Challenge an election, get disbarred

lennypartiv

Diamond Member
Jul 16, 2019
25,785
19,753
2,320
Really? Even when the loser became the winner in the middle of the night? Even when illegal drop off boxes are used? Ambushed seems like the right word.

---Trump Lawyer John Eastman Officially Disbarred For Challenging 2020 Election---​


 
Gore's lawyers have mad millions since they challenged the 2000 election. Many are big shots now in the Democratic Party circles.
 
Mo
Really? Even when the loser became the winner in the middle of the night? Even when illegal drop off boxes are used? Ambushed seems like the right word.

---Trump Lawyer John Eastman Officially Disbarred For Challenging 2020 Election---​


More like be a lousy lawyer forgetting you are considered an officer of the court and have standards of conduct to maintain before the bar, and get disbarred.
 
Really? Even when the loser became the winner in the middle of the night? Even when illegal drop off boxes are used? Ambushed seems like the right word.

---Trump Lawyer John Eastman Officially Disbarred For Challenging 2020 Election---​


Hey look the 1,235th thread started by a red hat who can't figure out reality because their mind is so gone.
 
Really? Even when the loser became the winner in the middle of the night? Even when illegal drop off boxes are used? Ambushed seems like the right word.

---Trump Lawyer John Eastman Officially Disbarred For Challenging 2020 Election---​



He didn't 'challenge the election', he conspired with Trump to unlawfully overturn the 2020 election. The substantial evidence presented during the trial revealed that Eastman abandoned his ethical and legal duties by conspiring with Trump to obstruct the counting of electoral votes, illegally disrupting the peaceful transfer of power to Biden. While his case is under appeal, Eastman remains suspended from practicing law in California. He also faces a subpoena related to a civil suit brought by Capitol Police officers against Trump, seeking accountability for the violence they suffered during the riots.

FYI, Gatewaypundit has the highest failed factcheck rate of the vast majority of political websites. It's not a reliable source.
 
Thank god nobody is quoting court documents, official records, or any sort of transcript. It always best to discuss what our feelings are about the headlines and not the actual facts.
 
The title of the article you cited is disinformation.

Jeffrey Clark’s bid to aid Trump election scheme violated attorney rules, DC Bar panel finds

A disciplinary panel in Washington has found that Jeffrey Clark, a former high-ranking Justice Department official, violated ethics rules for lawyers in his attempt to aid Donald Trump’s bid to subvert the 2020 election.

The three-member disciplinary committee determined Thursday that Clark’s campaign to pressure Justice Department leaders to help upend the transfer of power to Joe Biden violated his duties as an attorney.

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/04/04/jeffrey-clark-ethics-rules-00150631

Another Trump dupe pays the price for loyalty to an insurrectionist.
 
Really? Even when the loser became the winner in the middle of the night? Even when illegal drop off boxes are used? Ambushed seems like the right word.

---Trump Lawyer John Eastman Officially Disbarred For Challenging 2020 Election---​


That's not why he was disbarred. It wasn't just for "challenging an election".

Since you only get your "information" from MAGA "sources", you don't know that.
 
1712321932783.png

Christina better watch out whet she reports

The FBI might seize her cell phone and lock her up one if these days
 

Attachments

  • 1712321778366.png
    1712321778366.png
    70.8 KB · Views: 0
Really? Even when the loser became the winner in the middle of the night? Even when illegal drop off boxes are used? Ambushed seems like the right word.

---Trump Lawyer John Eastman Officially Disbarred For Challenging 2020 Election---​


Thegatewaypundit again? As usual whenever this source is cited it makes the whole OP complete fake news bullshit.
Why do you MAGAt Trumptards even bother?
Do you actually TRY to appear stupid?
See, here is what Thegatewaypukepile does....
It starts with an innacurate claim in the title of the article like:

Trump Lawyer John Eastman Officially Disbarred For Challenging 2020 Election-​

And then it just continues in the article to pile on one innaccurate falsehood after another in support of it's initial false claim....creating an entire false narrative.
Fake news!
Eastman was not disbarred for simply "challenging" an election, which is perfectly legal to do. Instead Eastman was disbarred for his illegal actions in trying to overturn the election results.
Big difference huh?
So yeah....the mods should probably stick this thread in the flame zone since the OP itself is pure Gatewaypukepile garbage.

  1. Disbarment is warranted because of Eastman’s bad faith and dishonesty in pushing this dangerous and unsupported plan, the significant harm his actions caused to our democratic institutions, and his indifference toward the consequences of his actions. Eastman has not shown any remorse for his misconduct or accepted any responsibility. Instead, he has continued to promote baseless conspiracy theories about the 2020 election.
 
Really? Even when the loser became the winner in the middle of the night? Even when illegal drop off boxes are used? Ambushed seems like the right word.

---Trump Lawyer John Eastman Officially Disbarred For Challenging 2020 Election---​



When lawyers break the law, they get disbarred. Eastman tried to overthrow the government.
 
Really? Even when the loser became the winner in the middle of the night? Even when illegal drop off boxes are used? Ambushed seems like the right word.

---Trump Lawyer John Eastman Officially Disbarred For Challenging 2020 Election---​


Which of the 64 legal challenges that Benedict Donald's lawyers made after losing the 2020 election was he involved with that is he going to get him disbarred?
 
Christina better watch out whet she reports
She has nothing to worry about as long as she keeps lying to Gateway's audience. That's what she's being paid for.

The decision followed six days of testimony, including by Clark’s former Justice Department superiors: Acting Attorney General Jeff Rosen and his deputy Richard Donoghue, who described a failed effort by Clark to use the department to falsely claim the election results were in doubt. Former Deputy White House Counsel Pat Philbin also testified publicly for the first time about Clark’s gambit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top