No clear evidence? I think you are dreaming.No evidence? You're joking, right? They admitted they failed to disclose foreign contributions. They took foreign contributions after Hillary promised Obama she wouldnt. And that's just what we know for a fact. Arent you bothered even by the suggestion that Hillary took bribes while in office?No, idiot. You are illiterate because you cant tell the difference between of and have."Must have" You are illiterate as well as ignorant.
What does Sarah Palin have to do with anything? Nothing.
So focus on the issue here.
The Clinton Foundation is not a foundation at all. It is merely a PAC designed to give tax free income to support the Clinton lifestyle, which resembles that of the uber-wealthy. Meanwhile Hillary is roaming around in a luxury automobile (when she's not flying first class) pretending to be an ordinary American.
Does anyone really think people will be fooled by this?
Hey folks it's Rabbi!
Considering SarahPac also contributes almost nothing financially to it's advertised cause, it can be used a tie-in to this thread as a "per-example" of the OP implied Clinton scam. Using examples in the course of discussion, is nothing new, I'd bet you have done it yourself thousands of times and that would be just on these boards.
Therefore, implying illiteracy and ignorance is complete hypocrisy. Way to go Rabbi!
If Palin's PAC did that does that make the Clinton's PAC OK? You are a lying little piece of sniveling shit hypocrite. Sarah is not running for the presidency. Clinton is. Sarah did not sell out government favorites in exchange for contributions to her PAC, Clinton did. Sarah's PAC is not resubmitting new tax reports to reflect foreign contributions which were omitted in previous years, Clinton's is.
See the difference, you worthless piece of shit? Go ahea, post a graph so your humiliation is complete.No, idiot. You are illiterate because you cant tell the difference between of and have."Must have" You are illiterate as well as ignorant.
What does Sarah Palin have to do with anything? Nothing.
So focus on the issue here.
The Clinton Foundation is not a foundation at all. It is merely a PAC designed to give tax free income to support the Clinton lifestyle, which resembles that of the uber-wealthy. Meanwhile Hillary is roaming around in a luxury automobile (when she's not flying first class) pretending to be an ordinary American.
Does anyone really think people will be fooled by this?
Hey folks it's Rabbi!
Considering SarahPac also contributes almost nothing financially to it's advertised cause, it can be used a tie-in to this thread as a "per-example" of the OP implied Clinton scam. Using examples in the course of discussion, is nothing new, I'd bet you have done it yourself thousands of times and that would be just on these boards.
Therefore, implying illiteracy and ignorance is complete hypocrisy. Way to go Rabbi!
If Palin's PAC did that does that make the Clinton's PAC OK? You are a lying little piece of sniveling shit hypocrite. Sarah is not running for the presidency. Clinton is. Sarah did not sell out government favorites in exchange for contributions to her PAC, Clinton did. Sarah's PAC is not resubmitting new tax reports to reflect foreign contributions which were omitted in previous years, Clinton's is.
See the difference, you worthless piece of shit? Go ahea, post a graph so your humiliation is complete.
Haaaaaa no evidence there either, you're nothing but a bunch of Hot Air .... Say something with substance instead of blah blah blah...
Sarah Palin should really think about running: Saturday Night Live needs some new material....
There were 9 parts of the Government that signed off of this deal...
Anyway with the Koch Brothers funding this book, I am not too worried... They are worried about Hillary and are digging deep those assholes.
~
What did you go and watch Fox news finally? There is no clear evidence about what your saying, I am sure we will hear the facts soon...Fox news.1 % truth and 99% fabricated..
What is concerning to me is she deleted all of her emails. ummmm concerns me. There could have been some bad info in those emails. I do not like this fogged transparency from her.
~
Exclusive Clinton charities will refile tax returns audit for other errors Reuters
The Foundation is restating years' worth of tax returns because they didnt disclose foreign contributions.
Foreign governments gave millions to foundation while Clinton was at State Dept. - The Washington Post
The Clinton Foundation accepted millions of dollars from seven foreign governments during Hillary Rodham Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, including one donation that violated its ethics agreement with the Obama administration, foundation officials disclosed Wednesday.]
OK, so now I have proven this, are you concerned that there is at least the appearance of bribery from when Clinton was SecState?