Can "Liberals" Still Be Called "Liberals" After Voting for Hillary?

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Can "Liberals" Still Be Called "Liberals" After Voting for Hillary?

Most people referred to as liberals aren't really liberals anyway, so why not?

 

[WaitingFor2020]

What most Americans aren't thinking about is how the rest of the world is on tiptoe and very nervous about Mr. Trump. The rest of the world matters to me as we are all citizens of the planet. Mrs. Clinton's sins with the CGI and her email are laughable compared to what would happen with an obsessive-compulsive impetuous man-baby in the Oval Office who asked Chris Matthews why we couldn't use nuclear weapons in Europe and women who have had abortions should be punished.

You realize right at this moment the Democrats are the laughingstock of the world, right?

You realize you spelled "Republicans" wrong.

No.

Mr. Disir:

I'm a female.

Start here:
Why China Dreads a Hillary Clinton Presidency

and move here:
Clinton's Latin American clangers | Mark Weisbrot

What makes Democrats laughingstocks is that you don't get it. You are oblivious to this.

Blogs are for idiots who can't think for themselves. Two blogs don't make a right.

 

[Disir]

You realize right at this moment the Democrats are the laughingstock of the world, right?

You realize you spelled "Republicans" wrong.

No.

Mr. Disir:

I'm a female.

Start here:
Why China Dreads a Hillary Clinton Presidency

and move here:
Clinton's Latin American clangers | Mark Weisbrot

What makes Democrats laughingstocks is that you don't get it. You are oblivious to this.

Blogs are for idiots who can't think for themselves. Two blogs don't make a right.

In-text links. The Diplomat is well respected. Try again.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Well I doubt Liberals are going to vote for birther Trump.

Hillary's '08 Dem primary campaign started the Birther movement.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

I'm sure that was meaningful to someone.

Yes, those who can think. Leaves you out.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

You realize you spelled "Republicans" wrong.

No.

Mr. Disir:

I'm a female.

Start here:
Why China Dreads a Hillary Clinton Presidency

and move here:
Clinton's Latin American clangers | Mark Weisbrot

What makes Democrats laughingstocks is that you don't get it. You are oblivious to this.

Blogs are for idiots who can't think for themselves. Two blogs don't make a right.

In-text links. The Diplomat is well respected. Try again.

By whom? You come up with two articles by bloggers and that's evidence of what?

 

[Disir]

I'm sure that was meaningful to someone.

Yes, those who can think. Leaves you out.

You can't answer them. This makes you nothing more than a uneducated hillbilly hack.

This is what you look like to the rest of the world:

 

[WaitingFor2020]

I'm sure that was meaningful to someone.

Yes, those who can think. Leaves you out.

You can't answer them. This makes you nothing more than a uneducated hillbilly hack.

This is what you look like to the rest of the world:

is this somehow different from the cartoons that you otherwise dismiss?

The links you provided are two opinions. Do you know the difference between an opinion and a fact?

 

[Disir]

No.

Mr. Disir:

I'm a female.

Start here:
Why China Dreads a Hillary Clinton Presidency

and move here:
Clinton's Latin American clangers | Mark Weisbrot

What makes Democrats laughingstocks is that you don't get it. You are oblivious to this.

Blogs are for idiots who can't think for themselves. Two blogs don't make a right.

In-text links. The Diplomat is well respected. Try again.

By whom? You come up with two articles by bloggers and that's evidence of what?

CSIS and others. Look at you try to run away from the truth. What a good little Democrat pet you turned out to be.

 

[Disir]

I'm sure that was meaningful to someone.

Yes, those who can think. Leaves you out.

You can't answer them. This makes you nothing more than a uneducated hillbilly hack.

This is what you look like to the rest of the world:

is this somehow different from the cartoons that you otherwise dismiss?

The links you provided are two opinions. Do you know the difference between an opinion and a fact?

Which part of the opinion did you take issue with specifically? Any part? Did you read it? Of course you didn't. Because you don't know a fucking thing about international relations. Isn't that right?

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Mr. Disir:

I'm a female.

Start here:
Why China Dreads a Hillary Clinton Presidency

and move here:
Clinton's Latin American clangers | Mark Weisbrot

What makes Democrats laughingstocks is that you don't get it. You are oblivious to this.

Blogs are for idiots who can't think for themselves. Two blogs don't make a right.

In-text links. The Diplomat is well respected. Try again.

By whom? You come up with two articles by bloggers and that's evidence of what?

CSIS and others. Look at you try to run away from the truth. What a good little Democrat pet you turned out to be.

Here's an opinion to go with your opinion. From the BBC.
What a good little racist white supremacist you turned out to be.
"Europe hates Trump. Does it matter?"
Europe hates Trump. Does it matter? - BBC News

 

[Disir]

I'm a female.

Start here:
Why China Dreads a Hillary Clinton Presidency

and move here:
Clinton's Latin American clangers | Mark Weisbrot

What makes Democrats laughingstocks is that you don't get it. You are oblivious to this.

Blogs are for idiots who can't think for themselves. Two blogs don't make a right.

In-text links. The Diplomat is well respected. Try again.

By whom? You come up with two articles by bloggers and that's evidence of what?

CSIS and others. Look at you try to run away from the truth. What a good little Democrat pet you turned out to be.

Here's an opinion to go with your opinion. From the BBC.
What a good little racist white supremacist you turned out to be.
"Europe hates Trump. Does it matter?"
Europe hates Trump. Does it matter? - BBC News

So, which part of the "opinion" did you have trouble with? Maybe I can walk your dumbass through that.

 

[CowboyTed]

The Rest of World has a general view... A vast majority think Trump to be a dangerous individual who lack the intellectual depth to run a country of US stature without causing major damage to the US first and the rest of the world second.

Trump has shown himself to be childlike in his responses to major problems. He has been supported by one of US biggest enemies in Putin. Has his supporters ever thought why Putin supports Trump? It is because he is weak and very weak at that... He has shown no ability to being able to deal with the global problems that America is going to face for the next 8 years.

Clinton is considered at least competent by nearly everyone. While some don't particularly warm to her, she is considered to be able to do the job. The real thing everyone says here is, Wel Bill did a fine job and she has the same DNA for the job. We expect her much like Bill and Obama to appoint a top professional team and the world can get back to making money. The real secret to a good economy is stability and Clinton brings that while Trump says what are in effect suicidal comments, look at his comments on the National Debt. On that topic alone he showed that he has a complete lack of understanding how US debt is structure and handled.

Clinton is the safe pair of hands while Trump is the equivalence of a country committing suicide.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Oooops. Nobody reads the NYT:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/30/u...iplomats-seek-reassurance-from-democrats.html

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Blogs are for idiots who can't think for themselves. Two blogs don't make a right.

In-text links. The Diplomat is well respected. Try again.

By whom? You come up with two articles by bloggers and that's evidence of what?

CSIS and others. Look at you try to run away from the truth. What a good little Democrat pet you turned out to be.

Here's an opinion to go with your opinion. From the BBC.
What a good little racist white supremacist you turned out to be.
"Europe hates Trump. Does it matter?"
Europe hates Trump. Does it matter? - BBC News

So, which part of the "opinion" did you have trouble with? Maybe I can walk your dumbass through that.

I don't think you can walk and talk at the same time.

 

[sealybobo]

If 10-15 years ago you had told true-blue liberals that they would be voting for someone who had been an Establishment insider all her life, who had supported every misguided military intervention in the last two decades, who had taken--and was still taking--tens of millions of dollar from foreign interests, who was taking millions of dollars from Wall Street, who had given private--and unreleased--speeches to Wall Street bankers for huge fees, who was actually a "Goldwater Girl" in high school, and who had severely flip-flopped on everything from gay marriage to the Iraq War to free trade (indeed, who, until a few months ago, was an ardent defender of NAFTA), they would have blushed and scoffed.

And if you had told them that they would vote for this person when there was a true-blue liberal in the race, i.e., Jill Stein, they would have said that was impossible.

So, can so-called "liberals" still be called "liberals" after this election? How?

I thought hillary was a socialist.

And maybe we want a moderate not a liberal or con

 

[Disir]

Oooops. Nobody reads the NYT:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/30/u...iplomats-seek-reassurance-from-democrats.html

No. Nobody does. The NYT is no longer considered a solid source. So, what was the hard part for you in that "opinion"?

 

[Disir]

In-text links. The Diplomat is well respected. Try again.

By whom? You come up with two articles by bloggers and that's evidence of what?

CSIS and others. Look at you try to run away from the truth. What a good little Democrat pet you turned out to be.

Here's an opinion to go with your opinion. From the BBC.
What a good little racist white supremacist you turned out to be.
"Europe hates Trump. Does it matter?"
Europe hates Trump. Does it matter? - BBC News

So, which part of the "opinion" did you have trouble with? Maybe I can walk your dumbass through that.

I don't think you can walk and talk at the same time.

So, you're another loud mouth ignorant Democrat. You lack detail in international relations. Got it.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Well looky here. Even the conservative Newsmax is warning us that the Europeans are against Trump:
Bill Richardson: Europeans 'Aghast' at a Trump Presidency

 

[WaitingFor2020]

By whom? You come up with two articles by bloggers and that's evidence of what?

CSIS and others. Look at you try to run away from the truth. What a good little Democrat pet you turned out to be.

Here's an opinion to go with your opinion. From the BBC.
What a good little racist white supremacist you turned out to be.
"Europe hates Trump. Does it matter?"
Europe hates Trump. Does it matter? - BBC News

So, which part of the "opinion" did you have trouble with? Maybe I can walk your dumbass through that.

I don't think you can walk and talk at the same time.

So, you're another loud mouth ignorant Democrat. You lack detail in international relations. Got it.

You know absolutely nothing about me. But I think you should get out into the international community and learn about what the rest of the world really thinks about America. I can't walk or talk you through it because your mind is made up