Can we all agree that the Oregon's Umpqua Community College was an act of terrorism?

[Sallow]

Pretty simple really.

It was an act of unbridled terrorism.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Nope.

"Terrorism" has an actual definition and meaning. It's not a catch-all for anything bad that happens.

It remains to be seen whether this was "terrorism".

 

[Blackrook]

The shooter asked his victims what religion they are. That's happened before, and it was Muslim terrorists sparing Muslims and killing everyone else.

 

[Buzz Jenkins]

What the fuck difference does it make?

 

[Sallow]

Of course for some "it remains to be seen".

Because for some, if this guy turns out to be a white Christian, it will be the act of a mentally deranged guy.

And if it turns out if this guy was a dark skinned Muslim, it will be the act of jihad against America.

 

[Missourian]

I'm with Doc. Words have meanings.

 

[Sallow]

The shooter asked his victims what religion they are. That's happened before, and it was Muslim terrorists sparing Muslims and killing everyone else.

I saw that on FOX too.

Do you stand by that?

Here and now. Do you stand by that as "gospel" truth?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Of course for some "it remains to be seen".

Because for some, if this guy turns out to be a white Christian, it will be the act of a mentally deranged guy.

And if it turns out if this guy was a dark skinned Muslim, it will be the act of jihad against America.

No - it will be "terrorism" if the attack was meant to further a political goal via fear.

The religion of the shooter is irrelevant.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Pretty simple really.

It was an act of unbridled terrorism.

I cannot say I would disagree.

 

[MaryL]

What the fuck difference does it make?

Perhaps, everything.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Nope.

"Terrorism" has an actual definition and meaning. It's not a catch-all for anything bad that happens.

It remains to be seen whether this was "terrorism".

BY which criteria do you believe that would disqualify this act as terrorism?

 

[thereisnospoon]

Of course for some "it remains to be seen".

Because for some, if this guy turns out to be a white Christian, it will be the act of a mentally deranged guy.

And if it turns out if this guy was a dark skinned Muslim, it will be the act of jihad against America.

No - it will be "terrorism" if the attack was meant to further a political goal via fear.

The religion of the shooter is irrelevant.

Muslim terrorists have no political ideology. Theirs is a religious issue.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Of course for some "it remains to be seen".

Because for some, if this guy turns out to be a white Christian, it will be the act of a mentally deranged guy.

And if it turns out if this guy was a dark skinned Muslim, it will be the act of jihad against America.

No - it will be "terrorism" if the attack was meant to further a political goal via fear.

The religion of the shooter is irrelevant.

Muslim terrorists have no political ideology. Theirs is a religious issue.

Nonsense.

If that were true, why are al-qaeda and ISIS killing each other?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Nope.

"Terrorism" has an actual definition and meaning. It's not a catch-all for anything bad that happens.

It remains to be seen whether this was "terrorism".

BY which criteria do you believe that would disqualify this act as terrorism?

ter·ror·ism
ˈterəˌrizəm/
noun

1. the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

If the shooter had no political aims, then it was not terrorism. Pretty simple.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Of course for some "it remains to be seen".

Because for some, if this guy turns out to be a white Christian, it will be the act of a mentally deranged guy.

And if it turns out if this guy was a dark skinned Muslim, it will be the act of jihad against America.

You're a bigot.
If it's a white Christian or any color/religion combo who does this in the name of a religion or cause then it's terrorism. If it's a psycho off his meds or something then that's what it is regardless of skin color or religion.
You're an anti-white, anti-Christian bigot.

 

[GWV5903]

It was an act of unbridled terrorism.

I think it's a sever case of depression and unbridled anger...

Terrorism has a political agenda...

 

[Sallow]

Of course for some "it remains to be seen".

Because for some, if this guy turns out to be a white Christian, it will be the act of a mentally deranged guy.

And if it turns out if this guy was a dark skinned Muslim, it will be the act of jihad against America.

You're a bigot.
If it's a white Christian or any color/religion combo who does this in the name of a religion or cause then it's terrorism. If it's a psycho off his meds or something then that's what it is regardless of skin color or religion.
You're an anti-white, anti-Christian bigot.

Meh.

I could give a fuck what you think.


Charleston church shooting suspect arrested in N.C. - CNN.com


Dylann Roof was a terrorist.

A bloodthirsty white Christian Terrorist.

And the MSM didn't call him that.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Of course for some "it remains to be seen".

Because for some, if this guy turns out to be a white Christian, it will be the act of a mentally deranged guy.

And if it turns out if this guy was a dark skinned Muslim, it will be the act of jihad against America.

You're a bigot.
If it's a white Christian or any color/religion combo who does this in the name of a religion or cause then it's terrorism. If it's a psycho off his meds or something then that's what it is regardless of skin color or religion.
You're an anti-white, anti-Christian bigot.

Meh.

I could give a fuck what you think.


Charleston church shooting suspect arrested in N.C. - CNN.com


Dylann Roof was a terrorist.

A bloodthirsty white Christian Terrorist.

And the MSM didn't call him that.

There's plenty of black ones too. But, I'll agree that Dylann Roof committed a violent act of terrorism against innocent people.

 

[Pete7469]

Of course for some "it remains to be seen".

Because for some, if this guy turns out to be a white Christian, it will be the act of a mentally deranged guy.

And if it turns out if this guy was a dark skinned Muslim, it will be the act of jihad against America.

You're a bigot.
If it's a white Christian or any color/religion combo who does this in the name of a religion or cause then it's terrorism. If it's a psycho off his meds or something then that's what it is regardless of skin color or religion.
You're an anti-white, anti-Christian bigot.

And a blithering idiot.

Bed wetters like swallow will defend muzbot as they throw queers of buildings, rape their way across the ME and slaughter people here at home.

One thing is for sure, the media is just as bigoted, just as stupid and just as conniving as swallow and every other bed wetter. You can bet that if this asshole was shooting muzbots and sparing Christians you'd have to be in space not to feel them grinding their teeth.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Of course for some "it remains to be seen".

Because for some, if this guy turns out to be a white Christian, it will be the act of a mentally deranged guy.

And if it turns out if this guy was a dark skinned Muslim, it will be the act of jihad against America.

You're a bigot.
If it's a white Christian or any color/religion combo who does this in the name of a religion or cause then it's terrorism. If it's a psycho off his meds or something then that's what it is regardless of skin color or religion.
You're an anti-white, anti-Christian bigot.

geezus sallow i go away for a few days and i come back and here you are being called an anti-white, anti-Christian bigot.....cant i ever leave you by yourself?...