Clinton says U.S. could "totally obliterate" Iran

[billyerock1991]

you mean her

"Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton warned Tehran on Tuesday that if she were president, the United States could "totally obliterate" Iran in retaliation for a nuclear strike against Israel.

On the day of a crucial vote in her nomination battle against fellow Democrat Barack Obama, the New York senator said she wanted to make clear to Tehran what she was prepared to do as president in hopes that this warning would deter any Iranian nuclear attack against the Jewish state.

"I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran (if it attacks Israel)," Clinton said in an interview on ABC's "Good Morning America."

"In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them," she said.


Clinton says U.S. could

Clearly, this is not some one we can risk giving the nuclear codes to.

We couldn't obliterate anybody, we have a pussy for commander-in-chief

you mean where we had Osama Bin Ladin in Pakistan, that pussy of a president !!! along with that pussy secretary of state had him either captured or killed those 2 pussies ... seem you have no Idea what a pussy is

Seals done the deed, not commander asshat and his sniper dogging mutt Hildabeast. Lol

lets see HUMM dumb ass, who has the authority to send in the seal in hummmmmmm !!!!! who could that be ??? oh yes the president orders that strike ... so that would be Obama dick weed... allowing the seals to go in to do their job for the president ... now where oh where did the president get the info from ???? HUMMMMMM who could that be ??? Oh yes ... it was Hildabeast, as you call her that brought the president the intel where she assured the president that Osama was there ... so you stupidity really out shines us all right about now .... now doesn't it

 

[billyerock1991]

"Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton warned Tehran on Tuesday that if she were president, the United States could "totally obliterate" Iran in retaliation for a nuclear strike against Israel.

On the day of a crucial vote in her nomination battle against fellow Democrat Barack Obama, the New York senator said she wanted to make clear to Tehran what she was prepared to do as president in hopes that this warning would deter any Iranian nuclear attack against the Jewish state.

"I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran (if it attacks Israel)," Clinton said in an interview on ABC's "Good Morning America."

"In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them," she said.


Clinton says U.S. could

Clearly, this is not some one we can risk giving the nuclear codes to.

and trump is better ??? some Iranian leader calls trump a tiny weenee president and Iran is wiped off the earth ... I feel if hillary saying if Iran launches a nuclear attack on Isreal that she would wipe them off the face of the earth, is just fine with me ... clinton is clearly the person that I want to have nuclear codes ... what the hell is wrong with you???

Forgetting for a moment that you are a big fan of killing 80,000,000 people, more that all the people who died in WWII, why would Hillary nuke Iran for targeting Israel when Israel is perfectly capable of handling Iran on its own? Does Hillary not understand the relative capabilities of Iran and Israel? Or is she just crazy?

first of all he said attacking Israel not targeting Israel with nukes ... big difference here ... I'm sure they would attack all of Israel's bases where they have their nukes ... that would be ignorant on Irans part if they didn't ... as of 80 million people so be it ... if you're going to attack not target, israel then you better think twice...

 

[PredFan]

Iran is the most modern, best educated and developed nation in the region The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.

They are not the pushover you think they would be. Remember when you all thought Iraq was going to be a quick little walk in the park? It's like that only a whole lot worse. For one there is not a big sectarian divide to exploit like Iraq and they have been preparing for a US invasion for many years. Deciding to bomb Iran into regime change would go down as the most futile war effort in our history. It's all hypothetical though, Iran is not going to attack Israel unless we open hostilities against them. That too has always been part of the balance of terror we have with them.

Yes they are.
In an eight year war with Iraq they fought to a draw.
We took out Iraq's Military in just days, and we'd do the same with Iran's.
What is true is that Islamic fighters would indeed stream into Iran by the thousands and we'd find ourselves bogged down as we are right now in Iraq.

Squadron of loaded B-52s....just sayin' we COULD obliterate them.

It is the standing policy of the pentagon to take all reasonable precautions to avoid civilian deaths to maintain the moral superiority of our mission. Carpet bombing the civilian population is not an option under any circumstances.

But we could.

 

[PredFan]

Who's talking about regime change? I'm talking about obliterating them, like Hillary supposedly said. What I'm talking about isn't the stupid idea of winning the hearts and minds of the people, like in Iraq, I'm talking about splattering their hearts and minds all over the ground.

Yeah, they have a word for that and it's harder to wash off than a tattoo. Mass killing of a civilian population is sort of frowned upon.

Cry me a fucking river. They would do it to Israel and then make it a national holiday. I've not a bit of sympathy.

No they wouldn't because they have not done it after all this time, their threats against Israel are a sort of ultimatum of where their counter attack will be IF we attack them for no good reason like Iraq. You should really learn more about Iran, it's not like you think. Their people enjoy greater freedoms than our so-called ally Saudi Arabia and all those big threats against the west are mostly for domestic consumption for their own hardliner conservatives. It is clear you picture some dusty primitive place like Afghanistan but they look more like one of the southern European countries.

Ok nutter, we'll just have to disagree. I'm tired of taking Hillary's side.

You are talking mechanized genocide of the Iranian people and I'm the nutter? Damn.

Yup, that's how far gone you are.

 

[PredFan]

We wouldn't need nukes to do that. A squadron of B-52s with large payloads would send them back to the Stone Age, which for them was about 70 years ago.

have you heard of ICBM's ??? cruse missiles, polaris missiles ??? they all can have nuclear weapons on them ... hell you could put them on drones ... why would anyone use a B-52 these days ...

I simply stated we don't need nukes. Why irradiate the place? Enough conventional bombs could obliterate them and then we'd have a nice parking lot.

 

[PredFan]

We wouldn't need nukes to do that. A squadron of B-52s with large payloads would send them back to the Stone Age, which for them was about 70 years ago.

Iran is the most modern, best educated and developed nation in the region The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.

you do know that a squadron of B52 can be shot down in a instance don't you??? apparently not!!!! b-52's would be that last resort that I as a leader would use ...

Dude, a squadron of B-52s is accompanied by fighters, they also flu so high that by the time anyone got to them, it would be all over. Last resort? What would your first resort be then?

 

[PredFan]

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.

They are not the pushover you think they would be. Remember when you all thought Iraq was going to be a quick little walk in the park? It's like that only a whole lot worse. For one there is not a big sectarian divide to exploit like Iraq and they have been preparing for a US invasion for many years. Deciding to bomb Iran into regime change would go down as the most futile war effort in our history. It's all hypothetical though, Iran is not going to attack Israel unless we open hostilities against them. That too has always been part of the balance of terror we have with them.

Yes they are.
In an eight year war with Iraq they fought to a draw.
We took out Iraq's Military in just days, and we'd do the same with Iran's.
What is true is that Islamic fighters would indeed stream into Iran by the thousands and we'd find ourselves bogged down as we are right now in Iraq.

Squadron of loaded B-52s....just sayin' we COULD obliterate them.

It is the standing policy of the pentagon to take all reasonable precautions to avoid civilian deaths to maintain the moral superiority of our mission. Carpet bombing the civilian population is not an option under any circumstances.

that clown wasn't talking about carpet bombing he was talking about nukes ..

No you illiterate moron, I specifically said we wouldn't need nuke. Learn to read for fuck's sake.

 

[PredFan]

We wouldn't need nukes to do that. A squadron of B-52s with large payloads would send them back to the Stone Age, which for them was about 70 years ago.

Iran is the most modern, best educated and developed nation in the region The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.

They are not the pushover you think they would be. Remember when you all thought Iraq was going to be a quick little walk in the park? It's like that only a whole lot worse. For one there is not a big sectarian divide to exploit like Iraq and they have been preparing for a US invasion for many years. Deciding to bomb Iran into regime change would go down as the most futile war effort in our history. It's all hypothetical though, Iran is not going to attack Israel unless we open hostilities against them. That too has always been part of the balance of terror we have with them.

Who's talking about regime change? I'm talking about obliterating them, like Hillary supposedly said. What I'm talking about isn't the stupid idea of winning the hearts and minds of the people, like in Iraq, I'm talking about splattering their hearts and minds all over the ground.

While Russia and China sit quietly on the sidelines? LOL!!

So you are saying that Hillary is full of shit then?

 

[dannyboys]

...The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.

That was then.

Long ago, in a galaxy far, far away.

This is now.

Now you think it's primitive like Afghanistan but it's not, it is a modern, advanced even westernized country that hates the west more because we have fucked them over a bunch of times .

Iran is a modernized country- and frankly from what i have seen, Iranians don't hate the west- Iran's government is an ideological theology- and they do hate the west.

Guilt by association - just like what happened to Germany in the mid-20th - don't want to be associated with your government? Get rid of it. Otherwise, No Sale.

The German electorate voted in Hitler knowing exactly what he was promising he would do to the Jews. And the mentally ill and the crippled.
After the war virtually no one in the country admitted to being a Nazi supporter.

 

[the_human_being]

Iran is the most modern, best educated and developed nation in the region The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.

They are not the pushover you think they would be. Remember when you all thought Iraq was going to be a quick little walk in the park? It's like that only a whole lot worse. For one there is not a big sectarian divide to exploit like Iraq and they have been preparing for a US invasion for many years. Deciding to bomb Iran into regime change would go down as the most futile war effort in our history. It's all hypothetical though, Iran is not going to attack Israel unless we open hostilities against them. That too has always been part of the balance of terror we have with them.

Who's talking about regime change? I'm talking about obliterating them, like Hillary supposedly said. What I'm talking about isn't the stupid idea of winning the hearts and minds of the people, like in Iraq, I'm talking about splattering their hearts and minds all over the ground.

While Russia and China sit quietly on the sidelines? LOL!!

So you are saying that Hillary is full of shit then?

Exactly. Iran is an ally of both Russia and China just like England is an ally of ours.

 

[the_human_being]

We wouldn't need nukes to do that. A squadron of B-52s with large payloads would send them back to the Stone Age, which for them was about 70 years ago.

Iran is the most modern, best educated and developed nation in the region The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.

you do know that a squadron of B52 can be shot down in a instance don't you??? apparently not!!!! b-52's would be that last resort that I as a leader would use ...

Dude, a squadron of B-52s is accompanied by fighters, they also flu so high that by the time anyone got to them, it would be all over. Last resort? What would your first resort be then?

Russia's new bombers are a whole lot younger than our old ancient B52's. Now our Stealth bombers are not nearly as old as the B52. Russia's bombers are operating from Iranian air bases right now. You're going to nuke them? LOL!!

 

[my2¢]

Appears OP took Obama's side of the issue back in 2008. Or perhaps Iranian's? From the OP article I don't see nukes discussed.

Clinton:

• "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran (if it attacks Israel),"
• "In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them,"
• "That's a terrible thing to say but those people who run Iran need to understand that because that perhaps will deter them from doing something that would be reckless, foolish and tragic,"

Obama:

• "One of the things that we've seen over the last several years is a bunch of talk using words like 'obliterate'. It doesn't actually produce good results. And so I'm not interested in saber rattling."

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (3 years earlier in 2005):

• "Israel should be wiped off the map."

 

[PredFan]

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.

They are not the pushover you think they would be. Remember when you all thought Iraq was going to be a quick little walk in the park? It's like that only a whole lot worse. For one there is not a big sectarian divide to exploit like Iraq and they have been preparing for a US invasion for many years. Deciding to bomb Iran into regime change would go down as the most futile war effort in our history. It's all hypothetical though, Iran is not going to attack Israel unless we open hostilities against them. That too has always been part of the balance of terror we have with them.

Who's talking about regime change? I'm talking about obliterating them, like Hillary supposedly said. What I'm talking about isn't the stupid idea of winning the hearts and minds of the people, like in Iraq, I'm talking about splattering their hearts and minds all over the ground.

While Russia and China sit quietly on the sidelines? LOL!!

So you are saying that Hillary is full of shit then?

Exactly. Iran is an ally of both Russia and China just like England is an ally of ours.

Still, we could.

 

[the_human_being]

They are not the pushover you think they would be. Remember when you all thought Iraq was going to be a quick little walk in the park? It's like that only a whole lot worse. For one there is not a big sectarian divide to exploit like Iraq and they have been preparing for a US invasion for many years. Deciding to bomb Iran into regime change would go down as the most futile war effort in our history. It's all hypothetical though, Iran is not going to attack Israel unless we open hostilities against them. That too has always been part of the balance of terror we have with them.

Who's talking about regime change? I'm talking about obliterating them, like Hillary supposedly said. What I'm talking about isn't the stupid idea of winning the hearts and minds of the people, like in Iraq, I'm talking about splattering their hearts and minds all over the ground.

While Russia and China sit quietly on the sidelines? LOL!!

So you are saying that Hillary is full of shit then?

Exactly. Iran is an ally of both Russia and China just like England is an ally of ours.

Still, we could.

Yes indeed if we were very very stupid.

 

[PredFan]

We wouldn't need nukes to do that. A squadron of B-52s with large payloads would send them back to the Stone Age, which for them was about 70 years ago.

Iran is the most modern, best educated and developed nation in the region The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.

you do know that a squadron of B52 can be shot down in a instance don't you??? apparently not!!!! b-52's would be that last resort that I as a leader would use ...

Dude, a squadron of B-52s is accompanied by fighters, they also flu so high that by the time anyone got to them, it would be all over. Last resort? What would your first resort be then?

Russia's new bombers are a whole lot younger than our old ancient B52's. Now our Stealth bombers are not nearly as old as the B52. Russia's bombers are operating from Iranian air bases right now. You're going to nuke them? LOL!!

Fir the 100th fucking time, I'm not talking about nukes, I soecifically said we don't need nukes. Why would I give a flying fuck about Russia's bombers? You don't attack bombers with bombers dumbass.

 

[the_human_being]

Iran is the most modern, best educated and developed nation in the region The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.

you do know that a squadron of B52 can be shot down in a instance don't you??? apparently not!!!! b-52's would be that last resort that I as a leader would use ...

Dude, a squadron of B-52s is accompanied by fighters, they also flu so high that by the time anyone got to them, it would be all over. Last resort? What would your first resort be then?

Russia's new bombers are a whole lot younger than our old ancient B52's. Now our Stealth bombers are not nearly as old as the B52. Russia's bombers are operating from Iranian air bases right now. You're going to nuke them? LOL!!

Fir the 100th fucking time, I'm not talking about nukes, I soecifically said we don't need nukes. Why would I give a flying fuck about Russia's bombers? You don't attack bombers with bombers dumbass.

No you don't. You attack countries and cities like Portsmouth, Norfolk, New York, etc. You don't even need bombers. Why endanger your bombers when you have submarines armed with nukes?

 

[PredFan]

Who's talking about regime change? I'm talking about obliterating them, like Hillary supposedly said. What I'm talking about isn't the stupid idea of winning the hearts and minds of the people, like in Iraq, I'm talking about splattering their hearts and minds all over the ground.

While Russia and China sit quietly on the sidelines? LOL!!

So you are saying that Hillary is full of shit then?

Exactly. Iran is an ally of both Russia and China just like England is an ally of ours.

Still, we could.

Yes indeed if we were very very stupid.

Which makes sense since a very stupid person said it originally.

 

[PredFan]

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.

you do know that a squadron of B52 can be shot down in a instance don't you??? apparently not!!!! b-52's would be that last resort that I as a leader would use ...

Dude, a squadron of B-52s is accompanied by fighters, they also flu so high that by the time anyone got to them, it would be all over. Last resort? What would your first resort be then?

Russia's new bombers are a whole lot younger than our old ancient B52's. Now our Stealth bombers are not nearly as old as the B52. Russia's bombers are operating from Iranian air bases right now. You're going to nuke them? LOL!!

Fir the 100th fucking time, I'm not talking about nukes, I soecifically said we don't need nukes. Why would I give a flying fuck about Russia's bombers? You don't attack bombers with bombers dumbass.

No you don't. You attack countries and cities like Portsmouth, Norfolk, New York, etc. You don't even need bombers. Why endanger your bombers when you have submarines armed with nukes?

Irrelevant nonsense. Do you have anything intelligent or relevant to add? If not, go play in the street.

 

[the_human_being]

you do know that a squadron of B52 can be shot down in a instance don't you??? apparently not!!!! b-52's would be that last resort that I as a leader would use ...

Dude, a squadron of B-52s is accompanied by fighters, they also flu so high that by the time anyone got to them, it would be all over. Last resort? What would your first resort be then?

Russia's new bombers are a whole lot younger than our old ancient B52's. Now our Stealth bombers are not nearly as old as the B52. Russia's bombers are operating from Iranian air bases right now. You're going to nuke them? LOL!!

Fir the 100th fucking time, I'm not talking about nukes, I soecifically said we don't need nukes. Why would I give a flying fuck about Russia's bombers? You don't attack bombers with bombers dumbass.

No you don't. You attack countries and cities like Portsmouth, Norfolk, New York, etc. You don't even need bombers. Why endanger your bombers when you have submarines armed with nukes?

Irrelevant nonsense. Do you have anything intelligent or relevant to add? If not, go play in the street.

Actually, you're the one who is totally off the wall here.

 

[toomuchtime_]

"Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton warned Tehran on Tuesday that if she were president, the United States could "totally obliterate" Iran in retaliation for a nuclear strike against Israel.

On the day of a crucial vote in her nomination battle against fellow Democrat Barack Obama, the New York senator said she wanted to make clear to Tehran what she was prepared to do as president in hopes that this warning would deter any Iranian nuclear attack against the Jewish state.

"I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran (if it attacks Israel)," Clinton said in an interview on ABC's "Good Morning America."

"In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them," she said.


Clinton says U.S. could

Clearly, this is not some one we can risk giving the nuclear codes to.

and trump is better ??? some Iranian leader calls trump a tiny weenee president and Iran is wiped off the earth ... I feel if hillary saying if Iran launches a nuclear attack on Isreal that she would wipe them off the face of the earth, is just fine with me ... clinton is clearly the person that I want to have nuclear codes ... what the hell is wrong with you???

Forgetting for a moment that you are a big fan of killing 80,000,000 people, more that all the people who died in WWII, why would Hillary nuke Iran for targeting Israel when Israel is perfectly capable of handling Iran on its own? Does Hillary not understand the relative capabilities of Iran and Israel? Or is she just crazy?

first of all he said attacking Israel not targeting Israel with nukes ... big difference here ... I'm sure they would attack all of Israel's bases where they have their nukes ... that would be ignorant on Irans part if they didn't ... as of 80 million people so be it ... if you're going to attack not target, israel then you better think twice...

You're sounding almost as crazy as Hillary. First of all this threat by crazy Hillary was made in 2008, long before Iran had enough enriched uranium to make a single bomb. Second, by 2010 Netanyahu had ordered the IDF to prepare to attack and destroy the Iranian nuclear program if it became necessary, something the Pentagon later said Israel was fully capable of doing. Third, in 2012, Netanyahu addressed the UNGA and told the world Israel had drawn a red line at 240 kg of 20% enriched uranium, enough to produce a single bomb if further enriched to 90%, and made it clear in interviews that Israel would destroy Iran's nuclear weapons program if Iran exceeded 240 kg of 20% enriched uranium. Iran heeded Netanyahu's red line and stopped enriching uranium to 20%. It is bizarre to imagine Israel would ever have allowed Iran to develop nuclear weapons. Netanyahu asked for help from the US and others to prevent the necessity of an Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear weapons program, but made it clear that Israel would act alone if necessary to prevent Iran from ever acquiring nuclear weapons.

Clearly, there was no rational basis for Hillary's reckless, genocidal threat to "obliterate" Iran in a nuclear attack. It is hard to imagine that Hillary was so uninformed as to believe an Iranian nuclear attack on Israel was something so imminent that such a horrible threat was necessary, and we are left with the only rational explanation that this was a sign of her deteriorating mental health. Obviously, Hillary is too reckless and crazy to be allowed to have her finger on the nuclear button.