California bill would make questioning school board members a crime

[Slade3200]

I see a lot of california license plates in Texas

I have one in Texas

 

[Slade3200]

Hopefully the heat wave sends most of them out of Texas, along with their wetback buddies.

I’m inviting all my friends

 

[Slade3200]

California will throw you in prison for disagreeing with a school board while freeing mass murderers using prison overcrowding as the excuse.

No they won’t. You’re lying again

 

[Slade3200]

California needs to be demoted to a territory.

Cali funds most this country’s federal operations. They aren’t going anywhere

 

[BULLDOG]

No dipshit, there are already laws on the books for those types of things. You are a piece of shit totalitarian that wants anyone who has a problem with how schools are being run to have no recourse. Retard.

I'm sure lots of batshit crazy inbread MAGAs agree with you.

 

[SamInAZ]

I'm sure lots of batshit crazy inbread MAGAs agree with you.

Oh shut your cock polishers, you totalitarian faggot.

 

[candycorn]

No matter which dictionary you use, that’s pure fascism by Democrats. Straight out of the Stalin handbook. Next will be thought crimes.

California is poised to codify at the state level what the feds were once requested to do — that is, turn inquisitive parents into criminals for daring to question their school board representatives.

Senate Bill 596, introduced by Democratic State Senator Anthony Portantino in February and dubbed the “School Employees: Protection” act, expands an existing law “which makes it a misdemeanor for any ‘person’ to threaten or harass a school employee during the ‘course of [their] duties,'” according to the California Globe.

This expansion adds a penalty for creating a “substantial disorder” at any meeting of a public school board, charter school board, county board of education, and the California State Board of Education.

Although “substantial disorder” is not precisely defined, the bill notes that “course of conduct” is “a pattern of conduct composed of two or more acts over a period of time, however short … evidencing a continuity of purpose.”

Gone from the definition of “harassment” is “unlawful violence” and “credible threat of violence,” and in its place is “torments, or terrorizes.”

It’s not difficult to figure out what’s happening here. A concerned parent at a school board meeting asks a board member a question and reiterates it (thereby establishing a “course of conduct”) … and if the board member feels “tormented” the parent can be arrested and charged with a fine between $500 and $1,000 and face up to a year in jail.

California bill would make questioning school board members a crime | The College Fix

Democrats don’t much like concerned parents.

www.thecollegefix.com

False.

If you harass a public official you can be arrested. Questioning is fine.

You are simply lying.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Censorship is another symptom that indicates that the Democrat Party is a sick political cult.

 

[Independent thinker]

No matter which dictionary you use, that’s pure fascism by Democrats. Straight out of the Stalin handbook. Next will be thought crimes.

California is poised to codify at the state level what the feds were once requested to do — that is, turn inquisitive parents into criminals for daring to question their school board representatives.

Senate Bill 596, introduced by Democratic State Senator Anthony Portantino in February and dubbed the “School Employees: Protection” act, expands an existing law “which makes it a misdemeanor for any ‘person’ to threaten or harass a school employee during the ‘course of [their] duties,'” according to the California Globe.

This expansion adds a penalty for creating a “substantial disorder” at any meeting of a public school board, charter school board, county board of education, and the California State Board of Education.

Although “substantial disorder” is not precisely defined, the bill notes that “course of conduct” is “a pattern of conduct composed of two or more acts over a period of time, however short … evidencing a continuity of purpose.”

Gone from the definition of “harassment” is “unlawful violence” and “credible threat of violence,” and in its place is “torments, or terrorizes.”

It’s not difficult to figure out what’s happening here. A concerned parent at a school board meeting asks a board member a question and reiterates it (thereby establishing a “course of conduct”) … and if the board member feels “tormented” the parent can be arrested and charged with a fine between $500 and $1,000 and face up to a year in jail.

California bill would make questioning school board members a crime | The College Fix

Democrats don’t much like concerned parents.

www.thecollegefix.com

There are already thought crimes by the left.

 

[Auld Phart]

I’m inviting all my friends

I’m inviting all my friends

Which wouldn't fill a duplex.

 

[SamInAZ]

Which wouldn't fill a duplex.

That's because all of his friends are fentanyl zombies who prefer to live in tents on city sidewalks though...

 

[LordBrownTrout]

I see a lot of california license plates in Texas

Everyday, I see at least 10 plates. CA is a third world state dump.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

You’re lying again. The law says nothing about questioning. It addresses threats and harassment. Why you gotta lie Willis?

No, he's not. "Substantial disorder" is ambiguous and could be construed to mean anything that the board doesn't agree with and this is precisely why the dems wrote this bill. There was already a law on the books about threats and harassments. There is no need for additional laws unless you have nefarious plans.

"This expansion adds a penalty for creating a “substantial disorder” at any meeting of a public school board, charter school board, county board of education, and the California State Board of Education.

Although “substantial disorder” is not precisely defined, the bill notes that “course of conduct” is “a pattern of conduct composed of two or more acts over a period of time, however short … evidencing a continuity of purpose.”

 

[toobfreak]

California needs to be demoted to a territory.

The good news: the next major earthquake there will strike the deep blue areas of LA or San Fran where all of the biggest fascist derps live.

 

[Slade3200]

Which wouldn't fill a duplex.

Ya think so?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

You’re lying again. The law says nothing about questioning. It addresses threats and harassment. Why you gotta lie Willis?

It's not hard to imagine such a law being stretched to the point of abuse against any criticism.

 

[Slade3200]

It's not hard to imagine such a law being stretched to the point of abuse against any criticism.

How so? Aren’t there legal standards to determine what behavior constitutes a threat or harassment?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Maybe the next big earthquake will knock it off the map.

People get that all wrong.

What is really going to happen, one day, when the San Andreas finally cuts loose, is that everything east of it will drop off into the ocean, and all that will remain will be this sliver of California.

 

[john doe 101]

No matter which dictionary you use, that’s pure fascism by Democrats. Straight out of the Stalin handbook. Next will be thought crimes.

California is poised to codify at the state level what the feds were once requested to do — that is, turn inquisitive parents into criminals for daring to question their school board representatives.

Senate Bill 596, introduced by Democratic State Senator Anthony Portantino in February and dubbed the “School Employees: Protection” act, expands an existing law “which makes it a misdemeanor for any ‘person’ to threaten or harass a school employee during the ‘course of [their] duties,'” according to the California Globe.

This expansion adds a penalty for creating a “substantial disorder” at any meeting of a public school board, charter school board, county board of education, and the California State Board of Education.

Although “substantial disorder” is not precisely defined, the bill notes that “course of conduct” is “a pattern of conduct composed of two or more acts over a period of time, however short … evidencing a continuity of purpose.”

Gone from the definition of “harassment” is “unlawful violence” and “credible threat of violence,” and in its place is “torments, or terrorizes.”

It’s not difficult to figure out what’s happening here. A concerned parent at a school board meeting asks a board member a question and reiterates it (thereby establishing a “course of conduct”) … and if the board member feels “tormented” the parent can be arrested and charged with a fine between $500 and $1,000 and face up to a year in jail.

California bill would make questioning school board members a crime | The College Fix

Democrats don’t much like concerned parents.

www.thecollegefix.com

Your thread title is pure gaslighting. Since you wild animals seem to be unable to control yourselves, there have to be laws to keep you animals acting civil.

 

[Blaster]

People get that all wrong.

What is really going to happen, one day, when the San Andreas finally cuts loose, is that everything east of it will drop off into the ocean, and all that will remain will be this sliver of California.