Buttigieg Says He and Same-Sex Husband Hope to Start a Family and May Have Children in White House

[LaDairis]

Allowing homos to adopt = serving up chickens to a fox = a guarantee the kid will be sexually abused

I’m not sure how you came to that conclusion? Are you saying that all homosexuals are also pedophiles? Are you saying that a straight person that adopts can’t/won’t sexually abuse a child?

all homosexuals are also pedophiles?

Perhaps not all, but way too high a real percent to risk kids' lives over....


Are you saying that a straight person that adopts can’t/won’t sexually abuse a child?

It is likely 10 to 1, homos over hetros, on that risk issue. Get Big Government involved and it climbs to 50 to 1.

Homos are obsessed with sexually assaulting kids. That's the truth of the Boy Scouts. If we care about kids, we should want to keep HOMOS away from them, since sexually assaulting little kids is how HOMOS "reproduce" by sexually "initiating" them....

 

[Circe]

Fact is gay men are far more likely to have been sexually abused as children by men.

In Butt's case I think his name and family heritage contributed to his gayness. I really mean that.

Of course Buttgig's name was a factor. I don't know anything about his family or heritage. I agree that people "live up to" their names, so often. And his is so very unfortunate.

 

[Circe]

Since the only way homosexuals can increase their ranks is to actively recruit, pedophilia is more of a possibility. I had knew a gay guy who 'adopted' a poor kid from South America. Later on I found out that the kid became homosexual. Sad thing is, no one was surprised.

Right, it's how they reproduce. They take other people's children and "convert" them.

Pretty sick.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Fact is gay men are far more likely to have been sexually abused as children by men.

In Butt's case I think his name and family heritage contributed to his gayness. I really mean that.

Of course Buttgig's name was a factor. I don't know anything about his family or heritage. I agree that people "live up to" their names, so often. And his is so very unfortunate.

On top of that his asshole (literally) parent's named him Peter.

 

[Circe]

Fact is gay men are far more likely to have been sexually abused as children by men.

In Butt's case I think his name and family heritage contributed to his gayness. I really mean that.

Of course Buttgig's name was a factor. I don't know anything about his family or heritage. I agree that people "live up to" their names, so often. And his is so very unfortunate.

On top of that his asshole (literally) parent's named him Peter.

Were his "parents" both men?

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Fact is gay men are far more likely to have been sexually abused as children by men.

In Butt's case I think his name and family heritage contributed to his gayness. I really mean that.

Of course Buttgig's name was a factor. I don't know anything about his family or heritage. I agree that people "live up to" their names, so often. And his is so very unfortunate.

On top of that his asshole (literally) parent's named him Peter.

Were his "parents" both men?

I think so, and the mother-father spent days in labor to drop a Butt from his butt.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

The bottom line is that your fear that homosexuality will endanger the human species, is irrational, bizarre and beyond stupid> The fact is that while homosexuality is more visible and accepted, and that there are population centers where they are more numerous in no way means that there are more gay people than at other times. Furthermore, gay people do have children and are parents. They are not sterile! Do your really believe your own bovine excrement? Sadly, I think that you do

Homosexuality has already threatened the human species and killed a lot of gays. Remember AIDS?

Bullshit. AIDS was never a threat to the species. What else are you going to pull out of your ass? Now tell us all how deeply troubled you are about gays dying of AIDS

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Since the only way homosexuals can increase their ranks is to actively recruit, pedophilia is more of a possibility. I had knew a gay guy who 'adopted' a poor kid from South America. Later on I found out that the kid became homosexual. Sad thing is, no one was surprised.

Right, it's how they reproduce. They take other people's children and "convert" them.

Pretty sick.

You people are really deranged! Take the kids? How does that work? Recruit them? For what?
And they do reproduce!!

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Fact is gay men are far more likely to have been sexually abused as children by men.

In Butt's case I think his name and family heritage contributed to his gayness. I really mean that.

When you post something as a fact you need to provide a source. Even if true, it does not prove a cause and effect. Gay adults who were sexually abused as children may have been abused because they were gay and vulnerable, as opposed to "turning gay" because of the abuse. I'm quite sure that you can't come up with a shred of evidence to support the idea that molestation is a cause of homosexuality

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Allowing homos to adopt = serving up chickens to a fox = a guarantee the kid will be sexually abused

I’m not sure how you came to that conclusion? Are you saying that all homosexuals are also pedophiles? Are you saying that a straight person that adopts can’t/won’t sexually abuse a child?

all homosexuals are also pedophiles?

Perhaps not all, but way too high a real percent to risk kids' lives over....


Are you saying that a straight person that adopts can’t/won’t sexually abuse a child?

It is likely 10 to 1, homos over hetros, on that risk issue. Get Big Government involved and it climbs to 50 to 1.

Homos are obsessed with sexually assaulting kids. That's the truth of the Boy Scouts. If we care about kids, we should want to keep HOMOS away from them, since sexually assaulting little kids is how HOMOS "reproduce" by sexually "initiating" them....

Complete and utter horseshit! That is moronic!

 

[Seawytch]

Not the only "non-traditional family" setup screwing up kids, but . . .

True. there are many pitfalls that results in kids being screwed. However, living in a homosexual family with two moms or two dads has to be a very confusing environment for a kid.

A child needs the love and nurturing of a mom and the firm loving direction of a dad.

No, actually they don't. They need two parents that love and support them, yes, but the gender is immaterial...as every single study on the subject will tell you.

Since we all know that when people like you say, "Every single study on the subject", what you actually mean is "Every study I will accept as valid because it agrees with me", color me unimpressed.

No, its actually every single study.

How different are the adult children of parents who have same-sex relationships? Findings from the New Family Structures Study - ScienceDirect

Your insistence that "every single study" agrees with you just demonstrates my point that you only notice, listen to, and accept studies which agree with you.

You linked to a study that was so bad it was laughed out of a court of law...

http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2012/07/10/12-15388_Amicus_Brief_Psychological.pdf

And was thoroughly debunked by his peers.

https://www.impactprogram.org/wp-co...visory-editors-of-Social-Science-Research.pdf

 

[Seawytch]

Highly unlikely.

What is unlikely? That surrogates are compensated? That i was one twice? Both statements are fact. I received over $45,000 plus medical expenses and salary loss compensation for the three children I bore for two gay men.

Why on Earth would you do that?

Consider the source.

I don't believe any of this --- what, THREE babies artificially inseminated as if she were a Holstein milk cow? And then the story is she gives them all to two MEN of a sexual perversion well known to contribute most of the pedophiles to the criminal population of the world. Men who want sex with children always hang around children: it's the scoutmasters, the priests, the schoolteachers, the Indian reservation doctors --- and they are nearly always homosexual and go after boys. It would be a terrible thing for a woman to do and I just don't believe it. This story is the same as the Buttgig announcement --- an attempt to normalize homosexuality. Buttgig's whole campaign is simply a way to promote homosexuality normalization, and this "kid in the White House" stuff is all part of that fake narrative.

Well, I hope it is just a promotion of homosexuality fake. Otherwise they would likely abuse the child or children. We had enough sex abuse with other presidents against interns and mistresses. We don't need pedophilia in the White House. Let them go do that somewhere else, if society is so degraded as to allow them access to small children now.

I seem to recall that Seawytch said she was pregnant twice, which would indicate that one of those times resulted in twins. No real idea, since I don't personally know Seawytch, nor do I particularly want to.

If you know anything about Seawytch, you know she's an extreme far-leftist nutball who would be quite likely to think that producing children for homosexuals is a dandy idea. Hence my instruction to "consider the source".

I've been pregnant four times and bore five children to term. (had two of my gay own)

But I do support surrogacy for all couples, gay or straight, who want children and can't have their own.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

​

I’m not sure how you came to that conclusion? Are you saying that all homosexuals are also pedophiles? Are you saying that a straight person that adopts can’t/won’t sexually abuse a child?

Yes? Certainly MOST pedophiles are homosexual: this is known. Have you all not been paying attention to the late travails of the Catholic Church with its rampant pedophilia going back a millennium, famed in history and literature? The caricature of the predatory priest -- always against boys -- is all over European literature. And the Boy Scouts going bankrupt is all over the news today 2/18 --- because of all the homosexual predators who got into Scouting to abuse boys and are now suing.

And no, a straight PERSON that adopts may not sexually abuse a child, but a MAN who adopts may well. Could we not overuse this "person" word when the point is that men and women are different?? By far and away most pedophiles are males and most homosexuals are pedophilic, if at all, against male children. Come on, people, you all know this. The fact that so many pedophiles go after boys is, after all, a clue to their sexual orientation.

More straight out of your ass horseshit. Let me tell you something slick. I spent 26 years investigating child abuse, including sexual abuse and I know who the abusers are. I also worked in foster care and placed kids with gay and lesbian people after their heterosexual parents fucked them over. You have know fucking idea what you're talking about.

And your contention that most pedophiles are homosexual is just more stupidity. The vast majority of people who I busted for child molestation were heterosexual men victimizing girls. Your ignorance is quite dangerous. You need to educate yourself or shut the fuck up because what you are doing here is dispicable Now hear this:

Members of disliked minority groups are often stereotyped as representing a danger to the majority's most vulnerable members. For example, Jews in the Middle Ages were accused of murdering Christian babies in ritual sacrifices. Black men in the United States were often lynched after being falsely accused of raping White women.

In recent years, antigay activists have routinely asserted that gay people are child molesters. This argument was often made in debates about the Boy Scouts of America's policy to exclude gay scouts and scoutmasters. More recently, in the wake of Rep. Mark Foley's resignation from the US House of Representatives in 2006, antigay activists and their supporters seized on the scandal to revive this canard.

Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation

http://psc.dss.ucdavis.edu/faculty_sites/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html - Bing

Selected Excerpts:

The number of Americans who believe the myth that gay people are child molesters has declined substantially. In a 1970 national survey, more than 70% of respondents agreed with the assertions that "Homosexuals are dangerous as teachers or youth leaders because they try to get sexually involved with children" or that "Homosexuals try to play sexually with children if they cannot get an adult partner."1

By contrast, in a 1999 national poll, the belief that most gay men are likely to molest or abuse children was endorsed by only 19% of heterosexual men and 10% of heterosexual women. Even fewer – 9% of men and 6% of women – regarded most lesbians as child molesters.

Apparently you're a part of the moronic minority( Yes a play on words lifted from the moral majority)

One problem is that none of the studies in this area have obtained data from a probability sample, that is, a sample that can be assumed to be representative of the population of all child molesters. Rather, most research has been conducted only with convicted perpetrators or with pedophiles who sought professional help. Consequently, they may not accurately describe child molesters who have never been caught or have not sought treatment.

A second problem is that the terminology used in this area is often confusing and can even be misleading. We can begin to address that problem by defining some basic terms.

Pedophilia and child molestation are used in different ways, even by professionals. Pedophilia usually refers to an adult psychological disorder characterized by a preference for prepubescent children as sexual partners; this preference may or may not be acted upon. The term hebephilia is sometimes used to describe adult sexual attractions to adolescents or children who have reached puberty.

Child molestation and child sexual abuse refer to actions, and don't imply a particular psychological makeup or motive on the part of the perpetrator. Not all incidents of child sexual abuse are perpetrated by pedophiles or hebephiles; in some cases, the perpetrator has other motives for his or her actions and does not manifest an ongoing pattern of sexual attraction to children.

Thus, not all child sexual abuse is perpetrated by pedophiles (or hebephiles) and not all pedophiles and hebephiles actually commit abuse. Consequently, it is important to use terminology carefully.

Hopefully, you are beginning to see that the issue is a bit more complicated than your small mind is able or willing to contemplate

Another problem related to terminology arises because sexual abuse of male children by adult men2 is often referred to as "homosexual molestation." The adjective "homosexual" (or "heterosexual" when a man abuses a female child) refers to the victim's gender in relation to that of the perpetrator. Unfortunately, people sometimes mistakenly interpret it as referring to the perpetrator's sexual orientation.

Now we are getting to the crux of the issue. Still with me, or are you watching porn and jerking off, rather than trying to learn something?

As an expert panel of researchers convened by the National Academy of Sciences noted in a 1993 report: "The distinction between homosexual and heterosexual child molesters relies on the premise that male molesters of male victims are homosexual in orientation. Most molesters of boys do not report sexual interest in adult men, however" (National Research Council, 1993, p. 143, citation omitted).

To avoid this confusion, it is preferable to refer to men's sexual abuse of boys with the more accurate label of male-male molestation. Similarly, it is preferable to refer to men's abuse of girls as male-female molestation. These labels are more accurate because they describe the sex of the individuals involved but don't implicitly convey unwarranted assumptions about the perpetrator's sexual orientation.


Typologies of
Offenders The distinction between a victim's gender and a perpetrator's sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don't really have an adult sexual orientation. They have never developed the capacity for mature sexual relationships with other adults, either men or women. Instead, their sexual attractions focus on children – boys, girls, or children of both sexes.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Human beings would soon become extinct if only men poked each other in the butt. What more proof does anyone need to show homosexuality is NOT normal? Pete is a troubled man and should NEVER be allowed to raise children. His Presidential campaign is a joke.

Human being are in no way endangered by homosexuality. Homosexuals have ben a fixed percentage of the population all through history, and they do have children . They are not sterile. The threat to humanity is war and climate change perpetuated by conservatives.

Yeah...ALL those "Conservatives" in China destroying the climate.... Just stop already.
China emits more harmful pollution and ecological damage per hour than the US does in a year. Yet you won't chastise China. WHY?
Muslims kill more gays in a month than the West in a decade, yet you won't chastise Islam. WHY?
On the surface, it would appear that the real reason involves hatred for Christians and their nation, rather than true concern for any climate issues.

In light of this stark absurdity and nonsense, who should give you the time of day?

No one.

Now maybe can you actually discuss the issue of how homosexuality endangers the species with out all of the extraneous horseshit?

And your appeal to hypocrisy logical fallacy is also noted. Regardless of my position on climate, China or Islam, my statements on homosexuality are still valid

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Allowing homos to adopt = serving up chickens to a fox = a guarantee the kid will be sexually abused

I’m not sure how you came to that conclusion? Are you saying that all homosexuals are also pedophiles? Are you saying that a straight person that adopts can’t/won’t sexually abuse a child?

Welcome to the psych ward!

 

[Leo123]

Bullshit. AIDS was never a threat to the species. What else are you going to pull out of your ass? Now tell us all how deeply troubled you are about gays dying of AIDS

AIDS was a pandemic.

"The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/AIDS epidemic has already devastated many individuals, families, and communities. The epidemic has left millions of children orphaned, has disrupted village and community life, and increasingly contributes to the erosion of civil order and economic growth. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), an estimated 34.3 million people worldwide were living with HIV/AIDS at the end of 1999 (see Table Table3)3) and an estimated 15,000 people become infected each day (98). Of the global total of people who are living with HIV, 95% live in developing countries (93). As the epidemic evolves further, rates will continue to rise in communities and nations where poverty, social inequalities, and weak health infrastructures facilitate spread of the virus (93, 98)."

Global Impact of Human Immunodeficiency Virus and AIDS

 

[Leo123]

The Boy Scouts are going bankrupt because of increasing sexual abuse lawsuits. It should be noted that the BSA were forced to accept openly gay men years ago.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Fact is gay men are far more likely to have been sexually abused as children by men.

In Butt's case I think his name and family heritage contributed to his gayness. I really mean that.

When you post something as a fact you need to provide a source. Even if true, it does not prove a cause and effect. Gay adults who were sexually abused as children may have been abused because they were gay and vulnerable, as opposed to "turning gay" because of the abuse. I'm quite sure that you can't come up with a shred of evidence to support the idea that molestation is a cause of homosexuality

I don't need to do anything. I thought it was PROG to suggest victims of abuse increases percentages of more abuse through the line?

Gay people are more likely molested cuz they're gay huh? Interesting. Gay pedophiles out-number straight, I wonder why that is?

You're assuming there's a biological trace to gay. Believe it or not I agree to extent, I've noticed a somewhat common physical trait for gay men. As a clue it's something above the neck, George Michael & Chadwick Moore. - IMO, most are gay because of environment, or a combination of both.

Personally I don't care. Most gay dudes I've met are cool. Some with great character. On the flip-side most of the lesbians I've met have a nasty disposition, especially toward men. A dollar says most lesbians are lesbians because they were victims themselves. Again, by a man - generally speaking. Molestation by women is well under-reported. Seen it many times growing up in "the hood", and they were open about it too.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Now maybe can you actually discuss the issue of how homosexuality endangers the species with out all of the extraneous horseshit?

And your appeal to hypocrisy logical fallacy is also noted. Regardless of my position on climate, China or Islam, my statements on homosexuality are still valid

NO.
You are a sick bastard who's primary focus on life is main streaming homosexualty......which will NEVER happen. You are a tiny minority and always will be.
What WILL eventually happen is people like you will be systematically eliminated for making so much noise and putting freaking bright neon bullseyes on your asses instead of staying low key and enjoying the freedom you had. Won't be long now.

Good bye.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Bullshit. AIDS was never a threat to the species. What else are you going to pull out of your ass? Now tell us all how deeply troubled you are about gays dying of AIDS

AIDS was a pandemic.

"The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/AIDS epidemic has already devastated many individuals, families, and communities. The epidemic has left millions of children orphaned, has disrupted village and community life, and increasingly contributes to the erosion of civil order and economic growth. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), an estimated 34.3 million people worldwide were living with HIV/AIDS at the end of 1999 (see Table Table3)3) and an estimated 15,000 people become infected each day (98). Of the global total of people who are living with HIV, 95% live in developing countries (93). As the epidemic evolves further, rates will continue to rise in communities and nations where poverty, social inequalities, and weak health infrastructures facilitate spread of the virus (93, 98)."

Global Impact of Human Immunodeficiency Virus and AIDS

So what is your point. You have still not absolved yourself of the moronic statement that AIDS endangered the survival of the human species.