Can Anyone Tell Me How FOX Is A Conservative Network?

[Rotagilla]

Is it your position that everything you see on television is true and honest?

To Rotagilla: If you want to ask clever questions, first show me a quote in this thread, or any thread of mine, where I even implied that television is true and honest.

Indeed, this excerpt from another thread expresses a theme I’ve posted many times over the years:

Everything that is wrong with this country went wrong because of television. Print press could never have done the damage that television has been doing since 1960.

“You cannot put the genie back in the bottle” has been said about nuclear weapons. That is doubly true of television, but with television the genie can be driven away from the public trough simply by eliminating the advertising tax deduction. Let television pay corporate taxes instead of passing advertising costs onto the backs of the rest of us.

Speaker With Suck Up Experience Needed | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum​

now you want to play word games..

...look son..you typed an essay on fox news...I merely pointed out that all tv is propaganda and show biz and not to be taken seriously as a reliable source for information...and those are facts.
I even gave you proof by mentioning operation mockingbird.

I can see you're entrenched now and too insecure to admit I'm correct about the media being propaganda and entertainment for empty headed drones to keep them passive

 

[Flanders]

I merely pointed out that all tv is propaganda and show biz and not to be taken seriously as a reliable source for information

To Rotagilla: You stated the obvious, but you are too stupid to engage in Socratic elenchus; so it must be pure stupidity.

For a liberal to attack the media-education-entertainment complex is the height of stupidity. It is the M-E-E complex that justifies liberalism. Of the three —— television’s advertising tax deduction is the most successful funding cog in the Left’s massive propaganda apparatus.

NOTE: Liberals were as dumb as dishwater on every message board I posted on over the years, but the libs on this board have shown themselves to be the dumbest.

A little friendly advice. You should remain silent when the topic is over your head before you get the title as the Dumbest of the Dumb on USMB.

 

[Rotagilla]

I merely pointed out that all tv is propaganda and show biz and not to be taken seriously as a reliable source for information

To Rotagilla: You stated the obvious, but you are too stupid to engage in Socratic elenchus; so it must be pure stupidity.

For a liberal to attack the media-education-entertainment complex is the height of stupidity. It is the M-E-E complex that justifies liberalism. Of the three —— television’s advertising tax deduction is the most successful funding cog in the Left’s massive propaganda apparatus.

NOTE: Liberals were as dumb as dishwater on every message board I posted on over the years, but the libs on this board have shown themselves to be the dumbest.

A little friendly advice. You should remain silent when the topic is over your head before you get the title as the Dumbest of the Dumb on USMB.

you seem very confused...condescension, feigned superiority and "knowledge" and juvenile ad homs don't cover for your hyperpartisan leftist agenda, though.

 

[Flanders]

Another “Conservative” FOX moralist telling everybody how to behave even if it means putting their loved ones at risk in addition to undermining their own homeland:

Fox News anchor: We're 'barbarians' if we stop 'refugees'
Viewers warned U.S. risks 'self-destruction' without wave of Syrians
Published: 12 hours ago

Fox News anchor: We’re ‘barbarians’ if we stop ‘refugees’​

Every time a media mouth moralizes I ask myself what he, or she, is justifying. Shepard Smith is a classic:

Why hasn’t Shepard Smith come out yet? The affable Fox News anchor has a longtime boyfriend, ranks among Fox’s most senior talent, and lives in New York City. It could be, of course, that he’s just a very private person, or—as the Times argued in October—that public attitudes have changed and nobody cares if a famous figure is gay.

How Fox News Shoved Shepard Smith Back Into The Closet
J.K. Trotter
Filed to: shep smith
4/30/14 10:15am

How Fox News Shoved Shepard Smith Back Into The Closet​

It is not enough that dirty little moralists have well-paying jobs on television, those jobs come with a pulpit. Smith is not the only one. I am not saying the others are also homosexual. I am saying they only feel good about themselves when they find something that they see as a worse human failing than their own. In plain English, being queer, being a child molester, being the worst degenerate human being on the planet, and so on is not as bad as refusing to take in Muslim refugees.

Incidentally, Smith and the other wannabe priests never rail against the United Nations’ ban on DDT that is responsible for a million or more deaths caused by malaria every year. Knowing how the freaks work, I probably should not bring up that subject —— the dirty little moralists will demand that children from mosquito infected countries come here rather than curse the United Nations.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

FOX is more conservative than the MSM.

While that may be true,they sure aren't afraid to support RINOs.
I haven't watched FOX since the first debate debacle.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Another “Conservative” FOX moralist telling everybody how to behave even if it means putting their loved ones at risk in addition to undermining their own homeland:

Fox News anchor: We're 'barbarians' if we stop 'refugees'
Viewers warned U.S. risks 'self-destruction' without wave of Syrians
Published: 12 hours ago

Fox News anchor: We’re ‘barbarians’ if we stop ‘refugees’​

Every time a media mouth moralizes I ask myself what he, or she, is justifying. Shepard Smith is a classic:

Why hasn’t Shepard Smith come out yet? The affable Fox News anchor has a longtime boyfriend, ranks among Fox’s most senior talent, and lives in New York City. It could be, of course, that he’s just a very private person, or—as the Times argued in October—that public attitudes have changed and nobody cares if a famous figure is gay.

How Fox News Shoved Shepard Smith Back Into The Closet
J.K. Trotter
Filed to: shep smith
4/30/14 10:15am

How Fox News Shoved Shepard Smith Back Into The Closet​

It is not enough that dirty little moralists have well-paying jobs on television, those jobs come with a pulpit. Smith is not the only one. I am not saying the others are also homosexual. I am saying they only feel good about themselves when they find something that they see as a worse human failing than their own. In plain English, being queer, being a child molester, being the worst degenerate human being on the planet, and so on is not as bad as refusing to take in Muslim refugees.

Incidentally, Smith and the other wannabe priests never rail against the United Nations’ ban on DDT that is responsible for a million or more deaths caused by malaria every year. Knowing how the freaks work, I probably should not bring up that subject —— the dirty little moralists will demand that children from mosquito infected countries come here rather than curse the United Nations.

Shep is a flaming faggot liberal.

 

[PredFan]

FOX is more conservative than the MSM.

While that may be true,they sure aren't afraid to support RINOs.
I haven't watched FOX since the first debate debacle.

I'm not saying that they are good and true conservatives, that's why I worded that statement the way I did.

 

[Flanders]

Trump has a few things going for him in the eyes of conservatives. Ben Carson has none; nevertheless, both are acceptable to press barons:

Republicans are supposedly even more worried that Donald Trump or Ben Carson could win their presidential nomination. Yet the one thing they could do about it -- send a clear signal in support of a single alternative -- still hasn’t happened.

Why Republicans Aren't Sold on Rubio
Jonathan Bernstein
166 Nov 19, 2015 4:05 PM EST
By Jonathan Bernstein

Why Republicans Aren't Sold on Rubio - Bloomberg View​

The fact is: Establishment Republicans —— not conservatives —— are searching for anybody except Ted Cruz.

Media is promoting their choices, but they cannot con conservatives into believing that Rubio is not a true believer in amnesty for illegals. Media mouths obviously see Rubio as an acceptable substitute for the Democrat in all things. I enjoy giving media the bad news, but the only way Rubio can make himself appetizing is for him to come out in favor of passing H.R. 75.

Text of H.R. 75 (113th): American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2013 (Introduced version) - GovTrack.us​

That ain’t going to happen. Ron Paul and Mike Huckabee are the only wannabes I ever heard put the knock on the United Nations, and even they dropped it after they announced they were running. I do not know how Rand Paul stands on the United Nations.

Incidentally, the opposition to United Nations refugees gives Huckabee the best chance he has if he pushes for H. R. 75. He has nothing to lose.

RON PAUL​

NOTE: Ron Paul authored H. R. 1146 when he was in the House. H.R. 1146 is now H. R. 75.

 

[rdean]

Fox is a propaganda machine for those working to bring down America. We know that from one of the owners.

 

[Flanders]

Television failed to shove climate change fraud down the public’s throat after more than a decade of trying. The filthy sneaks will do no better at selling amnesty for illegals.

File this one under “You wouldn’t kid me, would ya?”

Pew: 65% of Americans Don’t Trust Media
by William Bigelow
23 Nov 2015

Pew: 65% of Americans Don't Trust Media - Breitbart​

 

[Flanders]

I can tell The Donald the game FOX is playing:

At a press event Tuesday evening, Trump seemed to cite disparate treatment from the network as his reasoning for not participating. “What’s wrong over there, something’s wrong,” Trump said of the “games” Roger Ailes and the network are “playing.”​

FOX is playing the same game liberal media played until the Internet came along: “We are unbiased journalists reporting the news fairly regardless of our personal beliefs.” The others got caught, FOX is still getting away with it.

Two proofs for consideration:

In asking the question of “what’s wrong over there?” Trump has shined a spotlight on one of Washington’s best kept secrets: namely, Fox’s role via its founder Rupert Murdoch in pushing an open borders agenda. The Trump campaign is a direct threat to Murdoch’s efforts to open America’s borders. Well-concealed from virtually all reporting on Fox’s treatment of Trump is the fact that Murdoch is the co-chair of what is arguably one of the most powerful immigration lobbying firms in country, the Partnership for a New American Economy (PNAE).​

The Anti-Trump Network: Fox News Money Flows into Open Borders Group
by Julia Hahn
26 Jan 2016

The Anti-Trump Network: Fox News Money Flows into Open Borders Group - Breitbart​

FOX was for mass migration by illegal aliens into this country years before the community organizer crawled out of the Chicago sewer system. Note that FOX’s media mouths still refer to 11 million illegal aliens when the number is closer to 30 million.

My gal Judi offers the second proof:

It’s not that Fox News narcissist Megyn Kelly allowed herself to be fat-cat fawned over by Michael Moore on last night’s surrealistic “The Kelly File” that should matter, it’s that Fox and Google have turned over tomorrow night’s GOP ‘debate’ to a Muslim YouTube Queen ‘debate participant.

“Fox News and Google have invited three YouTube personalities to ask questions at the Jan. 28 GOP debate — including a Muslim advocate who describes Donald Trump as a bigot and who visually portrayed him as being in agreement with national socialist Adolf Hitler.” (Breitbart, Jan. 26, 2016)\​

​

Pipe up the ‘Gone With the Wind’ music theme…

“...I feel bad for you,” Moore said. He then wondered why Trump would deprive himself of Kelly’s company: “What’s he afraid of? I’m sitting here. I don’t feel any fear.” (Washington Post, Jan. 27, 2016)​

If you watch the interview you’ll hear Michael Moore define what Republicans used to believe —— mainly environmental garbage. Kelly could have pointed out that older Republicans never heard about global warming or any of the garbage Moore assigns to them in retrospect.

Unbiased journalist Kelly never corrected Moore when he was spouting his perverted love for this country by reminding him that Republicans always defended the country and the Constitution —— two beliefs that Moore and his kind reject.

Fox & Google GOP ‘debate’ to be turned over to Muslim YouTube Activist
By Judi McLeod
January 27, 2016

Fox & Google GOP ‘debate’ to be turned over to Muslim YouTube Activist​

 

[Flanders]

El Rusbo has it right two ways. He lays out Trump’s position, and he exposes all of television by nailing FOX.

RUSH: So far Trump says he's not showing up. He claims he's not showing up because Megyn Kelly is going to continue to be a moderator. And if you believe that, I can give you substantive reasons.​

XXXXX​

RUSH: Everything he's doing goes against the book. Everything that any analyst or consultant or professional would tell you not to do, Donald Trump is doing it, and he's leading the pack. This creates its own set of emotions and feelings and thoughts that run from person to person. Now, the political business, if you want to look at it that way, is like any other business. It has its people who are considered the elites in it -- and like any business, they hate outsiders. They don't want outsiders just storming in trying to take over, and much less succeeding at it.

XXXXX​

RUSH: Politics is no different, and all of those determinations are made by who gets money and who doesn't.

XXXXX​

RUSH: It probably isn't necessary, but let me again say that whatever I say today about this or anything else today is not coming from a position of support for any candidate or opposition to any candidate. So whatever I happen to say about what I think of Trump skipping the debate, reaction to it, it's not rooted in -- and don't even consider that it's rooted in the fact that you think I might be doing it in support of Trump or in opposition to Trump or in support of Cruz or anybody else. It's none of that.


XXXXX​

RUSH: And in this business one of the games is that when the media calls, you answer, and when the media wants you, you go, and when the media is going to host a debate and it's part of a Republican presidential campaign, you go. You just do it, no matter what the media's done to you in the past, no matter what you think of it, whether you want to go or not, you go. That's the game.

Trump is so far outside this game, he's so far outside the rules, he's never been a player in this game. He's always been an outsider. I heard people on Fox last night talking about this. "Who does he think he is? He can't control the media." I got news for you: He is controlling the media, and it's his objective. He is controlling the media. He controls the media when he's not on it. He controls the media when he is on it. He controls the media when he's asleep. Nobody else has been able to do anything like this short of the Kennedys, and they're pikers compared to the way Trump is doing this.

XXXXX​

RUSH: He's exposing so much as fraud that has gone on inside the American political process for so long they can't allow somebody like this to win and succeed. It's quite natural they would want to take him out as well.

XXXXX​

RUSH: Here comes Megyn Kelly's first question. He didn't hear anybody else get a question like that. He never sees Hillary Clinton get a question like that. He never hears Bill Clinton or another Democrat get a question like that. So he answers it and says screw this. I'm not putting myself in that position again. Why should I? I don't have to.​

But the rules of the game say when there's a debate, you show up. Screw the rules, he's saying. Why should I willingly give them another shot at me in a circumstance they control, why should I do it? What's the sense in it for me? I'm leading; I'm running the pack here; why in the world should I put myself in that circumstance? I've already seen what's gonna happen.

I don't think it's any more complicated than that. I mean, there could be some personal things going on here that I don't know about. But just from the standpoint of knowing Trump, reading his book, and seeing how he operates elsewhere, in his mind, screw the rules, screw what's expected, screw "This is just the way you do it." I'm not gonna put myself in a position go where I'm gonna be treated unfairly. I don't have to. I'm Donald Trump. Anybody can do this. Ted Cruz could choose to do it if he wants to. They just don't. Cruz and the rest of the pack are playing the rules of the game. Trump is saying I don't have to do it. I don't want to do it. I don't have any respect for these people. What the hell.

In addition to that, Donald Trump knows that by not showing up, he's owning the entire event. Some guy not even present will end up owning the entire event, and the proof of that is Fox News last night. I have to tell you, folks, this is where this gets tough for me. I was stunned watching Fox News last night. Fox News was acting like they had been jilted at the altar. If it had been me -- and this is easy to say -- if it had been me and Donald Trump makes a big to-do about not showing up for the debate, report the story and move on. Talk about Ted Cruz. Go talk about the other candidates. Go talk about Hillary and the FBI. There's a lot of news out there. But don't devote the rest of the night to how a candidate's not showing up because of you. I mean, the network, not just Megyn Kelly.

XXXXX​

RUSH: Then bringing Michael Moore on late in that program to mock Trump.

XXXXX ​

RUSH: If I heard it once last night, I've heard it a thousand times since, that Trump is afraid of Megyn Kelly or afraid of Fox News. That is not what this is. There isn't any fear. What is there is here -- in my opinion -- is a desire to control this and a purposeful decision to not put himself in a circumstance where other people want to make him look bad.

In his mind, that's a dumb thing to do. You don't put yourself in a circumstance where a whole bunch of other people are gonna be able to make you look bad while you're there.

XXXXX​

RUSH: . . . he's avoiding the people of Iowa."

He's not avoiding the people of Iowa. He's all over Iowa. The guy does more TV and radio than any other candidate out there. So I don't think there's fear, and I don't think it's disrespect for the people of Iowa. This is what it looks like when some guy stands up to the rules and the game and says, "Screw yours; I'm looking out for me first. That's all this is. And you can say whatever you want, but I am not dumb. I'm not gonna give you the gun and the bullet and stand still. You want to hit me, come get me, but I'm not gonna put myself in your line of fire." That's what he's doing, if you ask me.

XXXXX​

RUSH: The media run this game. The media are never to blame for anything that goes wrong. They have total immunity where all this is concerned. The media has their immunities, and the way everybody plays the game, you have to go through the media to get where you want to go if you are in politics. You have to. And you have to bite your lip along the way. And if you don't, then you have made a perpetual enemy of people (as goes the saying) who buy ink by the barrel.

In this case, that's cable news, airwaves, whatever the analogy would be. The media does not look at themselves as an obstacle. The media looks at themselves as part of the obstacle course anybody has to pass in order to get where they want to go in politics. And Trump is saying, "I don't like those rules. Who says I have to go through you? Who says I have to look good according to what you say? Who says I have to get to the American people through you? Why can't I just do my own event?

"Why can't I buy my own microphone, my own camera, my own time, and talk to the American people without you? It seems to me a lot more efficient -- and, more importantly, I control it, and I don't have to deal with people maybe misrepresenting me or putting me in a bad light." The other players in the game who've always abided by these rules were shocked and dismayed that somebody would mock the game this way and to upset it like this. "This cannot stand," and so forth. But no journalist is ever gonna take themselves out. I don't think they should, by the way.

XXXXX​

RUSH: . . . don't forget one of my favorite journalism stories of all time.

Bernard Shaw was in the al-Rashid Hotel during the first Gulf War. It was one of our targets. He got out of there. The US military got Bernard Shaw out. When he got home, the US military wanted to debrief him to find out what he had seen about the enemy, and he said, "I refuse! That would compromise my journalistic ethics."

"What do you mean, 'journalistic ethics'?"

"Well, I can't help one side over the other."

"Well, it's your own country in a war, for crying out loud."

"Sorry. I can't help."

Not even realizing that it's his own country's Constitution permitting him to do what he's doing. But he couldn't compromise his ethics to help his own country.

I've never forgotten that.​

Nor have I forgotten. Yet the press moans to high heaven when the public does not shed a tear when a reporter is executed or held captive. As far as I am concerned America should lock up reporters like Bernard Shaw and throw away the key.

Let me close with a few words about Hillary Clinton’s reluctance to appear in an uncontrolled environment that included roping off the press —— and they loved her all the more for it while they despise Trump. I say that because the twentieth century will be remembered as The Age of the Electronic Dictator. Gruppenführer Clinton uses television to protect her in ways no Republican can expect. She is also living in a country whose government still promotes individual liberty whenever possible. (That has to annoy the hell out of media.)

Because of the nature of Mrs. Clinton’s past activities, she cannot stand up to a detailed defense of her criminal activities. The best that she can do is try to sell an image mainstream media promotes. Der Gruppenführer is a caring, loving, earth mother who simply wants to make the village a better place to live. That is image hogwash in its purest form. Hitler wrote Mein Kampf to further Fascism. Mrs. Clinton wrote It Takes A Village to further the New World Order crowd's agenda. The result will be the same —— Disaster with a capital d.

For thousands of years philosophers and ordinary people alike believed that the least government is the best government. Now, with the help of modern propaganda tools ——TELEVISION —— Socialists would have everyone believe that their form of government will suddenly make government beneficial to mankind. A quick look at the evils practiced by totalitarian governments in the twentieth century, made possible by electronic propaganda tools, tells us otherwise. The only government that is worth its salt is a representative form of government dedicated to keeping its powers over law-abiding citizens to an absolute minimum. The Right to be let alone is not a Right that press barons believe.

Bottom line: Whatever you think about Donald Trump, you should thank him for beating television at its own game. I cannot name one other person after Gutenberg invented the printing press that came close to exposing journalism for what it is. In addition to print press buying ink by the barrel, the people in television have so much money they buy whitewash by the tanker truck. They will use it to hide what they are until the end of time. So should The Donald get to the White House he has the opportunity to eliminate the advertising tax deduction. Call it “Getting even” if you trust media mouths; nevertheless, the country will improve considerably after television loses its major source of revenue.

RUSH: Now, Trump's out there talking about how they're desperate to have him because high ratings means a lot of advertising revenue. Lower ratings means lower advertising revenue because Fox has to charge less. They were hoping to get $750,000 a minute, I heard, and they may be down to $150,000 a minute if Trump isn't there. I mean, these are samples of the kind of things going around.

Trump Refuses to Play by the Rules
January 27, 2016

Trump Refuses to Play by the Rules - The Rush Limbaugh Show​

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Can Anyone Tell Me How FOX Is A Conservative Network?"

From the network's lies, misinformation, and rightwing partisan spin.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Fox is a branch of the Murdoch empire and its interests will be his interests rather than any political ideology. Generally that would be right wing,populist stuff but he isnt averse to going the other direction if it suits him.

Check out his record on China.

 

[Flanders]

Fox is a branch of the Murdoch empire and its interests will be his interests rather than any political ideology.

To Tommy Tainant: I remember Murdochs little problem in your country.

England, or America, there is one red line Murdoch will never cross. Neither he, nor any press baron, will ever come out against a one government world. That was a fact of life before 1945. It got much worse after television was in every home. See this thread for a quote about the promise print press gave to international bankers over 60 years ago. Note that no promise was required from television because television is an instrument of government propaganda not fully protected by our First Amendment:

It’s The United Nations, Stupid

The linked article is interesting in relation to FOX’s opposition to Donald Trump. I’ll begin with a few words about Davos.

Davos is a well-known joke repeated every time they meet. Devos offers crackpot tax schemes to abolish national sovereignty, while there is nothing humorous about the United Nations, Bilderberg meetings, the Council on Foreign Relations, the World Federalist Association, worldwide media, international bankers, and the US Congress. Every one of them have been gaining headway for decades in their collective goal to impose a one government world on every nation.

I love The Donald’s victory over the media, but I cannot quite trust a guy who never commits to passing H.R. 75.

Text of H.R. 75 (113th): American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2013 (Introduced version) - GovTrack.us

No American can expect help from a top Democrat. They would hand this country over to global governance in a flash. Mike Huckabee is the only Republican wannabe who indicated he has no use for the United Nations. Indeed, my choice, Ted Cruz, never came out against membership in the United Nations. That is not a good sign, but Cruz has so much else going for him I can only hope he turns on the United Nations as soon as he is president. Cruz will defend the Constitution better than any other Republican. I trust Ted Cruz to do what he says, but I cannot see how anybody can defend the Constitution without making sovereignty a top priority.

Bottom line: The issue of America’s sovereignty is coming to a head after 71 years of treason committed in the name of the United Nations.

Theodore Roosevelt Malloch understands the global elite.

He’s a descendent of President Theodore Roosevelt, chairman and CEO of The Global Fiduciary Governance LLC and a former board member of the World Executive Forum, which hosts the famous Davos meetings.

But as an ideological defector from globalism, he thinks American sovereignty needs a champion.

And that champion is Donald Trump.

Global insider: Trump is new Teddy Roosevelt
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 01/27/2016 @ 10:22 pm

Global insider: Trump is new Teddy Roosevelt

My advice to Cruz: Do not unpack if you fail to take on the United Nations in your first term. You will not get a second one.

Finally, since you are a Brit you might like to learn a bit about the UN the way a majority of Americans see it.

In addition to the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, the sneaks who got this country into the UN knew what they were doing when they designed a foundation that was a masterpiece of betrayal. A foundation that would withstand every challenge when their descendants carried on. Treason became legal the minute the US became a member of an underhanded organization that was, and is, determined to tear down America. Membership in the UN meant that no American official betraying this country on the UN’s behalf could be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that.

Finally, you might not know Socialist icon, the late Walter Cronkite. I’m sure you know something about Hilary Clinton. I’ll bet that you do not know this:

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Fox is a branch of the Murdoch empire and its interests will be his interests rather than any political ideology.

To Tommy Tainant: I remember Murdochs little problem in your country.

England, or America, there is one red line Murdoch will never cross. Neither he, nor any press baron, will ever come out against a one government world. That was a fact of life before 1945. It got much worse after television was in every home. See this thread for a quote about the promise print press gave to international bankers over 60 years ago. Note that no promise was required from television because television is an instrument of government propaganda not fully protected by our First Amendment:

It’s The United Nations, Stupid

The linked article is interesting in relation to FOX’s opposition to Donald Trump. I’ll begin with a few words about Davos.

Davos is a well-known joke repeated every time they meet. Devos offers crackpot tax schemes to abolish national sovereignty, while there is nothing humorous about the United Nations, Bilderberg meetings, the Council on Foreign Relations, the World Federalist Association, worldwide media, international bankers, and the US Congress. Every one of them have been gaining headway for decades in their collective goal to impose a one government world on every nation.

I love The Donald’s victory over the media, but I cannot quite trust a guy who never commits to passing H.R. 75.

Text of H.R. 75 (113th): American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2013 (Introduced version) - GovTrack.us

No American can expect help from a top Democrat. They would hand this country over to global governance in a flash. Mike Huckabee is the only Republican wannabe who indicated he has no use for the United Nations. Indeed, my choice, Ted Cruz, never came out against membership in the United Nations. That is not a good sign, but Cruz has so much else going for him I can only hope he turns on the United Nations as soon as he is president. Cruz will defend the Constitution better than any other Republican. I trust Ted Cruz to do what he says, but I cannot see how anybody can defend the Constitution without making sovereignty a top priority.

Bottom line: The issue of America’s sovereignty is coming to a head after 71 years of treason committed in the name of the United Nations.

Theodore Roosevelt Malloch understands the global elite.

He’s a descendent of President Theodore Roosevelt, chairman and CEO of The Global Fiduciary Governance LLC and a former board member of the World Executive Forum, which hosts the famous Davos meetings.

But as an ideological defector from globalism, he thinks American sovereignty needs a champion.

And that champion is Donald Trump.

Global insider: Trump is new Teddy Roosevelt
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 01/27/2016 @ 10:22 pm

Global insider: Trump is new Teddy Roosevelt

My advice to Cruz: Do not unpack if you fail to take on the United Nations in your first term. You will not get a second one.

Finally, since you are a Brit you might like to learn a bit about the UN the way a majority of Americans see it.

In addition to the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, the sneaks who got this country into the UN knew what they were doing when they designed a foundation that was a masterpiece of betrayal. A foundation that would withstand every challenge when their descendants carried on. Treason became legal the minute the US became a member of an underhanded organization that was, and is, determined to tear down America. Membership in the UN meant that no American official betraying this country on the UN’s behalf could be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that.

Finally, you might not know Socialist icon, the late Walter Cronkite. I’m sure you know something about Hilary Clinton. I’ll bet that you do not know this:

LOL !! Couldnt you just summarise all of that ?

 

[Flanders]

LOL !! Couldnt you just summarise all of that ?

To Tommy Tainant: I would if I thought every reader had the intelligence to grasp brevity beyond bumper sticker wisdom.

 

[Flanders]

LOL !! Couldnt you just summarise all of that ?

To Tommy Tainant: I won’t overtax you powers of concentration; so I will not excerpt this piece about Rupert Murdoch and journalism’s first loyalty. You will not strain yourself if you read it a bit at a time:

Rupert Murdoch’s Open Borders Wall Street Journal Warns: ‘Bad Sign’ Trump Is Following Jeff Sessions’ Lead
by Julia Hahn28 Jan 2016Washington D.C​

Rupert Murdoch's Open Borders Wall Street Journal Warns: 'Bad Sign' Trump Is Following Jeff Sessions' Lead - Breitbart​

 

[Tommy Tainant]

LOL !! Couldnt you just summarise all of that ?

To Tommy Tainant: I won’t overtax you powers of concentration; so I will not excerpt this piece about Rupert Murdoch and journalism’s first loyalty. You will not strain yourself if you read it a bit at a time:

Rupert Murdoch’s Open Borders Wall Street Journal Warns: ‘Bad Sign’ Trump Is Following Jeff Sessions’ Lead
by Julia Hahn28 Jan 2016Washington D.C​

Rupert Murdoch's Open Borders Wall Street Journal Warns: 'Bad Sign' Trump Is Following Jeff Sessions' Lead - Breitbart​

Murdochs editors are all lap dogs who either shape up or ship out.

On all editorial positions you have to ask what is in it for the Dirty Digger. I have no idea what he is up to on this one but it will be a subject close to his pocket.
He has been a cancer on the British political scene for about 40 years. He owns the best selling tabloid, "quality" paper and the major satellite tv platform.
British political leaders crawl to meet him for his endorsement.
I dont know if you heard about the phone hacking scandal over here but basically his paper were able to hack peoples voicemails illegally.It gave him a competitive edge. A few little people went down but the editor was protected by Murdoch millions and also by deleting over 2m e mails.She is now back in a senior position.
A year out of the spotlight and half the tory cabinet,including Cameron, were at his xmas party.
A few years back he was trying to get his satellite station into China. To help this his newspapers ignored the Tienanmen Square massacres.
He is an absolute ****.
Whatever his problem with Trump it will be related to his businesses and not his politics.

 

[Flanders]

I dont know if you heard about the phone hacking scandal over here but basically his paper were able to hack peoples voicemails illegally.

To Tommy Tainant: I did follow the story on the Internet. It was well-covered here.

Whatever his problem with Trump it will be related to his businesses and not his politics.

To Tommy Tainant: His business and his politics are inseparable in this one thing:

Neither he, nor any press baron, will ever come out against a one government world.