CA Democrat Says He'd Love To Be Able To Regulate Content Of Speech

[beautress]

This is why the Left constantly pushes the concept of HATE SPEECH. It is to censor speech, and ideas in which they DISAGREE. It violates the 1A.

Not only hateful speech but hateful actions, too. Maxine Waters is not content with just her vote in Congress, she wants the power to falsify charges against President Trump for measures in place before he took office on Obama's watch. (Obama was never called on the carpet by Ms. Waters)

Not only did she lie (or just didn't know), she ordered her stooges to stalk and confront members of the Executive Branch wherever they found them--in restuarants, on the street, anywhere they could stalk them ahead of time and be prepared to deliver hateful speech. A lot of it got out of hand, just like the hate-Trump shooter shot Republicans playing on a baseball field earlier.

Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-CA) openly called for people to form a mob and physically confront members of Donald Trump’s administration if they see them out in public after controversy over separated migrant families erupted two weeks ago.

Waters, who doesn’t live in the district she represents and paid her daughter $750,000 for Democratic fundraising activities, said to a crowd at a “Keep Families Together” rally on Saturday: “If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.” https://thedailycoin.org/2018/06/24...ployees-create-a-crowd-and-push-back-on-them/

Hate-Trump Democrat shoots Republican Majority House Whip and other Republicans at Baseball game:


​

Democrats believe in harassing and shooting to kill Republicans for their speech if they disagree with them. The horror of this Democrat side show to damage their fellow congressmen for protecting America is above. I think we need to control these hatemongers in Congress and people willing to do anything to hurt Republicans.

​

 

[beautress]

: Rep. Steve Scalise returns to Congress after recovering from gunshot
(He had to relearn how to walk, almost died in surgery after angry Trump and Republican-hating Democrat, James T. Hodgkinson, shot as many Republicans as he could) There was so much hatred expressed by Democrat haters of Republicans and President Trump that youtube disabled all commentary.
It must have looked really bad, and youtube didn't want the hate seen. It would frighten Americans, just like the Trump-hating Democrats like to do.
Shooting Congressman is a bad thing to do. It's also bad when a Congresswoman like Maxine Waters dispatches orders to her followers to harass Republicans. It's just evil.



​

 

[beautress]

President Trump delivers his appreciation to the First Responders to this travesty, some of whom were seriously wounded and still recuperating from their injuries received from the Hate-Trump, Hate-Republicans Democrat who shot up the Republican Congressmen who showed up for practice.

​

Maxine Waters either forget the dangers of using free speech badly or indeed wished Republicans to suffer yet more ill when she had her followers and employees to harass Republicans. What a craven cowards who perpetuates hate speak that results in injury against any political rival. I'm sure some of those First Responders may not have been Republicans, but they were heroes, and they put their lives on the line to protect members of Congress from the serial shooter's crime, who was so inflamed by lies, exaggerations, and hateful speech against Republicans for winning the Presidency, he took the law into his own hands to get revenge for things spoken that were not even true, and have been disproven over time. Even so, the hate speak does not stop. Republicans value the Constitutional freedoms all of us have.

And bless those First responders for their acts of.selflessness and valor.

 

[Dick Foster]

Can you show me any legislation where Democrats have curtailed free speech?

I don't have to. That's not the issue.
This guy simply wishes he could.
I remember when Obama said he wished he could grant amnesty, but said he couldn't.
Then he went ahead and did it anyway. DACA

When will yous guys make up your minds on the issue since there are complaints about conservatives getting muted on social media then a guy says he would like to stop the practice but thinks govt. shouldn't be the ones to make them do it and yous guys hate that idea also...

You're taking a position that stopping Twitter from doing it is regulating free speech, when of course it is the opposite.
Stopping Twitter from banning accounts because of conservative speech is a legal matter, which can be handled in the courts, as is slander and liable.
Twitter, Google, and Facebook all claimed in front of Congress it's not going on. If they were under oath this would be perjury.

I can't go into a church full of folks on Sunday morning and talk about gay porn from the pulpit...

That depends on were the so called church is. You can likely get away with it in San Fagcisco but in Texas it could get you shot full of holes. Just remember, there is no cure for stupid other than death.

 

[beautress]

Can you show me any legislation where Democrats have curtailed free speech?

I don't have to. That's not the issue.
This guy simply wishes he could.
I remember when Obama said he wished he could grant amnesty, but said he couldn't.
Then he went ahead and did it anyway. DACA

When will yous guys make up your minds on the issue since there are complaints about conservatives getting muted on social media then a guy says he would like to stop the practice but thinks govt. shouldn't be the ones to make them do it and yous guys hate that idea also...

You're taking a position that stopping Twitter from doing it is regulating free speech, when of course it is the opposite.
Stopping Twitter from banning accounts because of conservative speech is a legal matter, which can be handled in the courts, as is slander and liable.
Twitter, Google, and Facebook all claimed in front of Congress it's not going on. If they were under oath this would be perjury.

I can't go into a church full of folks on Sunday morning and talk about gay porn from the pulpit...

That depends on were the so called church is. You can likely get away with it in San Fagcisco but in Texas it could get you shot full of holes. Just remember, there is no cure for stupid other than death.

No cure for stupid other than death? Yo, mon, ever heard of 'learned from experience'.

 

[Aponi]

Can you show me any legislation where Democrats have curtailed free speech?

He said he wanted to I saw him say it.
He dislikes free speech
He the same type like the cali congressnan who said he could use nukes on gun owners if they resisted gun confiscation..

I think you fail to see just how radical and anti AMERICAN some of your fellow democrats are its shameful

 

[Moonglow]

Can you show me any legislation where Democrats have curtailed free speech?

He said he wanted to I saw him say it.
He dislikes free speech
He the same type like the cali congressnan who said he could use nukes on gun owners if they resisted gun confiscation..

I think you fail to see just how radical and anti AMERICAN some of your fellow democrats are its shameful

So no legislation.

 

[BluesLegend]

I love it when the left slip up and tell us what they really think.

 

[Moonglow]

It wasn't meant literally and the statement was a reflection upon complaints about conservatives being banned off social media sites.

 

[Aponi]

It wasn't meant literally and the statement was a reflection upon complaints about conservatives being banned off social media sites.

Nope thats not true he did indeed mean it I say the interview

 

[Moonglow]

It wasn't meant literally and the statement was a reflection upon complaints about conservatives being banned off social media sites.

Nope thats not true he did indeed mean it I say the interview

Que?

 

[Aponi]

Can you show me any legislation where Democrats have curtailed free speech?

Really you didnt understand the first time poor thing

He said he wanted to I saw him say it.
He dislikes free speech
He the same type like the cali congressnan who said he could use nukes on gun owners if they resisted gun confiscation..

I think you fail to see just how radical and anti AMERICAN some of your fellow democrats are its shameful

So no legislation.

 

[Moonglow]

Can you show me any legislation where Democrats have curtailed free speech?

Really you didnt understand the first time poor thing

He said he wanted to I saw him say it.
He dislikes free speech
He the same type like the cali congressnan who said he could use nukes on gun owners if they resisted gun confiscation..

I think you fail to see just how radical and anti AMERICAN some of your fellow democrats are its shameful

So no legislation.

Best retort evah!

 

[Aponi]

Can you show me any legislation where Democrats have curtailed free speech?

You have trouble accepting the truth about how radical some of your party os.
Thats the differance between you and me .I know there are some conservatives or those who cla8m to be that are a waste of skin and I speak out aginst them as I have on other boards and will here but I fear you never will do the same do you having a chicken heart

Really you didnt understand the first time poor thing

He said he wanted to I saw him say it.
He dislikes free speech
He the same type like the cali congressnan who said he could use nukes on gun owners if they resisted gun confiscation..

I think you fail to see just how radical and anti AMERICAN some of your fellow democrats are its shameful

So no legislation.

Best retort evah!

 

[Aponi]

Sorry your little chicken heart wont allow you to be honest about tge radicals that the demo party embrace .
Thats the differance I see groups who try to be party of the Republicans and we deny them unlike democrats who embrace radicals

 

[Centrista]

Can you show me any legislation where Democrats have curtailed free speech?

I don't have to. That's not the issue.
This guy simply wishes he could.
I remember when Obama said he wished he could grant amnesty, but said he couldn't.
Then he went ahead and did it anyway. DACA

You didn't even say which guy it is, and what he exactly said.

 

[Centrista]

Can you show me any legislation where Democrats have curtailed free speech?

He said he wanted to I saw him say it.
He dislikes free speech
He the same type like the cali congressnan who said he could use nukes on gun owners if they resisted gun confiscation..

I think you fail to see just how radical and anti AMERICAN some of your fellow democrats are its shameful

So no legislation.

No name either. And no quote.

 

[OKTexas]

Democrats are busy regulating speech everywhere else. Why not create laws that allows them to do so. Well this is wishful thinking for Democrats. They've figured out how to regulate speech by using Twitter and Facebook to attack people for what they said 6 years ago as teenager, and by banning conservative accounts. But more and more Democrats are hoping that the day will come that you won't be allowed to say what is the truth in public.

Tucker Carlson responded to a California Democrat who said Wednesday that he would "love to be able to regulate the content of speech" but that the First Amendment disallows the practice.

Rep. Ted Lieu, who represents Torrance and West Hollywood, was discussing the hearing involving the CEO of Google and the debate over whether tech companies operate with a political bent.

"I would love to be able to regulate the content of speech. The First Amendment prevents me from doing so, and that's simply a function of the First Amendment, but I think over the long run, it's better the government does not regulate the content of speech," Lieu told anchor Brianna Keilar.

However, Lieu then clarified his intended point, saying that he would ask private companies to regulate their content, but said the government should not play that role.
Carlson said the first freedom given citizens by America's founders is the right to free speech.

"Increasingly it is seen by our people in charge as an annoying relic," he said. "[Just] say something unauthorized in your workplace or on campus."

He said that Lieu's comments are indicative of the assertion that "the attitudes of our leaders have changed."

Carlson blasted Lieu's remark, saying the congressman was being "prevented from banning talk he doesn't like by a pesky legal antique."

Links

WATCH: Tucker Rips Rep. Ted Lieu for Saying He'd 'Love to Regulate Content of Speech'

TRUE COLORS: California Rep. Says He’d ‘Love to Regulate Speech’ but First Amendment ‘Prevents’ Him | Sean Hannity​

Not only do they want to limit speech, they also want to compel politically approved speech. You need look no farther than the teach fired in, I believe NC, for not using politically dictated speech. I hope the teacher sues their ass off, because the supremes back in the 40s said the government, which a public schools are a part, can't compel speech.

West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette



.

 

[Centrista]

Democrats are busy regulating speech everywhere else. Why not create laws that allows them to do so. Well this is wishful thinking for Democrats. They've figured out how to regulate speech by using Twitter and Facebook to attack people for what they said 6 years ago as teenager, and by banning conservative accounts. But more and more Democrats are hoping that the day will come that you won't be allowed to say what is the truth in public.

Tucker Carlson responded to a California Democrat who said Wednesday that he would "love to be able to regulate the content of speech" but that the First Amendment disallows the practice.

Rep. Ted Lieu, who represents Torrance and West Hollywood, was discussing the hearing involving the CEO of Google and the debate over whether tech companies operate with a political bent.

"I would love to be able to regulate the content of speech. The First Amendment prevents me from doing so, and that's simply a function of the First Amendment, but I think over the long run, it's better the government does not regulate the content of speech," Lieu told anchor Brianna Keilar.

However, Lieu then clarified his intended point, saying that he would ask private companies to regulate their content, but said the government should not play that role.
Carlson said the first freedom given citizens by America's founders is the right to free speech.

"Increasingly it is seen by our people in charge as an annoying relic," he said. "[Just] say something unauthorized in your workplace or on campus."

He said that Lieu's comments are indicative of the assertion that "the attitudes of our leaders have changed."

Carlson blasted Lieu's remark, saying the congressman was being "prevented from banning talk he doesn't like by a pesky legal antique."

Links

WATCH: Tucker Rips Rep. Ted Lieu for Saying He'd 'Love to Regulate Content of Speech'

TRUE COLORS: California Rep. Says He’d ‘Love to Regulate Speech’ but First Amendment ‘Prevents’ Him | Sean Hannity​

Not only do they want to limit speech, they also want to compel politically approved speech. You need look no farther than the teach fired in, I believe NC, for not using politically dictated speech. I hope the teacher sues their ass off, because the supremes back in the 40s said the government, which a public schools are a part, can't compel speech.

West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette



.

What's the name of the California congressman and what did he say?

 

[Disir]

Democrats are busy regulating speech everywhere else. Why not create laws that allows them to do so. Well this is wishful thinking for Democrats. They've figured out how to regulate speech by using Twitter and Facebook to attack people for what they said 6 years ago as teenager, and by banning conservative accounts. But more and more Democrats are hoping that the day will come that you won't be allowed to say what is the truth in public.

Tucker Carlson responded to a California Democrat who said Wednesday that he would "love to be able to regulate the content of speech" but that the First Amendment disallows the practice.

Rep. Ted Lieu, who represents Torrance and West Hollywood, was discussing the hearing involving the CEO of Google and the debate over whether tech companies operate with a political bent.

"I would love to be able to regulate the content of speech. The First Amendment prevents me from doing so, and that's simply a function of the First Amendment, but I think over the long run, it's better the government does not regulate the content of speech," Lieu told anchor Brianna Keilar.

However, Lieu then clarified his intended point, saying that he would ask private companies to regulate their content, but said the government should not play that role.
Carlson said the first freedom given citizens by America's founders is the right to free speech.

"Increasingly it is seen by our people in charge as an annoying relic," he said. "[Just] say something unauthorized in your workplace or on campus."

He said that Lieu's comments are indicative of the assertion that "the attitudes of our leaders have changed."

Carlson blasted Lieu's remark, saying the congressman was being "prevented from banning talk he doesn't like by a pesky legal antique."

Links

WATCH: Tucker Rips Rep. Ted Lieu for Saying He'd 'Love to Regulate Content of Speech'

TRUE COLORS: California Rep. Says He’d ‘Love to Regulate Speech’ but First Amendment ‘Prevents’ Him | Sean Hannity​

Ok. This is a mole hill not the mountain I expected.