Statistikhengst
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #21
You have a deep-seated need to declare victory. Were you brain-damaged as a wee lad?God damn I made you look stupid.I've discharged thousands of rounds over the last two decades with no ill effects.But both points are correct
Guns dont discharge themselves, which is what is meant by "guns dont kill people," (it takes one firing the gun, and the gun, to kill people).
same with ciggs. They dont smoke themselves.
Show me someone who has smoked thousands of cigarettes over the same frame with no ill effects.
Oops.
'ClarifyI've discharged thousands of rounds over the last two decades with no ill effects.But both points are correct
Guns dont discharge themselves, which is what is meant by "guns dont kill people," (it takes one firing the gun, and the gun, to kill people).
same with ciggs. They dont smoke themselves.
Show me someone who has smoked thousands of cigarettes over the same frame with no ill effects.
Oops.
Did you really just quibble about something so small as me not specifying 'fire at someone?'I've discharged thousands of rounds over the last two decades with no ill effects.But both points are correct
Guns dont discharge themselves, which is what is meant by "guns dont kill people," (it takes one firing the gun, and the gun, to kill people).
same with ciggs. They dont smoke themselves.
Show me someone who has smoked thousands of cigarettes over the same frame with no ill effects.
Oops.
God damn youre a nuisance.
Guns dont kill people. For every person killed by a gun there are many more saved by them. There are even more that are never aimed or fired at anyone over the course of their lives.
Cigarettes cause damage but people are aware of that and assume the risk.
The two arent comparable in any way.
Thats' why you look like a moron.
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk