Climate change rhetoric?

I believe he's mocking the bilge you ecofascisti keep pumping.

Go go gadget gaia!

One more dishonest idiotgram from the echo chamber. Notice the editorial change made by Big Fritz? Read carefully and you will see that Big Fritz is a liar by omission. He changed the earlier post by removing the following dishonest statement by Daveman:

"In case you're wondering, this is in response to a thread by Wry Catcher, where he blames "the residents of Joplin, MO; Tuscaloosa, AL and the states which border the Mississippi River and its tributaries" for the disasters that befell them because they didn't vote Democrat."

Big Fritz is too stupid to do a competent job of censorship!
:wtf:

Hmmm.... nope. My eyes aren't playing tricks on me. You are that fucking clueless.

And on a related note, 'omission is lying' now? Really? You want to discuss how THAT works?

I'm not obligated to put irrelevant aspects to my retort, mockery or derision in my posts. I quote accurately and without altering what is said, starting from the point I deem appropriate to the point I deem a good spot to end. If you don't like it, you leftists shouldn't engage in the same tactic.



Fitz bro.........you're debating one of the 5 or 6 most eccentric hyper-partians on the whole message board.

He marches in those hyper-fairy gay parades in SanFransisco every year.......the ones where the marchers wear toothfairy costumes while riding on a unicycle. Remember all those weird little people when Dorothy was skipping out of MunchskinLand?

Need I elaborate more???:2up:
 
OK. So the climate is changing. Good. You have come one step of the way out of denial.
I never said it wasn't changing, you stupid old retard.
Now if you will just address the science as to the reason why the climate is changing, perhaps we can have a discussion.
I've seen your "science". It's crap. End of discussion.
 
I don't know. I suspect the residents of Massachusetts might be beginning to question the conventional wisdom (i.e. propaganda) of the right wing spin machine.

Oh, wait...



In case you're wondering, this is in response to a thread by Wry Catcher, where he blames "the residents of Joplin, MO; Tuscaloosa, AL and the states which border the Mississippi River and its tributaries" for the disasters that befell them because they didn't vote Democrat.

Please note I'm not blaming anyone's voting patterns for weather phenomena. I'm not stupid enough to believe that if only we'd all voted Democrat, bad weather would not have happened -- unlike some people.
Soo.... gaia's an ecofascist... errrr... I mean democrat?
White liberals think they can speak for minorities, so I don't see why they wouldn't think they can speak for the planet as well.

American SUVs make baby Gaea cry. :(
 
One more dishonest idiotgram from the echo chamber. Notice the editorial change made by Big Fritz? Read carefully and you will see that Big Fritz is a liar by omission. He changed the earlier post by removing the following dishonest statement by Daveman:

"In case you're wondering, this is in response to a thread by Wry Catcher, where he blames "the residents of Joplin, MO; Tuscaloosa, AL and the states which border the Mississippi River and its tributaries" for the disasters that befell them because they didn't vote Democrat."

Big Fritz is too stupid to do a competent job of censorship!
:wtf:

Hmmm.... nope. My eyes aren't playing tricks on me. You are that fucking clueless.

And on a related note, 'omission is lying' now? Really? You want to discuss how THAT works?

I'm not obligated to put irrelevant aspects to my retort, mockery or derision in my posts. I quote accurately and without altering what is said, starting from the point I deem appropriate to the point I deem a good spot to end. If you don't like it, you leftists shouldn't engage in the same tactic.



Fitz bro.........you're debating one of the 5 or 6 most eccentric hyper-partians on the whole message board.

He marches in those hyper-fairy gay parades in SanFransisco every year.......the ones where the marchers wear toothfairy costumes while riding on a unicycle. Remember all those weird little people when Dorothy was skipping out of MunchskinLand?

Need I elaborate more???:2up:
Who's debating? I haven't debated Flywatcher for a while now. The fact I've observed slime molds under microscopes with more sentience and better debating skills should be considered.

Jamie Lee Curtis has worn skirts with a higher IQ.
 
Still creating strawmen and lying about what other people have said. That is the Daveboy way.
I don't have to lie. He wrote what he wrote, and there it is. You simply lack the wit to acknowledge it. But then, there are no enemies on the left. You won't hold any fellow leftists accountable for anything.
Given the weather related disasters worldwide, at some point we are going to have to say that something significant has changed. I believe that we are near that point now, for the extremes in weather are now affecting our food supply. And fools like you will still be denying that there are any changes taking place.
"Voter Democrat, or we're all gonna die!!"

That's all you've got. Really. And it's stupid.

Oh, and speaking of lying, I never said the climate wasn't changing. That would be a lie on your part, and a strawman.

But lies and strawmen are your stock in trade.
If an ecofacisti tard makes a post and is on ignore... does he make a point?
He doesn't make a point when he's not on ignore.
 
I don't know. I suspect the residents of Massachusetts might be beginning to question the conventional wisdom (i.e. propaganda) of the right wing spin machine.

Oh, wait...



In case you're wondering, this is in response to a thread by Wry Catcher, where he blames "the residents of Joplin, MO; Tuscaloosa, AL and the states which border the Mississippi River and its tributaries" for the disasters that befell them because they didn't vote Democrat.

Please note I'm not blaming anyone's voting patterns for weather phenomena. I'm not stupid enough to believe that if only we'd all voted Democrat, bad weather would not have happened -- unlike some people.
Soo.... gaia's an ecofascist... errrr... I mean democrat?
White liberals think they can speak for minorities, so I don't see why they wouldn't think they can speak for the planet as well.

American SUVs make baby Gaea cry. :(
funny-pictures-cats-share-basket-unhappily.jpg


Preeeetty much.
 
I don't have to lie. He wrote what he wrote, and there it is. You simply lack the wit to acknowledge it. But then, there are no enemies on the left. You won't hold any fellow leftists accountable for anything.

"Voter Democrat, or we're all gonna die!!"

That's all you've got. Really. And it's stupid.

Oh, and speaking of lying, I never said the climate wasn't changing. That would be a lie on your part, and a strawman.

But lies and strawmen are your stock in trade.
If an ecofacisti tard makes a post and is on ignore... does he make a point?
He doesn't make a point when he's not on ignore.
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to daveman again.

:lol:
 
Daveman is a liar. If he truly believes what he wrote he is more than brainwashed; he is reality challenged. I suspect he lies - bears false witness against me - for several reasons. I have confronted him for being a troll and posting idiotgrams, for being far right and unable to support his opinions with any evidence and for being a member of the echo chamber. I'm sure other echo chamber members will support Daveman, for anyone who offers opinions which challenge RW Dogma is a threat to them.

The thread which Daveman brands with his LIE is now in bold above, the thread itself is posted below, in bold.



Climate Change?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't know. I suspect the residents of Joplin, MO; Tuscaloosa, AL and the states which border the Mississippi River and its tributaries might be beginning to question the conventional wisdom (i.e. propaganda) of the right wing spin machine.


Daveman does a service to this message board for he and others on the far right lack the ability to understand current events, and when facts get in the way of what they believe and challenge the partisan and extreme ideology they hold as immutable, their only recourse is to lie.

Liars cannot be trusted and everything they write will come under scrutiny of those who seek an understanding of events and solutions to problems not to simply point fingers and blame. Now, those who are willfully ignorant (shout out to CrusaderFrank, Daveman, Big Fritz, Willow Tree and the rest of the echo chamber players) you may now ignore this entire post and suggest that I too pointed fingers. In this case you might be correct in a very concret way for the middle finger of my right hand is pointed at you.
My goodness, but you're a sissy bedwetter. :lol:

You said what you said, retard. Back pedaling may be aerobic, but it's not really effective in debate.

You're just pissed I stated outright what you were trying to imply. Suck it up, Buttercup. Joplin hadn't even begun burying their dead when you stood on the bodies and blamed the disasters on them listening to the right wing. The clear implication is, of course, that had they listened to the left wing (thereby voting Democrat), the disasters would not have happened.

Asshole.
 
One more dishonest idiotgram from the echo chamber. Notice the editorial change made by Big Fritz? Read carefully and you will see that Big Fritz is a liar by omission. He changed the earlier post by removing the following dishonest statement by Daveman:

"In case you're wondering, this is in response to a thread by Wry Catcher, where he blames "the residents of Joplin, MO; Tuscaloosa, AL and the states which border the Mississippi River and its tributaries" for the disasters that befell them because they didn't vote Democrat."

Big Fritz is too stupid to do a competent job of censorship!
:wtf:

Hmmm.... nope. My eyes aren't playing tricks on me. You are that fucking clueless.

And on a related note, 'omission is lying' now? Really? You want to discuss how THAT works?

I'm not obligated to put irrelevant aspects to my retort, mockery or derision in my posts. I quote accurately and without altering what is said, starting from the point I deem appropriate to the point I deem a good spot to end. If you don't like it, you leftists shouldn't engage in the same tactic.



Fitz bro.........you're debating one of the 5 or 6 most eccentric hyper-partians on the whole message board.

He marches in those hyper-fairy gay parades in SanFransisco every year.......the ones where the marchers wear toothfairy costumes while riding on a unicycle. Remember all those weird little people when Dorothy was skipping out of MunchskinLand?

Need I elaborate more???:2up:
Oh hey Skooker. Found this for Flywatcher.

The green fairies are on the move!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tg7QyVDfMiE]YouTube - ‪Moulin Rouge - Absynthe and Green Fairy‬‏[/ame]

Stunned with how apropos it is.
 
We all know that the climate is changing.
It's the argument of, is it man's doing or if it's natural, Old Rocks

OK, Peaches, let's have that discussion. Here is what physicists state concerning that;

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

Now there is only one way that the earth gets heat on the surface, and that is the sun. Since the Earth reflects or reradiates about 30% of the energy it receives from the sun, anything that would retain more of that heat would warm the surface, land and sea. The reason that we do not have oceans frozen nearly to the equator, is that the GHGs in the atmosphere only, at present, allow 30% of the heat recieved to escape. But when we add more GHGs, we trap more heat. We have added 40% more CO2 to the atmosphere, and 150% more CH4, as well as introducing many industrial gases that are as much as 10,000 to 20,000 times as effective of a greenhouse gas as CO2.

We have been monitoring the total solar irradiance from satellites for nearly 40 years. In that time, we have seen a slight decrease in the energy from the sun. Yet the temperature continues to go up.

UAH Temperature Update for April, 2011: +0.12 deg. C « Roy Spencer, Ph. D.


Ok - I saw the charts.
What I don't see is a complete picture of everything involved from anyone.
That would be Sun, Mars polar ice caps melting, volcanic activity, mankind's emissions and the polar tilt, and the magnetic field fluctuations.
These are all being done separate from what I see and is not being put all together to come up with something.
I think it is all of the above and even if mankind got the emissions out of the picture the earth will still be in a climate change.
It's what the earth has always done and will always be doing.
We are little ants on this planet and if the ants are irritating mother earth, she will wipe the majority of us off of her and everything will start all over again,just like it has been done in the past.
 
:wtf:

Hmmm.... nope. My eyes aren't playing tricks on me. You are that fucking clueless.

And on a related note, 'omission is lying' now? Really? You want to discuss how THAT works?

I'm not obligated to put irrelevant aspects to my retort, mockery or derision in my posts. I quote accurately and without altering what is said, starting from the point I deem appropriate to the point I deem a good spot to end. If you don't like it, you leftists shouldn't engage in the same tactic.



Fitz bro.........you're debating one of the 5 or 6 most eccentric hyper-partians on the whole message board.

He marches in those hyper-fairy gay parades in SanFransisco every year.......the ones where the marchers wear toothfairy costumes while riding on a unicycle. Remember all those weird little people when Dorothy was skipping out of MunchskinLand?

Need I elaborate more???:2up:
Oh hey Skooker. Found this for Flywatcher.

The green fairies are on the move!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tg7QyVDfMiE]YouTube - ‪Moulin Rouge - Absynthe and Green Fairy‬‏[/ame]

Stunned with how apropos it is.



LMBO Fitz...........I think thats Fly second from the left!!!:rock:
 
As noted many times before, the more homophopic one is, the more likely they are at least gay curious, and the certainty they are bigots.
That observaton aside, the echo chamber (EC) has only one fall back position when their lies are exposed, and that is to lie and lie again.
 
Fitz bro.........you're debating one of the 5 or 6 most eccentric hyper-partians on the whole message board.

He marches in those hyper-fairy gay parades in SanFransisco every year.......the ones where the marchers wear toothfairy costumes while riding on a unicycle. Remember all those weird little people when Dorothy was skipping out of MunchskinLand?

Need I elaborate more???:2up:
Oh hey Skooker. Found this for Flywatcher.

The green fairies are on the move!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tg7QyVDfMiE]YouTube - ‪Moulin Rouge - Absynthe and Green Fairy‬‏[/ame]

Stunned with how apropos it is.



LMBO Fitz...........I think thats Fly second from the left!!!:rock:
Hey! You leave The Professor alone! He's cool. I was thinking the 6th green fairy on the left in the chorus line.
 
As noted many times before, the more homophopic one is, the more likely they are at least gay curious, and the certainty they are bigots.
That observaton aside, the echo chamber (EC) has only one fall back position when their lies are exposed, and that is to lie and lie again.
mm. Denial and sidestep. Common tactic, and square dance move.
 
As noted many times before, the more homophopic one is, the more likely they are at least gay curious, and the certainty they are bigots.
That observaton aside, the echo chamber (EC) has only one fall back position when their lies are exposed, and that is to lie and lie again.
mm. Denial and sidestep. Common tactic, and square dance move.

I don't know about square dance moves BF, but each and every post where you have attacked me has been an example of "Denial and sidestep". You know that I know you're a liar, and I know for certain you have no integrity.
 
As noted many times before, the more homophopic one is, the more likely they are at least gay curious, and the certainty they are bigots.
And yet you've never noted that when it's a fellow leftist throwing out homophobic statements.

Oh...that's because your principles, such as they are, are very selectively applied.

No enemies on the left.
That observaton aside, the echo chamber (EC) has only one fall back position when their lies are exposed, and that is to lie and lie again.
I'll assume you're talking about me. Are you ever going to get around to proving I lied, or do you think "nuh-UH!!" is sufficient, like you usually do?
 
As noted many times before, the more homophopic one is, the more likely they are at least gay curious, and the certainty they are bigots.
That observaton aside, the echo chamber (EC) has only one fall back position when their lies are exposed, and that is to lie and lie again.
mm. Denial and sidestep. Common tactic, and square dance move.

I don't know about square dance moves BF, but each and every post where you have attacked me has been an example of "Denial and sidestep". You know that I know you're a liar, and I know for certain you have no integrity.
Someone who blames disaster victims for the disasters has no room to talk about integrity.
 

Forum List

Back
Top