Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If 10-15 years ago you had told true-blue liberals that they would be voting for someone who had been an Establishment insider all her life, who had supported every misguided military intervention in the last two decades, who had taken--and was still taking--tens of millions of dollar from foreign interests, who was taking millions of dollars from Wall Street, who had given private--and unreleased--speeches to Wall Street bankers for huge fees, who was actually a "Goldwater Girl" in high school, and who had severely flip-flopped on everything from gay marriage to the Iraq War to free trade (indeed, who, until a few months ago, was an ardent defender of NAFTA), they would have blushed and scoffed.
And if you had told them that they would vote for this person when there was a true-blue liberal in the race, i.e., Jill Stein, they would have said that was impossible.
So, can so-called "liberals" still be called "liberals" after this election? How?
If 10-15 years ago you had told true-blue liberals that they would be voting for someone who had been an Establishment insider all her life, who had supported every misguided military intervention in the last two decades, who had taken--and was still taking--tens of millions of dollar from foreign interests, who was taking millions of dollars from Wall Street, who had given private--and unreleased--speeches to Wall Street bankers for huge fees, who was actually a "Goldwater Girl" in high school, and who had severely flip-flopped on everything from gay marriage to the Iraq War to free trade (indeed, who, until a few months ago, was an ardent defender of NAFTA), they would have blushed and scoffed.
And if you had told them that they would vote for this person when there was a true-blue liberal in the race, i.e., Jill Stein, they would have said that was impossible.
So, can so-called "liberals" still be called "liberals" after this election? How?
And the right is going off the rails on a crazy train.If 10-15 years ago you had told true-blue liberals that they would be voting for someone who had been an Establishment insider all her life, who had supported every misguided military intervention in the last two decades, who had taken--and was still taking--tens of millions of dollar from foreign interests, who was taking millions of dollars from Wall Street, who had given private--and unreleased--speeches to Wall Street bankers for huge fees, who was actually a "Goldwater Girl" in high school, and who had severely flip-flopped on everything from gay marriage to the Iraq War to free trade (indeed, who, until a few months ago, was an ardent defender of NAFTA), they would have blushed and scoffed.
And if you had told them that they would vote for this person when there was a true-blue liberal in the race, i.e., Jill Stein, they would have said that was impossible.
So, can so-called "liberals" still be called "liberals" after this election? How?
No, they all are regressives now.
And the right is going off the rails on a crazy train.If 10-15 years ago you had told true-blue liberals that they would be voting for someone who had been an Establishment insider all her life, who had supported every misguided military intervention in the last two decades, who had taken--and was still taking--tens of millions of dollar from foreign interests, who was taking millions of dollars from Wall Street, who had given private--and unreleased--speeches to Wall Street bankers for huge fees, who was actually a "Goldwater Girl" in high school, and who had severely flip-flopped on everything from gay marriage to the Iraq War to free trade (indeed, who, until a few months ago, was an ardent defender of NAFTA), they would have blushed and scoffed.
And if you had told them that they would vote for this person when there was a true-blue liberal in the race, i.e., Jill Stein, they would have said that was impossible.
So, can so-called "liberals" still be called "liberals" after this election? How?
No, they all are regressives now.
And the right is going off the rails on a crazy train.If 10-15 years ago you had told true-blue liberals that they would be voting for someone who had been an Establishment insider all her life, who had supported every misguided military intervention in the last two decades, who had taken--and was still taking--tens of millions of dollar from foreign interests, who was taking millions of dollars from Wall Street, who had given private--and unreleased--speeches to Wall Street bankers for huge fees, who was actually a "Goldwater Girl" in high school, and who had severely flip-flopped on everything from gay marriage to the Iraq War to free trade (indeed, who, until a few months ago, was an ardent defender of NAFTA), they would have blushed and scoffed.
And if you had told them that they would vote for this person when there was a true-blue liberal in the race, i.e., Jill Stein, they would have said that was impossible.
So, can so-called "liberals" still be called "liberals" after this election? How?
No, they all are regressives now.
The only one who is crazy is the one not on board.
If 10-15 years ago you had told true-blue liberals that they would be voting for someone who had been an Establishment insider all her life, who had supported every misguided military intervention in the last two decades, who had taken--and was still taking--tens of millions of dollar from foreign interests, who was taking millions of dollars from Wall Street, who had given private--and unreleased--speeches to Wall Street bankers for huge fees, who was actually a "Goldwater Girl" in high school, and who had severely flip-flopped on everything from gay marriage to the Iraq War to free trade (indeed, who, until a few months ago, was an ardent defender of NAFTA), they would have blushed and scoffed.
And if you had told them that they would vote for this person when there was a true-blue liberal in the race, i.e., Jill Stein, they would have said that was impossible.
So, can so-called "liberals" still be called "liberals" after this election? How?
You realize right at this moment the Democrats are the laughingstock of the world, right?If 10-15 years ago you had told true-blue liberals that they would be voting for someone who had been an Establishment insider all her life, who had supported every misguided military intervention in the last two decades, who had taken--and was still taking--tens of millions of dollar from foreign interests, who was taking millions of dollars from Wall Street, who had given private--and unreleased--speeches to Wall Street bankers for huge fees, who was actually a "Goldwater Girl" in high school, and who had severely flip-flopped on everything from gay marriage to the Iraq War to free trade (indeed, who, until a few months ago, was an ardent defender of NAFTA), they would have blushed and scoffed.
And if you had told them that they would vote for this person when there was a true-blue liberal in the race, i.e., Jill Stein, they would have said that was impossible.
So, can so-called "liberals" still be called "liberals" after this election? How?
What most Americans aren't thinking about is how the rest of the world is on tiptoe and very nervous about Mr. Trump. The rest of the world matters to me as we are all citizens of the planet. Mrs. Clinton's sins with the CGI and her email are laughable compared to what would happen with an obsessive-compulsive impetuous man-baby in the Oval Office who asked Chris Matthews why we couldn't use nuclear weapons in Europe and women who have had abortions should be punished.
You mean Americans, because of Donald Trump.You realize right at this moment the Democrats are the laughingstock of the world, right?If 10-15 years ago you had told true-blue liberals that they would be voting for someone who had been an Establishment insider all her life, who had supported every misguided military intervention in the last two decades, who had taken--and was still taking--tens of millions of dollar from foreign interests, who was taking millions of dollars from Wall Street, who had given private--and unreleased--speeches to Wall Street bankers for huge fees, who was actually a "Goldwater Girl" in high school, and who had severely flip-flopped on everything from gay marriage to the Iraq War to free trade (indeed, who, until a few months ago, was an ardent defender of NAFTA), they would have blushed and scoffed.
And if you had told them that they would vote for this person when there was a true-blue liberal in the race, i.e., Jill Stein, they would have said that was impossible.
So, can so-called "liberals" still be called "liberals" after this election? How?
What most Americans aren't thinking about is how the rest of the world is on tiptoe and very nervous about Mr. Trump. The rest of the world matters to me as we are all citizens of the planet. Mrs. Clinton's sins with the CGI and her email are laughable compared to what would happen with an obsessive-compulsive impetuous man-baby in the Oval Office who asked Chris Matthews why we couldn't use nuclear weapons in Europe and women who have had abortions should be punished.
You mean Americans, because of Donald Trump.You realize right at this moment the Democrats are the laughingstock of the world, right?If 10-15 years ago you had told true-blue liberals that they would be voting for someone who had been an Establishment insider all her life, who had supported every misguided military intervention in the last two decades, who had taken--and was still taking--tens of millions of dollar from foreign interests, who was taking millions of dollars from Wall Street, who had given private--and unreleased--speeches to Wall Street bankers for huge fees, who was actually a "Goldwater Girl" in high school, and who had severely flip-flopped on everything from gay marriage to the Iraq War to free trade (indeed, who, until a few months ago, was an ardent defender of NAFTA), they would have blushed and scoffed.
And if you had told them that they would vote for this person when there was a true-blue liberal in the race, i.e., Jill Stein, they would have said that was impossible.
So, can so-called "liberals" still be called "liberals" after this election? How?
What most Americans aren't thinking about is how the rest of the world is on tiptoe and very nervous about Mr. Trump. The rest of the world matters to me as we are all citizens of the planet. Mrs. Clinton's sins with the CGI and her email are laughable compared to what would happen with an obsessive-compulsive impetuous man-baby in the Oval Office who asked Chris Matthews why we couldn't use nuclear weapons in Europe and women who have had abortions should be punished.
More than the cost the 2006 Secure Fence Act didWhy won't Mr. Trump tell us how much this wall is going to cost that he is planning on building? If he is such a sharp businessman why doesn't he have a number for this project?
He just stands up at the podium and yacks "yeah, we're gonna build that wall..." And the stupid ignorant rednecks eat it up.
The creation and building of Homeland Security that Mr. Bush created is nothing more than a plague on our national debt. I can't imagine what it will cost for this fantasy wall.
The world is laughing at all Americans, for being such a bunch of idiot children that someone like Trump can run for the highest office in the land. It's pathetic.You mean Americans, because of Donald Trump.You realize right at this moment the Democrats are the laughingstock of the world, right?If 10-15 years ago you had told true-blue liberals that they would be voting for someone who had been an Establishment insider all her life, who had supported every misguided military intervention in the last two decades, who had taken--and was still taking--tens of millions of dollar from foreign interests, who was taking millions of dollars from Wall Street, who had given private--and unreleased--speeches to Wall Street bankers for huge fees, who was actually a "Goldwater Girl" in high school, and who had severely flip-flopped on everything from gay marriage to the Iraq War to free trade (indeed, who, until a few months ago, was an ardent defender of NAFTA), they would have blushed and scoffed.
And if you had told them that they would vote for this person when there was a true-blue liberal in the race, i.e., Jill Stein, they would have said that was impossible.
So, can so-called "liberals" still be called "liberals" after this election? How?
What most Americans aren't thinking about is how the rest of the world is on tiptoe and very nervous about Mr. Trump. The rest of the world matters to me as we are all citizens of the planet. Mrs. Clinton's sins with the CGI and her email are laughable compared to what would happen with an obsessive-compulsive impetuous man-baby in the Oval Office who asked Chris Matthews why we couldn't use nuclear weapons in Europe and women who have had abortions should be punished.
No, I mean the Democrats and separately from Trump.
You realize right at this moment the Democrats are the laughingstock of the world, right?If 10-15 years ago you had told true-blue liberals that they would be voting for someone who had been an Establishment insider all her life, who had supported every misguided military intervention in the last two decades, who had taken--and was still taking--tens of millions of dollar from foreign interests, who was taking millions of dollars from Wall Street, who had given private--and unreleased--speeches to Wall Street bankers for huge fees, who was actually a "Goldwater Girl" in high school, and who had severely flip-flopped on everything from gay marriage to the Iraq War to free trade (indeed, who, until a few months ago, was an ardent defender of NAFTA), they would have blushed and scoffed.
And if you had told them that they would vote for this person when there was a true-blue liberal in the race, i.e., Jill Stein, they would have said that was impossible.
So, can so-called "liberals" still be called "liberals" after this election? How?
What most Americans aren't thinking about is how the rest of the world is on tiptoe and very nervous about Mr. Trump. The rest of the world matters to me as we are all citizens of the planet. Mrs. Clinton's sins with the CGI and her email are laughable compared to what would happen with an obsessive-compulsive impetuous man-baby in the Oval Office who asked Chris Matthews why we couldn't use nuclear weapons in Europe and women who have had abortions should be punished.
More than the cost the 2006 Secure Fence Act didWhy won't Mr. Trump tell us how much this wall is going to cost that he is planning on building? If he is such a sharp businessman why doesn't he have a number for this project?
He just stands up at the podium and yacks "yeah, we're gonna build that wall..." And the stupid ignorant rednecks eat it up.
The creation and building of Homeland Security that Mr. Bush created is nothing more than a plague on our national debt. I can't imagine what it will cost for this fantasy wall.
H.R.6061 - 109th Congress (2005-2006): Secure Fence Act of 2006
Awwwww.....One thing is for sure, anyone who votes for Hitlery can be called stupid.
Not that I would consider anyone who's happily voting for the world's richest professional clown a fuckin genius.
We are soooooo fucked.
The world is laughing at all Americans, for being such a bunch of idiot children that someone like Trump can run for the highest office in the land. It's pathetic.You mean Americans, because of Donald Trump.You realize right at this moment the Democrats are the laughingstock of the world, right?If 10-15 years ago you had told true-blue liberals that they would be voting for someone who had been an Establishment insider all her life, who had supported every misguided military intervention in the last two decades, who had taken--and was still taking--tens of millions of dollar from foreign interests, who was taking millions of dollars from Wall Street, who had given private--and unreleased--speeches to Wall Street bankers for huge fees, who was actually a "Goldwater Girl" in high school, and who had severely flip-flopped on everything from gay marriage to the Iraq War to free trade (indeed, who, until a few months ago, was an ardent defender of NAFTA), they would have blushed and scoffed.
And if you had told them that they would vote for this person when there was a true-blue liberal in the race, i.e., Jill Stein, they would have said that was impossible.
So, can so-called "liberals" still be called "liberals" after this election? How?
What most Americans aren't thinking about is how the rest of the world is on tiptoe and very nervous about Mr. Trump. The rest of the world matters to me as we are all citizens of the planet. Mrs. Clinton's sins with the CGI and her email are laughable compared to what would happen with an obsessive-compulsive impetuous man-baby in the Oval Office who asked Chris Matthews why we couldn't use nuclear weapons in Europe and women who have had abortions should be punished.
No, I mean the Democrats and separately from Trump.
We really really really need that "Irony" smilie.'Can "Liberals" Still Be Called "Liberals" After Voting for Hillary?'
This fails as a loaded question fallacy.
You fail as someone who lacks the capacity to commit logic.
You realize you spelled "Republicans" wrong.You realize right at this moment the Democrats are the laughingstock of the world, right?If 10-15 years ago you had told true-blue liberals that they would be voting for someone who had been an Establishment insider all her life, who had supported every misguided military intervention in the last two decades, who had taken--and was still taking--tens of millions of dollar from foreign interests, who was taking millions of dollars from Wall Street, who had given private--and unreleased--speeches to Wall Street bankers for huge fees, who was actually a "Goldwater Girl" in high school, and who had severely flip-flopped on everything from gay marriage to the Iraq War to free trade (indeed, who, until a few months ago, was an ardent defender of NAFTA), they would have blushed and scoffed.
And if you had told them that they would vote for this person when there was a true-blue liberal in the race, i.e., Jill Stein, they would have said that was impossible.
So, can so-called "liberals" still be called "liberals" after this election? How?
What most Americans aren't thinking about is how the rest of the world is on tiptoe and very nervous about Mr. Trump. The rest of the world matters to me as we are all citizens of the planet. Mrs. Clinton's sins with the CGI and her email are laughable compared to what would happen with an obsessive-compulsive impetuous man-baby in the Oval Office who asked Chris Matthews why we couldn't use nuclear weapons in Europe and women who have had abortions should be punished.
