California prosecutes man for posting anti muslim messages on facebook

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by MindWars, Dec 31, 2017.

  1. Syriusly
    Offline

    Syriusly Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    50,529
    Thanks Received:
    6,369
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +19,740
    The irony of a contard complaining about California 'attacking the Constitution' and then calling on Trump to violate the Constitution with Federal troops- well the irony will be lost on the contard Trumpsters
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  2. Faun
    Offline

    Faun Messiah

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2011
    Messages:
    42,635
    Thanks Received:
    6,543
    Trophy Points:
    1,860
    Ratings:
    +22,638
    I never said I believe Feigin is guilty of the threats; only that it is what he was charged with making them. The evidence does appear to exonerate him but that's for the courts to sort out. He brought this on himself for being a bigot in a hyper-sensitive environment which brought attention to him. As far as the misdemeanor charge for his Facebook rants, agree with their constitutionality or not, they've been constitutionally tested and upheld (so far). He never would have been charged with those had there not been a credible threat made to the mosque -- but because he was charged with making that threat, the police tacked on a hate crime which is only intended to be used as evidence for the felony charge and to add more time to a conviction.

    There is another lesson to be learned here, though it's lost on the brain-dead right -- don't trust InfoWars. It's nothing but a hack site which only serves to dumb-down its followers. Like in this case, how many folks in this thread were fully unaware that Feigin was even charged with threatening to kill people precisely because InfoWars only told them part of the story and they're too mentally lazy to be bothered with checking out the whole story from independent sites?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  3. Syriusly
    Offline

    Syriusly Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    50,529
    Thanks Received:
    6,369
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +19,740
    Well of course no one should trust Infowars- I am rather shocked that they actually had links to take the reader to the other contard website that they 'borrowed' the story from- which did have links to the actual legal documents which showed the charges of the second count.
     
  4. Faun
    Offline

    Faun Messiah

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2011
    Messages:
    42,635
    Thanks Received:
    6,543
    Trophy Points:
    1,860
    Ratings:
    +22,638
    Sadly for the rightards posting here, not one of them will learn the valuable lesson Feigin had to learn the hard way -- when you boastfully parade your bigotry in public, like they do online, you expose yourself to prosecution for related crimes. Anonymity provides them a false sense of comfort; but in reality, any one of them could find themselves in a predicament like Feigin's.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Lastamender
    Offline

    Lastamender Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2011
    Messages:
    4,762
    Thanks Received:
    646
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +3,534
    Not yet, but as we have seen sometimes it happens. Now name one synagogue or church that did retaliate violently to insults. The Boston and Phoenix mosques, just to name a couple of mosques that have preached violence and had members act on it.. The intimidation of possible violence makes our spineless PC government act differently in Islams case.

    I got news for you it will not make them hate us any less.
     
  6. Syriusly
    Offline

    Syriusly Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    50,529
    Thanks Received:
    6,369
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +19,740
    LOL- you literally stated :"What I asked is the case at hand"- and then went ahead and spun your story that had nothing to do with the case in hand.

    a) There is absolutely nothing to indicate that the government acted differently here in regards to this mosque than it would to similar threats against a church or synogogue.
    b) Who is hating who? It wasn't a Muslim reaching out to spew hate against anyone here- it was a non-Muslims reaching out to spew hate against Muslims.

    You know- in the case at hand. Which you asked about- literally :"What I asked is the case at hand"-
     
  7. Syriusly
    Offline

    Syriusly Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    50,529
    Thanks Received:
    6,369
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +19,740
    Wow- you are correct- look at how this Mosque dealt with hate speech....



    >> FORT SMITH, Ark. -

    In October of 2016, the Masjid Al Salam mosque in Fort Smith, Arkansas, was vandalized. Now more than a year later, the man charged with the crime is getting a helping hand from the people he hurt the most.

    Back in October the mosque was vandalized with swastikas and the words "go home." The mosque's security cameras caught the man in the act. That person was identified as Abraham Davis. He was charged with a felony, which consisted of community service and a hefty fine. But it was a fine he might not have been able to pay on his own, so the Masjid Al Salam stepped in.

    "We heard that he was having financial problems," said Louay Nassri, the president of Al Salam. "Now if you don't pay your fine, that's an automatic six years in jail. Well, we didn't want him to go to jail for six years," he told KARK-TV.

    So Nassri wrote a check for $1,700 to wipe out the fine for Davis. <<

    Link


    Those hateful Mooslims paid the guys fine for him.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. Lastamender
    Offline

    Lastamender Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2011
    Messages:
    4,762
    Thanks Received:
    646
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +3,534
    All around the world governments are acting differently because of Islam and you refuse to see it. And Muslims as a rule spew more hate than anyone. That hate is a religious obligation.
     
  9. Syriusly
    Offline

    Syriusly Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    50,529
    Thanks Received:
    6,369
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +19,740
    'as a rule'

    Yet- in the case in hand- the one spewing the hate is not the ebil Mooslims but one of your own.

    One of you haters.
     
  10. TheGreatGatsby
    Offline

    TheGreatGatsby Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2012
    Messages:
    23,782
    Thanks Received:
    2,815
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    California
    Ratings:
    +8,887
    A word to describe all the made up bull shit by Muslims, yes; but it's actually an Islamic word, twat.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

man arrested in california for posting anti-muslim stuff on facebook