conceal carry without a permit. Republicans in Michigan almost passed it but I’m sure they didn’t want blacks to be able to carry guns freely without having to first go through the class and jump through the hoops.

You know who hates guns? Cops.

First off, don't project blue state racism on red states. Second, cops do not hate guns.

The other standout takeaway, cited both by Ron Avery and Dan Marcou, is our overwhelming belief that the best defense against gun crime and mass shootings is an armed citizenry. A whopping 91 percent of those polled support concealed carry by honest/screened citizens.

When asked how important armed citizens are in reducing the overall crime rate — on a scale of one to five (with one being low and five being high) — 54 percent rate the effectiveness of citizens at a “5.” And more than 86 percent of the respondents feel a legally armed citizen at the Newtown or Aurora incidents could have reduced or eliminated casualties.
​

If you're this ignorant about guns, perhaps you shouldn't own any.

But you want anyone to own them. No training, no classes, no background checks. No permits to carry. Carry them in schools and in bars.

You want idiots like me to have no regulations.

Freedom isn’t free! Lol

Dood, why you gotta lie about me?

Where did I ever say I didn't want background checks?

Training and classes are a great idea. You sound like you sure as hell need classes.

The Second Amendment is a permit to carry. And I guess it's completely escaped your notice that most shootings happen in gun-free zones.

You sound reasonable. Talk to your boys

Conservatives don't require slavish echo-chamber adherence to Groupthink. That's the left.

Whatever. You just admitted you agree with common sense gun regulations. Get over here for a hug my liberal friend.

 

[EGR one]

Common sense gun regulations are not about taking guns away from everyone
NRA and supporters say common sense gun regulations are the government attempting to take guns away from law abiding citizens.
Bull Shit - it is an evil attempt to confuse logical arguments for gun control. Those who confuse the discussion with lies all have blood on their hands.

I’m getting a Ruger 1911 45. Holds 8 plus 1. A smart regulation is to not make clips any bigger than this. It’s enough.

Good guys with guns can stop a bad guy with a gun as long as bad guy doesn’t have an assault rifle that can shoot or spray 40 bullets at a time.

Why would it be better to limit the ability to kill to eight people in lieu of nine people or twenty people? Some otherwise logical people seem to get fascinated by the number of people killed, versus the fact that people are killed.

Children are killed, all over this country, at school, on the way to school, or on the way home from school, every day, and few seem to notice. So, what is the magic number of dead people that causes so much concern? It is obviously not the deaths, it is the numbers of deaths that creates the concern.

There is no ultimate solve all solution. The goal is to lower the number of people a nut can kill because guns aren’t going away.

You’re talking about a completely different problem. Why people kill. I’m just trying to lower the number of people they can kill. I wish none of us could get a ten round clip because they don’t make them.

And my Ruger bushmaster only holds 4. And you have to do the thing each time to unload the spent cartridge and put another in the chamber. I couldn’t do the kind of damage the Vegas shooter did. Or the guys on the movie heat with their assault weapons. That was based on a real case. Those weapons shouldn’t be available.

Solve the crazy male problem first then I’ll consider letting anyone own and carry a gun.

So, you are content to suffer shootings, as long as the body count is low? How liberal of you.

 

[sealybobo]

Common sense gun regulations are not about taking guns away from everyone
NRA and supporters say common sense gun regulations are the government attempting to take guns away from law abiding citizens.
Bull Shit - it is an evil attempt to confuse logical arguments for gun control. Those who confuse the discussion with lies all have blood on their hands.

I’m getting a Ruger 1911 45. Holds 8 plus 1. A smart regulation is to not make clips any bigger than this. It’s enough.

Good guys with guns can stop a bad guy with a gun as long as bad guy doesn’t have an assault rifle that can shoot or spray 40 bullets at a time.

Why would it be better to limit the ability to kill to eight people in lieu of nine people or twenty people? Some otherwise logical people seem to get fascinated by the number of people killed, versus the fact that people are killed.

Children are killed, all over this country, at school, on the way to school, or on the way home from school, every day, and few seem to notice. So, what is the magic number of dead people that causes so much concern? It is obviously not the deaths, it is the numbers of deaths that creates the concern.

There is no ultimate solve all solution. The goal is to lower the number of people a nut can kill because guns aren’t going away.

You’re talking about a completely different problem. Why people kill. I’m just trying to lower the number of people they can kill. I wish none of us could get a ten round clip because they don’t make them.

And my Ruger bushmaster only holds 4. And you have to do the thing each time to unload the spent cartridge and put another in the chamber. I couldn’t do the kind of damage the Vegas shooter did. Or the guys on the movie heat with their assault weapons. That was based on a real case. Those weapons shouldn’t be available.

Solve the crazy male problem first then I’ll consider letting anyone own and carry a gun.

So, you are content to suffer shootings, as long as the body count is low? How liberal of you.

What do you suggest we do to stop the shootings?

 

[daveman]

First off, don't project blue state racism on red states. Second, cops do not hate guns.

The other standout takeaway, cited both by Ron Avery and Dan Marcou, is our overwhelming belief that the best defense against gun crime and mass shootings is an armed citizenry. A whopping 91 percent of those polled support concealed carry by honest/screened citizens.

When asked how important armed citizens are in reducing the overall crime rate — on a scale of one to five (with one being low and five being high) — 54 percent rate the effectiveness of citizens at a “5.” And more than 86 percent of the respondents feel a legally armed citizen at the Newtown or Aurora incidents could have reduced or eliminated casualties.
​

If you're this ignorant about guns, perhaps you shouldn't own any.

But you want anyone to own them. No training, no classes, no background checks. No permits to carry. Carry them in schools and in bars.

You want idiots like me to have no regulations.

Freedom isn’t free! Lol

Dood, why you gotta lie about me?

Where did I ever say I didn't want background checks?

Training and classes are a great idea. You sound like you sure as hell need classes.

The Second Amendment is a permit to carry. And I guess it's completely escaped your notice that most shootings happen in gun-free zones.

You sound reasonable. Talk to your boys

Conservatives don't require slavish echo-chamber adherence to Groupthink. That's the left.

Whatever. You just admitted you agree with common sense gun regulations. Get over here for a hug my liberal friend.

Oh, if only you irrational gun-haters would be satisfied with background checks.

No, a complete ban is the leftist goal.

And that's never going to happen.

 

[daveman]

Common sense gun regulations are not about taking guns away from everyone
NRA and supporters say common sense gun regulations are the government attempting to take guns away from law abiding citizens.
Bull Shit - it is an evil attempt to confuse logical arguments for gun control. Those who confuse the discussion with lies all have blood on their hands.

I’m getting a Ruger 1911 45. Holds 8 plus 1. A smart regulation is to not make clips any bigger than this. It’s enough.

Good guys with guns can stop a bad guy with a gun as long as bad guy doesn’t have an assault rifle that can shoot or spray 40 bullets at a time.

Why would it be better to limit the ability to kill to eight people in lieu of nine people or twenty people? Some otherwise logical people seem to get fascinated by the number of people killed, versus the fact that people are killed.

Children are killed, all over this country, at school, on the way to school, or on the way home from school, every day, and few seem to notice. So, what is the magic number of dead people that causes so much concern? It is obviously not the deaths, it is the numbers of deaths that creates the concern.

There is no ultimate solve all solution. The goal is to lower the number of people a nut can kill because guns aren’t going away.

You’re talking about a completely different problem. Why people kill. I’m just trying to lower the number of people they can kill. I wish none of us could get a ten round clip because they don’t make them.

And my Ruger bushmaster only holds 4. And you have to do the thing each time to unload the spent cartridge and put another in the chamber. I couldn’t do the kind of damage the Vegas shooter did. Or the guys on the movie heat with their assault weapons. That was based on a real case. Those weapons shouldn’t be available.

Solve the crazy male problem first then I’ll consider letting anyone own and carry a gun.

So, you are content to suffer shootings, as long as the body count is low? How liberal of you.

What do you suggest we do to stop the shootings?

It's so insanely simple.

LET PEOPLE CARRY WEAPONS TO DEFEND THEMSELVES AND OTHERS.

 

[Uncensored2008]

But you want anyone to own them. No training, no classes, no background checks. No permits to carry. Carry them in schools and in bars.

You want idiots like me to have no regulations.

Freedom isn’t free! Lol

Just like a chainsaw? Or a forge?

Moron...

 

[Uncensored2008]

In Russia people aren’t even allowed to own guns. And yet Republicans are saying we should be like Russia. Because they send spies here to trick Republicans into thinking that guns protect you from government.

Herpaderpaderpity derp.

The only ones who want things like Russia are you stalinist piles of shit.

 

[sealybobo]

But you want anyone to own them. No training, no classes, no background checks. No permits to carry. Carry them in schools and in bars.

You want idiots like me to have no regulations.

Freedom isn’t free! Lol

Just like a chainsaw? Or a forge?

Moron...

Hey everyone. I’m a hypocrite like al gore when he preached about going green. Sure he has 3 homes all burning electricity and he flies on private jets but that doesn’t mean he can’t be for us as a society going green.

Same for me. I said my new gun comes with an 8 round clip and they shouldn’t make clips that hold more rounds, but then the guy shows up and he had two normal clips and one that holds ten instead of 8.

That doesn’t mean I approve of them making ten round clips.

But, guess which clip this hypocrite put in the gun? Lol