Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I have to laugh at the liberal women in this thread
YOU all had a chance to have a WOMAN run things and be the FIRST woman PRESIDENT..
but what did you do? throw her under a bus FOR A MAN and one with no experience in ANYTHING but he did have a pretty slogan, hopey changey
I now go laugh
The left supports a woman's right to choose -- but only as long as she makes the liberal-sanctioned choice.
And liberal women seem to be okay with being told they have to vote Democrat because they have ovaries.
As someone who was out there in the streets fighting when women had barely understood what equal pay meant, I am totally disappointed and disgusted with what women did with the rights we fought so hard to give them. Women rejected the entire idea of being reduced to nothing more than tits and ovaries. We were so much more than a vagina and uterus. Not today. Today protesters dress up like vaginas just to prove the point that women can't aspire to being anything more than that. You poor thing you, nothing but a woman, a julia, who needs support and protection from your spouse, the US government. That's the problem with the democrats. Women don't want to be able to start and run a business. They want free birth control. Women don't want a decent job. They want free abortions. They want free whatever it is. The very idea that a woman would stand up and refuse to be a julia is repugnant to democrats. Women have their place. Don't step out of line.
If I had known then, what I know now, I would never have given my time and energy to what women said they wanted. They never wanted it in the first place.
As someone who was out there in the streets fighting when women had barely understood what equal pay meant, I am totally disappointed and disgusted with what women did with the rights we fought so hard to give them. Women rejected the entire idea of being reduced to nothing more than tits and ovaries. We were so much more than a vagina and uterus. Not today. Today protesters dress up like vaginas just to prove the point that women can't aspire to being anything more than that. You poor thing you, nothing but a woman, a julia, who needs support and protection from your spouse, the US government. That's the problem with the democrats. Women don't want to be able to start and run a business. They want free birth control. Women don't want a decent job. They want free abortions. They want free whatever it is. The very idea that a woman would stand up and refuse to be a julia is repugnant to democrats. Women have their place. Don't step out of line.
If I had known then, what I know now, I would never have given my time and energy to what women said they wanted. They never wanted it in the first place.
Oh, cry me a river... If you were fighting for the right of women to be part of soulless corporatism, then you probably missed the point.
Oh, cry me a river... If you were fighting for the right of women to be part of soulless corporatism, then you probably missed the point.
Women have no place in corporatism. Right? Those bitches better learn their place and it isn't running companies. Go work in the community garden, it's all you're good for.
As someone who was out there in the streets fighting when women had barely understood what equal pay meant, I am totally disappointed and disgusted with what women did with the rights we fought so hard to give them. Women rejected the entire idea of being reduced to nothing more than tits and ovaries. We were so much more than a vagina and uterus. Not today. Today protesters dress up like vaginas just to prove the point that women can't aspire to being anything more than that. You poor thing you, nothing but a woman, a julia, who needs support and protection from your spouse, the US government. That's the problem with the democrats. Women don't want to be able to start and run a business. They want free birth control. Women don't want a decent job. They want free abortions. They want free whatever it is. The very idea that a woman would stand up and refuse to be a julia is repugnant to democrats. Women have their place. Don't step out of line.
If I had known then, what I know now, I would never have given my time and energy to what women said they wanted. They never wanted it in the first place.
Oh, cry me a river... If you were fighting for the right of women to be part of soulless corporatism, then you probably missed the point.
Women have no place in corporatism. Right? Those bitches better learn their place and it isn't running companies. Go work in the community garden, it's all you're good for.
That would be the only way to overturn Roe.When people talk about Mitt flip-flopping it's mostly about him talking out of both side of his mouth on this issue over the years, so yeah I was hoping...
I have not seen any statement by Mitt that he "promised to appoint anti-Choice judges" and Mitt has always articulated support for certain exceptions and insisted this issue was never his real agenda, but now his own website says he believes overturning Roe v Wade would be the proper course, so hope seems to be fading fast...
Maybe this is just his backhanded way of finally saying he does not support the personhood amendment...
There are three ways Roe v. Wade, (1973) can be overturned:
Since Roe vs. Wade was a Supreme Court decision, the Supreme Court can effectively overturn the decision by ruling against abortion in a future case.
Congress can pass legislation protecting the fetus from the moment of conception (There are usually several bills addressing this issue in committee during each Congressional term. The 111th Congress (current) includes three House Resolutions and one Senate bill.).
Congress and the states can amend the Constitution to include the definition of "person" to include the unborn (this is the least likely scenario).
How can Roe v. Wade be reversed
LifeSiteNews Mobile | Hustler pornographer admires Obama family, disdains Palin for not having abortionThe left supports a woman's right to choose -- but only as long as she makes the liberal-sanctioned choice.
And liberal women seem to be okay with being told they have to vote Democrat because they have ovaries.
Where do liberals try to stop women from choosing to have babies?
Nobody should have children they can't support. Even Democrat special interest groups.In fact, wasn't your complaint about welfare that the government was paying women to have babies and encouraging the wrong kind of behavior?
As someone who was out there in the streets fighting when women had barely understood what equal pay meant, I am totally disappointed and disgusted with what women did with the rights we fought so hard to give them. Women rejected the entire idea of being reduced to nothing more than tits and ovaries. We were so much more than a vagina and uterus. Not today. Today protesters dress up like vaginas just to prove the point that women can't aspire to being anything more than that. You poor thing you, nothing but a woman, a julia, who needs support and protection from your spouse, the US government. That's the problem with the democrats. Women don't want to be able to start and run a business. They want free birth control. Women don't want a decent job. They want free abortions. They want free whatever it is. The very idea that a woman would stand up and refuse to be a julia is repugnant to democrats. Women have their place. Don't step out of line.
If I had known then, what I know now, I would never have given my time and energy to what women said they wanted. They never wanted it in the first place.
LifeSiteNews Mobile | Hustler pornographer admires Obama family, disdains Palin for not having abortionThe left supports a woman's right to choose -- but only as long as she makes the liberal-sanctioned choice.
And liberal women seem to be okay with being told they have to vote Democrat because they have ovaries.
Where do liberals try to stop women from choosing to have babies?
Nobody should have children they can't support. Even Democrat special interest groups.In fact, wasn't your complaint about welfare that the government was paying women to have babies and encouraging the wrong kind of behavior?
It's astoundingly easy to not get pregnant.
So?LifeSiteNews Mobile | Hustler pornographer admires Obama family, disdains Palin for not having abortionWhere do liberals try to stop women from choosing to have babies?
Nobody should have children they can't support. Even Democrat special interest groups.In fact, wasn't your complaint about welfare that the government was paying women to have babies and encouraging the wrong kind of behavior?
It's astoundingly easy to not get pregnant.
And yet, 50% of all pregnancies in America are unplanned.
Personally, I would like to think women are more than ovaries. They can be involved with the economy and they too, are looking for jobs. No president has the absolute determination of birth control or abortions. We have a Congress who makes the laws.
Women are as involved in what is best for this country and they too, can see what has happened in the last 3 1/2 years. Pretty much nothing. We need a leader who can get Congress working together, leads by example and unites this nation. Presently we have a president who tries to divide and conquer for his own personal agenda. That isn't in the best interests of this country.
Oh, cry me a river... If you were fighting for the right of women to be part of soulless corporatism, then you probably missed the point.
Women have no place in corporatism. Right? Those bitches better learn their place and it isn't running companies. Go work in the community garden, it's all you're good for.
Um,no, Corporatism is a soulless, evil system... and if you think that's the be all and end all that you have someone like the HP woman firing hundreds of people instead of a dude, then again, you are missing the point.
Personally, I would like to think women are more than ovaries. They can be involved with the economy and they too, are looking for jobs. No president has the absolute determination of birth control or abortions. We have a Congress who makes the laws.
Women are as involved in what is best for this country and they too, can see what has happened in the last 3 1/2 years. Pretty much nothing. We need a leader who can get Congress working together, leads by example and unites this nation. Presently we have a president who tries to divide and conquer for his own personal agenda. That isn't in the best interests of this country.
Ryan voted repeatedly to raise the debt ceiling under Bush with no muss or fuss.
When Obama wanted to raise the debt ceiling, we had nothing but contentious debate.
Care to comment?
Personally, I would like to think women are more than ovaries. They can be involved with the economy and they too, are looking for jobs. No president has the absolute determination of birth control or abortions. We have a Congress who makes the laws.
Women are as involved in what is best for this country and they too, can see what has happened in the last 3 1/2 years. Pretty much nothing. We need a leader who can get Congress working together, leads by example and unites this nation. Presently we have a president who tries to divide and conquer for his own personal agenda. That isn't in the best interests of this country.
Ryan voted repeatedly to raise the debt ceiling under Bush with no muss or fuss.
When Obama wanted to raise the debt ceiling, we had nothing but contentious debate.
Care to comment?
Do you recall the call to action after 9/11?
I don't see reproductive rights being a deciding factor in this election, no matter how much the dems want it to be . However I don't think talking reproductive health is particularly good for the GOP either.
