Clinton unveils plan for tighter gun control including executive action, expanded background checks

[Rexx Taylor]

How about banning women who look and act like like men running for President?

 

[tyroneweaver]

Looks the gun-grabbers are revving up...
Clinton unveils plan for tighter gun control including executive action, expanded background checks
Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton on Monday proposed tighter gun-control measures, including expanded background checks, and suggested that if elected she would use executive powers to achieve her goals.


She called for expanded background checks for firearms sales online and at gun shows. Clinton also called for closing loopholes in federal laws that allow for gun-sale transactions to be completed if the buyer’s background check is not finished within three days.

Clinton will unveil more details about her plans Monday during a campaign swing through New Hampshire.

Her campaign says her proposals also include a repeal of legislation shielding gun manufacturers, distributors and dealers from most liability suits, even in the case of mass shootings like the one that killed nine students and teachers at an Oregon community college on Thursday.

Easy for her to say. She has lifetime protection from the secret service. Is she willing to take their guns away and give them pepper spray.

I bet her IUD has cobwebs on it.

 

[Katzndogz]

Good. She needs to run on this issue.

 

[Stephanie]

Good. View attachment 51652

one million, that's a drop in a pale compared to 5-7 MILLION who are member's of the NRA. so too bad how sad for you. you'll just have to keep stomping your feet and wailing

 

[Rexx Taylor]

yet Hillary doesnt see a problem with the legal sales of Pressure Cookers.

 

[hortysir]

Good. View attachment 51652

Do you agree with all Supreme Court Justices on every matter, or just the ones that fit your narrative?

 

[Stephanie]

Good. View attachment 51652

Do you agree with all Supreme Court Justices on every matter, or just the ones that fit your narrative?

I can answer that for $100 alex
some are sheep. beats me why

 

[Vandalshandle]

Fantastic! Another reason for voting for Hillary!

 

[Sallow]

Funny thing is our founding fathers were trying to get away from an overbearing tax happy government... In that context ya, the individual had the right to bear arms against a government trying to control them.

The funny thing history is repeating itself... Damn those founding father were a brilliant group of fellas.
As an Indian I am damn thankful they fled incestuous Europe to here... And brought firearms with them.
Us Indians would still be playin around with stupid sticks, dirt, rocks and sinew.

There's nothing in the Constitution of the United States that advocates in the slightest the use of arms against the government.

Nothing at all.

 

[hortysir]

Good. View attachment 51652

********
Not surprisingly, the advertisements don’t cite the place where the former Chief Justice set forth his analysis of the Second Amendment.

Because the Chief Justice never said anything about the Second Amendment when he was actually on the Supreme Court. (Half a dozen Supreme Court decisions affirm that the Second Amendment is an individual right.)

Nor did Mr. Burger write anything about the Second Amendment in scholarly legal or historical journal. (The scholarly consensus is virtually unanimous that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right).

No, the Chief Justice wrote about the Second Amendment in Parade magazine, in a short article in January 1990.********
Warren Burger and the Second Amendment

 

[hortysir]

Funny thing is our founding fathers were trying to get away from an overbearing tax happy government... In that context ya, the individual had the right to bear arms against a government trying to control them.

The funny thing history is repeating itself... Damn those founding father were a brilliant group of fellas.
As an Indian I am damn thankful they fled incestuous Europe to here... And brought firearms with them.
Us Indians would still be playin around with stupid sticks, dirt, rocks and sinew.

There's nothing in the Constitution of the United States that advocates in the slightest the use of arms against the government.

Nothing at all.

In the 1789 debate in Congress on James Madison's proposed Bill of Rights, Elbridge Gerry argued that a state militia was necessary: "to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty ... Whenever governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia in order to raise and army upon their ruins."
Ex-Chief Justice Warren Burger in Parade Magazine

 

[Rozman]

Looks the gun-grabbers are revving up...
Clinton unveils plan for tighter gun control including executive action, expanded background checks
Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton on Monday proposed tighter gun-control measures, including expanded background checks, and suggested that if elected she would use executive powers to achieve her goals.


She called for expanded background checks for firearms sales online and at gun shows. Clinton also called for closing loopholes in federal laws that allow for gun-sale transactions to be completed if the buyer’s background check is not finished within three days.

Clinton will unveil more details about her plans Monday during a campaign swing through New Hampshire.

Her campaign says her proposals also include a repeal of legislation shielding gun manufacturers, distributors and dealers from most liability suits, even in the case of mass shootings like the one that killed nine students and teachers at an Oregon community college on Thursday.

And what is Hillary's and the Libs plan for the guns that have already been purchased .....
Answer me that!

That has to be like maybe a few hundred out there...
And maybe even a few more then that....

 

[Vigilante]

Funny thing is our founding fathers were trying to get away from an overbearing tax happy government... In that context ya, the individual had the right to bear arms against a government trying to control them.

The funny thing history is repeating itself... Damn those founding father were a brilliant group of fellas.
As an Indian I am damn thankful they fled incestuous Europe to here... And brought firearms with them.
Us Indians would still be playin around with stupid sticks, dirt, rocks and sinew.

There's nothing in the Constitution of the United States that advocates in the slightest the use of arms against the government.

Nothing at all.

Said by our third president....

 

[Stephanie]

Good. View attachment 51652

********
Not surprisingly, the advertisements don’t cite the place where the former Chief Justice set forth his analysis of the Second Amendment.

Because the Chief Justice never said anything about the Second Amendment when he was actually on the Supreme Court. (Half a dozen Supreme Court decisions affirm that the Second Amendment is an individual right.)

Nor did Mr. Burger write anything about the Second Amendment in scholarly legal or historical journal. (The scholarly consensus is virtually unanimous that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right).

No, the Chief Justice wrote about the Second Amendment in Parade magazine, in a short article in January 1990.********
Warren Burger and the Second Amendment

wow, who can expect HONESTY from them. if it's for their Cause lying is ok. they have no honor

 

[Vigilante]

Good. View attachment 51652

********
Not surprisingly, the advertisements don’t cite the place where the former Chief Justice set forth his analysis of the Second Amendment.

Because the Chief Justice never said anything about the Second Amendment when he was actually on the Supreme Court. (Half a dozen Supreme Court decisions affirm that the Second Amendment is an individual right.)

Nor did Mr. Burger write anything about the Second Amendment in scholarly legal or historical journal. (The scholarly consensus is virtually unanimous that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right).

No, the Chief Justice wrote about the Second Amendment in Parade magazine, in a short article in January 1990.********
Warren Burger and the Second Amendment

wow, who can expect HONESTY from them. if it's for their Cause lying is ok. they have no honor

They put to use the arabic word taqiyya constantly...LIE as long as it helps the PARTY...FUCK the country!

 

[Rustic]

The federal government is not faultless... It's track record sucks.

Embrace the suck

 

[Stephanie]

here ya go libs. learn from your actions.

SNIP:
The More You Politicize Guns, The Weaker Your Case Becomes


As difficult as it might be to accept, there are problems that can’t be fixed by Washington



By David Harsanyi
October 2, 2015


After the horrific mass shooting at a community college in Oregon, President Obama
made an impassioned case that gun violence is “something we should politicize”—and why should this be any different:

This is a political choice that we make, to allow this to happen every few months in America. We collectively are answerable to those families who lose their loved ones because of our inaction.

Everything in that statement is wrong. What happened in Oregon is tragic, and the nation should comfort families and look for reasonable and practical ways to stem violence, but there is only one murderer. Now, if government somehow bolstered, endorsed, or “allowed” the actions of Chris Harper-Mercer—as they might, say, the death of 10,000-plus viable babies each year or the civilian deaths that occur during an American drone action—a person could plausibly argue that we are collectively answerable as a nation.

SNIP:
For the liberal, every societal problem has a state-issued remedy waiting to be administered over the objections of a reactionary Republican. But just because you have a tremendous amount of emotion and frustration built up around a certain cause doesn’t make your favored legislation any more practical, effective or realistic. It doesn’t change the fact that owning a gun is a civil right, that the preponderance of owners are not criminals, or that there are 300 million guns out there.

ALL of it here:
The More You Politicize Guns, The Weaker Your Case Becomes

 

[M14 Shooter]

NRA gun nuts must either bend or break.

More mindless nonsense from the village useful idiot.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Good

The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home
Regardless of how much you hate that fact, it remains a fact.

 

[Sallow]

Good

The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home
Regardless of how much you hate that fact, it remains a fact.

That's what case law has done to corrupt the amendment.

And case law isn't written in stone and can be reversed.