Cannon set to dismiss documents case

It's little more than reading tea leaves, but it does look positive for DJT.

NO DEMOCRAT would ever be charged under these circumstances. While it's not totally a bullshit case, it's like charging someone with stealing a bicycle that had a "FREE" sign on it, left on the sidewalk. Trump could have, with a swipe of his magic wand, declassified every one of those documents the day before he left office. He IS NOT BOUND by procedures covering others because he is the AUTHORITY that declassifies documents.
 
It's little more than reading tea leaves, but it does look positive for DJT.

NO DEMOCRAT would ever be charged under these circumstances. While it's not totally a bullshit case, it's like charging someone with stealing a bicycle that had a "FREE" sign on it, left on the sidewalk. Trump could have, with a swipe of his magic wand, declassified every one of those documents the day before he left office. He IS NOT BOUND by procedures covering others because he is the AUTHORITY that declassifies documents.
When Trump admits to actually declassifying the documents, you can make your point.

What isn't up for debate, is the fact that Trump had no authority to obstruct justice by lying about complying with the subpoena and hiding documents that were required to have been turned over to the DoJ.

Very few people are so stupid as to try that nonsense.
 
It's little more than reading tea leaves, but it does look positive for DJT.

NO DEMOCRAT would ever be charged under these circumstances. While it's not totally a bullshit case, it's like charging someone with stealing a bicycle that had a "FREE" sign on it, left on the sidewalk. Trump could have, with a swipe of his magic wand, declassified every one of those documents the day before he left office. He IS NOT BOUND by procedures covering others because he is the AUTHORITY that declassifies documents.
He had the authority to declassify documents, but didn't do it. He lost that authority when Biden was inaugurated.
 
Huh? Link?

What cha talkin' about, Willis? ;)
~~~~~~
Here it is.. I'll spoon feed you.

Judge Cannon's 'worrisome' wording sparks fear Trump classified docs case may be dismissed​


"Cannon filed to the Florida federal court Wednesday a paperless order accepting two amicus briefs, one from the America First Legal Foundation and one from former Reagan era Attorney General Ed Meese, calling on the Florida federal judge to dismiss charges against Trump, court records show."
 
It's little more than reading tea leaves, but it does look positive for DJT.

NO DEMOCRAT would ever be charged under these circumstances. While it's not totally a bullshit case, it's like charging someone with stealing a bicycle that had a "FREE" sign on it, left on the sidewalk. Trump could have, with a swipe of his magic wand, declassified every one of those documents the day before he left office. He IS NOT BOUND by procedures covering others because he is the AUTHORITY that declassifies documents.

FPOTUS#45 was not charged with taking the documents just like VP Pence and Senator/VP/President Biden were not charged with taking the documetns.

FPOTUS#45 is charged with willfully not returning them when instructed to do so by Officers of the United States government after leaving office.

Oh - and FPOTUS#45 has never claimed in court that he declassified any of the documents in the case prior to leaving office.

WW
 
It's little more than reading tea leaves, but it does look positive for DJT.

NO DEMOCRAT would ever be charged under these circumstances. While it's not totally a bullshit case, it's like charging someone with stealing a bicycle that had a "FREE" sign on it, left on the sidewalk. Trump could have, with a swipe of his magic wand, declassified every one of those documents the day before he left office. He IS NOT BOUND by procedures covering others because he is the AUTHORITY that declassifies documents.

Oh and for those that don't understand...

See this is what people that don't understand what "classified" shows. Documents are not "declassified" it is the information in the document that is declassified. The document is a piece of paper, it is the information that is important.

For example let’s say that there are 6 copies of a specific document containing specific classified information. One located in the White House, 5 located amongst various agencies which also need the document. In addition there are subordinate documents that contain (either in part of in whole some of the same classified information).

Under a normal process when the information contained in a highly classified documents is declassified (or downgraded) that impacts all copies of the document (its information, and subordinate documents containing the same information in whole or portions of a subordinate document).

So If the FPOTUS "declassified" a document, he is really declassifying the information in that document. If the FPOTUS, while acting as POTUS, "declassified" the information without telling anyone (either directly or in writing) for that specific document, you end up with:

  • One copy of the information located at the White House (or one of his Country Clubs) being "declassified", and
  • Five copies of the information located at the responsible agencies still being classified as the responsible agencies will not know the information was declassified because the FPOTUS (while POTUS) just mentally declassified the information in his head.
The result is someone could be prosecuted for improper handling of classified material for actions related to the 5 responsible agency documents, but not for improper handling of the exact same document if the source of the document was the White House. But they contain the same information! By this we are talking about the information in the document and subordinate information which sourced the document which can have even wider reaching impacts.

The national security infrastructure cannot function in a reasonable way if the same information is both classified and declassified at the same time simply because the POTUS chooses not to tell anyone.

Kind of a Schrodinger's Classified document where the same information is both classified and declassified at the same time until someone asks the FPOTUS to find out if he mentally and secretly declassified it without telling anyone while still POTUS. Normal people wouldn't know just by looking at the document.

WW
 
Right now there is nothing to discuss here
Both Politics and Current have 80% smear Trump thread titles. Stormy is being brought back. Rereading of Muller being demanded. 9-0 isn’t 9-0. It’s all kiddie stuff flailing that it’s not going their way
I’m not a kid. The kiddie corp dog whistled in for 50+ obsessive posts per 12 hour period is not an adult thing. See you couple times per day until this place is no longer a paid for anti Trump dumping ground and returns to a “discussion board” . See you this evening, like a healthy person would do.
 
Huh? Link?

What cha talkin' about, Willis? ;)
Links look like other parts of the post but are usually a different color, typically blue or purple, and underlined. Your cursor will change when you hover over them. Now that you know that, see if you can find the link in the post that is confusing you.

Next week we'll go over what are called "search engines".
 
03c40b88-62ee-4284-8887-49c1ceabfc84_text.gif


If it comes to pass I'll be looking forward to the REEEEEEEEEEEEing.
 
When Trump admits to actually declassifying the documents, you can make your point.

What isn't up for debate, is the fact that Trump had no authority to obstruct justice by lying about complying with the subpoena and hiding documents that were required to have been turned over to the DoJ.

Very few people are so stupid as to try that nonsense.

If trump obstructed justice then they would have nailed his ass to the wall in the biggest public spectacle they could. But they didn't.

Show me where he was convicted of obstruction of justice
 
If trump obstructed justice then they would have nailed his ass to the wall in the biggest public spectacle they could. But they didn't.

Show me where he was convicted of obstruction of justice
He's charged with obstruction of justice. He can be convicted once there's a trial, which they're doing everything they can to prevent.
 

Forum List

Back
Top