JBeukema
Rookie
- Banned
- #41
Because I vote for candidates not parties?
oh, and the LP supports the slaughter of the unborn...
hell, let me quote myself:
jbeukema said:This, too, has come up. It is true that many of my views are in agreement with the Libertarian platform. However, it is the litmus test issues that seperate us.
1.4 Abortion
Recognizing that abortion is a sensitive issue and that people can hold good-faith views on all sides, we believe that government should be kept out of the matter, leaving the question to each person for their conscientious consideration.
If I take my child and I do not want to continue to provide for this child and surrender my personal life, and I kill my child- am I not a murderer? If I kill my child an hour or a year after her birth? Why not half-an-hour? or just before my child sees the light of the outside world? Why is it that if I assault s pregnant woman, and her child dies, I am a murderer- yet if she does the job herself, it is her right? Do not our children have rights? Are they not men and women (boys and girls?) with the same basic human rights as any other? What if it is the day before she is due? or week? Two days before or an hour before that? What changed the week or the month before that? For long before the last two months her child's heart beats. The month before, during the sonogram, she had the hiccups.... and two months before, when she finally asked what color to paint the room- after debating so long whether to ask, she would have sworn she were waving... Is it not murder if i then kill this child? Two weeks ago, she began to ponder the world around her- building 250,000 new neurons every minute as she got ready for the outside world... Last week, she started to move around- she still has trouble with the vulcan hand sign, though. It'll be a while...Three weeks from now I would be a murder; what about today? tomorrow? two days from then? another 48 hours? the day after that? Why not yesterday?
for those keeping tack, we're at 9 weeks...
suffice to say I am- dare i say it- a 'right-to-lifer'. Our founding fathers realized that life is the first thing we must defend. Depriving a man of his life is the single greatest violation of rights possible. If we fail to protect to the lives of our children, how can we be expected to protect any other of a man's right?
(I've been known to go minute-by-minute until a month and second-by-second until conception before, but that'd be a a LOT of repetitive text, and I think you get the idea)
Yet they refuse to enforce the right of a child to live... they condone murder of our most defenseless while daring to claim to defend life.
Anyone with common sense can reason that in order for the Federal government to perform its duties, it must have funding. Taxation is the only viable means of achieving this. The only other means with any chance of success if the government takeover of business- the results of which have been seen around the world.
define which impediments are unacceptable. After the Opium Wars, China was forced to allow imports of cheap goods from the British. This detroyed their economy and the livelihoods of their people. We are stupid if we allow ourselves to do the same thing... with the Chinese, to boot...
as a Nationalist, I recognize the need to secure our interests.
I was against going in. We are their, however. If we leave, we create a power vacuum as we have in Central and South America in the past. Due to our meddling, the shit has hit the fan. Our only option is to take responsibility and stay aide the Iraqis until they are able to take the reins. Reality, not politics, must define determine the timeline.
This is the title of their section on Immigration. It is blatant catering. Immigration and security policies should reflect our sovereignty and be determined by our best interests.
Then the market must adapt and dynamically evolve with the changing American market.
... what?@! What about Temporary Employment Visas (or Temporary Work Permits)?
H-2B classification applies to temporary or seasonal nonagricultural workers. This classification requires a temporary labor certification issued by the Secretary of Labor (66,000);
(MORE)
Legally, it's a civil offense. In reality, it is at best trespassing and at worst a blatant sign that one has no intentions of obeying our laws.
Yes.. by making rape legal, I can drastically reduce the arrests for rape, as well. One not call surrender victory
ICE: How long have you live here illegally?
Pablo: I just got here, esse
ICE: You just said you've worked here for two years
Pablo: No, Senor
ICE: Do you want to stay hee?
Pablo: Yes, Senor
ICE: You've been here at least the mandatory two years?
Pablo: yes, Senor.
ICE: How long?
Pablo: I just get here, Senor...
Am I getting the problem across?
The fatal flaw of the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act was not that it offered legal status to workers already here but that it made no provision for future workers to enter legally.
The fatal flaw with the pardon of Weinberger is that it fails to protect future arms dealers, traitors, international criminals, and crooks...
the problem with the pardon on Nixon is that- well, you get the idea...
everything else I like, though...
sources
Libertarian Party | Smaller Government | Lower Taxes | More Freedom
Fetal development: What happens during the first trimester? - MayoClinic.com
Temporary Workers