China makes Trump blink, again!

[SassyIrishLass]

Anti-American scumbags can't contain their excitement over the notion that our president might fail to secure better trade deals for our nation.

..."our president"? Not my president, pal.

You're part of this nation, right pal?

Sorry, but my country has always been great, until now.

Oh stop. What a bunch of TDS baloney

 

[jc456]

Anti-American scumbags can't contain their excitement over the notion that our president might fail to secure better trade deals for our nation.

..."our president"? Not my president, pal.

....because you’re not American.

I don't recognize Trump as my president BECAUSE I am an American who loves his country.

then why are you rooting for china?

 

[Vandalshandle]

Anti-American scumbags can't contain their excitement over the notion that our president might fail to secure better trade deals for our nation.

..."our president"? Not my president, pal.

You are not an American? What nationality are you?

My family has been here since 1691. I guess that makes me an illegal immigrant. We did not have green cards.

 

[jc456]

Anti-American scumbags can't contain their excitement over the notion that our president might fail to secure better trade deals for our nation.

..."our president"? Not my president, pal.

You are not an American? What nationality are you?

My family has been here since 1691. I guess that makes me an illegal immigrant. We did not have green cards.

why are you rooting for china?

 

[Harry Dresden]

Even while Trump is using his fake Japanese accent to beg Japan to buy American agriculture, he is still on the side of China.

Trump can’t be on the side of democracy and freedom overseas if he’s not on the side of democracy and freedom in this country.

Makes no sense.

Besides, how could he be pro freedom and democracy and still want to be president for life?

Hey Dentard, hows that Russian collusion impeachment doing? Haven’t seen you post much on that lately.......I wonder why.

dean was sent to the cornfield for a timeout.....who knows what horrors the poor slop had to endure while there....

 

[The Original Tree]

The electoral college doesn't balance anything, in fact it unbalances the principal of one person one vote.

no it doesn't, you're still confused lad, go get your sherbet and let the adults discuss adult topics.

If we divide the total U.S. population (about 319 million) by 538 electoral college votes, each electoral college vote should equal about 593K people.

So if we take our nation’s most populated state—California—and divide its 39.1 million population by 593K, the state should get sixty-six electoral college votes. Under the Electoral College system, however, the state only gets fifty-five electoral college votes.

That’s a difference of eleven electoral college votes.

Meanwhile, if we look at one of our nation’s least populated states—North Dakota—and divide its 757K population by 593K, the state should get about one electoral vote. However, under the Electoral College system, it gets three votes.

That means in North Dakota a voter has three times more say in who gets to become President. And it means that a California voter has a vote that is worth only about 83 percent as the rest of the country.

I've never understood the argument that the EC gives each state an equal voice. If each state got the same number of votes, I could see that. But when Maine gets 4 and California gets 55, I don't see how that "levels" things out.

The EC vote is based on both Population and Equal Representation of The States since we are a Republic of States, or Union of States.

Or do you not understand how the number of EC votes are assigned to a state?

Where is the "equal" part? I have heard people say that without the E.C., heavily populated states like New York and California would dominate. But since heavily populated states ALREADY have a butt load more votes than a state like Nevada or Maine, how is that really any different?
Does New York and California always win the Presidential election? Of course not. So explain how going to the popular vote would actually change anything.

Because of the number of EC votes required to win a National Election and because this number is Finite, a candidate cannot just go to California and New York to win an election. Because EC votes are distributed using two factors, Population and Equal Representation of Each State small states are still in play.

Part of that allocation is based on The Census, and is a big reason why The Left fought tooth and nail to delay the addition of the "Legal Status" question to a respondee to The Census on all Census Questionnaires. They feared being nailed with fraud for counting Illegal Immigrants in their population to gain an unfair advantage in Congress and distribution of Federal Dollars. They could lose Rep seats over such fraudulent actions.

Distribution of Electoral Votes

Electoral votes are allocated among the states based on the Census. Every state is allocated a number of votes equal to the number of senators and representatives in its U.S. Congressional delegation—two votes for its senators in the U.S. Senate plus a number of votes equal to the number of its members in the U. S. House of Representatives.

Under the 23rd Amendment of the Constitution, the District of Columbia is allocated three electors and treated like a state for purposes of the Electoral College.

The allocations below are based on the 2010 Census. They are effective for the 2012, 2016, and 2020 presidential elections.

Total Electoral Votes: 538; Majority Needed to Elect: 270

U. S. Electoral College: How are the Electoral College Votes Allocated

 

[Harry Dresden]

Anti-American scumbags can't contain their excitement over the notion that our president might fail to secure better trade deals for our nation.

..."our president"? Not my president, pal.

Of course he is

Not at all. If I were to find myself in a room with Trump, I would stand and turn my back to him. I am sure that some clown in a MAGA hat would threaten me, and Trump would say, "Get him outa here!", and then offer to pay their legal expenses if the rough me up, and then they would drag me out. But I simply do not recognize the orange reality star as my president.

in other words you cant accept the results of an election that did not go the way you hoped it would...

 

[Synthaholic]

The SLAVE states wanted that, but you knew that already.

Again Propaganda.

The Electoral College was designed to balance power between Urban Populations and Rural Populations. That was it's sole purpose, so that New States would not be bullied by Older more Populated States.

This is also the reason we have A Senate and a House of Representatives.

Not only is The Left Ignorant of History, but they are poor liars.

Speaking of Slaves, what is your party doing to stop The Human Trafficking Crisis that occurs across our Southern Border? Or are you all still too dependent on Brown Latino Slaves to work on your Democrat Plantations and Sweat Shops to cut you off from your 250 year addiction to Slave Labor?

The electoral college doesn't balance anything, in fact it unbalances the principal of one person one vote.

The Electoral College not only ensures One Man One Vote, it Ensures States have an Equal Say in a National Election.

1 State 1 Vote.

So now, are you going to Tout THE VIRTUES OF VOTER ID ?

Why do you oppose One Man One Vote?

Only Voter ID Laws can Guarantee that.

They exist in every Democracy on Earth except for ours.

Why are you opposed to protecting the integrity of The Vote?

Nebraska has 1 electoral vote for every 380k people.

New Jersey has 1 for every 635k. Is that remotely fair?

Yes......because of the number of non-citizens in the state.

Keep failing. That’s 635k registered voters.

 

[Synthaholic]

I still have issues with folks that cheer the demise of America every chance they get.

As he cheers for Putin to hack the voting booths in 2020.

You showed your true colors long ago, traitor.

Yeah.....fuck.you.
Trump is no friend of Russia.
And I'll compare my patriotism to yours any fucking day of the week, dirt bag

Trump is Putin’s puppet, and victim of blackmail. Anyone who cheers that or supports that is a fucking traitor to America. You made your choice, Comrade. If you weren’t fine with it you’d be screaming for paper ballots in all 50 states like the rest of us.

 

[OldLady]

no it doesn't, you're still confused lad, go get your sherbet and let the adults discuss adult topics.

If we divide the total U.S. population (about 319 million) by 538 electoral college votes, each electoral college vote should equal about 593K people.

So if we take our nation’s most populated state—California—and divide its 39.1 million population by 593K, the state should get sixty-six electoral college votes. Under the Electoral College system, however, the state only gets fifty-five electoral college votes.

That’s a difference of eleven electoral college votes.

Meanwhile, if we look at one of our nation’s least populated states—North Dakota—and divide its 757K population by 593K, the state should get about one electoral vote. However, under the Electoral College system, it gets three votes.

That means in North Dakota a voter has three times more say in who gets to become President. And it means that a California voter has a vote that is worth only about 83 percent as the rest of the country.

I've never understood the argument that the EC gives each state an equal voice. If each state got the same number of votes, I could see that. But when Maine gets 4 and California gets 55, I don't see how that "levels" things out.

The EC vote is based on both Population and Equal Representation of The States since we are a Republic of States, or Union of States.

Or do you not understand how the number of EC votes are assigned to a state?

Where is the "equal" part? I have heard people say that without the E.C., heavily populated states like New York and California would dominate. But since heavily populated states ALREADY have a butt load more votes than a state like Nevada or Maine, how is that really any different?
Does New York and California always win the Presidential election? Of course not. So explain how going to the popular vote would actually change anything.

Because of the number of EC votes required to win a National Election and because this number is Finite, a candidate cannot just go to California and New York to win an election. Because EC votes are distributed using two factors, Population and Equal Representation of Each State small states are still in play.

Part of that allocation is based on The Census, and is a big reason why The Left fought tooth and nail to delay the addition of the "Legal Status" question to a respondee to The Census on all Census Questionnaires. They feared being nailed with fraud for counting Illegal Immigrants in their population to gain an unfair advantage in Congress and distribution of Federal Dollars. They could lose Rep seats over such fraudulent actions.

Distribution of Electoral Votes

Electoral votes are allocated among the states based on the Census. Every state is allocated a number of votes equal to the number of senators and representatives in its U.S. Congressional delegation—two votes for its senators in the U.S. Senate plus a number of votes equal to the number of its members in the U. S. House of Representatives.

Under the 23rd Amendment of the Constitution, the District of Columbia is allocated three electors and treated like a state for purposes of the Electoral College.

The allocations below are based on the 2010 Census. They are effective for the 2012, 2016, and 2020 presidential elections.

Total Electoral Votes: 538; Majority Needed to Elect: 270

U. S. Electoral College: How are the Electoral College Votes Allocated

I know all that. No one is understanding my question.

 

[jc456]

I still have issues with folks that cheer the demise of America every chance they get.

As he cheers for Putin to hack the voting booths in 2020.

You showed your true colors long ago, traitor.

Yeah.....fuck.you.
Trump is no friend of Russia.
And I'll compare my patriotism to yours any fucking day of the week, dirt bag

Trump is Putin’s puppet, and victim of blackmail. Anyone who cheers that or supports that is a fucking traitor to America. You made your choice, Comrade. If you weren’t fine with it you’d be screaming for paper ballots in all 50 states like the rest of us.

ain't freedom of speech wonderful? idiots like you can post anything without consequences. amazing thing. I got an idea, perhaps post something that is true.

 

[jc456]

If we divide the total U.S. population (about 319 million) by 538 electoral college votes, each electoral college vote should equal about 593K people.

So if we take our nation’s most populated state—California—and divide its 39.1 million population by 593K, the state should get sixty-six electoral college votes. Under the Electoral College system, however, the state only gets fifty-five electoral college votes.

That’s a difference of eleven electoral college votes.

Meanwhile, if we look at one of our nation’s least populated states—North Dakota—and divide its 757K population by 593K, the state should get about one electoral vote. However, under the Electoral College system, it gets three votes.

That means in North Dakota a voter has three times more say in who gets to become President. And it means that a California voter has a vote that is worth only about 83 percent as the rest of the country.

I've never understood the argument that the EC gives each state an equal voice. If each state got the same number of votes, I could see that. But when Maine gets 4 and California gets 55, I don't see how that "levels" things out.

The EC vote is based on both Population and Equal Representation of The States since we are a Republic of States, or Union of States.

Or do you not understand how the number of EC votes are assigned to a state?

Where is the "equal" part? I have heard people say that without the E.C., heavily populated states like New York and California would dominate. But since heavily populated states ALREADY have a butt load more votes than a state like Nevada or Maine, how is that really any different?
Does New York and California always win the Presidential election? Of course not. So explain how going to the popular vote would actually change anything.

Because of the number of EC votes required to win a National Election and because this number is Finite, a candidate cannot just go to California and New York to win an election. Because EC votes are distributed using two factors, Population and Equal Representation of Each State small states are still in play.

Part of that allocation is based on The Census, and is a big reason why The Left fought tooth and nail to delay the addition of the "Legal Status" question to a respondee to The Census on all Census Questionnaires. They feared being nailed with fraud for counting Illegal Immigrants in their population to gain an unfair advantage in Congress and distribution of Federal Dollars. They could lose Rep seats over such fraudulent actions.

Distribution of Electoral Votes

Electoral votes are allocated among the states based on the Census. Every state is allocated a number of votes equal to the number of senators and representatives in its U.S. Congressional delegation—two votes for its senators in the U.S. Senate plus a number of votes equal to the number of its members in the U. S. House of Representatives.

Under the 23rd Amendment of the Constitution, the District of Columbia is allocated three electors and treated like a state for purposes of the Electoral College.

The allocations below are based on the 2010 Census. They are effective for the 2012, 2016, and 2020 presidential elections.

Total Electoral Votes: 538; Majority Needed to Elect: 270

U. S. Electoral College: How are the Electoral College Votes Allocated

I know all that. No one is understanding my question.

what question is that?

 

[mudwhistle]

I still have issues with folks that cheer the demise of America every chance they get.

As he cheers for Putin to hack the voting booths in 2020.

You showed your true colors long ago, traitor.

Yeah.....fuck.you.
Trump is no friend of Russia.
And I'll compare my patriotism to yours any fucking day of the week, dirt bag

Trump is Putin’s puppet, and victim of blackmail. Anyone who cheers that or supports that is a fucking traitor to America. You made your choice, Comrade. If you weren’t fine with it you’d be screaming for paper ballots in all 50 states like the rest of us.

Sure he is.*phffffffffffff*
Yet Hillary got $140 million from him.
That rubbish isn't even worthy of a response

Let's talk about Bush bringing down the WTC while we're at it too.

 

[Dragonlady]

Tramp is LOSING badly

You're just a plain retard. There's no other explanation for your colossal stupidity.

Trump is winning. All economic indicators are great. Shut your stupid dicksucker you freak

Including the volutility in the stock market? The declining job numbers? Declining investor confidence?

Spin, spin, spin, little Russian.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Anti-American scumbags can't contain their excitement over the notion that our president might fail to secure better trade deals for our nation.

..."our president"? Not my president, pal.

Of course he is

Not at all. If I were to find myself in a room with Trump, I would stand and turn my back to him. I am sure that some clown in a MAGA hat would threaten me, and Trump would say, "Get him outa here!", and then offer to pay their legal expenses if the rough me up, and then they would drag me out. But I simply do not recognize the orange reality star as my president.

Whether or not you like it or recognize is entirely irrelevant to the facts.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Anti-American scumbags can't contain their excitement over the notion that our president might fail to secure better trade deals for our nation.

..."our president"? Not my president, pal.

Of course he is

Not at all. If I were to find myself in a room with Trump, I would stand and turn my back to him. I am sure that some clown in a MAGA hat would threaten me, and Trump would say, "Get him outa here!", and then offer to pay their legal expenses if the rough me up, and then they would drag me out. But I simply do not recognize the orange reality star as my president.

Whether or not you like it or recognize is entirely irrelevant to the facts.

To recognize that Trump is president would be the worst insult to my country that I can imagine.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Anti-American scumbags can't contain their excitement over the notion that our president might fail to secure better trade deals for our nation.

..."our president"? Not my president, pal.

Of course he is

Not at all. If I were to find myself in a room with Trump, I would stand and turn my back to him. I am sure that some clown in a MAGA hat would threaten me, and Trump would say, "Get him outa here!", and then offer to pay their legal expenses if the rough me up, and then they would drag me out. But I simply do not recognize the orange reality star as my president.

Whether or not you like it or recognize is entirely irrelevant to the facts.

To recognize that Trump is president would be the worst insult to my country that I can imagine.

having so called citizens that cant except the results of an election is pretty bad too....

 

[lennypartiv]

Trump should have ruined your Christmas. You libs are ungrateful.

 

[easyt65]

Anti-American scumbags can't contain their excitement over the notion that our president might fail to secure better trade deals for our nation.

..."our president"? Not my president, pal.

Of course he is

Not at all. If I were to find myself in a room with Trump, I would stand and turn my back to him. I am sure that some clown in a MAGA hat would threaten me, and Trump would say, "Get him outa here!", and then offer to pay their legal expenses if the rough me up, and then they would drag me out. But I simply do not recognize the orange reality star as my president.

Whether or not you like it or recognize is entirely irrelevant to the facts.

To recognize that Trump is president would be the worst insult to my country that I can imagine.

You have a weak-ass imagination.

 

[Vandalshandle]

..."our president"? Not my president, pal.

Of course he is

Not at all. If I were to find myself in a room with Trump, I would stand and turn my back to him. I am sure that some clown in a MAGA hat would threaten me, and Trump would say, "Get him outa here!", and then offer to pay their legal expenses if the rough me up, and then they would drag me out. But I simply do not recognize the orange reality star as my president.

Whether or not you like it or recognize is entirely irrelevant to the facts.

To recognize that Trump is president would be the worst insult to my country that I can imagine.

You have a weak-ass imagination.

Actually, it is not my imagination. I really do have a weak ass. Spinal stenosis and sciatica. Luckily, I have Medicare, which covers just about everything.