Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What a weak argument from a faggot organization ABS.Hey Smartt........might wanna take your gay bias somewhere else.
By the way, might wanna give this a read.......
LGBT Texts
These perverts will try and claim everything as somehow homo, just to further their sick agenda and nasty lifestyle.
"Faggot organization"? Might wanna check the website again Sunnidiot, as it is a SCHOLAR SITE for religions from all over the world. Even your fucked up theology is in there.
Go ahead........pull something up that proves Sacred Texts Archives is a "faggot organization".
Prove your assertion douche.
Hey Smartt........might wanna take your gay bias somewhere else.
Are you saying that the Christian view of homosexuality is not wanted here. What are you afraid of? Read the title.
Sinning is against G*d, and it does not matter what your sin is. There have only been two people (some later discussion) that lived that did not sin, and neither walk among us today.
What a weak argument from a faggot organization ABS.
These perverts will try and claim everything as somehow homo, just to further their sick agenda and nasty lifestyle.
"Faggot organization"? Might wanna check the website again Sunnidiot, as it is a SCHOLAR SITE for religions from all over the world. Even your fucked up theology is in there.
Go ahead........pull something up that proves Sacred Texts Archives is a "faggot organization".
Prove your assertion douche.
It is clear that you have no idea how I feel about gays. However, I will take the information, and read it over with an open mind. I canot just read it and make a shallow rsponse.
As to a "scholar site of people from religions of all kinds, whenever you get a group like that together, you usually cannot tust any of them to do any less than compromise. Their inomation is not trustworthy in most cases.
"Faggot organization"? Might wanna check the website again Sunnidiot, as it is a SCHOLAR SITE for religions from all over the world. Even your fucked up theology is in there.
Go ahead........pull something up that proves Sacred Texts Archives is a "faggot organization".
Prove your assertion douche.
It is clear that you have no idea how I feel about gays. However, I will take the information, and read it over with an open mind. I canot just read it and make a shallow rsponse.
As to a "scholar site of people from religions of all kinds, whenever you get a group like that together, you usually cannot tust any of them to do any less than compromise. Their inomation is not trustworthy in most cases.
if you had actually bothered to go to the site, you would see that it is organized by religion, and there is no mixing of religions on the site.
Hey Smartt........might wanna take your gay bias somewhere else.
By the way, might wanna give this a read.......
David and Jonathan
There is an extensive and very sympathetic description of a same-sex relationship in the Bible, the story of David and Jonathan, e.g.: 1 Samuel 18:1-5, 1 Samuel 19:1-7, 1 Samuel 20:30-42, 2 Samuel 1:25-6. While their bond is described as non-sexual, it is difficult to characterize it as purely one of friendship.
Jonathan was the son of Saul, David's nemesis. Their souls are described as 'knit together'. David and Jonathan 'made a covenant, because he loved him as his own soul.' The word convenant is significant, because in the Tanach this word always implies a formal legal agreement. To mark this convenant, Jonathan literally gives David the clothes off of his back, as well as other gifts such as weapons.
Later in the narrative, Jonathan successfully intercedes with Saul to spare David's life. At their last meeing, 1 Samuel 20:41, they are described as kissing one another and weeping together. David's grief at Jonathan's death is profound and moving. In Davids lament for Jonathan he describes their friendship as '(sur)passing the love of women'. This elegy, 2 Samuel 1:18-27. known as 'the Bow,' is one of the most beloved passages in the Hebrew Bible.
This narrative far outweighs the two trivial aspersions against same-sex love in Leviticus. The bigots who use the Bible to assault gays are apparently blind to it.
LGBT Texts
It is clear that you have no idea how I feel about gays. However, I will take the information, and read it over with an open mind. I canot just read it and make a shallow rsponse.
As to a "scholar site of people from religions of all kinds, whenever you get a group like that together, you usually cannot tust any of them to do any less than compromise. Their inomation is not trustworthy in most cases.
if you had actually bothered to go to the site, you would see that it is organized by religion, and there is no mixing of religions on the site.
I did not go to the site because I guess I missed the link to it.
Let me get this straight. There are various religions represented (any religion or all) but they are not necessarily there as a common group. Is that correct?
If that is the case, have you read other views of this topic there, or just the one you agree with? If all religions are represented, then you can find the apposing view too, right? Otherwise, I am correct. Who is biased?
if you had actually bothered to go to the site, you would see that it is organized by religion, and there is no mixing of religions on the site.
I did not go to the site because I guess I missed the link to it.
Let me get this straight. There are various religions represented (any religion or all) but they are not necessarily there as a common group. Is that correct?
If that is the case, have you read other views of this topic there, or just the one you agree with? If all religions are represented, then you can find the apposing view too, right? Otherwise, I am correct. Who is biased?
I'll make this simple........we were talking about how Christians view homosexuality, so I went to the Christian section to see what it had to say.
If you want, you can even check out what the Book of Shadows or the Necronomicron has to say, but I'm not really interested in demon theology.
Go to the site and research it yourself.
I did not go to the site because I guess I missed the link to it.
Let me get this straight. There are various religions represented (any religion or all) but they are not necessarily there as a common group. Is that correct?
If that is the case, have you read other views of this topic there, or just the one you agree with? If all religions are represented, then you can find the apposing view too, right? Otherwise, I am correct. Who is biased?
I'll make this simple........we were talking about how Christians view homosexuality, so I went to the Christian section to see what it had to say.
If you want, you can even check out what the Book of Shadows or the Necronomicron has to say, but I'm not really interested in demon theology.
Go to the site and research it yourself.
OK, you went to the "Christian section" of the site. Cool. Now, did you visit and notice that there were apposing views on the matter? Is it possible for you to even consider the possibilities that the sites that agree with you are wrong, which they are?
I still don't know what site it is. Wanna present it again here?
I'll make this simple........we were talking about how Christians view homosexuality, so I went to the Christian section to see what it had to say.
If you want, you can even check out what the Book of Shadows or the Necronomicron has to say, but I'm not really interested in demon theology.
Go to the site and research it yourself.
OK, you went to the "Christian section" of the site. Cool. Now, did you visit and notice that there were apposing views on the matter? Is it possible for you to even consider the possibilities that the sites that agree with you are wrong, which they are?
I still don't know what site it is. Wanna present it again here?
Okay stupid, go to post 254 of this thread, and click on the underlined part that says "LGBT Texts".
That's a link for you computer illiterate types, generally links are found with lines under them. Click on them and it will take you to a whole brand new web page! Isn't that neat?
Then, when there, click on the home page button and you will see what the site is about.
For someone who claims to be Smartt, you've got the IQ of a lobotomized retard.
I strongly suspect 'Paul' was a closet homosexual
it explains everything- never having a woman, his misogyny and hatred of gays...
OK, lets travel that highway for a minute. Lets say Paul was gay. Now, I want you to go beyond speculation here, tell me where the Bible says that he married a man. Tell me where the Bible says he had sex with another man.
OK, you went to the "Christian section" of the site. Cool. Now, did you visit and notice that there were apposing views on the matter? Is it possible for you to even consider the possibilities that the sites that agree with you are wrong, which they are?
I still don't know what site it is. Wanna present it again here?
Okay stupid, go to post 254 of this thread, and click on the underlined part that says "LGBT Texts".
That's a link for you computer illiterate types, generally links are found with lines under them. Click on them and it will take you to a whole brand new web page! Isn't that neat?
Then, when there, click on the home page button and you will see what the site is about.
For someone who claims to be Smartt, you've got the IQ of a lobotomized retard.
You don't have a clue how to carry on a converstaion without acting like a teenager who thinks he knows it all. You actually knows nothing. You are nothing but a name caller, and cannot respond with respect to anyone you don't agree with. I will not continue to discuss this with children. Grow up.
As to the link, I know what a link is. I just missed the one you were talking about. Of course you never miss a thing.
Bottom line, Jonathan and Davis were not gay. The Bible speaks clearly against sin, and clearly shows gay sex to be sin in Romans 1.
That is really all that needs to be said, and opinion doesn't override the Bible. The Bible trumps every opinion.
That is the final answer. Get over it.
Okay stupid, go to post 254 of this thread, and click on the underlined part that says "LGBT Texts".
That's a link for you computer illiterate types, generally links are found with lines under them. Click on them and it will take you to a whole brand new web page! Isn't that neat?
Then, when there, click on the home page button and you will see what the site is about.
For someone who claims to be Smartt, you've got the IQ of a lobotomized retard.
You don't have a clue how to carry on a converstaion without acting like a teenager who thinks he knows it all. You actually knows nothing. You are nothing but a name caller, and cannot respond with respect to anyone you don't agree with. I will not continue to discuss this with children. Grow up.
As to the link, I know what a link is. I just missed the one you were talking about. Of course you never miss a thing.
Bottom line, Jonathan and Davis were not gay. The Bible speaks clearly against sin, and clearly shows gay sex to be sin in Romans 1.
That is really all that needs to be said, and opinion doesn't override the Bible. The Bible trumps every opinion.
That is the final answer. Get over it.
Not my problem that you can't read a web page and notice where the links are fuckwit.
Get over yourself.
I strongly suspect 'Paul' was a closet homosexual
it explains everything- never having a woman, his misogyny and hatred of gays...
OK, lets travel that highway for a minute. Lets say Paul was gay. Now, I want you to go beyond speculation here, tell me where the Bible says that he married a man. Tell me where the Bible says he had sex with another man.
He hates women throughout all his writings and espouses the virtue of being without a female. He also condemns homosexuality like CB52.
I tell ya, he sounds like a self-hating closet case.
OK, lets travel that highway for a minute. Lets say Paul was gay. Now, I want you to go beyond speculation here, tell me where the Bible says that he married a man. Tell me where the Bible says he had sex with another man.
He hates women throughout all his writings and espouses the virtue of being without a female. He also condemns homosexuality like CB52.
I tell ya, he sounds like a self-hating closet case.
You know, I've often wondered why Yeshua would have told Paul (who incidentally hated Christians, as he often persecuted them) that he would be the rock upon which He would build His Church.
And..........Paul was the very first pope, which means that he was responsible for handing down the teachings of Yeshua.
Did you know that Paul persecuted James (Yeshua's brother), because he didn't want James building up a sizeable following.
Nope.........I think Paul was probably a mole, placed there to destroy Christianity.
