The Halderman Report Silences The Election Fraud Deniers

excalibur

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2015
18,382
34,957
2,290
Everyone knows that things weren't proper in Georgia in 2020(among several other states).

If we had a free press, a report like this would be a major story. But, we only have the MSM which is a propaganda arm for the Democratic Party and the deep state.



The most important report in 2023 is the Halderman report — which has finally been “unsealed” by our corrupt court system. Its 96 pages sound the death knell for the election fraud deniers in both political parties — and for electronic voting machines in general.

Page 4 is brutal.





Ah yes, the old “multiple routes by which attackers can install malicious software” ploy!

Page 5 is even more brutal.







 
Nothing to refute dumbass, even the courts wasn't buying that bullshit.
96 pages and you don’t grasp one point of it. Not one.

It is also amusing how you seem to revere courts when it suits your temporary purpose. The courts also gave us Plessy v. Ferguson. Not so reverent there, are you?
 
Everyone knows that things weren't proper in Georgia in 2020(among several other states).

If we had a free press, a report like this would be a major story. But, we only have the MSM which is a propaganda arm for the Democratic Party and the deep state.


The most important report in 2023 is the Halderman report — which has finally been “unsealed” by our corrupt court system. Its 96 pages sound the death knell for the election fraud deniers in both political parties — and for electronic voting machines in general.
Page 4 is brutal.






Ah yes, the old “multiple routes by which attackers can install malicious software” ploy!
Page 5 is even more brutal.






There was no massive election fraud. 60+ judges in court cases across the US can't be wrong.
All of this is conspiracy theory. :)
 
When the actual evidence isn’t even reached, we don’t have 60 judges discussing it.
Again, a bullshit claim.

 
Well, if you can't trust *checks notes* emerald.tv who can you trust?

qQVgqH1.gif
qQVgqH1.gif
qQVgqH1.gif
 
Everyone knows that things weren't proper in Georgia in 2020(among several other states).

If we had a free press, a report like this would be a major story. But, we only have the MSM which is a propaganda arm for the Democratic Party and the deep state.


The most important report in 2023 is the Halderman report — which has finally been “unsealed” by our corrupt court system. Its 96 pages sound the death knell for the election fraud deniers in both political parties — and for electronic voting machines in general.
Page 4 is brutal.






Ah yes, the old “multiple routes by which attackers can install malicious software” ploy!
Page 5 is even more brutal.






hehehe
 
Again, a bullshit claim.

See? Your ignorance keeps getting highlighted. Cases dismissed on procedural grounds such as “lack of standing,” etc., don’t get the evidence evaluated.

You putz.
 
See? Your ignorance keeps getting highlighted. Cases dismissed on procedural grounds such as “lack of standing,” etc., don’t get the evidence evaluated.

You putz.
The majority were dismissed on LACK OF EVIDENCE. Not lack of standing. I remember the SC case that the nutjob AG of Texas bought was dismissed on standing..duh.
60+ judges, a lot of them Trump appointees, looked at Trump's D-Team's "evidence"...and decided it was BULLSHIT. Dismissed.
 
Everyone knows that things weren't proper in Georgia in 2020(among several other states).

If we had a free press, a report like this would be a major story. But, we only have the MSM which is a propaganda arm for the Democratic Party and the deep state.


The most important report in 2023 is the Halderman report — which has finally been “unsealed” by our corrupt court system. Its 96 pages sound the death knell for the election fraud deniers in both political parties — and for electronic voting machines in general.
Page 4 is brutal.






Ah yes, the old “multiple routes by which attackers can install malicious software” ploy!
Page 5 is even more brutal.







Sent them all to Gitmo
 
See? Your ignorance keeps getting highlighted. Cases dismissed on procedural grounds such as “lack of standing,” etc., don’t get the evidence evaluated.

You putz.
Actually it's your ignorance on full display here. Standing is anything but just some procedure. Standing means you suffered some sort of injury by the party you are suing. You must have standing to make a claim.
 
It was quoted in part for you. Can’t you read? Or are you just afraid of what it says?
I read it.

Not a single one of the conservatives in this thread, including you, has said what they think this report shows.

Is that a coincidence?

Or are you all morons who don’t have any idea what you’re talking about.
 

Forum List

Back
Top