Clinton says U.S. could "totally obliterate" Iran

toomuchtime_

Gold Member
Dec 29, 2008
19,703
4,746
280
"Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton warned Tehran on Tuesday that if she were president, the United States could "totally obliterate" Iran in retaliation for a nuclear strike against Israel.

On the day of a crucial vote in her nomination battle against fellow Democrat Barack Obama, the New York senator said she wanted to make clear to Tehran what she was prepared to do as president in hopes that this warning would deter any Iranian nuclear attack against the Jewish state.

"I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran (if it attacks Israel)," Clinton said in an interview on ABC's "Good Morning America."

"In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them," she said.


Clinton says U.S. could

Clearly, this is not some one we can risk giving the nuclear codes to.
 
This has pretty much been the policy of the US for a long time. Presidents have said it in less and more aggressive terms but it's always been the same.
 
"Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton warned Tehran on Tuesday that if she were president, the United States could "totally obliterate" Iran in retaliation for a nuclear strike against Israel.

On the day of a crucial vote in her nomination battle against fellow Democrat Barack Obama, the New York senator said she wanted to make clear to Tehran what she was prepared to do as president in hopes that this warning would deter any Iranian nuclear attack against the Jewish state.

"I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran (if it attacks Israel)," Clinton said in an interview on ABC's "Good Morning America."

"In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them," she said.


Clinton says U.S. could

Clearly, this is not some one we can risk giving the nuclear codes to.


We already know that WWIII is a certainty.


There is no way Russia is going to let the US controlled Iran.


Erdogan knows Obama is behind the failed coup. They also know that the US favors the Kurds So NATO lost one powerful ally..


.
 
We wouldn't need nukes to do that. A squadron of B-52s with large payloads would send them back to the Stone Age, which for them was about 70 years ago.
Iran is the most modern, best educated and developed nation in the region The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.
 
We wouldn't need nukes to do that. A squadron of B-52s with large payloads would send them back to the Stone Age, which for them was about 70 years ago.
Iran is the most modern, best educated and developed nation in the region The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.
 
So Hillary is open to allowing Iran to get nukes AND nuke Israel....interesting.
 
We wouldn't need nukes to do that. A squadron of B-52s with large payloads would send them back to the Stone Age, which for them was about 70 years ago.
Iran is the most modern, best educated and developed nation in the region The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.
They are not the pushover you think they would be. Remember when you all thought Iraq was going to be a quick little walk in the park? It's like that only a whole lot worse. For one there is not a big sectarian divide to exploit like Iraq and they have been preparing for a US invasion for many years. Deciding to bomb Iran into regime change would go down as the most futile war effort in our history. It's all hypothetical though, Iran is not going to attack Israel unless we open hostilities against them. That too has always been part of the balance of terror we have with them.
 
Wait? Am I defending the Hildabeast? FUCK!
image.jpeg
 
We wouldn't need nukes to do that. A squadron of B-52s with large payloads would send them back to the Stone Age, which for them was about 70 years ago.
Iran is the most modern, best educated and developed nation in the region The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.
They are not the pushover you think they would be. Remember when you all thought Iraq was going to be a quick little walk in the park? It's like that only a whole lot worse. For one there is not a big sectarian divide to exploit like Iraq and they have been preparing for a US invasion for many years. Deciding to bomb Iran into regime change would go down as the most futile war effort in our history. It's all hypothetical though, Iran is not going to attack Israel unless we open hostilities against them. That too has always been part of the balance of terror we have with them.

Who's talking about regime change? I'm talking about obliterating them, like Hillary supposedly said. What I'm talking about isn't the stupid idea of winning the hearts and minds of the people, like in Iraq, I'm talking about splattering their hearts and minds all over the ground.
 
We wouldn't need nukes to do that. A squadron of B-52s with large payloads would send them back to the Stone Age, which for them was about 70 years ago.
Iran is the most modern, best educated and developed nation in the region The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.
They are not the pushover you think they would be. Remember when you all thought Iraq was going to be a quick little walk in the park? It's like that only a whole lot worse. For one there is not a big sectarian divide to exploit like Iraq and they have been preparing for a US invasion for many years. Deciding to bomb Iran into regime change would go down as the most futile war effort in our history. It's all hypothetical though, Iran is not going to attack Israel unless we open hostilities against them. That too has always been part of the balance of terror we have with them.

Who's talking about regime change? I'm talking about obliterating them, like Hillary supposedly said. What I'm talking about isn't the stupid idea of winning the hearts and minds of the people, like in Iraq, I'm talking about splattering their hearts and minds all over the ground.
Yeah, they have a word for that and it's harder to wash off than a tattoo. Mass killing of a civilian population is sort of frowned upon.
 
We wouldn't need nukes to do that. A squadron of B-52s with large payloads would send them back to the Stone Age, which for them was about 70 years ago.
Iran is the most modern, best educated and developed nation in the region The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.
They are not the pushover you think they would be. Remember when you all thought Iraq was going to be a quick little walk in the park? It's like that only a whole lot worse. For one there is not a big sectarian divide to exploit like Iraq and they have been preparing for a US invasion for many years. Deciding to bomb Iran into regime change would go down as the most futile war effort in our history. It's all hypothetical though, Iran is not going to attack Israel unless we open hostilities against them. That too has always been part of the balance of terror we have with them.

Who's talking about regime change? I'm talking about obliterating them, like Hillary supposedly said. What I'm talking about isn't the stupid idea of winning the hearts and minds of the people, like in Iraq, I'm talking about splattering their hearts and minds all over the ground.
Yeah, they have a word for that and it's harder to wash off than a tattoo. Mass killing of a civilian population is sort of frowned upon.

Cry me a fucking river. They would do it to Israel and then make it a national holiday. I've not a bit of sympathy.
 
We wouldn't need nukes to do that. A squadron of B-52s with large payloads would send them back to the Stone Age, which for them was about 70 years ago.
Iran is the most modern, best educated and developed nation in the region The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.
They are not the pushover you think they would be. Remember when you all thought Iraq was going to be a quick little walk in the park? It's like that only a whole lot worse. For one there is not a big sectarian divide to exploit like Iraq and they have been preparing for a US invasion for many years. Deciding to bomb Iran into regime change would go down as the most futile war effort in our history. It's all hypothetical though, Iran is not going to attack Israel unless we open hostilities against them. That too has always been part of the balance of terror we have with them.

Yes they are.
In an eight year war with Iraq they fought to a draw.
We took out Iraq's Military in just days, and we'd do the same with Iran's.
What is true is that Islamic fighters would indeed stream into Iran by the thousands and we'd find ourselves bogged down as we are right now in Iraq.
 
We wouldn't need nukes to do that. A squadron of B-52s with large payloads would send them back to the Stone Age, which for them was about 70 years ago.
Iran is the most modern, best educated and developed nation in the region The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.
They are not the pushover you think they would be. Remember when you all thought Iraq was going to be a quick little walk in the park? It's like that only a whole lot worse. For one there is not a big sectarian divide to exploit like Iraq and they have been preparing for a US invasion for many years. Deciding to bomb Iran into regime change would go down as the most futile war effort in our history. It's all hypothetical though, Iran is not going to attack Israel unless we open hostilities against them. That too has always been part of the balance of terror we have with them.

Who's talking about regime change? I'm talking about obliterating them, like Hillary supposedly said. What I'm talking about isn't the stupid idea of winning the hearts and minds of the people, like in Iraq, I'm talking about splattering their hearts and minds all over the ground.
Yeah, they have a word for that and it's harder to wash off than a tattoo. Mass killing of a civilian population is sort of frowned upon.

Unless one is a Muslim of course.
 
Iran is the most modern, best educated and developed nation in the region The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.
They are not the pushover you think they would be. Remember when you all thought Iraq was going to be a quick little walk in the park? It's like that only a whole lot worse. For one there is not a big sectarian divide to exploit like Iraq and they have been preparing for a US invasion for many years. Deciding to bomb Iran into regime change would go down as the most futile war effort in our history. It's all hypothetical though, Iran is not going to attack Israel unless we open hostilities against them. That too has always been part of the balance of terror we have with them.

Who's talking about regime change? I'm talking about obliterating them, like Hillary supposedly said. What I'm talking about isn't the stupid idea of winning the hearts and minds of the people, like in Iraq, I'm talking about splattering their hearts and minds all over the ground.
Yeah, they have a word for that and it's harder to wash off than a tattoo. Mass killing of a civilian population is sort of frowned upon.

Cry me a fucking river. They would do it to Israel and then make it a national holiday. I've not a bit of sympathy.
Israel can take care of itself. They have a very capable military and nukes of their own. They would fuck Iran up if Iran tried any shit.
 
Iran is the most modern, best educated and developed nation in the region The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.
They are not the pushover you think they would be. Remember when you all thought Iraq was going to be a quick little walk in the park? It's like that only a whole lot worse. For one there is not a big sectarian divide to exploit like Iraq and they have been preparing for a US invasion for many years. Deciding to bomb Iran into regime change would go down as the most futile war effort in our history. It's all hypothetical though, Iran is not going to attack Israel unless we open hostilities against them. That too has always been part of the balance of terror we have with them.

Who's talking about regime change? I'm talking about obliterating them, like Hillary supposedly said. What I'm talking about isn't the stupid idea of winning the hearts and minds of the people, like in Iraq, I'm talking about splattering their hearts and minds all over the ground.
Yeah, they have a word for that and it's harder to wash off than a tattoo. Mass killing of a civilian population is sort of frowned upon.

Cry me a fucking river. They would do it to Israel and then make it a national holiday. I've not a bit of sympathy.
No they wouldn't because they have not done it after all this time, their threats against Israel are a sort of ultimatum of where their counter attack will be IF we attack them for no good reason like Iraq. You should really learn more about Iran, it's not like you think. Their people enjoy greater freedoms than our so-called ally Saudi Arabia and all those big threats against the west are mostly for domestic consumption for their own hardliner conservatives. It is clear you picture some dusty primitive place like Afghanistan but they look more like one of the southern European countries.
 
We wouldn't need nukes to do that. A squadron of B-52s with large payloads would send them back to the Stone Age, which for them was about 70 years ago.
Iran is the most modern, best educated and developed nation in the region The written history of the Persian civilization stretches back to a time Europeans were still wearing furs, head hunting and worshiping trees.

A squadron of fully loaded B-52s will change that right quick.
They are not the pushover you think they would be. Remember when you all thought Iraq was going to be a quick little walk in the park? It's like that only a whole lot worse. For one there is not a big sectarian divide to exploit like Iraq and they have been preparing for a US invasion for many years. Deciding to bomb Iran into regime change would go down as the most futile war effort in our history. It's all hypothetical though, Iran is not going to attack Israel unless we open hostilities against them. That too has always been part of the balance of terror we have with them.

Yes they are.
In an eight year war with Iraq they fought to a draw.
We took out Iraq's Military in just days, and we'd do the same with Iran's.
What is true is that Islamic fighters would indeed stream into Iran by the thousands and we'd find ourselves bogged down as we are right now in Iraq.

Squadron of loaded B-52s....just sayin' we COULD obliterate them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top