Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Obama budget deficits originated during the Bush presidency...
That is pretty damn stupid, even for you.
A budget deficit is based on a fiscal year.
Obama signed the fiscal year 2009 budget in March 2009, and has signed off on every dime of overspending since then.
And this surprises anyone?
It's just par for the course with Barry and his buds. First, we supposed to SAVE MONEY with Obamacare. Then it was 500 billion; 1 Trillion; and I'll be dang we're almost up to 2 Trillion.
The debt means nothing. As far as Barry and the boys are concerned, this country is history anyway. Why not spend everything you can and then make a clean exit?
The Obama budget deficits originated during the Bush presidency...
That is pretty damn stupid, even for you.
A budget deficit is based on a fiscal year.
Obama signed the fiscal year 2009 budget in March 2009, and has signed off on every dime of overspending since then.
http://cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/03-13-Coverage Estimates.pdf
That is a link to the document referred to in the article. If you don't feel like reading it, jump to the last few pages and look at the tables. You'll see the total cost has gone DOWN by some $50B.
I just cannot wait for the libtards to come in here and say that almost doubling the cost of Obamacare is not a big deal.
Might want to read the actual document, champ. The CBO is projecting spending on the ACA to be lower than previously projected and the deficit reductions to be higher.
And, pertinent to your signature, today's estimates now show a decrease of $97 billion in projected costs for exchange subsidies and related spending over the 10-year budget window (the very source of the $111 billion controversy in the White House's FY13 budget).
I just cannot wait for the libtards to come in here and say that almost doubling the cost of Obamacare is not a big deal.
Might want to read the actual document, champ. The CBO is projecting spending on the ACA to be lower than previously projected and the deficit reductions to be higher.
And, pertinent to your signature, today's estimates now show a decrease of $97 billion in projected costs for exchange subsidies and related spending over the 10-year budget window (the very source of the $111 billion controversy in the White House's FY13 budget).
.
When the Bush tax cuts expire in December of 2012, Obama won't allow them to be renewed.
I just cannot wait for the libtards to come in here and say that almost doubling the cost of Obamacare is not a big deal.
Might want to read the actual document, champ. The CBO is projecting spending on the ACA to be lower than previously projected and the deficit reductions to be higher.
And, pertinent to your signature, today's estimates now show a decrease of $97 billion in projected costs for exchange subsidies and related spending over the 10-year budget window (the very source of the $111 billion controversy in the White House's FY13 budget).
So, the CBO saying the cost of Obamacare over 10 years, going from 940 billion to 1.76 trillion... is NOT double? It's actually lower? You really want to go with that, Sparky?
And this surprises anyone?
It's just par for the course with Barry and his buds. First, we supposed to SAVE MONEY with Obamacare. Then it was 500 billion; 1 Trillion; and I'll be dang we're almost up to 2 Trillion.
The debt means nothing. As far as Barry and the boys are concerned, this country is history anyway. Why not spend everything you can and then make a clean exit?
It seems par for US Presidents to claim the cost of a requested program to be much less than the actual cost. An example is Medicare Part D, estimatd cost prior to the vote $395 billion, then it was revised up after it was madeinto law to $534 billion and now the cost is at $900 billion.
Keeping Medicare Part D, I wonder what the true cost of Omamcare is really going to be in the end. Two trillion? Four trillion?
The Obama budget deficits originated during the Bush presidency...
That is pretty damn stupid, even for you.
A budget deficit is based on a fiscal year.
Obama signed the fiscal year 2009 budget in March 2009, and has signed off on every dime of overspending since then.
There was no way Obama could have come in on Day One and reversed every Bush provision. The GOP would have filibustered it until it was dead.
I just cannot wait for the libtards to come in here and say that almost doubling the cost of Obamacare is not a big deal.
Might want to read the actual document, champ. The CBO is projecting spending on the ACA to be lower than previously projected and the deficit reductions to be higher.
And, pertinent to your signature, today's estimates now show a decrease of $97 billion in projected costs for exchange subsidies and related spending over the 10-year budget window (the very source of the $111 billion controversy in the White House's FY13 budget).
Which cancer drug is that?How much will the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans from lack of health care cost?
Accepted cost according to democrats as they kill a cancer drug for women.
I recall the Bush administration telling us that the Iraq war would pay for itself and last a very short time.
What a surprise, Obama lied about the costs.
Of course Republicans and conservatives said it was a lie from the start and predicted it would cost well more than advertised, but they we're quickly labeled racists and hate mongers.
I recall the Bush administration telling us that the Iraq war would pay for itself and last a very short time.
What a surprise, Obama lied about the costs.
Of course Republicans and conservatives said it was a lie from the start and predicted it would cost well more than advertised, but they we're quickly labeled racists and hate mongers.
I recall the Bush administration telling us that the Iraq war would pay for itself and last a very short time.
What a surprise, Obama lied about the costs.
Of course Republicans and conservatives said it was a lie from the start and predicted it would cost well more than advertised, but they we're quickly labeled racists and hate mongers.
Which cancer drug is that?How much will the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans from lack of health care cost?
Accepted cost according to democrats as they kill a cancer drug for women.
