recuse from what?Thomas refused to recuse knowing this information.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
recuse from what?Thomas refused to recuse knowing this information.
Notice, not one Dembot spoke up when Justice Sotomayor refused to recuse herself from a case involving an employer that paid her over $3 million dollars directly. Not one.Prove he knew this company was a subsidiary of a subsidiery.
Or Kagan who refused to recuse on ruling on the viability of the ACA after being in charge of defending it against court challenges while serving as Barry Hussein’s Solicitor General.Notice, not one Dembot spoke up when Justice Sotomayor refused to recuse herself from a case involving an employer that paid her over $3 million dollars directly. Not one.
Conservatives said nothing out of respect for the Court, and our understanding of the rules of the Court, and that a Justice has the ability to make their own decision on if something will impact their decision making besides the rule of law.
Dembots of course don't understand it, and merely parrot the talking point of their demafascsit masters who are clutching their pearls of non-issues, to undermine the Judicial branch, and attack a black man that doesn't fall in line with their party.
Further proving the point that the demafascist don't care about "ethics" on the Court, they only care about the Court doing what they want.Or Kagan who refused to recuse on ruling on the viability of the ACA after being in charge of defending it againot court challenges while serving as Barry Hussein’s Solicitor General.
Not a peep.
Domestic terrorists.Further proving the point that the demafascist don't care about "ethics" on the Court, they only care about the Court doing what they want.
These recent attacks are more about undermining the Judicial branch, so they can remodel it so their party has more control, and they can set up their "political courts" This is very much akin to what we say in Germany in the 30s
Sondergericht - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Domestic terrorists.
Exactly. What's the big deal?A kid got a free education.
The big deal is that the useful idiots can't stand an African American who's conservative sitting on the Supreme Court and being a positive influence for other independent blacks. Can't threaten that voting block.Exactly. What's the big deal?
And the Dems aren't rampant abusers of this bribery and traitorousness????
Everyone knows it's best to leave lynching to Democrats, they have the most experience at it.So if this was Soros and Sotomayor you would have called for a public lynching.
The kid is not his son, dumbass..The Milton Hershey School pays the tuition of children in low income families.
Was Clarence Thomas and Ginni a low income family at the time?
So thread title fake Once Again . Over half are but reporting gets zero changedThe kid is not his son, dumbass..
It's called influencing a top judge of the nation.
And Thomas didn't recuse himself from hearing arguments brought by Crow before the court.
Had he recused himself it wouldn't have changed a damn thing.
.
Ok but Clarence Thomas paid taxes on the gift. right?
Joe Soros have never paid for a adopted son of the Supreme Count. He wouldn't do that, he know the SC , he know the person has his own wishes. He wouldn''t compromised the SC like this.
they should have the same standards of judges.